| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110
Received 6 February 2007/ Returned for modification 12 April 2007/ Accepted 25 April 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation by proinflammatory stimuli. Generation and analysis of ABIN-3-null mice demonstrated that ABIN-3 is unnecessary for the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-10 as well as for proper negative regulation of NF-
B. Conversely, human ABIN-3 was capable of inhibiting NF-
B activation in response to signaling from Toll-like receptor, IL-1, and tumor necrosis factor. Enforced expression of human ABIN-3 in human monocytic cells suppressed the cytoplasmic degradation of I
B
, the activation of NF-
B, and the induction of proinflammatory genes. Comparative sequence analyses revealed that mouse ABIN-3 lacks a complete ABIN homology domain, which was required for the functional activity of human ABIN-3. ABIN-3 is, thus, an IL-10-induced gene product capable of attenuating NF-
B in human macrophages yet is inoperative in mice and represents a basis for species-specific differences in IL-10 actions. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, the AP-1, and the IRF families (1, 40, 58). These signaling processes effect the induction of genes that promote the inflammatory response including cytokines, chemokines, and enzymes responsible for producing reactive oxygen and nitrogen species.
The cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) plays a critical role in limiting the magnitude and duration of inflammatory responses (13, 39). This conclusion is supported by the finding that mice lacking an IL-10 response display exacerbated inflammatory responses and develop a chronic inflammatory bowel disease clinically related to Crohn's disease (28, 56, 59). Despite the clearly established physiologic relevance of IL-10's anti-inflammatory properties, its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood. This subject is particularly complex because IL-10 has been reported to exert its anti-inflammatory functions through multiple mechanisms that include inhibition of gene transcription, destabilization of mRNA, and suppression of protein translation (2, 8, 10, 12, 16, 26, 27, 41, 67). Some of these effects have been reported to reflect the ability of IL-10 to antagonize PRR-induced signaling and thereby inhibit the activation of NF-
B and p38 MAPK (17, 27, 53, 62). However, these mechanisms appear insufficient to account for the breadth of IL-10's biological effects. Additionally, the extent to which IL-10 mediates its effects via cell- or species-specific mechanisms of action remains unclear.
It is now generally accepted that IL-10 manifests its anti-inflammatory effects by binding to a specific heterodimeric cell surface receptor (consisting of the IL-10R1 and IL-10R2 polypeptides), resulting in the activation of the receptor-associated tyrosine kinases JAK1 and Tyk2 and the latent transcription factor STAT3 (13, 39). STAT3 activation was shown to be obligatory for IL-10's anti-inflammatory effects on both mouse and human mononuclear phagocytes (51, 59, 65). Mice lacking STAT3 specifically in macrophages and neutrophils display an overexuberant inflammatory response phenotype similar to that of mice lacking either IL-10 or the IL-10R2 receptor subunit (59, 64). Based on the findings that STAT3 and new protein synthesis are required for IL-10 function, several groups performed large-scale gene microarray analyses of human and mouse myeloid cells to identify IL-10-regulated genes (25, 31, 47, 66). At present, relatively few of the IL-10-induced genes identified thus far have been examined for their role in mediating IL-10 action (16, 42, 67). The genes that have been proposed to be functionally important appear to act selectively in specific IL-10-dependent anti-inflammatory functions, and as a result, no single IL-10-induced gene acts as a master regulator of the cytokine's broad effects.
Using a representational difference analysis (RDA) approach, we cloned a novel gene product that was induced in mouse macrophages by the combination of IL-10 and LPS and was homologous in sequence to human LIND (Listeria INDuced). LIND had been previously identified as a gene product of unknown function expressed in human monocytes during Listeria monocytogenes infection and, based on sequence homology, was also termed the third member of the ABIN (A20-binding inhibitor of NF-
B activation) family of proteins, i.e., ABIN-3 (21, 57). Because previously characterized members of the ABIN family are capable of inhibiting NF-
B activation in response to particular stimuli in vitro (20, 24, 35, 61), we addressed the question of whether the IL-10-inducible ABIN-3 protein we identified in mouse macrophages possessed an anti-inflammatory effector function. Herein we show that IL-10, in combination with proinflammatory stimuli, such as LPS, leads to optimal induction of ABIN-3 expression in both mouse and human mononuclear phagocytes. Although enforced expression of mouse ABIN-3 in cells had no effect on the activation and function of the NF-
B pathway, expression of the human ortholog indeed suppressed both NF-
B activation and induction of proinflammatory gene expression. This functional disparity was due, in part, to the absence of an intact ABIN homology domain in mouse ABIN-3. These results identify a novel divergence between IL-10's actions on human and mouse cells, which may have significant mechanistic or functional consequences for anti-inflammatory function between different species.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A/D; Hoffman-LaRoche), and mouse and human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) (Genentech). The IL-10 receptor-neutralizing antibody (
IL-10R1 monoclonal antibody [MAb], clone 1B13A) was provided by Schering-Plough. LPS (from Escherichia coli 0127:B8), PGN (from Staphylococcus aureus), and poly(I:C) were obtained from Sigma. Phosphorothioate-stabilized CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (5'-TCC ATG ACG TTC CTG ACG TT) (19) and non-CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (5'-CCA TGG CCA TGG CCA TGG) (15) were obtained from IDT. Cell culture and mice. The mouse monocyte/macrophage RAW264.7 and the human epithelial HEK 293T cell lines were cultured in complete Dulbecco's minimum essential medium with 10% fetal calf serum. The human monocytic cell lines THP-1 and U937 were cultured in complete RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol. Mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) were prepared as described previously (9). IL-10-null mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and bred alongside wild-type mice in a specific-pathogen-free facility in accordance with American Association of Laboratory Animal Science guidelines.
Cloning of mouse ABIN-3 and ABIN-3ß.
RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with either LPS (50 ng/ml) alone or LPS plus IL-10 (100 ng/ml) for 2 h, and RDA was performed as described previously (23, 43). After three sequential rounds of subtraction using tester/driver ratios of 1:50, 1:400, and 1:800, final PCR products were cloned into pBluescript II SK. A
phage cDNA library was constructed (Uni-ZAP-XR; Stratagene) from LPS plus IL-10-stimulated RAW264.7 and screened with an RDA-derived probe, yielding full-length mouse ABIN-3 and ABIN-3ß cDNA.
Plasmid constructs and antibodies.
The cDNAs for mouse ABIN-3Long (GenBank accession no. AK033534), ABIN-1, ABIN-2, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), TLR3, TLR4, MD2, and CD14 were amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR from BMM-derived total RNA using SuperScript RT (Invitrogen) and Pfu Turbo (Stratagene). Similarly, the cDNAs for human ABIN-3, ABIN-3ß, RIP1, TRAF6, IKK
, IKKß, and RelA were subcloned from human leukocyte-derived cDNA (BD Clontech). The mouse A20 cDNA was kindly provided by David Goeddel (Amgen, San Francisco, CA). The human ABIN-3 mutants
AHD1 (amino acids [aa] 1 to 151 fused to aa 173 to 325),
AHD2 (aa 1 to 198 fused to aa 222 to 325), and
AHD1/2 (aa 1 to 151 fused to aa 222 to 325) were constructed by PCR and blunt-end ligation. For protein expression, cDNAs were subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) or the retroviral green fluorescent protein (GFP)-RV vector (44, 50). For antibody generation, glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins containing sequences specific for mouse ABIN-3 (aa 141 to 208) or mouse ABIN-3ß (aa 141 to 168) or common to both isoforms (aa 17 to 89) were bacterially expressed, and hamster MAbs against ABIN-3ß (T1C1H10) and ABIN-3 (Tgr21A5) were produced.
Gene targeting. ABIN-3 (encoded by the gene Tnip3; official symbol 9030611K07Rik) genomic clones were isolated from a 129/Sv genomic library (Lambda FIX II; Stratagene). The 5' homology arm represented a 1.6-kb NcoI-NcoI fragment located upstream of exon 1 and was subcloned into the NotI-linearized TNLOX1-3 gene-targeting vector (49). The 3' homology arm represented a 6.0-kb SacII-SalI fragment located downstream of exon 5 and was subcloned into the AscI-PmeI site of the vector. The resulting vector was linearized and electroporated into the MC-50 embryonic stem (ES) cell line (55). Two hundred and sixty-seven ES clones doubly resistant to G418 and ganciclovir were screened for homologous recombination by PCR and Southern blotting with 5' and 3' external probes. Three correctly targeted clones were identified and, following in vitro Cre-mediated excision of the neomycin resistance gene, two clones transmitted the mutant allele to produce independent lines of ABIN-3-null mice (129/Sv background).
Retroviral vector transduction. For retrovirus packaging, HEK 293T cells were transfected with 2.5 µg GFP-RV vector (empty or containing an N-terminal Myc epitope-tagged human ABIN-3 ortholog [hABIN-3]), 2.0 µg pUMVC3-gag-pol, and 0.5 µg VSVg expression plasmids. THP-1 cells were infected in retroviral supernatant supplemented with 4 µg/ml Polybrene (Sigma). Transduced cells were enriched for GFP expression (under an internal ribosome entry site) by multiple rounds of cell sorting using a Vantage SE model fluorescence-activated cell sorter (BD Biosciences) and maintained at a purity of >97% as measured by flow cytometry.
mRNA analysis. For Northern blotting, 15 µg of total RNA (RNA-Bee; Tel-Test, Inc.) was fractionated in agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred to nylon membranes (Zeta Probe; Bio-Rad), and hybridized using PerfectHyb Plus (Sigma). For quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), 1 µg of DNase I-treated total RNA was used to make random- or oligo(dT)-primed first-strand cDNA using SuperScript RT (Invitrogen). Expression was measured using SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems) and an ABI Prism 7000 (Applied Biosystems). Primers were designed using either MacVector (Accelrys Software) or PrimerBank (63) and are available upon request.
NF-
B-dependent reporter gene assay.
HEK 293T cells were plated in either duplicate (in 24-well plates) or triplicate (in 96-well plates) and 24 h later were transfected with 1 µg or 0.33 µg total DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), respectively. Each transfection contained the indicated expression plasmids, with 120 ng of 2
B-Luc reporter plasmid (34) and 30 ng of control pRL-TK plasmid (Renilla luciferase; Promega). Twenty-four hours posttransfection, cells were stimulated for 5 h and lysed in Passive lysis buffer (Promega), and luciferase was measured using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and a Monolight 3096 luminometer (BD Pharmingen).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Ten micrograms of nuclear extract was incubated with IRDye700-labeled DNA probes (LI-COR) for NF-
B (Ig
promoter) or for STAT1/3 (M67) (52). Each reaction included an IRDye800-labeled Y-box (E
promoter) probe to normalize loading to the constitutive NF-Y complex. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved on 5% gels and imaged with an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting.
For immunoprecipitation, cell lysates were prepared by freeze-thaw in isotonic buffer containing 0.1% NP-40 and were incubated with anti-Myc-agarose beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For Western blotting, whole-cell lysates were prepared in boiling sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.6], 0.5% SDS, and 2 mM dithiothreitol). For Western blots coupled to luciferase assays, after preparation of luciferase lysates, the pellets were solubilized in boiling SDS lysis buffer. Cell equivalents of soluble and insoluble extracts were acetone precipitated, fractionated, and blotted. Western blots were visualized with Alexa 680-conjugated (Molecular Probes) or IRDye800-conjugated (Rockland) secondary antibodies and an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR). The Myc (9E10), IKK
(FL-419), I
B
(FL), glycemldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (V-18), and Lamin B1 (C-20) antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequences of mouse ABIN-3, mouse ABIN-3ß, and human ABIN-3ß have been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers EF585494, EF585495, and EF585496, respectively.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We confirmed that the combination of IL-10 plus LPS induced the expression of ABIN-3 in mouse macrophages and tissues. Three ABIN-3-related transcripts were slightly induced in BMM following LPS stimulation (as detected by Northern blotting), not induced by IL-10 alone, but were robustly induced by the combination of IL-10 and LPS (Fig. 1A). This expression pattern was distinct from that of SOCS3, which was induced by either LPS or IL-10 alone and showed a modestly enhanced induction by the combined stimuli. Similar results were obtained using RAW264.7 cells or thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal exudate macrophages (data not shown). The modest induction of ABIN-3 by LPS stimulation alone was still observed when BMM from the IL-10-null mouse were tested, thereby documenting that LPS alone could indeed induce a low level of expression in the absence of the autocrine action of IL-10. In vivo, as detected by qRT-PCR, ABIN-3 transcripts displayed low or undetectable basal expression in tissues from naive mice but were induced, particularly in myeloid-rich tissues, after mice were injected with the combination of IL-10 and LPS (Fig. 1B).
|
To determine whether ABIN-3 gene expression was also regulated by IL-10 in humans, the human monocytic cell lines THP-1 and U937 were stimulated with LPS, IL-10, or the combination of LPS plus IL-10, and ABIN-3 mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR (Fig. 1D). As was the case with mouse, human ABIN-3 transcripts were induced strongly by IL-10 in the presence of LPS.
Characteristics of ABIN-3 induction: agonist specificity and requirement for de novo protein synthesis.
We assessed the selectivity of ABIN-3 induction by IL-10 and LPS with mouse macrophages. First, we determined whether ABIN-3 could be induced by proinflammatory cytokines that also activate STAT3 such as IL-6 and type I IFN (IFN-
/ß). Stimulation of BMM with IL-6 did not lead to the induction of ABIN-3, either when the cytokine was added alone or in the presence of LPS (Fig. 2A). In contrast, IL-6 induced the expression of the SOCS3 and Bcl-3 control genes. Likewise, stimulation of BMM with IFN-
, either alone or in combination with LPS, failed to induce significant ABIN-3 expression, although IFN-
indeed induced expression of the ISG54 control gene (Fig. 2B). Thus, ABIN-3 expression is induced selectively in response to IL-10, relative to proinflammatory cytokines that activate JAK-STAT pathways including STAT3.
|
To characterize the kinetics of ABIN-3 induction, a time course of stimulation was analyzed by Northern blotting. In response to IL-10 and LPS, ABIN-3 transcripts were induced at 1 h, reached maximal levels at 2 h, and began to decline by 6 h (Fig. 2D). ABIN-3 expression was not induced when macrophages were cultured in the presence of the translation inhibitor cycloheximide or the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D, indicating that ABIN-3 induction depends on both de novo protein synthesis and gene transcription (Fig. 2E). This characteristic is in contrast to the induction of SOCS3, which occurred independently of de novo protein synthesis. Both of the ABIN-3 protein isoforms could be detected in stimulated mouse BMM and displayed induction kinetics that reflected that of their mRNAs. The cellular ABIN-3ß protein disappeared more rapidly than the ABIN-3 isoform, suggesting that the former was less stable (Fig. 2F). These data collectively characterize ABIN-3 as a delayed response gene downstream of the combined IL-10 and TLR/IL-1/TNF stimulation in macrophages.
ABIN-3 is not required for IL-10's anti-inflammatory actions or NF-
B regulation in mice.
In view of the selective regulation of ABIN-3 by IL-10 and the fact that other ABIN family members (namely, ABIN-1 and ABIN-2) were characterized as NF-
B inhibitors in overexpression studies, we tested whether mouse ABIN-3 was required for IL-10's anti-inflammatory actions by generating ABIN-3 knockout mice (Fig. 3). The gene that encodes ABIN-3 (Tnip3) is located on mouse chromosome 6 and comprises 8 exons. Our gene-targeting strategy deleted exons 1 to 5, which includes all of the N-terminal sequence shared between ABIN-3 and ABIN-3ß, as well as the C-terminal sequence specific to ABIN-3ß (Fig. 3A). Wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/), and homozygous (/) ABIN-3 knockout mice were identified by restriction fragment length polymorphism/Southern blotting (Fig. 3B). ABIN-3-null mice were born in the expected Mendelian distribution (70 wild type:140 heterozygous:91 knockout) and were fertile. BMM from ABIN-3-null mice expressed neither ABIN-3 transcripts nor proteins when tested before or after stimulation (Fig. 3C and D and data not shown).
|
To directly test whether mouse ABIN-3 was required for the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-10 on macrophages in vitro, we compared proinflammatory gene induction in BMM from mice with an intact versus a disrupted ABIN-3 gene. IL-10 produced the same suppressive effects on LPS-induced proinflammatory gene expression in macrophages from ABIN-3-null mice as it did from wild-type mice (Fig. 3D). ABIN-3-null macrophages did not exhibit quantitatively or kinetically enhanced responses to LPS signaling in the absence or presence of IL-10 compared to that of wild-type macrophages. Moreover, IL-10 responses in ABIN-3-null macrophages were equivalent to those of wild-type macrophages throughout a wide dose range of cytokine and LPS (data not shown). Additionally, no differences were observed for either LPS- or TNF-
-dependent activation of NF-
B or for the induction of classical NF-
B I
B
and A20 target genes (data not shown). Last, IL-10-mediated suppression of LPS and/or IFN-
-induced surface expression of major histocompatibility class II (I-Ab), B7-2 (CD86), and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 was also unaltered in ABIN-3-null macrophages (Fig. 3E). Similar results were obtained when elicited peritoneal exudate macrophages were examined (data not shown).
To test whether ABIN-3 deficiency led to discernible effects on IL-10 responses in vivo, we assessed the susceptibility of ABIN-3-null mice in three disease models for which IL-10 is known to play a critical role. Compared to wild-type mice, IL-10-null mice exhibit increased sensitivity to endotoxin shock (4), increased susceptibility to experimental colitis induced by oral administration of dextran sulfate sodium (60), and increased resistance to infection with microbial pathogens including Listeria monocytogenes (11, 39). However, when they were tested in these same models, no differences could be detected between ABIN-3-null mice and wild-type mice (Fig. 3F and data not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that ABIN-3 is not an essential mediator of IL-10's broad anti-inflammatory actions in mice and, moreover, that it does not appear to play an obligatory role in the negative regulation of NF-
B or other proinflammatory signaling pathways.
Functional divergence in mouse and human ABIN-3 for NF-
B inhibition.
The aforementioned experiments were complemented by testing whether enforced expression of ABIN-3 was sufficient to effect NF-
B inhibition akin to that of ABIN-1 and ABIN-2. Using a reporter gene assay, HEK 293T cells transfected with an NF-
B-dependent luciferase gene expressed luciferase in response to TNF stimulation (Fig. 4A). This induction was completely inhibited by the coexpression of mouse A20 protein and partially inhibited by coexpression of mouse ABIN-1 or mouse ABIN-2. In contrast, enforced expression of mouse ABIN-3 (mABIN-3) or mABIN-3ß, singly or in combination, had no effect on NF-
B activation (Fig. 4A and data not shown). The lack of activity of mouse ABIN-3 could not be explained simply by a deficit of protein expression since the Myc epitope-tagged mouse ABIN-3 was present at levels comparable to or higher than those of the functional Myc-tagged ABIN family members (Fig. 4A, right panel). Mouse ABIN-3ß, which also did not inhibit NF-
B, was not significantly expressed in the transfected cells, confirming its relative instability. In contrast, enforced expression of hABIN-3 inhibited NF-
B activation in a manner similar to that of ABIN-1 and ABIN-2 (Fig. 4A). The inhibitory activity of human ABIN-3 was dose dependent (i.e., dependent on protein expression level) and was generalizable to IL-1-induced NF-
B activation as well (Fig. 4B).
|
B activation. As TLRs diverge in their usage of specific TIR-containing adaptor proteins for signaling (1), we tested the effect of human ABIN-3 against a representative group of receptors which included TLR2, TLR3, and TLR4. Notably, human ABIN-3 inhibited LPS-induced NF-
B activation in HEK 293T cells engineered to express the TLR4 receptor complex (Fig. 4C). Likewise, enforced expression of human ABIN-3 inhibited TLR2- and TLR3-induced NF-
B activation. In contrast, mouse ABIN-3 or ABIN-3ß failed to inhibit TLR-induced NF-
B activation. Collectively, these results demonstrate that although ABIN-3 represents an IL-10-inducible gene in both humans and mice, only the human protein is capable of suppressing proinflammatory signaling pathways leading to canonical NF-
B activation.
Functional divergence correlates with genetic divergence: mouse ABIN-3 lacks the ABIN homology domain.
Human ABIN proteins share only a short stretch of protein sequence homology, referred to as the ABIN homology domain (AHD). The AHD consists of two homologous stretches of approximately 20 amino acids each, separated by a stretch of approximately 30 nonhomologous amino acids (21, 61). The two homologous subregions within the AHD have been designated AHD1 and AHD2 (21). Deletion of the entire AHD from ABIN-1 or ABIN-2 or site-directed mutagenesis within the AHD2 subdomain of ABIN-1 renders the proteins incapable of inhibiting NF-
B (21, 36). These results point to a critical role for the AHD and specifically the AHD2 sequence in mediating the ability of ABINs to inhibit NF-
B. The AHD1 subdomain, on the other hand, plays a functional role in mediating the ability of ABINs to interact with A20. Thus, the AHD1 and AHD2 subdomains appear to mediate distinct ABIN activities.
Sequence alignment of the functionally divergent human and mouse ABIN-3 proteins revealed that the mouse protein lacks 92 amino acids present within the C terminus of human ABIN-3. Consequently, mouse ABIN-3 is devoid of all but the five most N-terminal residues of the AHD2 subdomain (Fig. 5A). In humans, this specific sequence is derived from three genomic exons that are not present in the mouse gene (Fig. 5C). Alternatively, both the mouse and human ABIN-3ß splice variants display even greater deficits in the ABIN homology domain because both lack approximately half of AHD1 and all of the intervening and AHD2 sequences. In both species, ABIN-3ß arises as a consequence of analogous alternative splicing of the ABIN-3 gene. Despite this equivalent processing, the encoded C-termini of the human and mouse ABIN-3ß proteins are distinct due to a lack of sequence conservation within the corresponding region of exon 5 between the human and mouse genes (Fig. 5B and C).
|
The ABIN homology domain is required but not sufficient for human ABIN-3 function.
We performed structure-function analyses to address whether the functional divergence between human and mouse ABIN-3 was due to the presence or absence of the intact AHD. Deletion of AHD1, AHD2, or the entire AHD from human ABIN-3 had no deleterious effect on the expression or stability of the protein (Fig. 6A). Nonetheless, the ability of human ABIN-3 to inhibit NF-
B activity was partially impaired by deletion of AHD1 and completely abrogated by deletion of either AHD2 or the entire AHD. These latter two human mutants functionally resembled mouse ABIN-3, which naturally lacks the AHD2 sequence (Fig. 6B). Thus, the presence of the intact AHD is required for the anti-inflammatory effects of human ABIN-3 and is sufficient to account for the functional disparity between the human and mouse proteins.
|
B activation as measured by the reporter gene assay (Fig. 6C and D). In this chimeric protein, the first 5 residues of AHD2 (WHKQQ) were derived from a mouse sequence while the more C-terminal 18 residues were derived from human (Fig. 5A and Fig. 6C). We considered the possibility that the inactivity of the chimeric protein was due to a species-specific incompatibility in the AHD2. Therefore, using site-directed mutagenesis, we generated another chimera with an entirely humanized AHD2. However, this second chimeric protein (chimera WH>VL) was yet again not capable of inhibiting NF-
B (Fig. 6C and D). Collectively, these data demonstrate that whereas the presence of the AHD2 sequence is required for human ABIN-3 to inhibit NF-
B activation, its incorporation into the mouse protein is not sufficient to impart human ABIN-3-like activity. Theses results suggest that additional nonhomologous sequences between human and mouse contribute to ABIN-3 function.
Enforced expression of human ABIN-3 suppresses proinflammatory gene responses.
To extend our findings using the reporter gene assay, we constitutively expressed human ABIN-3 in the human THP-1 monocytic cell line and examined proinflammatory gene responses. Enforced expression of Myc epitope-tagged human ABIN-3 was confirmed by Western blotting and qRT-PCR, and its expression level was found to be comparable to that of the endogenous gene induced by LPS and IL-10 (data not shown). Compared to that of control cells, THP-1 cells stably expressing human ABIN-3 displayed partially impaired induction of several proinflammatory NF-
B-dependent genes in response to LPS or PGN (Fig. 7). The mRNA levels for IL-8, TNF-
, IL-12p40, and IL-6 were suppressed at multiple time points after stimulation (Fig. 7A), or when various doses of ligand were employed (Fig. 7B). The magnitude of the suppression of proinflammatory gene induction in human ABIN-3-expressing THP-1 cells was comparable to that of NF-
B inhibition observed for the reporter gene assays (Fig. 4). The effect of human ABIN-3 was both gene- and stimulus-specific as there was no suppression of IFN-
-induced IRF-1 or IL-10-induced SOCS3 expression (Fig. 7C). These data support the notion that human ABIN-3 expression suppresses NF-
B-dependent proinflammatory gene induction.
|
B signaling.
To explore the mechanism by which human ABIN-3 expression inhibits NF-
B activity, we first examined whether it had an effect on NF-
B nuclear translocation and/or DNA binding. THP-1 cells stably expressing human ABIN-3 displayed reduced levels of nuclear NF-
B DNA-binding activity when stimulated with LPS or PGN as measured by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) (Fig. 8A, upper panel). This effect correlated with reduced degradation of cytoplasmic I
B
as measured by Western blotting (Fig. 8A, lower panel). The partially impaired I
B
degradation and NF-
B activation led to a reduction in the NF-
B-dependent resynthesis of I
B
at the later time points. A similar partial reduction in nuclear NF-
B DNA-binding activity and I
B
degradation was observed when measured at a fixed time point using a dose range of the TLR agonists (Fig. 8B). In agreement with our finding that human ABIN-3 had no effect on IFN-
- or IL-10-induced gene expression (Fig. 7C), we observed no inhibitory effect on the activation of STAT1 or STAT3 (Fig. 8C).
|
B
degradation. This notion is consistent with both the cytoplasmic localization of the ABIN-3 protein and the mechanisms of action reported for ABIN-1 and ABIN-2 (20, 61 and data not shown). In order to confirm this concept for human ABIN-3, additional epistatic experiments were carried out in which NF-
B was activated in a ligand-independent manner by overexpressing individual pathway components (Fig. 9A). Overexpression of TLR4, RIP1, or TRAF6 in HEK 293T cells led to the activation of NF-
B-dependent luciferase, which could be inhibited by human ABIN-3 coexpression in an AHD2-dependent manner. In contrast, human ABIN-3 was unable to inhibit NF-
B activation in response to the overexpression of either IKKß or RelA. These results indicate that human ABIN-3 acts upstream of the IKKß kinase. The regulatory subunit of the IKK complex, IKK
(also termed NEMO), is an attractive candidate for the target of human ABIN-3's actions since it is shared among all pathways leading to IKKß and canonical NF-
B activation (6, 18). In agreement with this reasoning, ABIN-2 (and more recently ABIN-1) has been shown to physically interact with IKK
(36, 37). To determine whether human ABIN-3 could likewise interact with IKK
, Myc epitope-tagged versions of human ABIN-3, mouse ABIN-3, or mouse ABIN-2 were coexpressed with human IKK
in cells and protein-protein interaction was assessed by coimmunoprecipitation (Fig. 9B). The results confirmed that human ABIN-3 associates with IKK
in a stimulus-independent manner and to a similar extent as that of the mouse ABIN-2 control. Collectively, these data suggest that expression of human ABIN-3 acts to inhibit activation of the IKK complex through an interaction with IKK
. However, interaction with IKK
is not sufficient to fully account for the inhibitory action of human ABIN-3 since the noninhibitory mouse ABIN-3 also coimmunoprecipitated IKK
(Fig. 9B). Thus, the precise mechanism by which an ABIN-IKK
interaction might productively lead to suppression of I
B kinase activation remains to be elucidated.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B negative feedback regulator, A20, and, in vitro, were shown to inhibit NF-
B activation in their own right (20, 61). Although the role of A20 in negative regulation of NF-
B has been firmly established (7, 33), the significance of its interaction with ABIN family members and the physiologic roles of the ABINs in regulating NF-
B are presently unclear. In contrast to A20, the expression of ABIN-1 and ABIN-2 are not under the control of NF-
B and so they do not readily fit into an analogous model of negative feedback. Moreover, whereas ABIN-1-null mice have not yet been reported, studies with ABIN-2-null mice and cells have failed to demonstrate a role for ABIN-2 in the negative regulation of NF-
B. Instead, ABIN-2 appears to serve a positive signaling role in TLR-induced activation of the Tpl2-ERK pathway (32, 45). Therefore, our discovery that ABIN-3 was unique among ABINs in its induction by IL-10 prompted our pursuit of its potential role as a mediator of IL-10's anti-inflammatory actions.
Through the generation and analysis of ABIN-3-null mice and macrophages, we conclude that mouse ABIN-3 does not play an obligatory role in mediating the broad anti-inflammatory effects of IL-10. Furthermore, mouse ABIN-3 does not play a major role in the normal negative regulation of NF-
B or other proinflammatory signaling pathways. ABIN-3-null mouse macrophages responded by producing proinflammatory molecules in a manner that was indistinguishable from wild-type macrophages. ABIN-3 deficiency did not lead to an alteration in the magnitude or kinetics of NF-
B activation or NF-
B-dependent gene expression in mice. Importantly, ABIN-3-null macrophages responded normally to IL-10, and ABIN-3-null mice did not develop the autoimmune and inflammatory phenotype observed with mice that lack IL-10 responses.
In parallel with our studies investigating the requirement for ABIN-3 in promoting IL-10's actions or in regulating NF-
B signaling in mice, we questioned whether ABIN-3 expression was sufficient to mediate IL-10 or ABIN-like anti-inflammatory effects. Consistent with our analysis of ABIN-3-null mice, enforced expression of either isoform of mouse ABIN-3 (i.e., ABIN-3 or ABIN-3ß) was not sufficient to inhibit NF-
B transactivation. In striking contrast, enforced expression of the human ABIN-3 ortholog in cells inhibited NF-
B activation and proinflammatory gene expression in response to TNF, IL-1, and TLR ligands. As the manuscript was being prepared, a report from Wullaert et al. appeared in press showing that human ABIN-3 was an LPS-inducible gene and that its enforced expression could inhibit NF-
B activation (68). Our study confirms and significantly extends the concurrent work of Wullaert et al. by demonstrating the important role of IL-10 in regulating ABIN-3 gene expression, characterizing the species-specific differences that exist for this gene, and unequivocally documenting the lack of anti-inflammatory function for mouse ABIN-3 in vivo.
The functional differences that we document herein between the mouse and the human proteins reflect the structural differences between the two. Human ABIN-3 contains a complete ABIN homology domain, while the mouse ortholog does not. Deletion of the AHD2 subdomain of human ABIN-3 renders it incapable of inhibiting NF-
B. Therefore, the absence of the AHD2 in mouse ABIN-3 is sufficient to explain its functional inactivity. However, introducing the AHD2 sequence of human ABIN-3 into the mouse ortholog was not sufficient to impart NF-
B inhibitory capacity to mouse ABIN-3. These results suggest that additional ABIN-3 sequences may have functional importance in inhibiting NF-
B. It is noteworthy that the genetic and structural differences between mouse and human ABIN-3 are reflected in other species. Rat ABIN-3 resembles the mouse ortholog in that it also lacks an intact AHD. In contrast, ABIN-3 of chicken, dog, cow, and chimpanzee contain an intact AHD similar to the human ortholog. This species divergence in ABIN-3 may ultimately impact the ways in which different host species respond to inflammatory signals.
Although the mechanisms by which IL-10 manifests its anti-inflammatory effects remain incompletely understood, there is generalized agreement that STAT3 is integral in mediating IL-10 function. In contrast, the question of whether IL-10 acts to inhibit NF-
B activation has been a matter of debate (16, 67). Part of the disagreement may stem from the use of varied experimental conditions or could reflect a true heterogeneity of effector mechanisms downstream of IL-10-induced STAT3 activation that differ between cell types and/or species. Reports suggesting a role for IL-10 in inhibiting NF-
B have pointed to multiple and distinct mechanisms of action. IL-10 has been shown to inhibit IKK activation in the cellular cytoplasm while also inhibiting NF-
B transactivation potential in the nucleus (14, 53, 54). Evidence for the former stems primarily from work using human mononuclear phagocytes (53, 54, 62), whereas evidence for the latter mechanism stems from studies using both human and mouse cells (14, 30, 53).
Herein, we provide evidence that IL-10-induced human ABIN-3 can mediate anti-inflammatory effects in the cytoplasm by inhibiting the activation of the IKK kinase, thus preventing the degradation of I
B
. The IKK regulatory subunit IKK
may be a target of human ABIN-3 since it is required for IKK activation and could associate with human ABIN-3 when coexpressed in cells. In this regard, IL-10 induction of ABIN-3 in inflammatory human macrophages might terminate NF-
B signaling at a point upstream of IKK activation in a manner comparable to the negative feedback actions of A20. Moreover, since our results show that human, but not mouse, ABIN-3 is structurally competent to exert this activity, they establish a novel mechanism that could underlie species-specific differences in the mechanism of action of IL-10.
Research by many groups has led to an emerging picture wherein IL-10 mediates its broad effects through the induction of numerous target genes. Some of these genes play essential roles in mediating highly selective IL-10-induced effects. For example, the IL-10-induced I
B proteins Bcl-3 and I
BNS appear to act as selective transcriptional corepressors at the level of individual NF-
B target gene promoters. At least in mice, Bcl-3 participates in IL-10-mediated suppression of TLR-induced TNF-
synthesis, whereas I
BNS appears to modulate TLR-induced IL-6 and IL-12p40 transcription (22, 29, 30). In addition to antagonizing NF-
B, IL-10 mediates yet broader effects including destabilization and translational inhibition of specific cytokine and chemokine mRNAs. Several other IL-10-induced genes have been shown or suggested to be important for select IL-10-mediated effects, but to date, ablation of any gene in isolation has not led to an abrogation of all of IL-10's anti-inflammatory effects (5, 16, 48, 67). These data lend support to two models of IL-10 action subsequent to its activation of STAT3: one involving the induction of heterogeneous effector pathways with distinct proinflammatory target gene specificities and a second involving the induction of redundant mechanisms for the suppression of particular target genes.
Our data support the concept that IL-10 mediates its anti-inflammatory effects on mononuclear phagocytes through one or more of its induced gene products and that one of the cytokine's effects might be the attenuation of NF-
B signaling. We raise the possibility that this latter aspect is species specific due to structural differences in the IL-10-induced ABIN-3 gene. Future studies should address whether ABIN-3 plays an obligatory role in IL-10-mediated attenuation of NF-
B signaling in human mononuclear phagocytes and, if so, whether its ablation leads to impairment of the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-10. Our current attempts to ablate ABIN-3 expression in human mononuclear phagocytes using RNA interference (RNAi), employing both small interfering RNAs transiently and short hairpin RNAs stably, have not yet yielded sufficient reduction in gene expression to answer these questions in an unequivocal manner. Nevertheless, the work described herein identifies human ABIN-3 as a potential effector of IL-10's anti-inflammatory effects in humans.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a Career Development Award from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America to B.K.W., by a research grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BO 1527/1-1) to E.B., and by a grant (AI058047) from the National Institutes of Health to R.D.S.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 7 May 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aste-Amezaga, M., X. Ma, A. Sartori, and G. Trinchieri. 1998. Molecular mechanisms of the induction of IL-12 and its inhibition by IL-10. J. Immunol. 160:5936-5944.
3. Berg, D. J., N. Davidson, R. Kuhn, W. Muller, S. Menon, G. Holland, L. Thompson-Snipes, M. W. Leach, and D. Rennick. 1996. Enterocolitis and colon cancer in interleukin-10-deficient mice are associated with aberrant cytokine production and CD4(+) TH1-like responses. J. Clin. Investig. 98:1010-1020.[Medline]
4. Berg, D. J., R. Kuhn, K. Rajewsky, W. Muller, S. Menon, N. Davidson, G. Grunig, and D. Rennick. 1995. Interleukin-10 is a central regulator of the response to LPS in murine models of endotoxic shock and the Shwartzman reaction but not endotoxin tolerance. J. Clin. Investig. 96:2339-2347.[Medline]
5. Berrebi, D., S. Bruscoli, N. Cohen, A. Foussat, G. Migliorati, L. Bouchet-Delbos, M. C. Maillot, A. Portier, J. Couderc, P. Galanaud, M. Peuchmaur, C. Riccardi, and D. Emilie. 2003. Synthesis of glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) by macrophages: an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive mechanism shared by glucocorticoids and IL-10. Blood 101:729-738.
6. Bonizzi, G., and M. Karin. 2004. The two NF-
B activation pathways and their role in innate and adaptive immunity. Trends Immunol. 25:280-288.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Boone, D. L., E. E. Turer, E. G. Lee, R. C. Ahmad, M. T. Wheeler, C. Tsui, P. Hurley, M. Chien, S. Chai, O. Hitotsumatsu, E. McNally, C. Pickart, and A. Ma. 2004. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of Toll-like receptor responses. Nat. Immunol. 5:1052-1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Brown, C. Y., C. A. Lagnado, M. A. Vadas, and G. J. Goodall. 1996. Differential regulation of the stability of cytokine mRNAs in lipopolysaccharide-activated blood monocytes in response to interleukin-10. J. Biol. Chem. 271:20108-20112.
9. Celada, A., P. W. Gray, E. Rinderknecht, and R. D. Schreiber. 1984. Evidence for a gamma-interferon receptor that regulates macrophage tumoricidal activity. J. Exp. Med. 160:55-74.
10. Clarke, C. J., A. Hales, A. Hunt, and B. M. Foxwell. 1998. IL-10-mediated suppression of TNF-
production is independent of its ability to inhibit NF
B activity. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:1719-1726.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Dai, W. J., G. Kohler, and F. Brombacher. 1997. Both innate and acquired immunity to Listeria monocytogenes infection are increased in IL-10-deficient mice. J. Immunol. 158:2259-2267.[Abstract]
12. Denys, A., I. A. Udalova, C. Smith, L. M. Williams, C. J. Ciesielski, J. Campbell, C. Andrews, D. Kwaitkowski, and B. M. Foxwell. 2002. Evidence for a dual mechanism for IL-10 suppression of TNF-
production that does not involve inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase or NF-
B in primary human macrophages. J. Immunol. 168:4837-4845.
13. Donnelly, R. P., H. Dickensheets, and D. S. Finbloom. 1999. The interleukin-10 signal transduction pathway and regulation of gene expression in mononuclear phagocytes. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 19:563-573.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Driessler, F., K. Venstrom, R. Sabat, K. Asadullah, and A. J. Schottelius. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of interleukin-10-mediated inhibition of NF-
B activity: a role for p50. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 135:64-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Gao, J. J., E. G. Zuvanich, Q. Xue, D. L. Horn, R. Silverstein, and D. C. Morrison. 1999. Cutting edge: bacterial DNA and LPS act in synergy in inducing nitric oxide production in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J. Immunol. 163:4095-4099.
16. Grutz, G. 2005. New insights into the molecular mechanism of interleukin-10-mediated immunosuppression. J. Leukoc. Biol. 77:3-15.
17. Hammer, M., J. Mages, H. Dietrich, F. Schmitz, F. Striebel, P. J. Murray, H. Wagner, and R. Lang. 2005. Control of dual-specificity phosphatase-1 expression in activated macrophages by IL-10. Eur. J. Immunol. 35:2991-3001.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Hayden, M. S., and S. Ghosh. 2004. Signaling to NF-
B. Genes Dev. 18:2195-2224.
19. Hemmi, H., O. Takeuchi, T. Kawai, T. Kaisho, S. Sato, H. Sanjo, M. Matsumoto, K. Hoshino, H. Wagner, K. Takeda, and S. Akira. 2000. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature 408:740-745.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Heyninck, K., D. De Valck, W. Vanden Berghe, W. Van Criekinge, R. Contreras, W. Fiers, G. Haegeman, and R. Beyaert. 1999. The zinc finger protein A20 inhibits TNF-induced NF-
B-dependent gene expression by interfering with an RIP- or TRAF2-mediated transactivation signal and directly binds to a novel NF-
B-inhibiting protein ABIN. J. Cell Biol. 145:1471-1482.
21. Heyninck, K., M. M. Kreike, and R. Beyaert. 2003. Structure-function analysis of the A20-binding inhibitor of NF-
B activation, ABIN-1. FEBS Lett. 536:135-140.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Hirotani, T., P. Y. Lee, H. Kuwata, M. Yamamoto, M. Matsumoto, I. Kawase, S. Akira, and K. Takeda. 2005. The nuclear I
B protein I
BNS selectively inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-6 production in macrophages of the colonic lamina propria. J. Immunol. 174:3650-3657.
23. Hubank, M., and D. G. Schatz. 1994. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:5640-5648.
24. Hughes, D. P., M. B. Marron, and N. P. Brindle. 2003. The antiinflammatory endothelial tyrosine kinase Tie2 interacts with a novel nuclear factor-
B inhibitor ABIN-2. Circ. Res. 92:630-636.
25. Jung, M., R. Sabat, J. Kratzschmar, H. Seidel, K. Wolk, C. Schonbein, S. Schutt, M. Friedrich, W. D. Docke, K. Asadullah, H. D. Volk, and G. Grutz. 2004. Expression profiling of IL-10-regulated genes in human monocytes and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from psoriatic patients during IL-10 therapy. Eur. J. Immunol. 34:481-493.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Kim, H. S., D. Armstrong, T. A. Hamilton, and J. M. Tebo. 1998. IL-10 suppresses LPS-induced KC mRNA expression via a translation-dependent decrease in mRNA stability. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64:33-39.[Abstract]
27. Kontoyiannis, D., A. Kotlyarov, E. Carballo, L. Alexopoulou, P. J. Blackshear, M. Gaestel, R. Davis, R. Flavell, and G. Kollias. 2001. Interleukin-10 targets p38 MAPK to modulate ARE-dependent TNF mRNA translation and limit intestinal pathology. EMBO J. 20:3760-3770.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Kuhn, R., J. Lohler, D. Rennick, K. Rajewsky, and W. Muller. 1993. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 75:263-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Kuwata, H., M. Matsumoto, K. Atarashi, H. Morishita, T. Hirotani, R. Koga, and K. Takeda. 2006. I
BNS inhibits induction of a subset of Toll-like receptor-dependent genes and limits inflammation. Immunity 24:41-51.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Kuwata, H., Y. Watanabe, H. Miyoshi, M. Yamamoto, T. Kaisho, K. Takeda, and S. Akira. 2003. IL-10-inducible Bcl-3 negatively regulates LPS-induced TNF-
production in macrophages. Blood 102:4123-4129.
31. Lang, R., D. Patel, J. J. Morris, R. L. Rutschman, and P. J. Murray. 2002. Shaping gene expression in activated and resting primary macrophages by IL-10. J. Immunol. 169:2253-2263.
32. Lang, V., A. Symons, S. J. Watton, J. Janzen, Y. Soneji, S. Beinke, S. Howell, and S. C. Ley. 2004. ABIN-2 forms a ternary complex with TPL-2 and NF-
B1 p105 and is essential for TPL-2 protein stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5235-5248.
33. Lee, E. G., D. L. Boone, S. Chai, S. L. Libby, M. Chien, J. P. Lodolce, and A. Ma. 2000. Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-
B and cell death responses in A20-deficient mice. Science 289:2350-2354.
34. Liou, H. C., W. C. Sha, M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore. 1994. Sequential induction of NF-
B/Rel family proteins during B-cell terminal differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5349-5359.