Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2006, p. 9533-9543, Vol. 26, No. 24
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.01063-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Institute for Integrative Genome Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Science, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, California 92521,1 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 857212
Received 13 June 2006/ Returned for modification 22 August 2006/ Accepted 22 September 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 different nucleoporins with a combined mass of
50 MDa (26). The mammalian NPCs are much larger complexes (
120 MDa) composed of
80 different proteins (10). Although the structural organization of NPCs, the transport mechanism across the channels, and the function of individual nucleoporins have been extensively studied in yeast and vertebrates, very little is known about NPCs in plants. Recently, it was reported that the Arabidopsis thaliana proteins MOS3/SAR3 and SAR1 share high sequence similarities with human nucleoporins Nup96 and Nup160, respectively (25, 34). The putative nucleoporin MOS3/SAR3 was localized at the nuclear rim. The studies suggested that nucleocytoplasmic trafficking plays an important role in plant disease resistance, hormone signaling, and development (25, 34). In the present report, we provide evidence that Arabidopsis nucleoporin AtNUP160/SAR1 controls nucleocytoplasmic transport of RNAs and plays important roles in seedling growth, flowering time regulation, and cold stress tolerance.
Low temperature is one of the most important environmental factors that greatly influences the growth, development, survival, and geographic distribution of plants. Most plants from temperate regions can increase their freezing tolerance by being exposed to low, nonfreezing temperatures (0°C to 10°C), i.e., by cold acclimation (20). Plant cold acclimation involves complicated biochemical and physiological changes, such as alterations in lipid composition and the accumulation of sugars and other osmolytes. Low temperatures induce the expression of diverse and numerous plant genes, many of which are known as COR (cold regulated), KIN (cold induced), LTI (low-temperature induced), or RD (responsive-to-desiccation) genes (5, 24, 33). Transcription factors known as CBFs or DREB1s can bind to the DRE/CRT cis elements in their promoters and activate the transcription of the COR/KIN/LTI/RD genes (33, 27). The CBF genes are also induced by low temperature, and the induction is transient and precedes that of the COR/KIN/LTI/RD genes (6, 21, 22). Ectopic overexpression of CBF1 and CBF3 in Arabidopsis results in the constitutive expression of the downstream cold-inducible genes even at warm temperatures and confers increased freezing tolerance (7, 14, 16, 21). These studies demonstrate an important role for the CBF regulon in cold acclimation.
Recently, a number of studies have investigated the regulation of the CBF regulon. ICE1 is a positive regulator of CBF genes and encodes a MYC-like basic helix-loop-helix transcriptional activator (1). The ice1 mutation reduces the expression of CBF3 and many other cold-responsive transcription factor genes, decreases the expression of numerous genes downstream of the transcription factors, and significantly reduces chilling and freezing tolerances (1, 17). On the other hand, the Arabidopsis HOS1 protein is a negative regulator of CBF genes. CBF genes and their downstream COR genes show enhanced cold induction in hos1 mutant plants (13). HOS1 encodes a RING-finger ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets ICE1 and possibly other positive regulators of CBF genes for ubiquitination and degradation (3, 19). In addition to ice1 and hos1, mutations in the translation elongation factor 2 (11) and an RNA helicase (9) also alter the expression of CBF genes under cold treatment.
To identify additional regulatory components in plant responses to cold stress, we performed a genetic screen to search for mutations that impair cold-induced expression of the CBF3-LUC reporter gene (1). One of the mutated genes, atnup160-1, was characterized in the present study. The atnup160-1 mutation greatly reduces CBF3-LUC expression in response to cold treatment, and the mutant plants are highly sensitive to chilling and freezing stresses. In addition, the atnup160-1 mutation also affects plant growth and flowering time. We cloned AtNUP160 using a map-based approach and found that it encodes a putative homolog of the human nucleoporin Nup160. AtNUP160 protein is enriched at the nuclear rim, and atnup160 mutant plants are defective in mRNA export from the nucleus. Our results suggest the possibility of a critical role for RNA export in cold stress responses and in the regulation of plant growth and development.
|
|
|---|
RNA expression analysis. Two-week-old wild-type and mutant plants grown on agar plates with Murashige and Skoog (MS) salts plus 3% sucrose were treated at 4°C in light (20 µmol · m2 · s1). Total RNA was extracted from whole seedlings. Gene-specific probes used in the RNA analysis were described previously (1).
For Affymetrix GeneChip array analysis, 20 µg of total RNA from wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant seedlings grown on two separate halves of the sample agar plates treated with cold (0°C, 24 h) was extracted using the RNeasy plant minikit (QIAGEN) and used to make biotin-labeled cRNA targets. An Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 genome array, the GeneChip array, which contains >22,500 probe sets representing
24,000 genes, was used, and hybridization, washing, and staining were carried out as instructed in the manufacturer's manual. Microarray data were obtained from scanned GeneChip images and analyzed using Microarray Suite version 5.0.1 software (Affymetrix) (1). The array experiment was repeated with independent plant materials.
Electrolyte leakage and cold tolerance assays. The electrolyte leakage test was performed to compare membrane integrity and chilling sensitivity of wild-type and atnup160-1 plants. Two-week-old plants grown in soil were transferred to a cold room and treated at 4°C in the light. Several rosette leaves from either treated or untreated plants were detached and transferred to tubes with 10 ml of deionized water. The conductivity of the solution was measured after shaking overnight at room temperature. After measurement, the samples were autoclaved. After shaking at room temperature for 2 h, the conductivity of the solution was measured again. The percentage of electrolyte leakage was calculated as the percentage of the conductivity before autoclaving divided by that after autoclaving (18).
For observation of chilling tolerance, 2-week-old plants grown in soil under normal growth conditions were transferred to a cold room at 4°C in light. The freezing test was carried out as described previously (1).
Genetic mapping and cloning of AtNUP160. For genetic mapping of the atnup160-1 mutation, the mutant plants from the Columbia ecotype were crossed with wild-type plants of the Ler ecotype. A total of 1,011 homozygous atnup160-1 mutants were chosen from the segregated F2 population. Genomic DNA extracted from these seedlings was used for PCR-based mapping with simple sequence polymorphism markers.
A cDNA containing a full-length open reading frame (ORF) of AtNUP160 was obtained by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and cloned into a vector (pEGAD) in frame with a gene encoding green fluorescent protein (GFP). The transient expression of GFP-AtNUP160 was conducted as previously described (2). Photographs were taken using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP2).
Poly(A)-mRNA in situ localization. Poly(A)-mRNA in situ hybridization was conducted as described previously (8). The samples were observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP2).
|
|
|---|
30% of the luminescence of the wild-type plants (Fig. 1B).
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The atnup160-1 mutation impairs cold-induced luminescence expression from CBF3-LUC. (A) Luminescence images of wild-type (WT, left) and atnup160-1 (right) mutant plants taken after cold treatment at 4°C for 6 h. The color scale at the right shows the luminescence intensity, from dark blue (lowest) to white (highest). (B) Time course of luminescence induction in wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant plants by cold treatment. Shown are the means ± standard deviations from 20 individual seedlings.
|
3:1 ratio of wild-type to mutant plants, respectively (data not shown), indicating that the mutant is caused by a recessive mutation in a single nuclear gene. atnup160-1 mutant plants were backcrossed to the wild type three times to remove possible unlinked mutations. All subsequent characterizations were performed using the mutants that had been backcrossed. Effect of the atnup160 mutation on endogenous cold-regulated gene expression. We conducted Northern blot hybridization to determine the transcript levels of cold-induced CBF genes and their downstream genes. Total RNA was extracted from atnup160-1 mutant seedlings and wild-type seedlings that were treated with low temperatures. The transcript level of CBF3 as well as that of CBF1 and CBF2 was substantially reduced in the mutant plants. Wild-type plants showed induction of the CBF genes after 1 h of cold treatment, and the expression peaked at 3 h. For atnup160-1 plants, the transcript levels of CBF genes also peaked at 3 h after cold treatment, but the levels were greatly reduced compared to those of the wild type (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This observation of reduced endogenous CBF gene expression in the atnup160-1 mutant plants is consistent with that of the reduced luminescence of the CBF3-LUC transgene in the mutant plants (Fig. 1). We also examined the transcript levels of two CBF target genes and found that the transcript levels of COR47 and RD29A in the atnup160 mutants were not lower than those in wild-type plants. Rather, COR47 and RD29A transcript levels were higher in the mutant plants at the 12- and 48-h time points during cold treatment (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
To examine additional alterations of the gene expression of atnup160-1, we used Affymetrix GeneChip arrays containing about 24,000 genes per chip. Transcript levels of atnup160-1 were analyzed after plants were transferred from 22°C to 0°C at the 24-h time point. Comparisons between transcript levels of atnup160-1 and those of wild-type plants indicated that the transcript levels of 39 genes decreased and those of 17 genes increased by at least twofold for atnup160-1 mutant plants relative to those for the wild-type (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
The GeneChip analysis revealed that other genes important for plant cold tolerance were affected in the atnup160-1 mutant plants. These included a cold-induced LEA gene (At1g52690) and genes involved in sugar metabolism or responsive to oxidative stress. During cold acclimation, sugars, including sucrose and raffinose, accumulate in Arabidopsis (7, 32), and the genes with roles in sugar synthesis, sugar metabolism, and sugar transport are up-regulated in response to low temperatures. The transcript levels of sucrose synthase (At3g43190), polygalacturonase (At1g48100), and arabinogalactan proteins (At5g53250 and At4g26320) in atnup160-1 were at least twofold lower than those in the wild type (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In addition, the expression of several genes known to be responsive to oxidative stress was lower in atnup160-1 mutant plants. These include a glutathione S-transferase (At1g49860), peroxidases (At5g64110 and At5g67400), and a stromal ascorbate peroxidase (At4g08390). In contrast, the transcript of an oxidoreductase (At3g49620) was higher in the mutant (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In summary, the atnup160-1 mutation affects the expression of a number of stress-related genes, although its impact on global gene expression appears to be rather limited.
The atnup160-1 mutation renders the plant sensitive to chilling and freezing stresses. Impaired cold-regulated gene expression of atnup160-1 prompted us to investigate the cold stress tolerance of the mutant plants. Under normal growth conditions, the atnup160-1 mutant plant was like the wild type, although the mutant seedlings were slightly smaller (Fig. 2A). When plants were treated at 4°C in the light, the growth of the atnup160-1 mutant plants was dramatically retarded, and dead leaves appeared after 3 weeks of cold treatment (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the chilling treatment caused no apparent damage to wild-type plants (Fig. 2A).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Cold sensitivity of atnup160-1 mutant plants. (A) Fourteen-day-old wild-type (WT) and atnup160-1 mutant plants grown at 22°C were shifted to 4°C in the light for 21 days. (B) Ion leakage was assayed using wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant leaves from 14-day-old plants grown in soil at 22°C and then shifted to 4°C in the light for the indicated number of days. Data shown are means with standard errors (n = 10). (C) Survival rates for wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant plants were quantified 2 days after freezing treatment following a 4-day cold acclimation. Data shown are means with standard errors (n = 10).
|
We analyzed the effect of cold acclimation on the freezing tolerance of atnup160-1 mutant plants. Without cold acclimation, wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant plants had the same level of freezing tolerance (data not shown). Both the wild-type and the atnup160-1 mutant plants survived 4°C freezing, but neither survived 8°C freezing. Ten-day-old atnup160-1 mutant and wild-type seedlings grown on separate halves of the same agar plates were cold acclimated at 4°C for 4 days and were then subjected to a freezing tolerance assay. The atnup160-1 mutants were less tolerant to freezing than the wild types at all freezing temperatures (Fig. 2C). For example, most of the atnup160-1 mutant plants did not survive freezing at 8°C. On the contrary,
80% of the wild-type plants survived the 8°C freezing. Even after freezing at 10°C, about half of the wild-type plants survived. These results demonstrate that the atnup160-1 mutant is defective in cold acclimation, i.e., the mutant is impaired in acquired freezing tolerance.
Early flowering and growth phenotypes in atnup160-1 mutant plants. As shown in Fig. 3, atnup160-1 mutant plants flowered earlier and produced fewer rosette leaves than wild-type plants (average times to flowering after germination were 32.8 ± 1.83 days for wild-type plants and 21.9 ± 1.10 days for atnup160-1 mutant plants; average numbers of rosette leaves were 11.2 ± 0.79 for wild-type plants and 5.7 ± 0.48 for atnup160-1 mutant plants). Under our standard growth conditions, wild-type Arabidopsis plants produced a mean of 11 rosette leaves before they formed inflorescences, and the first flowers opened on average 33 days after germination. In contrast, atnup160-1 mutant plants began flowering 11 days earlier and formed about 6 rosette leaves (see above) (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Early flowering phenotype of atnup160-1 mutant plants. Wild-type (WT) and atnup160-1 mutant plants gown under normal conditions were photographed at indicated time points after imbibition.
|
72% of the length of those of the wild type. Interestingly, when the atnup160-1 mutant seedlings were treated at 4°C in the dark for 50 days, the lengths of the hypocotyls in the atnup160-1 mutant seedlings was only
25% of that of the wild type, indicating that hypocotyl elongation in atnup160-1 mutants is hypersensitive to inhibition by chilling stress. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Average length of seedling hypocotyls and main roots and adult inflorescences of wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant plantsa
|
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Retarded seedling growth of atnup160-1 mutant seedlings. Wild-type (WT) and atnup160-1 mutant seedlings grown under different conditions were compared. Growth conditions are indicated at left.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Positional cloning of AtNUP160. (A) Genetic mapping with PCR-based markers shows the position of atnup160 on the contig of BAC clones F10C21 and T16O9. The numbers of recombination events out of the total numbers of chromosomes examined are indicated. (B) Sequence analysis identified a single nucleotide change (C37549 to T37549) that creates a stop codon in At1g33410 (F10C21.8).
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Gene expression and protein localization of AtNUP160. (A) AtNUP160 expression in wild-type (WT) and atnup160-1 mutant plants. Fourteen-day-old plants were treated at 4°C for the indicated times. A cDNA fragment of AtNUP160 3'-UTR was used as a probe. Included are 18S RNA and ethidium bromide-stained rRNA as loading controls. (B) AtNUP160 gene expression pattern as indicated by promoter-GUS analysis. Twenty-day-old seedlings grown on MS plates and flower buds from soil-grown mature plants were stained for GUS activity. Panels 1 to 5 show a seedling, a hypocotyl, a cotyledon, a leaf, and flowers, respectively. Scale bar, 0.5 mm. (C) Subcellular localization of AtNUP160. The GFP (upper left panel) and the GFP-AtNUP160 fusion gene (lower left panel) were transiently expressed in onion epidermal cells by particle bombardment. (Right panel) The root of a stable transgenic Arabidopsis plant expressing GFP-AtNUP160. Samples were observed under a confocal microscope. Arrows point to the nuclear rim. Scale bar, 50 µm.
|
A T-DNA insertion mutant in AtNUP160 (Salk_016091) (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material) was obtained from the Salk collection and designated atnup160-2. To examine the cold stress sensitivity of atnup160-2, the mutant plants were treated at 4°C in the light together with the wild-type and atnup160-1 mutant plants. A chilling sensitivity phenotype for atnup160-2 mutant plants was similar to that observed for atnup160-1 mutant plants (Fig. 7A). In addition, the atnup160-2 mutant plants also flowered earlier than the wild type. When the atnup160-2 mutant plants were crossed with atnup160-1 mutant plants, the resulting F1 plants showed a reduced CBF3-LUC expression in the cold, compared to that of the wild type (Fig. 7B). These results confirm that the AtNUP160 gene is responsible for CBF-LUC expression, chilling sensitivity, and early flowering phenotypes.
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Chilling sensitivity of atnup160-2 mutant plants. (A) Comparison of the chilling sensitivity phenotypes of the atnup160-1 and the atnup160-2 mutants. Fourteen-day-old wild-type plants (WT), atnup160-1 mutant plants, and atnup160-2 mutant plants grown at 22°C were shifted to 4°C in the light for 2 months. (B) Luminescence images of the WT, the atnup160-1 mutant plants, and the F1 progeny of the atnup160-1 mutant crossed with the atnup160-2 mutant. Photographs and luminescence images were taken after cold treatment at 4°C for 6 h.
|
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Defect of atnup160-1 mutant plants in mRNA export. Poly(A)-mRNA export is blocked in atnup160-1 mutant cells. Wild-type (WT) and atnup160-1 mutant plants were grown at 22°C for 3 weeks. In situ hybridization with fluorescein-labeled oligo(dT) probe was performed using leaves with or without cold treatment (22°C or 4°C, respectively).
|
|
|
|---|
AtNUP160 appears to be the only Nup160 gene in Arabidopsis. The atnup160-1 mutation truncates most of the C-terminal half of the protein, and the nonsense mutation renders the AtNUP160 transcript undetectable in the mutant, probably due to nonsense-mediated decay. Therefore, atnup160-1 appears to be a null allele. Consistent with a critical role for AtNUP160 in RNA export, the mutation causes mRNA accumulation in the nuclei of the mutant plant. Nevertheless, the mutant plants can complete their life cycles and do not exhibit severe defects in growth and development. Considering the wide range of essential functions of the nuclear pore complex, it is likely that other nucleoporins can partially compensate for the loss of function of atnup160-1. This notion is supported by the additive effects observed with the sar1 sar3 double mutant, in which the development of the plants was more severely affected than in either of the single mutants (25). Considering their similarities in the nuclear rim localization of AtNUP160, AtNUP96 (34, 25), and the RNA helicase-like protein LOS4 (8) and their similar roles in RNA export and in the early flowering phenotypes of their loss-of-function mutants, it is likely that these proteins function together or in the same pathway which is important for plant growth, development, disease resistance, and response to cold stress.
In contrast to its largely unessential role in plant growth and development, AtNUP160 is necessary for plants to survive cold stress. The atnup160-1 mutant plants are not only defective in acquired freezing tolerance but are also deficient in chilling tolerance. The molecular mechanisms of chilling tolerance in plants are poorly understood (23, 28). Membrane lipid fatty acid desaturation has been shown to be important for chilling tolerance (23). In addition, mutational analysis showed that an Arabidopsis 16S rRNA methylase is required for the development of chloroplasts at low temperatures, indicating that there is a chilling sensitivity step in ribosome biogenesis, which is compensated by the 16S rRNA methylase (29). Our results suggest that nucleocytoplasmic transport is another cellular process critical for chilling tolerance.
The defect in chilling and freezing tolerance is probably related to the altered cold regulation of gene expression observed in the atnup160 mutant. The CBF transcription factor genes have been shown to be important for acquired freezing tolerance (7, 16, 17, 21). All three cold-induced CBF genes show substantially reduced expression in atnup160-1 mutant plants. Intriguingly, two downstream genes of the CBF transcription factors, COR47 and RD29A, do not show reduced expression in the mutant. Recent studies indicate that these downstream genes are controlled by both CBF-dependent and CBF-independent pathways (35, 36). It seems that the atnup160-1 mutation influences both pathways that may have antagonistic effects on downstream target genes like COR47 and RD29A. Microarray analysis showed that the transcript levels of other genes potentially important for plant cold tolerance are decreased in cold-treated atnup160-1 mutant plants versus similarly treated wild-type plants. These include a cold-responsive LEA-like gene (At1g52690), genes involved in sugar metabolism and oxidative stress detoxification, and genes encoding possible signal transduction pathway components (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The chilling and freezing sensitivity phenotypes of the atnup160-1 mutant under cold conditions may be attributed to the altered expression levels of these genes. For example, the reduced expression of several oxidative stress-related genes such as glutathione S-transferases, peroxidase, and stromal ascorbate peroxidase in the atnup160-1 mutant likely contributes to the mutant phenotypes. Lipid peroxidation produces phospholipid hydroperoxides that form clusters and results in an increase in membrane permeability to electrolytes (15). Increased membrane permeability resulting from the lipid peroxidation by reactive oxygen species may contribute to the chilling sensitivity phenotype of atnup160-1 mutant plants.
The effect of the atnup160-1 mutation on cold-regulated gene expression, cold tolerance, and flowering time may be due to the defect in RNA export seen in the mutant plants. Compared to other genes in general, certain regulators of cold responses and flowering time may have a more critical RNA export requirement. In addition, the structure or transport properties of the nuclear pores may be influenced by cold temperatures such that AtNUP160 may become more important in cold-remodeled nuclear pores.
This work was supported by grants MCB-0241450 and USDA NRI 2003-00751 to J.-K. Zhu.
Published ahead of print on 9 October 2006. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»