Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2006, p. 1235-1244, Vol. 26, No. 4
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.26.4.1235-1244.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry, Life Science Center, University of MissouriColumbia, Columbia, Missouri 65212
Received 30 August 2005/ Returned for modification 23 September 2005/ Accepted 4 December 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Nrf2 is a member of the CNC subfamily of bZIP transcription factors (32). Nrf2 contains an N-terminal regulatory domain (Neh2), a central transactivation domain, and a C-terminal bZIP domain that is responsible for both nuclear localization and DNA binding. The major upstream regulator of Nrf2 is a BTB-Kelch protein termed Keap1, which binds the Neh2 regulatory domain of Nrf2 via loops that extend out from the bottom face of the Kelch ß-propeller domain (21, 27). Keap1 was initially regarded as a protein that sequestered Nrf2 in the cytoplasm (21). Subsequent work has revealed that Keap1 functions as a substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets lysine residues within the Neh2 domain for ubiquitin conjugation (7, 14, 25, 26, 43). Ubiquitin conjugation onto specific N-terminal lysine residues marks Nrf2 for degradation by the 26S proteosome, such that Nrf2 is maintained at low steady-state levels under basal conditions (43). However, upon exposure to oxidative stress and reactive molecules, Nrf2 is no longer targeted for ubiquitin-dependent degradation (42, 43). Instead, Nrf2 accumulates in the nucleus and activates expression of phase 2 genes.
Cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases are assembled around a common core complex consisting of one of six cullin proteins and a common RING finger protein, Rbx1 (also known as Roc1) (35). This core complex is used by a large number of substrate adaptor proteins that bring in specific substrates. Substrate adaptor proteins are modular in nature, having one domain that binds to the cullin protein and another domain that binds to a small number of specific substrate proteins. These two modules can be encoded by two different polypeptides, as in the case of the Skp1-F-box protein complexes that are substrate adaptors for Cul1. Alternatively, as exemplified by Keap1, a substrate adaptor for Cul3, these two domains can be encoded by a single polypeptide.
A model that describes how cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases may be regulated by cycles of assembly and disassembly has been proposed (5). A central feature of this model is that the cullin-Rbx1 core complex cycles between active and inactive states. The active complex contains a substrate adaptor protein with its bound substrate docked at the N terminus of the cullin protein. In this active complex, the cullin protein is modified by Nedd8 conjugation on a conserved lysine residue (Lys 712 in Cul3). A ubiquitin-loaded E2 protein is recruited into the complex via protein-protein interactions with the Rbx1 subunit (9). The conjugated Nedd8 polypeptide may also facilitate E2 recruitment (24). The model proposes that the active complex is converted to an inactive complex in two steps. The first step is removal of the Nedd8 protein from the cullin protein by one or more deneddylases, such as the CSN5 subunit of the COP9 signalosome (CSN) (6, 15, 29, 40). The second step is the association of a protein known as CAND1 (also termed TIP120A) with the deneddylated cullin protein (17, 28, 45). CAND1 binds to both N-terminal and C-terminal sequences in Cul1 and blocks binding of the substrate adaptor protein (17, 19, 28, 30, 45). Subsequent conjugation of Nedd8 onto the cullin subunit by Ubc12, a Nedd8-specific E2 enzyme (5), is proposed to decrease the affinity of CAND1 for the cullin protein, enabling another substrate adaptor protein (presumably with its bound substrate) to displace CAND1 and initiate another cycle of substrate ubiquitination (5, 35). A recent crystal structure of the CAND1-Cul1 complex, which showed that Lys 720 in Cul1 is located at the CAND1:Cul1 interface, has provided support for the notion that neddylation of Cul1 and binding of CAND1 are antagonistic (17). However, it is not clear if CAND1 is a global regulator of all cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligase complexes (28, 30, 45).
Regulation of cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases by cycles of assembly and disassembly provides an attractive paradigm for considering how substrate adaptor proteins target their specific substrates for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. In the case of Keap1, we have proposed that cycles of assembly and disassembly of the Keap1-Cul3-Rbx1 complex allow Keap1 to act in a catalytic manner to efficiently target Nrf2 for degradation (43). To test this hypothesis, we have examined the role of CAND1 in Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2. Our results indicate that CAND1-dependent substrate adaptor recycling is required for efficient repression of Nrf2 by Keap1 and support the notion that CAND1 is a global regulator of cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture, transfections, and reporter gene assays. COS1, MDA-MB-231, and HeLa cells were purchased from ATCC. CHO-K1 cells were obtained from Toshihiko Ezashi. ts41 cells were obtained from Chuck Sherr. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, Eagle's minimal essential medium, or Ham's F-12 medium in the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum. Transfections of plasmid DNAs were performed with Lipofectamine Plus (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfections of small interfering RNA (siRNA) nucleotides were performed with Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All siRNA nucleotides used in this study were obtained from Dharmacon as purified and annealed duplexes. The antioxidant response element (ARE) TATA-Inr luciferase reporter plasmid pARE-Luc and a control plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase for transfection efficiency have been previously described (42). Reporter gene assays were performed using a Promega dual-light assay system as previously described (42).
Antibodies, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblot analysis. The anti-Keap1 antibody has been described previously (42). Antibodies against Nrf2 (Santa Cruz), CAND1 (Santa Cruz), tubulin (Santa Cruz), chitin-binding domain (New England Biolabs), the Flag epitope (Sigma), the myc epitope (Santa Cruz), and the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope (Covance) were purchased from commercial sources.
For detection of protein expression in total cell lysates, cells were lysed in sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 10% glycerol, 100 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.1% bromophenol blue) at 24 to 48 h posttransfection. For immunoprecipitation assays, cell extracts were prepared in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100) containing 1 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). In some cases, 10 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was included in the lysis solution to inactivate ubiquitin and Nedd8 hydrolase activities. Soluble cell lysates were incubated with 2 µg of affinity-purified antibodies for 2 h at 4°C, followed by incubation at 4°C with protein A-agarose beads (Sigma) for 2 h. Unbound proteins were removed by washing four times with lysis buffer. The immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted in sample buffer by boiling for 5 min, electrophoresed through SDS-polyacrylamide gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and subjected to immunoblot analysis.
In vivo ubiquitination assay. For detection of ubiquitinated Nrf2 proteins in vivo, cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-tagged ubiquitin, Gal4-Neh2, and the indicated proteins. Cells were lysed by boiling in a buffer containing 2% SDS, 10 mM NEM, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]. This rapid lysis procedure inactivates cellular ubiquitin hydrolases and therefore preserves ubiquitin-substrate protein conjugates present in cells prior to lysis. Protein-protein interactions, including association of Nrf2 with Keap1, are also disrupted by this lysis procedure. For immunoprecipitation, these lysates were diluted with 4 volumes of a buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM DTT, and 1% Triton X-100. The diluted lysates were precleared with protein A-agarose beads (Sigma) and incubated with 2 µg of anti-Gal4 antibodies. HA-ubiquitin conjugates in immunoprecipitated Gal4-Neh2 proteins were analyzed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies against the HA epitope.
In vitro ubiquitination assay. For detection of ubiquitinated Nrf2 and Keap1 proteins in vitro, cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Nrf2, Keap1-CBD, myc-Rbx1, and the wild-type or mutant HA-Cul3 proteins. Cells were lysed in buffer B (15 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 0.25% NP-40) containing 1 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The lysates were precleared with protein A-agarose beads prior to incubation with chitin beads (New England Biolabs) for 4 h at 4°C. Chitin beads were washed twice with buffer B, twice with buffer A (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% NP-40, and 100 mM NaCl), and twice with reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM NaF, 0.6 mM DTT). The pellets were incubated with ubiquitin (300 pmol), E1 (2 pmol), E2-UbcH5a (10 pmol), and ATP (2 mM) in 1x reaction buffer in a total volume of 30 µl for 1 h at 37°C. Ubiquitin, E1, and E2-UbcH5a were purchased from Boston Biochem. The chitin beads were pelleted by centrifugation (3,000 x g); resuspended in 2% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 1 mM DTT; and boiled for 5 min to release bound proteins, inactivate any contaminating ubiquitin hydrolases, and disrupt protein-protein interactions. The supernatant was diluted fivefold with buffer lacking SDS prior to immunoprecipitation with anti-Nrf2 or anti-Keap1 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antiubiquitin antibodies (Sigma).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Keap1 is one of 49 BTB-Kelch proteins encoded by the human genome (37). Several other BTB-Kelch proteins, including GAN and sarcosin, are able to associate with Cul3 and Rbx1 to form functional ubiquitin ligase complexes (13, 44). The ability of CAND1 to compete with either GAN or sarcosin for binding to Cul3 was determined. For these experiments, CBD-tagged GAN or sarcosin proteins were expressed in COS1 cells along with Cul3. Association of Cul3 with either GAN or sarcosin was measured following affinity purification with chitin beads. The amount of Cul3 that copurified with either CBD-GAN or CBD-sarcosin was markedly reduced in cells cotransfected with an expression vector for Flag-CAND1 (Fig. 1C, top panel, lanes 3 and 5). These results are consistent with the notion that CAND1 is a general regulator of Cul3-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes.
Increased CAND1 expression reduces Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 and increases steady-state levels of Nrf2. Keap1, as a substrate adaptor for Cul3, targets specific lysine residues within the N-terminal Neh2 domain of its substrate, the Nrf2 transcription factor, for ubiquitin conjugation (43). We therefore determined if increased levels of CAND1, which reduce association between Keap1 and Cul3, would also reduce Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2. In the presence of Keap1 and Cul3, strong ubiquitin conjugation onto a Gal4-Neh2 fusion protein was observed with transfected MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2A, top panel, lane 3). However, levels of ubiquitin conjugation onto Gal4-Neh2 were markedly reduced in the presence of increasing amounts of a cotransfected expression vector for CAND1 (Fig. 2A, top panel, lanes 4 to 7). In parallel experiments, the effect of CAND1 overexpression on steady-state levels of Nrf2 was determined. In both MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 2B, top panel) and HeLa cells (Fig. 2C, top panel), increased expression of CAND1 markedly increased steady-state levels of Nrf2 in the presence of coexpressed Keap1. Ectopic expression of CAND1 did not reduce binding of Nrf2 to Keap1 (data not shown). Rather, these results indicate that increased CAND1 expression, which reduces the ability of Keap1 to associate with Cul3, interferes with the ability of Keap1 to target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation.
|
|
To determine if increased steady-state levels of Nrf2 in the presence of the anti-CAND1 siRNA results from decreased binding of Nrf2 to Keap1, the level of Keap1-associated Nrf2 was determined in the absence and presence of the anti-CAND1 siRNA molecule. Increased steady-state levels of Nrf2 were again observed in the presence of the anti-CAND1 siRNA molecule (Fig. 3D, second panel from top, compare lanes 1 and 2). A marked increase in Keap1-associated Nrf2 was also observed (Fig. 3D, top panel, compare lanes 1 and 2). Thus, decreased levels of CAND1 do not disrupt the ability of Keap1 to bind Nrf2. Rather, these results indicate that decreased levels of CAND1 disrupt the ability of Keap1 to efficiently target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation and thereby increase steady-state levels of Keap1-associated Nrf2.
To confirm the importance of CAND1 for regulation of steady-state levels of Nrf2, steady-state levels of the endogenous Nrf2 protein in HeLa cells transfected with siRNA molecules against Keap1 or CAND1 were measured. As expected, the siRNA molecule against Keap1 markedly increased steady-state levels of the endogenous Nrf2 protein (Fig. 4A, top panel, compare lanes 1 and 5). A marked increase in the steady-state levels of the endogenous Nrf2 protein was also observed in the presence of two different siRNA molecules against CAND1 (Fig. 4A, top panel, lanes 2 and 3). A control siRNA had no effect on steady-state levels of Nrf2 (Fig. 4A, top panel, lane 4).
|
Our results indicate a critical role for CAND1 in regulation of Keap1-mediated control over steady-state levels of Nrf2 and Nrf2-dependent transcription. Ectopic expression of CAND1 decreased the ability of Keap1 to assemble with Cul3 into a functional E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, resulting in increased steady-state levels of Nrf2. On the other hand, decreased CAND1 expression, which increased complex formation between Keap1 and Cul3, also increased steady-state levels of Nrf2 and Nrf2-dependent gene expression. Taken together, these results indicate that an optimal level of CAND1 is required for efficient down-regulation of Nrf2 by Keap1. These results are consistent with a model in which CAND1-mediated cycles of assembly and disassembly of the Keap1-Cul3-Rbx1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex are required for efficient control by Keap1 over steady-state levels of Nrf2 and Nrf2-dependent transcription.
Neddylation of Cul3 on Lys 712 is required for efficient Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 in vivo. Cyclical assembly and disassembly of cullin-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes has been suggested to involve both CAND1 and site-specific modification of the cullin protein by the small ubiquitin-like protein, Nedd8 (5). The neddylated form of Cul3, which exhibits a slower mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, can be readily observed following immunoblot detection of Cul3 in whole-cell lysates (Fig. 1A, bottom panel). Neddylation of Cul3 occurs at a conserved C-terminal lysine residue (Lys 712 in human Cul3), and the biological importance of Nedd8 modification has been demonstrated for the Cul3 homologs in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans (36, 46).
To determine if neddylation of Cul3 is required for Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2, the ability of Keap1 to target Nrf2 for ubiquitination was characterized for the ts41 hamster ovary cell line. The ts41 cell line contains a temperature-sensitive defect in the Nedd8 E1 activation enzyme (3, 34). As expected, the slower-migrating form of Cul3 was not detected in ts41 cells following a shift to the restrictive temperature of 40°C (Fig. 5A, second panel from top, lane 4). Increased association of CAND1 with Cul3 was also observed with ts41 cells at the restrictive temperature (Fig. 5A, top panel, lanes 2 and 4), consistent with the notion that CAND1 preferentially binds to the nonneddylated form of Cul3 (17, 19, 28, 45). In contrast, the neddylated form of Cul3 was readily detectable in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells grown at either 34°C or 40°C, and no changes in CAND1 association with Cul3 were observed (Fig. 5A, top panel, lanes 6 and 8). Ectopic expression of Keap1 and Cul3 markedly increased ubiquitination onto the Gal4-Neh2 fusion protein in both ts41 and wild-type cells grown at 34°C and in the wild-type cells grown at 40°C (Fig. 5B, lanes 1 to 4 and 9 to 16). However, Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of the Gal4-Neh2 protein was abolished in ts41 cells shifted to 40°C (Fig. 5B, lanes 5 to 8).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A key feature of this model is that physical release of Nrf2 from Keap1 is not required for activation of Nrf2-dependent transcription. Indeed, knockdown of CAND1 markedly increases the level of Keap1-associated Nrf2 yet also increases Nrf2-dependent transcription. Thus, decreasing the ability of Keap1 to efficiently target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation is sufficient to activate Nrf2-dependent gene expression. We propose that a decreased ability of Keap1 to target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation results in the accumulation of an excess of Nrf2 relative to Keap1 such that free Nrf2 proteins are able to localize to the nucleus and activate Nrf2-dependent gene expression.
The ability of Keap1 to act in a catalytic manner and target multiple Nrf2 proteins for ubiquitin-dependent degradation has important implications for how Nrf2 is able to escape Keap1-mediated repression following exposure of cells to oxidative stress and chemopreventive compounds. As Keap1 is able to sequester Nrf2 in the cytoplasm, it has been suggested that reactive molecules bind to Keap1 and cause the physical release of Nrf2 from Keap1. Consistent with this suggestion, direct binding of chemically reactive molecules to Keap1 has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo (10, 18). However, the importance of physical release of Nrf2 from Keap1 has not been clearly established. For example, although one report suggested that chemical inducers of Nrf2-dependent gene expression dissociate the Keap1-Nrf2 complex in vitro (10), a subsequent report suggested that reactive molecules simply alter the mobility of the complex in native polyacrylamide gels without causing the physical release of Nrf2 (12). In our previous work, we have demonstrated that association between Nrf2 and Keap1 in vivo is not decreased but is actually increased following exposure of cells to inducers of Nrf2-dependent transcription (43). In a similar vein, we find that knockdown of CAND1, which markedly increases Nrf2-dependent gene expression, also increases the level of Keap1-associated Nrf2. Taken together, the available experimental evidence is most consistent with a model in which reactive molecules do not cause the physical release of Nrf2 from Keap1 but interfere with the ability of Keap1 to act in a catalytic manner to efficiently target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation.
Keap1 has been proposed to be a sensor of reactive molecules and oxidative stress, such that a redox-dependent modification of one or more cysteine residues in Keap1 is coupled to increased expression of Nrf2-dependent genes. Indeed, multiple cysteine residues in Keap1, including Cys 151, Cys 273, and Cys 288, can be modified by reactive molecules either in vivo or in vitro (10, 12, 18). Mutational analysis has revealed that Cys 273 and Cys 288, which are located in the central linker domain and participate in binding Zn2+ (11), are required for repression of Nrf2-dependent gene expression. In contrast, Cys 151, located in the N-terminal BTB domain, is specifically required for increased Nrf2-dependent gene expression following exposure of cells to oxidative stress (38, 42, 43). Mutant Keap1 proteins containing serine or alanine substitutions at Cys 151, Cys 273, or Cys 288 are still able to bind Nrf2 (42). However, serine substitutions at Cys 273 and Cys 288 compromise the ability of Keap1 to target Nrf2 for ubiquitination because they reduce the ability of Keap1 to bind Cul3 (unpublished data). On the other hand, serine substitution at Cys 151 renders Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 resistant to inhibition by oxidative stress or chemopreventive compounds, presumably because modification of Cys 151 by chemopreventive compounds, such as sulforaphane, decreases the ability of Keap1 to associate with Cul3 (43). Taken together, the current evidence is most consistent with a model in which modification of these (and perhaps other) cysteine residues in Keap1 would perturb the ability of Keap1 to assemble with Cul3 and target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation rather than inducing the release of Nrf2 from Keap1. An attractive feature of a model in which Keap1 acts in a catalytic manner to efficiently target Nrf2 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation is that modulating the catalytic efficiency of Keap1 by modification of one or more cysteine residues in Keap1 would allow a graded response of Nrf2-dependent gene expression following exposure of cells to oxidative stress and chemically reactive molecules.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the University of Missouri Molecular Biology Program, the University of Missouri Food for the 21st Century program, a research grant from NIH to M.H. (CA106593), and a development project in CA103130.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ceconi, C., A. Boraso, A. Cargnoni, and R. Ferrari. 2003. Oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease: myth or fact? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 420:217-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Chen, Y., D. L. McPhie, J. Hirschberg, and R. L. Neve. 2000. The amyloid precursor protein-binding protein APP-BP1 drives the cell cycle through the S-M checkpoint and causes apoptosis in neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 275:8929-8935.
4. Chuang, H. W., W. Zhang, and W. M. Gray. 2004. Arabidopsis ETA2, an apparent ortholog of the human cullin-interacting protein CAND1, is required for auxin responses mediated by the SCF(TIR1) ubiquitin ligase. Plant Cell 16:1883-1897.
5. Cope, G. A., and R. J. Deshaies. 2003. COP9 signalosome: a multifunctional regulator of SCF and other cullin-based ubiquitin ligases. Cell 114:663-671.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Cope, G. A., G. S. Suh, L. Aravind, S. E. Schwarz, S. L. Zipursky, E. V. Koonin, and R. J. Deshaies. 2002. Role of predicted metalloprotease motif of Jab1/Csn5 in cleavage of Nedd8 from Cul1. Science 298:608-611.
7. Cullinan, S. B., J. D. Gordan, J. Jin, J. W. Harper, and J. A. Diehl. 2004. The Keap1-BTB protein is an adaptor that bridges Nrf2 to a Cul3-based E3 ligase: oxidative stress sensing by a Cul3-Keap1 ligase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8477-8486.
8. Davies, K. J. 2000. Oxidative stress, antioxidant defenses, and damage removal, repair, and replacement systems. IUBMB Life 50:279-289.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Deffenbaugh, A. E., K. M. Scaglione, L. Zhang, J. M. Moore, T. Buranda, L. A. Sklar, and D. Skowyra. 2003. Release of ubiquitin-charged Cdc34-S-Ub from the RING domain is essential for ubiquitination of the SCF(Cdc4)-bound substrate Sic1. Cell 114:611-622.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., W. D. Holtzclaw, R. N. Cole, K. Itoh, N. Wakabayashi, Y. Katoh, M. Yamamoto, and P. Talalay. 2002. Direct evidence that sulfhydryl groups of Keap1 are the sensors regulating induction of phase 2 enzymes that protect against carcinogens and oxidants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11908-11913.
11. Dinkova-Kostova, A. T., W. D. Holtzclaw, and N. Wakabayashi. 2005. Keap1, the sensor for electrophiles and oxidants that regulates the phase 2 response, is a zinc metalloprotein. Biochemistry 44:6889-6899.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Eggler, A. L., G. Liu, J. M. Pezzuto, R. B. van Breemen, and A. D. Mesecar. 2005. Modifying specific cysteines of the electrophile-sensing human Keap1 protein is insufficient to disrupt binding to the Nrf2 domain Neh2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:10070-10075.
13. Furukawa, M., Y. J. He, C. Borchers, and Y. Xiong. 2003. Targeting of protein ubiquitination by BTB-Cullin 3-Roc1 ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:1001-1007.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Furukawa, M., and Y. Xiong. 2005. BTB protein Keap1 targets antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2 for ubiquitination by the cullin 3-Roc1 ligase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:162-171.
15. Gan-Erdene, T., K. Nagamalleswari, L. Yin, K. Wu, Z. Q. Pan, and K. D. Wilkinson. 2003. Identification and characterization of DEN1, a deneddylase of the ULP family. J. Biol. Chem. 278:28892-28900.
16. Golden, T. R., D. A. Hinerfeld, and S. Melov. 2002. Oxidative stress and aging: beyond correlation. Aging Cell 1:117-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Goldenberg, S. J., T. C. Cascio, S. D. Shumway, K. C. Garbutt, J. Liu, Y. Xiong, and N. Zheng. 2004. Structure of the Cand1-Cul1-Roc1 complex reveals regulatory mechanisms for the assembly of the multisubunit cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases. Cell 119:517-528.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Hong, F., K. R. Sekhar, M. L. Freeman, and D. C. Liebler. 2005. Specific patterns of electrophile adduction trigger Keap1 ubiquitination and Nrf2 activation. J. Biol. Chem. 280:31768-31775.
19. Hwang, J. W., K. W. Min, T. A. Tamura, and J. B. Yoon. 2003. TIP120A associates with unneddylated cullin 1 and regulates its neddylation. FEBS Lett. 541:102-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Imlay, J. A. 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57:395-418.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Itoh, K., N. Wakabayashi, Y. Katoh, T. Ishii, K. Igarashi, J. D. Engel, and M. Yamamoto. 1999. Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain. Genes Dev. 13:76-86.
22. Jaiswal, A. K. 2004. Nrf2 signaling in coordinated activation of antioxidant gene expression. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 36:1199-1207.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Kamura, T., D. M. Koepp, M. N. Conrad, D. Skowyra, R. J. Moreland, O. Iliopoulos, W. S. Lane, W. G. Kaelin, Jr., S. J. Elledge, R. C. Conaway, J. W. Harper, and J. W. Conaway. 1999. Rbx1, a component of the VHL tumor suppressor complex and SCF ubiquitin ligase. Science 284:657-661.
24. Kawakami, T., T. Chiba, T. Suzuki, K. Iwai, K. Yamanaka, N. Minato, H. Suzuki, N. Shimbara, Y. Hidaka, F. Osaka, M. Omata, and K. Tanaka. 2001. NEDD8 recruits E2-ubiquitin to SCF E3 ligase. EMBO J. 20:4003-4012.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Kobayashi, A., M. I. Kang, H. Okawa, M. Ohtsuji, Y. Zenke, T. Chiba, K. Igarashi, and M. Yamamoto. 2004. Oxidative stress sensor Keap1 functions as an adaptor for Cul3-based E3 ligase to regulate proteasomal degradation of Nrf2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:7130-7139.
26. Kobayashi, M., and M. Yamamoto. 2005. Molecular mechanisms activating the Nrf2-Keap1 pathway of antioxidant gene regulation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 7:385-394.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Li, X., D. Zhang, M. Hannink, and L. J. Beamer. 2004. Crystal structure of the Kelch domain of human Keap1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54750-54758.
28. Liu, J., M. Furukawa, T. Matsumoto, and Y. Xiong. 2002. NEDD8 modification of CUL1 dissociates p120(CAND1), an inhibitor of CUL1-SKP1 binding and SCF ligases. Mol. Cell 10:1511-1518.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Lyapina, S., G. Cope, A. Shevchenko, G. Serino, T. Tsuge, C. Zhou, D. A. Wolf, N. Wei, and R. J. Deshaies. 2001. Promotion of NEDD-CUL1 conjugate cleavage by COP9 signalosome. Science 292:1382-1385.
30. Min, K. W., J. W. Hwang, J. S. Lee, Y. Park, T. A. Tamura, and J. B. Yoon. 2003. TIP120A associates with cullins and modulates ubiquitin ligase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 278:15905-15910.
31. Min, K. W., M. J. Kwon, H. S. Park, Y. Park, S. K. Yoon, and J. B. Yoon. 2005. CAND1 enhances deneddylation of CUL1 by COP9 signalosome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 334:867-874.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Motohashi, H., T. O'Connor, F. Katsuoka, J. D. Engel, and M. Yamamoto. 2002. Integration and diversity of the regulatory network composed of Maf and CNC families of transcription factors. Gene 294:1-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Nguyen, T., P. J. Sherratt, and C. B. Pickett. 2003. Regulatory mechanisms controlling gene expression mediated by the antioxidant response element. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 43:233-260.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Osaka, F., H. Kawasaki, N. Aida, M. Saeki, T. Chiba, S. Kawashima, K. Tanaka, and S. Kato. 1998. A new NEDD8-ligating system for cullin-4A. Genes Dev. 12:2263-2268.
35. Petroski, M. D., and R. J. Deshaies. 2005. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6:9-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Pintard, L., T. Kurz, S. Glaser, J. H. Willis, M. Peter, and B. Bowerman. 2003. Neddylation and deneddylation of CUL-3 is required to target MEI-1/Katanin for degradation at the meiosis-to-mitosis transition in C. elegans. Curr. Biol. 13:911-921.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Stogios, P. J., G. S. Downs, J. J. S. Jauhal, S. K. Nandra, and G. G. Privé. 2005. Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins. Genome Biol. 6:R82.1-R82.18.
38. Wakabayashi, N., A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, W. D. Holtzclaw, M. I. Kang, A. Kobayashi, M. Yamamoto, T. W. Kensler, and P. Talalay. 2004. Protection against electrophile and oxidant stress by induction of the phase 2 response: fate of cysteines of the Keap1 sensor modified by inducers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:2040-2045.
39. Wu, K., A. Chen, and Z. Q. Pan. 2000. Conjugation of Nedd8 to CUL1 enhances the ability of the ROC1-CUL1 complex to promote ubiquitin polymerization. J. Biol. Chem. 275:32317-32324.
40. Yamoah, K., K. Wu, and Z. Q. Pan. 2005. In vitro cleavage of Nedd8 from cullin 1 by COP9 signalosome and deneddylase 1. Methods Enzymol. 398:509-522.[Medline]
41. You, J., M. Wang, T. Aoki, T. A. Tamura, and C. M. Pickart. 2003. Proteolytic targeting of transcriptional regulator TIP120B by a HECT domain E3 ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23369-23375.
42. Zhang, D. D., and M. Hannink. 2003. Distinct cysteine residues in Keap1 are required for Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 and for stabilization of Nrf2 by chemopreventive agents and oxidative stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8137-8151.
43. Zhang, D. D., S. C. Lo, J. V. Cross, D. J. Templeton, and M. Hannink. 2004. Keap1 is a redox-regulated substrate adaptor protein for a Cul3-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10941-10953.
44. Zhang, D. D., S. C. Lo, Z. Sun, G. M. Habib, M. W. Lieberman, and M. Hannink. 2005. Ubiquitination of Keap1, a BTB-Kelch substrate adaptor protein for Cul3, targets Keap1 for degradation by a proteasome-independent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 280:30091-30099.
45. Zheng, J., X. Yang, J. M. Harrell, S. Ryzhikov, E. H. Shim, K. Lykke-Andersen, N. Wei, H. Sun, R. Kobayashi, and H. Zhang. 2002. CAND1 binds to unneddylated CUL1 and regulates the formation of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase complex. Mol. Cell 10:1519-1526.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Zhu, S., R. Perez, M. Pan, and T. Lee. 2005. Requirement of Cul3 for axonal arborization and dendritic elaboration in Drosophila mushroom body neurons. J. Neurosci. 25:4189-4197.
47. Zhu, X., A. K. Raina, H. G. Lee, G. Casadesus, M. A. Smith, and G. Perry. 2004. Oxidative stress signalling in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Res. 1000:32-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|