| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received 16 March 2007/ Returned for modification 18 April 2007/ Accepted 16 May 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another significant difference between yeast and metazoans concerns yeast upstream activation sequences (UASs) and their metazoan counterparts, enhancers. Both serve as binding sites for gene-specific activators, yet while UASs are usually positioned within a few hundred base pairs 5' of the TATA box or core promoter, enhancers are often located several kilobases away from or even 3' of the promoter (5, 30). While there is some evidence that yeast UASs cannot function when moved too far from their promoters (31, 71), this area has not been extensively studied. As the S. cerevisiae genome is compact, and the majority of yeast promoters range from approximately 150 to 400 bp (28, 59), it seems logical that there would be restrictions on activation distance in order to maintain specificity between a UAS and its target gene. However, there is no clear understanding of the effect of distance on activation in S. cerevisiae in vivo and no knowledge concerning factors that might play a role in controlling this effect.
Different mechanisms have been proposed for the ability of enhancers to act over long distances (5, 11, 25, 62). One mechanism, looping, stipulates that proteins bound at an enhancer associate directly with proteins bound at a core promoter with a looping out of the intervening chromatin. For example, loops have been demonstrated between the locus control region of the murine ß-globin locus and activated genes located 40 to 60 kb away (72). Another proposed mechanism, tracking, requires the movement or binding of molecules along the DNA between the enhancer and core promoter. The tracking model postulates that RNA polymerase is recruited at the enhancer and moves along the DNA until it reaches the target promoter. The strongest evidence for this mechanism comes from analysis of a bacterial enhancer-like element (32). In S. cerevisiae, evidence consistent with tracking came from experiments in which LexA binding or a transcription terminator blocked transcriptional activation (8). Current evidence from metazoans supports several of these mechanisms, including combinations of mechanisms at particular enhancers (for an example, see reference 76).
The looping mechanism has been demonstrated to occur in S. cerevisiae in some circumstances. Looping has been detected in yeast between the promoters and terminators of long genes and this event has been correlated with active transcription (1, 58). In addition, looping has also been demonstrated within yeast telomeres, bringing the UAS and TATA box of a reporter gene located within that region into close proximity (22). Finally, genetic evidence for looping facilitated by the Drosophila melanogaster GAGA protein has been described previously (60). No evidence for looping as part of transcriptional activation, however, has been found, most likely because most S. cerevisiae UAS elements are close enough to the core promoter not to require looping as part of gene activation.
To study activation distance in S. cerevisiae, we established a system using the well-characterized activator, Gal4, to examine the ability of the GAL1 UAS to function at different distances from a TATA box in S. cerevisiae. These experiments clearly show that activation diminishes with distance, confirming the suggestions from previous studies (31, 71) and indicating that long-distance activation is normally repressed. Unexpectedly, we have also found that when a UAS is far from a TATA, the UAS directs expression of nonfunctional transcription from nearby start sites regardless of the location of the UAS, suggesting that promiscuous activation may be a property of UAS elements. To gain insight into factors that control activation distance in S. cerevisiae, we screened for mutants that permit activation from the normally nonpermissive distance of 800 bp. These screens have identified a small set of factors known to play roles in chromatin structure: Sin4, Spt2, Spt10, and histone H2A/H2B. The mutations that allow the strongest level of long-distance activation, in SIN4, expand the range of transcription start sites, thereby allowing long-distance activation. Finally, experiments to test the mechanism of long-distance activation in sin4
mutants have provided strong evidence against a tracking model.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0::kanMX (57), (hta1-htb1)
::LEU2 (35), mot1-1 (21), spt6-140 (18), and gal11
::TRP1 (63) alleles have been described previously. The sin4
0::LEU2, sin4
0::URA3, spt10
0::LEU2, pgd1
0::LEU2, spt8
0::LEU2, med1
0::URA3, med2
0::URA3, nut1
0::URA3, srb2
0::URA3, srb5
0::URA3, srb9
0::URA3, srb10
0::URA3, soh1
0::URA3 and set2
0::URA3 deletion mutations were constructed by replacing their open reading frames (ORFs) with the auxotrophic marker LEU2 or URA3 (17). The spt2
0::natMX deletion mutation was constructed by replacing its ORF with the natMX marker, which confers resistance to nourseothricin (29). The spt21
0::kanMX deletion mutation was constructed by replacing its ORF with the kanMX marker which confers resistance to G418 (7, 75).
|
winston/Winston%20Lab%20Links.html. For the reporter in the BPH1 gene, construction began with the integration of URA3 at the 3' end of the BPH1 ORF. Next, the HIS3 TATA and coding and terminator sequences were amplified by PCR from plasmid YIP55-ScHIS3A5 (36) with flanking homologies added so that the URA3 marker would be replaced entirely by the HIS3 sequences after transformation. Ura transformants were selected by resistance to 5-fluoroorotic acid. To prevent transcription through BPH1, sequences from 500 to +49 (where +1 is the ATG) were deleted and replaced with copies of the sequence encoding the HA1 epitope, using a method described previously (66). This strain, FY2549, was used as the parent strain for all other BPH1 reporter strains. To insert Gal4 binding sites at specified distances 5' of the HIS3 TATA in the BPH1 reporter, a cassette containing four Gal4 binding sites and the kanMX marker was amplified by PCR from the pFA6a-kanMX6-PGAL1 plasmid (47) using primers designed for recombination at specific distances 5' of HIS3. To make strain FY2584 for use in synthetic genetic array analysis, integrative transformation was used to replace the kanMX marker with the natMX4 marker, which confers resistance to the drug nourseothricin (29). To insert the ADH1 terminator between the Gal4 binding sites and HIS3 TATA in FY2555, the ADH1 terminator was amplified from pFA6a-GFP(S56T)-kanMX6 (47) and this PCR product was used in an integrative transformation to replace a URA3 marker within BPH1 using the same method described above. To place LexA binding sites 5' of the HIS3 TATA in FY2549, complementary oligonucleotides containing three overlapping LexA binding sites flanked by restriction sites were synthesized, annealed, and digested by BamHI and BglII. This LexA fragment was cloned into the BamHI and BglII sites of pFA6a-kanMX6-PGAL1, replacing the Gal4 binding sites and creating plasmid pFA6a-kanMX6-LexA. This plasmid was used as a template for PCR to generate DNA for integrative transformation into the BPH1 locus, and G418R transformants were selected. The LexA-GAL4 (8) and LexA-GCN4 plasmids were generously provided by Roger Brent and Mark Ptashne. To construct the YBR281C reporter, we first marked HIS3 so that it could be integrated at the YBR281C locus in one step. To do this, the natMX4 cassette was amplified by PCR from pAG25 (29) and inserted 3' of the HIS3 terminator at its genomic locus in a wild-type strain. Then the entire HIS3-natMX4 region was amplified by PCR and inserted by integrative transformation at the 3' end of the YBR281C ORF, selecting for nourseothricin resistance. Subsequently, a cassette containing four Gal4 binding sites and the TRP1 auxotrophic marker was amplified from the pFA6a-TRP1-PGAL1 plasmid (47), with flanking homology to specific sites within YBR281C. These PCR products were used to insert Gal4 binding sites by integrative transformation at the specified distances 5' of the HIS3 TATA within YBR281C. Transformants were selected by growth on SC-Trp. The design of the flanking homologous sequences was such that integration of the Gal4 binding sites within YBR281C simultaneously deleted all YBR281C sequences 5' of that integration to 140 (where +1 is the ATG) in order to prevent transcription through YBR281C. Verification of all correct integration and recombination events was performed by PCR.
Isolation of long-distance activation mutants. Long-distance activation mutants were identified by four methods, a transposon insertion mutagenesis screen (12), spontaneous mutant selection, systematic genetic array analysis using the nonessential deletion set and the doxycycline-repressible essential allele set (53, 73), and testing of candidate genes. For insertional mutagenesis, a mutagenized yeast genomic library containing LEU2-marked transposon insertions (12) was digested with NotI and transformed into FY2555. Integrative transformants were selected by growth on medium lacking leucine (SC-Leu), and these colonies were replica plated onto SC-His-Leu Glu and onto SC-His-Leu Gal to screen for transformants that were His+ only when galactose was the carbon source. Of 11 His+ transformants, one was retested after purification. Vectorette PCR (2) was used to amplify the region where the transposon had integrated, and sequencing determined this location to be within the coding region of SIN4. Two methods of spontaneous selection were carried out using strains FY2554 and FY2555. For the first method, patches of FY2554 and FY2555 were grown on YPD and replica plated to SC-His Gal medium. Papillae that grew after 2 weeks at room temperature were purified and retested to check that the His+ phenotype was galactose dependent. Of the four mutants that were rechecked, two FY2555-derived mutants were complemented by a wild-type SIN4 plasmid and two FY2554-derived mutants remain unidentified. In the second method, four cultures of either FY2554 or FY2555 were grown overnight and 1 x 107 cells from each culture were plated on SC-His Gal and grown at 30°C. Three colonies were picked from each plate, making a total of 24 putative mutants, 19 of which were retested upon purification. Of the 10 FY2554 mutants, 6 failed to complement a deletion of SIN4, 1 failed to complement a deletion of SPT10, 1 failed to complement a deletion of HTA1-HTB1, and 2 others remain unidentified. Of the nine FY2555 mutants, five failed to complement a deletion of SIN4, two failed to complement a deletion of HTA1-HTB1, and two remain unidentified but are in the same complementation group. For the systematic genetic array analysis, we screened both the yeast nonessential deletion set (73) and a doxycycline-repressible set of essential genes (53) by crossing each set to strain FY2584 and screening for growth on SC-His Gal. Deletion mutants of SIN4, SPT2, and HTA1 were identified as having a His+ phenotype in these screens.
Northern analysis.
RNA isolation and Northern hybridization experiments were performed as previously described (4). As indicated, strains were grown to mid-log phase in YPGal. Northern hybridization analysis was conducted with probes to the coding regions of HIS3 (27 to +376, where +1 is the ATG) and ACT1 (+533 to +722) (see Table S1 at http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/
winston/Winston%20Lab%20Links.html).
5' mapping of transcript start sites.
5' end mapping of RNAs was carried out using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) method. Total RNA was prepared as described above (4) and treated with DNase using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN). cDNA synthesis and PCR were performed using the SMART-RACE kit (Clontech) as described previously (80). The primer used for mapping the 5' ends of transcripts annealed to sequences from +263 to +282 of the HIS3 ORF (see Table S1 at http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/
winston/Winston%20Lab%20Links.html). The PCR products were cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced.
3C.
To assay possible loop formation between the Gal4 binding sites and HIS3 TATA in the reporter, the chromosome conformation capture (3C) method was used (1, 23). We followed the method of Ansari and Hampsey (1) with some modifications. Fifty milliliters of cells was grown in YPD or YPGal to a density of 3 x 107 cells/ml and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with the addition of glycine to 250 mM and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The cell pellet was washed with 10 ml of 1x Tris-buffered saline buffer plus 1% Triton X-100, resuspended in 1 ml 1x Tris-buffered saline, transferred to a 2-ml screw-cap tube, and pelleted. This pellet was resuspended in 750 µl of FA lysis buffer, approximately 500 µl of glass beads was added, and cells were lysed with vigorous shaking for 40 min at 4°C. Cell lysates were collected by puncturing the bottom of the tube with a 22-gauge needle and collecting the filtrate in a second 2-ml screw-cap tube set inside a 15-ml conical tube. The filtrate was then pelleted at top speed in a microfuge for 5 min at 4°C. The pellet was washed with 500 µl of FA lysis buffer and resuspended in 500 µl of 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Eighty microliters of this chromatin preparation was digested for 16 h, with shaking in a 125-µl digestion mixture with 10 µl each of enzymes BfaI (5,000 U/ml) and MseI (4,000 U/ml). Samples were pelleted at top speed in a microfuge for 5 min at room temperature and then resuspended in 90 µl of 10 mM Tris. Digestion was stopped by adding 10 µl of 10% SDS and incubating at 65°C for 20 min. To sequester the SDS, 75 µl of 10% Triton X-100 was added, and the reaction mixture was diluted to a volume of 750 µl. Ligations were carried out for 1 h at room temperature using 5 µl of Quick ligase (New England Biolabs). Two microliters of 10 mg/ml RNase was added, and the reaction mixture was incubated for 10 min at 37°C. Five microliters of 20 mg/ml proteinase K was then added, and the reaction mixture was incubated overnight at 65°C. The samples were extracted two times with phenol-chloroform and once with chloroform and ethanol precipitated in the presence of glycogen. The DNA concentration was determined, and 500 ng of DNA was used as the template for each PCR. PCRs (30 cycles) used same-strand oligonucleotides that anneal to the indicated regions of the reporter and require a cut between the two oligonucleotides to form a product (see Fig. 6A and Table S1 at http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/
winston/Winston%20Lab%20Links.html) (23). A PCR to control for the amount of template DNA was performed using convergent oligonucleotides that amplify a region of chromosome V lacking BfaI and MseI restriction sites (see Table S1 at the URL mentioned above). PCR products were visualized on a 1.6% agarose gel using ethidium bromide.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To test whether other activators would function similarly to Gal4 as the UAS-TATA distance was increased, we constructed three additional reporter strains in which three overlapping LexA binding sites were integrated 123, 417, and 642 bp 5' of the HIS3 TATA (Table 2). Using these reporters, we compared activation via two fusion proteins, LexA-Gal4 and LexA-Gcn4 (Fig. 1D). While the LexA-Gal4 fusion protein was able to activate transcription from distances of 123 and 417, similar to Gal4 alone, LexA-Gcn4 could activate transcription from only the shortest distance. None of the reporters were activated when transformed with a control plasmid that did not express an activator.
Isolation and characterization of mutants that allow long-distance activation. In order to discover factors that might determine the distance at which a UAS can activate in S. cerevisiae, BPH1 reporter strains with the UAS located either 690 or 799 bp 5' of HIS3 were screened for factors which, when mutated, enable the expression of HIS3 in a galactose-dependent manner. Four methods were used: transposon insertion mutagenesis, spontaneous mutagenesis, a candidate gene approach, and synthetic genetic array analysis with both the yeast nonessential deletion set as well as the essential repressible allele set (described in Materials and Methods) (12, 53, 73).
We found a small number of factors affecting long-distance activation of gene expression, all of which have been previously implicated in chromatin structure (Table 3 and Fig. 2). Mutations in SIN4 were recovered in all our screens, and sin4 mutations conferred the strongest His+ phenotype (Fig. 2A). SIN4 encodes a subunit of the tail domain of the Srb/Mediator coactivator complex and plays both positive and negative roles in the regulation of transcription (15, 16, 19, 20, 37-39, 45, 48, 69, 77). SPT2 encodes an HMG-like protein, binds DNA in a sequence-independent manner, and has been implicated in both transcription elongation and the recruitment of mRNA cleavage/polyadenylation factors (33, 43, 44, 57). Both SIN4 and SPT2 were previously isolated in a screen for suppressors of a transcriptional defect at an HO-lacZ fusion in strains mutated for members of the Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex (69). SPT10 encodes a site-specific DNA binding protein that regulates histone gene transcription and is also a putative histone acetyltransferase (24, 26, 34, 56, 67). Finally, HTA1-HTB1 encodes the core histones H2A and H2B. Mutations in SIN4, SPT10, and SPT2 share other phenotypes with histone gene mutants, such as the suppression of Ty and
insertions (Spt phenotype), reinforcing their roles in controlling chromatin structure (18, 27, 38, 43, 55, 64, 69, 78). In all four cases, complete deletion of the gene allowed long-distance activation, showing that the phenotype is caused by a loss of function. In addition, for each mutant, long-distance activation occurred only in the presence of galactose, showing that the mutations did not merely bypass the requirement for a UAS. The rest of our analysis is focused primarily on long-distance activation in sin4
mutants, as they have the strongest phenotypes, with some analysis of spt2
for comparison.
|
|
and spt2
mutants is specific for either location or activator, additional reporters were tested. First, we tested the effects of sin4
and spt2
mutations at YBR281C, testing the reporter in which the UAS-TATA distance is 806 bp. As can be seen by growth on SC-His Gal medium, sin4
and spt2
mutations allow long-distance activation at this site as well, showing that their phenotype is not location dependent (Fig. 2B). To discover whether HIS3 activation is activator specific, we tested our mutants with the reporter in which LexA binding sites are located 642 bases 5' of the TATA. When testing sin4
and spt2
mutants, we found that both are His+ in strains expressing a LexA-Gal4 fusion protein; however, only spt2
mutants are His+ in strains expressing a LexA-Gcn4 fusion protein (Fig. 2C). This result suggests that long-distance activation in sin4
mutants may be more activator dependent than in spt2
mutants.
To determine whether activation at even longer distances could occur in sin4
or spt2
mutants, we constructed two additional reporters within BPH1 with UAS-TATA distances of 1,397 and 1,995 bp. While both reporter strains were His in combination with spt2
, a low but visible level of growth was observed in sin4
mutants (Fig. 2D). This result confirms that sin4
mutants are quite permissive for long-distance activation. The ability to activate transcription from a distance of almost 2 kb makes the UASs in sin4
mutants behave similarly to Drosophila or mammalian enhancers.
Long-distance activation does not generally occur in Mediator mutants or other mutants that affect chromatin or transcription.
Although we had screened both the yeast nonessential deletion set and the tet-repressible essential gene set for mutants that allow long-distance activation, our results prompted us to retest particular mutants. To do this, we directly examined additional genes for their role in long-distance activation by combining mutations in these genes with the BPH1 reporter having a UAS-TATA distance of 799 bp and examining growth on SC-His Gal medium. First, as Sin4 is part of the large Mediator coactivator complex, it was of interest to test whether mutations in other Mediator genes might also allow long-distance activation. Therefore, we tested mutations in almost all of the other genes encoding nonessential subunits of Mediator. With the exception of srb9
and srb10
mutants, which showed an extremely weak His+ phenotype, none of the other Mediator mutants tested were His+ (Fig. 2E and Table 4).
|
Northern and 5' RACE analysis of long-distance activation.
To assay long-distance activation at the transcriptional level and to correlate it with the His phenotype conferred by our reporters, we examined HIS3 mRNA levels by Northern analysis. We first examined HIS3 expression in the BPH1 reporter strains. As expected, in reporter strains that have a His+ phenotype, wild-type-length HIS3 mRNA is produced, with the level corresponding to the UAS-TATA distance (Fig. 3A, lanes 3, 4, and 5). At UAS-TATA distances of 690 and 799 bp, which are His, extremely low levels of wild-type-length HIS3 mRNA are detected. Therefore, wild-type-length HIS3 mRNA levels correlate with the growth phenotypes conferred by the reporters, showing that greater distance decreases the level of activation. In sin4
and spt2
mutants, when we examined a UAS-TATA distance of 799 bp, we found that, as expected, wild-type-length HIS3 mRNA is produced at a level significantly greater than that in a wild-type background (Fig. 3A, compare lane 8 to lanes 9 and 10). Similar results were observed with the second reporter at YBR281C, where we observed even greater levels of HIS3 mRNA at the most proximal Gal4 binding site locations and in sin4
and spt2
mutants (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results demonstrate that sin4
and spt2
mutations allow long-distance activation by Gal4.
|
mutants, while the level of the long transcripts was approximately the same as in the wild type, the band corresponding to the long transcripts was reproducibly more diffuse, suggesting that a greater range of start sites are used in this mutant (Fig. 3A, compare lanes 8 and 9). The identification of these long transcripts suggests that UAS elements, in the absence of a nearby promoter, have the potential to initiate promiscuous transcription nearby. This property suggests that it is beneficial for UAS elements to be positioned close to their target promoters.
To precisely determine the 5' ends of all of the RNAs produced from a long-distance reporter, we used 5' RACE, comparing wild-type and sin
strains (Fig. 4A). Our results lead to two main conclusions. First, in strains carrying sin4
, but not in wild-type strains, initiation occurs at the wild-type HIS3 start site (36, 70). Second, in both wild-type and sin4
strains, the long transcripts initiate over a range of positions, all 3' of the GAL1 UAS; however, in the sin4
mutant, the degree of specificity for any site is reduced and the range is significantly greater. These results suggest that Sin4 normally constrains the distance over which transcription start sites can be used. Furthermore, in sin4
mutants, the distance barrier that exists in wild-type strains is surmounted, allowing accurate long-distance transcriptional activation to occur.
|
and spt2
mutants. For example, in wild-type strains, the long transcript might somehow prevent long-distance activation by transcriptional interference over the HIS3 TATA region. Alternatively, in sin4
and spt2
mutants, the long transcript might be required for long-distance activation by allowing RNA polymerase to track from the UAS to the HIS3 core promoter. To attempt to address these issues, we integrated the strong ADH1 terminator between the GAL1 UAS and the HIS3 TATA in the BPH1 reporter with a UAS-TATA distance of 839 bp (Fig. 5A). If transcriptional interference is the primary mechanism by which long-distance transcriptional activation is prevented, then integration of the terminator will result in the expression of the reporter and a His+ phenotype. Such a result was obtained in the case of transcriptional interference at the S. cerevisiae SER3 gene (50). We found, however, that a wild-type strain with the ADH1 terminator integrated between the GAL1 UAS and HIS3 TATA is still His, supporting the hypothesis that distance, and not transcriptional interference, is the reason that activation does not occur at the HIS3 start site (Fig. 5B). We also tested the BPH1 reporter containing the ADH1 terminator in sin4
and spt2
mutants to determine whether transcription across the length of the BPH1 reporter was required for HIS3 expression in these mutants. Both sin4
and spt2
mutants are His+, even with the terminator between the UAS and TATA, suggesting that transcription through the BPH1 reporter is not required for long-distance activation (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that RNA polymerase II does not need to track along the template to activate at a distance.
|
and spt2
mutants (Fig. 5C, lanes 4 to 7). An unexpected finding, however, was that in wild-type strains with this modified reporter, there is a transcript produced at a low level that appears to be the length of wild-type HIS3 mRNA (Fig. 5C, lane 3). This possibility seemed unlikely, since the strain has a tight His phenotype. To analyze this class of RNAs more precisely, we performed 5' RACE analysis to determine the 5' ends, from both wild-type and sin4
backgrounds. Our results again showed there to be a range of transcription start sites, extending from just 3' of the terminator to within the ORF of HIS3 (Fig. 4B). Unlike what was observed for the reporter strains lacking the terminator, in wild-type strains, transcription could now start over a wider range of positions, including a low level of initiation from the normal HIS3 start site. The insertion of the terminator between the UAS and TATA, then, does seem to help the UAS to communicate with the correct start site at a low level, suggesting that transcriptional interference may play some role in preventing HIS3 transcription. However, given the His phenotype of this strain, there is not an adequate level of functional HIS3 mRNA to alter the phenotype. In sin4
mutants, transcripts started at the correct location significantly more often than in the wild-type strain (Fig. 4B). These results support the view that Sin4 normally functions to select the proper sites for transcription initiation.
3C analysis.
Since the long transcript is efficiently terminated by the ADH1 sequences, we hypothesized that a loop might form between the UAS and the TATA for transcription to initiate 3' of the terminator. To test for such a loop, we used 3C analysis (1, 23). In this technique, chromatin was cross-linked and digested with the restriction enzymes BfaI and MseI that cut on either side of, and at several sites between, the Gal4 binding sites and the HIS3 TATA (Fig. 6A). Digested chromatin was then ligated at low concentration to maximize intramolecular ligations over intermolecular ones, and PCR was performed to detect the ligation products by using primers that anneal to specific regions in the reporter gene (Fig. 6A). If the Gal4 binding sites and HIS3 TATA are held physically close to one another by a bridge of transcription factors, then these regions should remain physically associated after restriction enzyme digestion. Our results show that the growth of either wild-type or sin4
strains in galactose leads to an enrichment of a PCR product specific to a ligation between the restriction fragments containing the Gal4 binding sites and HIS3 TATA (Fig. 6B). Importantly, these PCR products require formaldehyde cross-linking and ligation (Fig. 6C). We do not detect a difference between wild-type and sin4
mutants, indicating that sin4
mutants affect start site selection and long-distance activation at a step subsequent to loop formation.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results have shown that the GAL1 UAS directs the expression of a long RNA whose transcription is independent of genomic location or activator. This finding suggests that promiscuous transcription initiation at proximal sites may be an inherent property of UAS elements. This conclusion is consistent with recent studies of transcription start sites in Drosophila, mouse, and human. Whole-genome analysis of Drosophila has discovered a large number of intergenic transcripts that correspond to newly identified 5' exons of known genes (49). Additionally, an analysis of mammalian genomes has uncovered a number of "megatranscripts" that span megabases (13). Strikingly similar to what we have observed with our reporter genes, a transcript originates from the locus control region of the mammalian ß-globin locus as those genes are actively being transcribed (3, 42). In these larger eukaryotes, it has been proposed that such intergenic transcription may keep chromatin structure in the region of the enhancer open and accessible for binding by transcription factors (11). Thus, the ability to direct nearby transcription initiation events may be a property conserved between UASs and enhancers.
The importance of strictly limiting long-distance activation in S. cerevisiae is evident from its genome organization. In contrast to what is seen for larger eukaryotes, the S. cerevisiae genome is very compact, with the distance between ORFs generally within a range of 150 to 400 bp, depending upon the gene configuration, with many coding regions under 1 kb (28, 59). The mutations we have identified enable communication between UAS and TATA regions that are at least 800 bp apart, and in the case of sin4
mutants, almost 2 kb apart. If the entire yeast genome were able to make efficient UAS-TATA interactions at this distance, there would be a significant disruption to normal regulation and transcription. Therefore, it is clearly critical for S. cerevisiae and other organisms with compact genomes to constrain activation distance.
Given the importance of constraining long-distance activation, one might expect that mutations that are permissive for this type of event would cause poor growth or inviability due to widespread aberrant gene expression. However, of the loci we identified, only HTA1-HTB1 is essential for growth (46). Furthermore, there is little correlation between the growth rate and the strength of long-distance activation in our mutants, as the strongest long-distance activation mutant, sin4
, has only a mild growth defect. Consistent with this observation, recent microarray analysis of sin4
suggests that it does not cause dramatic changes in transcript levels genome-wide (74). The fitness of these strains is most likely explained by the model that a UAS will preferentially act at a nearby core promoter even in a sin4
mutant, where it has the modest ability to activate at a distance. This preference for activation from proximal sites is supported by our observation that the GAL1 UAS in a wild-type strain will activate primarily from proximal sites, even in the absence of core promoter elements. Thus, in a sin4
mutant, nearby core promoters may serve as barriers or insulators for long-distance activation. It seems possible that mutations that allow a stronger level of long-distance activation might be able to overcome such barriers.
While our results have clearly shown that long-distance activation in sin4
and other mutants can occur, we do not yet understand the mutant alteration that allows this type of activation. Initial genetic tests suggest that a sin4
spt2
double mutant is similar to a sin4
single mutant with respect to long-distance activation strength, suggesting that they may work by similar means. In addition, the presence of the ADH1 transcription terminator does not inhibit long-distance activation in either sin4
or spt2
mutants, suggesting that tracking of RNA polymerase II along the template is an unlikely mechanism. A previous study of UAS-TATA interactions found that in a wild-type strain with a UAS-TATA distance of less than 300 bp, the same ADH1 terminator did block transcriptional activation (8). The difference between those results and ours seems likely to be caused by the sin4
and spt2
mutant backgrounds in which our experiment was performed. Given the nature of the genes identified, chromatin structure also seems likely to play a role in long-distance activation, at the level of either nucleosome positioning or histone modification. In addition, other mechanisms, such as localization of the gene within the nucleus (10, 14, 52), might play a role. As the level of transcription in our long-distance activation mutants is considerably lower than that in genes usually studied for chromatin effects, such as GAL1 or PMA1, it is conceivable that the events that allow long-distance activation may be below the level of detection. The isolation of stronger long-distance activation mutants, or enhancers of those already found, will facilitate molecular analysis.
Our studies also suggest that both local differences in chromatin structure as well as activator strength affect the potential for long-distance activation. Between the two reporters that we have studied, the one located at YBR281C on chromosome II is detectably more permissive for long-distance activation than the one at BPH1 on chromosome III, and LexA-Gal4 is a better activator than LexA-Gcn4, consistent with their relative strengths at short distances (9). Previous studies of PHO5 showed that activation of that gene occurs even after the insertion of several hundred base pairs between the UAS and TATA (54), indicating that the location of PHO5 or activation by Pho4 is better suited for long-distance activation than the cases we have examined. These results suggest that the threshold at which UAS-TATA distance is too great for activation is not static but varies depending upon local chromatin structure and activator strength.
Taken together, our data have contributed to a clearer understanding of the constraints on long-distance transcriptional activation in yeast. In addition, our results have provided evidence that proximal transcription is a common property of UAS elements, similar to metazoan enhancers. Our reporters, especially our LexA reporters, provide a system for the study of specific transcription factors in long-distance transcriptional activation. Further studies of our mutants should reveal the mechanisms by which wild-type cells are able to repress long-distance interactions between UAS and TATA elements.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by NIH grant GM45720 to F.W., and K.C.D. was a recipient of an NSF graduate research fellowship.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 25 May 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Arnold, C., and I. J. Hodgson. 1991. Vectorette PCR: a novel approach to genomic walking. PCR Methods Appl. 1:39-42.[Medline]
3. Ashe, H. L., J. Monks, M. Wijgerde, P. Fraser, and N. J. Proudfoot. 1997. Intergenic transcription and transinduction of the human beta-globin locus. Genes Dev. 11:2494-2509.
4. Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. E. Struhl. 1991. Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
5. Blackwood, E. M., and J. T. Kadonaga. 1998. Going the distance: a current view of enhancer action. Science 281:60-63.
6. Boube, M., L. Joulia, D. L. Cribbs, and H.-M. Bourbon. 2002. Evidence for a mediator of RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation conserved from yeast to man. Cell 110:143-151.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Brachmann, C. B., A. Davies, G. J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J. D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Brent, R., and M. Ptashne. 1985. A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene. Nature 314:198.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Brent, R., and M. Ptashne. 1985. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell 43:729-736.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Brickner, J. H., and P. Walter. 2004. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2:e342.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Bulger, M., and M. Groudine. 1999. Looping versus linking: toward a model for long-distance gene activation. Genes Dev. 13:2465-2477.
12. Burns, N., B. Grimwade, P. B. Ross-Macdonald, E. Y. Choi, K. Finberg, G. S. Roeder, and M. Snyder. 1994. Large-scale analysis of gene expression, protein localization, and gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 8:1087-1105.
13. Carninci, P., T. Kasukawa, S. Katayama, J. Gough, M. C. Frith, N. Maeda, R. Oyama, T. Ravasi, B. Lenhard, C. Wells, R. Kodzius, K. Shimokawa, V. B. Bajic, S. E. Brenner, S. Batalov, A. R. Forrest, M. Zavolan, M. J. Davis, L. G. Wilming, V. Aidinis, J. E. Allen, A. Ambesi-Impiombato, R. Apweiler, R. N. Aturaliya, T. L. Bailey, M. Bansal, L. Baxter, K. W. Beisel, T. Bersano, H. Bono, A. M. Chalk, K. P. Chiu, V. Choudhary, A. Christoffels, D. R. Clutterbuck, M. L. Crowe, E. Dalla, B. P. Dalrymple, B. de Bono, G. Della Gatta, D. di Bernardo, T. Down, P. Engstrom, M. Fagiolini, G. Faulkner, C. F. Fletcher, T. Fukushima, M. Furuno, S. Futaki, M. Gariboldi, P. Georgii-Hemming, T. R. Gingeras, T. Gojobori, R. E. Green, S. Gustincich, M. Harbers, Y. Hayashi, T. K. Hensch, N. Hirokawa, D. Hill, L. Huminiecki, M. Iacono, K. Ikeo, A. Iwama, T. Ishikawa, M. Jakt, A. Kanapin, M. Katoh, Y. Kawasawa, J. Kelso, H. Kitamura, H. Kitano, G. Kollias, S. P. Krishnan, A. Kruger, S. K. Kummerfeld, I. V. Kurochkin, L. F. Lareau, D. Lazarevic, L. Lipovich, J. Liu, S. Liuni, S. McWilliam, M. Madan Babu, M. Madera, L. Marchionni, H. Matsuda, S. Matsuzawa, H. Miki, F. Mignone, S. Miyake, K. Morris, S. Mottagui-Tabar, N. Mulder, N. Nakano, H. Nakauchi, P. Ng, R. Nilsson, S. Nishiguchi, S. Nishikawa, et al. 2005. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309:1559-1563.
14. Casolari, J. M., C. R. Brown, S. Komili, J. West, H. Hieronymus, and P. A. Silver. 2004. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117:427-439.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Chen, S., R. W. West, Jr., J. Ma, S. L. Johnson, H. Gans, and G. Woldehawariat. 1993. TSF1 to TSF6, required for silencing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes, are global regulatory genes. Genetics 134:701-716.[Abstract]
16. Chen, S., R. W. J. West, S. L. Johnson, H. Gans, B. Kruger, and J. Ma. 1993. TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by
2 repressor and is identical to SIN4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:831-840.
17. Christianson, T. W., R. S. Sikorski, M. Dante, J. H. Shero, and P. Hieter. 1992. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110:119-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Clark-Adams, C. D., D. Norris, M. A. Osley, J. S. Fassler, and F. Winston. 1988. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 2:150-159.
19. Conlan, R. S., and D. Tzamarias. 2001. Sfl1 functions via the co-repressor Ssn6-Tup1 and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase Tpk2. J. Mol. Biol. 309:1007-1015.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Covitz, P. A., W. Song, and A. P. Mitchell. 1994. Requirement for RGR1 and SIN4 in RME1-dependent repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 138:577-586.[Abstract]
21. Davis, J. L., R. Kunisawa, and J. Thorner. 1992. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1879-1892.
22. de Bruin, D., Z. Zaman, R. A. Liberatore, and M. Ptashne. 2001. Telomere looping permits gene activation by a downstream UAS in yeast. Nature 409:109-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Dekker, J., K. Rippe, M. Dekker, and N. Kleckner. 2002. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295:1306-1311.
24. Dollard, C., S. L. Ricupero-Hovasse, G. Natsoulis, J. D. Boeke, and F. Winston. 1994. SPT10 and SPT21 are required for transcription of particular histone genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5223-5228.
25. Dorsett, D. 1999. Distant liaisons: long-range enhancer-promoter interactions in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:505-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Eriksson, P. R., G. Mendiratta, N. B. McLaughlin, T. G. Wolfsberg, L. Marino-Ramirez, T. A. Pompa, M. Jainerin, D. Landsman, C. H. Shen, and D. J. Clark. 2005. Global regulation by the yeast Spt10 protein is mediated through chromatin structure and the histone upstream activating sequence elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:9127-9137.
27. Fassler, J. S., and F. Winston. 1988. Isolation and analysis of a novel class of suppressor of Ty insertion mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 118:203-212.
28. Goffeau, A., B. G. Barrell, H. Bussey, R. W. Davis, B. Dujon, H. Feldmann, F. Galibert, J. D. Hoheisel, C. Jacq, M. Johnston, E. J. Louis, H. W. Mewes, Y. Murakami, P. Philippsen, H. Tettelin, and S. G. Oliver. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274:546-567.
29. Goldstein, A. L., and J. H. McCusker. 1999. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15:1541-1553.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Guarente, L. 1988. UASs and enhancers: common mechanism of transcriptional activation in yeast and mammals. Cell 52:303-305.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Guarente, L., and E. Hoar. 1984. Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:7860-7864.
32. Herendeen, D. R., G. A. Kassavetis, and E. P. Geiduschek. 1992. A transcriptional enhancer whose function imposes a requirement that proteins track along DNA. Science 256:1298-1303.
33. Hershkovits, G., H. Bangio, R. Cohen, and D. J. Katcoff. 2006. Recruitment of mRNA cleavage/polyadenylation machinery by the yeast chromatin protein Sin1p/Spt2p. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:9808-9813.
34. Hess, D., B. Liu, N. R. Roan, R. Sternglanz, and F. Winston. 2004. Spt10-dependent transcriptional activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires both the Spt10 acetyltransferase domain and Spt21. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:135-143.
35. Hirschhorn, J. N., S. A. Brown, C. D. Clark, and F. Winston. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 6:2288-2298.
36. Iyer, V., and K. Struhl. 1995. Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:7059-7066.[Abstract]
37. Jiang, Y. W., P. R. Dohrmann, and D. J. Stillman. 1995. Genetic and physical interactions between yeast RGR1 and SIN4 in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation. Genetics 140:47-54.[Abstract]
38. Jiang, Y. W., and D. J. Stillman. 1992. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4503-4514.
39. Jiang, Y. W., and D. J. Stillman. 1995. Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator. Genetics 140:103-114.[Abstract]
40. Kadonaga, J. T. 2002. The DPE, a core promoter element for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Exp. Mol. Med. 34:259-264.[Medline]
41. Kaplan, C. D., L. Laprade, and F. Winston. 2003. Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301:1096-1099.
42. Kong, S., D. Bohl, C. Li, and D. Tuan. 1997. Transcription of the HS2 enhancer toward a cis-linked gene is independent of the orientation, position, and distance of the enhancer relative to the gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3955-3965.