| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2007, p. 568-578, Vol. 27, No. 2
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00731-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Hiromitsu Watanabe,1
Katsuhiko Shirahige,1,
Takehiko Kobayashi,2 and
Hisaji Maki1*
Department of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan,1 National Institute of Basic Biology and SOKENDAI, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan2
Received 27 April 2006/ Returned for modification 22 May 2006/ Accepted 30 October 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the initiation proteins, ORC (origin recognition complex) plays a central role in initiating replication by associating with the replication origin and recruiting other replication factors (2, 4, 15). ORC also composes the chromatin environment near origins, which determines the timing of origin firing during chromosomal replication (28). Using yeast cells defective in ORC function, we have shown previously that chromosome loss, allelic recombination, and other chromosomal aberrations are induced in cells grown at the restrictive temperature but that this chromosomal instability is efficiently suppressed by DNA damage checkpoint control functions (38). Yeast orc mutants with temperature-sensitive (ts) growth phenotypes show either a severe defect in entering the S phase of the cell cycle or a reduced capacity to regulate the timing and efficiency of origin firing at nonpermissive temperatures (4, 15, 20, 26, 33, 34, 38). In the latter case, at the nonpermissive temperature, cells divide with a slightly prolonged S phase that correlates with mildly reduced efficiencies of origin firing at several replication origins examined, indicating that the origin firing is not abolished but is perturbed to some extent. However, following two or three rounds of cell division after the shift up to the restrictive temperature, the cell cycle is arrested at the G2/M boundary and cells start to die after prolonged incubation. These cell fate characteristics after the temperature shift were observed with orc1-4 cells at 37°C and orc2-1 cells at 26°C (38). We found that the G2/M arrest and subsequent cell death in the orc mutants were suppressed by a rad9 null mutation, thus revealing that RAD9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint control is activated in orc mutant cells when the initiation program of chromosomal DNA replication is perturbed. This implies that some DNA lesion(s) with a perturbed initiation program is produced in cells and triggers the checkpoint response which ensures genome integrity, either by blocking cell cycle progression at the G2/M boundary until the lesions are properly repaired or by inducing cell death if they are not. It was recently shown that Mec1p, which functions upstream of Rad9p in checkpoint control, is responsible for the induction of yeast apoptotic processes in orc2-1 cells that include the production of reactive oxygen species and activation of the metacaspase Yca1p (9, 39). The checkpoint-mediated apoptotic program is likely to be involved in the cell death phenotype observed with orc1-4 and orc2-1 mutants at nonpermissive temperatures.
It is largely unknown how DNA lesions are produced by perturbation of origin firing. Here, we provide evidence that the rRNA gene (rDNA) cluster (rDNA array) is the site most sensitive to such lesions in the yeast genome and primarily signals an abnormality in the initiation program to the DNA damage checkpoint control. The rDNA is a highly repetitive DNA sequence, usually in a head-to-tail consecutive configuration, and comprises one to several huge clusters in eukaryotic genomes. In budding yeast, the rDNA array resides in a single cluster of about 150 copies, occupying about 60% of chromosome XII (Chr XII). Besides the 5S and 35S rRNA genes, each unit of the rDNA contains a replication origin (rDNA autonomously replicating sequence [ARS]) and an orientation-specific replication terminus (replication fork barrier [RFB]) that functions with a replication-blocking protein, Fob1p. Yeast cells, and probably most eukaryotes, possess an elaborate mechanism for actively maintaining the high copy number of the rDNA (24). This maintenance mechanism controls and utilizes sister chromatid recombination and involves the action of Fob1p on the RFB. We initially found extremely high Chr XII instability in orc mutant cells grown at the nonpermissive temperature. Further studies revealed that DNA lesions were induced much more quickly and frequently within the rDNA locus than at other chromosomal loci when cells underwent perturbations of origin firing. During these experiments, we found that orc mutant clones surviving a prolonged incubation at the restrictive temperature included some having extensively shortened rDNA. Surprisingly, these surviving clones with truncated rDNA were cured of the ts phenotype. The reduction in the rDNA copy number also compromised the activation of the DNA damage checkpoint response upon perturbation of origin firing in the orc mutants. Furthermore, in orc2-1 cells, completion of chromosomal duplication was delayed specifically on Chr XII, and this delay was partially suppressed when the rDNA copy number was reduced. More interestingly, relatively weak rDNA ARS origin activities were significantly increased in cells with reduced rDNA copy numbers. Therefore, the copy number of the rDNA is a crucial determinant for the capacity of the rDNA array to initiate DNA replication and, thus, for the sensitivity of the rDNA array to perturbed origin firing. These results suggest that the rDNA locus plays an important role in monitoring abnormality in the initiation program of chromosomal replication for DNA damage checkpoint control.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of orc1-4 and orc2-1 cells surviving after incubation at nonpermissive temperatures. Surviving orc1-4 cells (orc1-4 surviving cell [orc1-4 SvC]) were isolated from RD603 (orc1-4/orc1-4) as described previously (38). RD603 cells were incubated in YPD at 37°C for 24 h, spread on YPD plates after appropriate dilution, and incubated at 23°C until colonies of surviving cells were formed. Six independent colonies were picked and named orc1-4 SvC a to f. Surviving orc2-1 cells were isolated from YNV1 in the same way, except that the YNV1 cells were incubated in YPD at 26°C for 12 h. Eight independent colonies were picked and named orc2-1 SvC1 to SvC8.
Analysis of yeast chromosomes by PFGE. Samples for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were prepared as described previously (19). To determine the size of Chr XII, electrophoresis was carried out with a 0.8% agarose gel with Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE), using a CHEF Mapper XA with a pulse time of 20 min to 22 min 53 s, at 2.0 V/cm, and at an include angle of 106° for 72 h at 14°C in block1 and with a pulse time of 25 s to 2 min 26 s, at 6.0 V/cm, and at an include angle of 120° for 7.5 h at 14°C in block2. Following electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml) for 30 min, destained in deionized water for 20 min, photographed, and then subjected to Southern hybridization analysis, using a probe for the site proximate to YLL058W on Chr XII (probe 058). To analyze Chr XII in exponentially growing cells, electrophoresis was carried out with a 1.0% agarose gel with 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE), using a CHEF-DRIII with a pulse time of 0.2 s to 266 s, at 6.0 V/cm, and at an include angle of 120° for 15.2 h at 14°C. Southern hybridization was performed with probe 058 and a probe for the MCM2 gene on Chr II (probe MCM2).
Construction of orc2-1 and orc1-4 derivatives with reduced copy numbers of rDNA repeats.
Using hygromycin (300 µg/ml) and plasmid pRDN-hyg1, cells carrying Chr XII with extensively reduced copy numbers of rDNA repeats were constructed (10). To construct orc2-1 derivatives with reduced copy numbers of rDNA repeats, pRDN-hyg1 was introduced into NOY408-1bf. Hygromycin-resistant clones of the resulting transformant were selected. Based on the size of Chr XII determined by PFGE, a hygromycin-resistant clone whose rDNA copy number was about 30 was isolated and grown on an SC plate containing 5-fluoroorotic acid to drop the plasmid off. An orc2-1 mutation was introduced into the resulting strain (NOY408-1bf30) by the method of Foss et al. (15). For orc1-4 derivatives, YSI7 (orc1-4 MATa) cells were transformed with pRDN-hyg1 and mated with YMJ26 (orc1-4 MAT
), and the resulting diploid strain (RD702) was grown in the presence of hygromycin, from which a hygromycin-resistant clone (RD703) was selected. These strains with reduced copy numbers of rDNA repeats were maintained on hygromycin until the cells were spotted on a YPD plate or precultured in YPD liquid medium at 23°C.
Determination of ARS plasmid loss rate.
Plasmids YCplac111 (ARS1) (17) and pRS414 (ARSH4) (35) were introduced separately into NOY408-1bf (fob1
), NOY408-1bf30 (fob1
rdn
30), YNV2 (orc2-1 fob1
), and YNV15 (orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30). Transformants were inoculated into nonselective medium (SC) and maintained in exponential-phase growth at 23°C for 3 days. Aliquots were withdrawn at various times, spread onto SC plates and SC-Trp or SC-Leu plates after appropriate dilution, and incubated at 23°C until colonies formed. The percentage of cells losing the plasmid per generation was determined as described previously (11).
Western blotting. Yeast whole-cell extracts were prepared by the trichloroacetic acid method (29). Proteins were fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), and subjected to Western blotting analysis as described previously (32). For detection of Rad53p, antihemagglutinin monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (Roche) was used. For detection of Orc2p and Mcm2p, affinity-purified anti-Orc2p antibody (a gift from Y. Kawasaki, Osaka University) and goat anti-MCM antibody (Santa Cruz Antibodies) were used, respectively.
FACS analysis. To measure cellular DNA content, cells were stained with propidium iodide and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with a Becton Dickinson FACScan and Cell Quest software.
2D gel electrophoresis analysis of replication intermediates. The origin activities of rDNA ARS and ARS1 were analyzed by two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and quantified using a Bio-Image BAS2000 analyzer (Fuji Photo Film) as described previously (5).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
cells, the hyperinstability of Chr XII was seen as early as the 2.5-h time point and, thus, was probably induced immediately after the temperature shift. This also clearly indicated that the stability of Chr XII is maintained by checkpoint control until 2.5 h after the temperature shift, as for other chromosomes, but that Chr XII became unstable at some time between the 2.5-h and 5-h time points in those cells where checkpoint control was still functioning to suppress rigorously the instability of other chromosomes. In orc1-4 rad9
diploid cells where DNA damage checkpoint control was not functioning, the instability of Chr III began to increase sharply immediately after the temperature shift (38). The frequency of LOH, mostly chromosome loss events, for the URA3 marker on Chr III was 2.7 x 103 at 5 h after the temperature shift (38), whereas almost all of the orc1-4 rad9
cells suffered size aberration of Chr XII at the same time point (Fig. 1C). From these data, we speculated that very soon after the temperature shift, DNA lesions would be induced within every Chr XII at an extremely high frequency and within other chromosomes at much lower frequencies and that all the DNA lesions could be properly corrected by functions of DNA damage checkpoint control before the 2.5-h time point. However, these functions would become insufficient to correct completely the DNA lesions within Chr XII after the 2.5-h time point, whereas lesions within other chromosomes were still efficiently corrected until the catastrophic time point (Fig. 1A). The extent of DNA lesions afflicting Chr XII may surpass the capacities of repair functions that suppress chromosome aberration. orc mutant cells carrying extensively shortened Chr XIIs are cured of the ts phenotype. As shown in Fig. 1B, about one-third of orc1-4 clones that survived heat treatment at 37°C for 24 h carried a very small Chr XII. We found that the surviving orc1-4 clones with extensively shortened Chr XIIs (SvC a and c) were able to grow at 37°C (Fig. 2). Such very small Chr XIIs, with deletions exceeding 500 kb, probably reflect a severe reduction in the copy number of rDNA repeats. Therefore, we reasoned that the reduced copy numbers of the rDNA repeats might lead to the suppression of the ts phenotype in orc1-4 diploid cells.
|
|
mutation, a series of strains stably inheriting 30 copies of the rDNA repeats (rdn
30) was constructed and used to determine whether the reduction of the rDNA copy number alone is the reason for the suppression of the ts phenotype observed with the heat-surviving orc mutants. The orc2-1 point mutation was introduced into a fob1
rdn
30 strain as well as a fob1
strain with the normal copy number of rDNA. The copy number in each strain was examined by measuring the size of Chr XII by PFGE (Fig. 4A) and by Southern hybridization with probes specific for rDNA after digestion of the chromosomal DNA with BglII (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
|
rdn
30 strain was able to form colonies at the nonpermissive temperature, 26°C, but not at 28°C. The growth pattern of the ts phenotype is the same as that observed with orc2-1 SvC1. In FACS profiles of orc2-1 and orc2-1 fob1
strains, the proportions of cells in G1 phase were significantly reduced even at 23°C, and cell cycle arrest at G2/M was clearly seen at 9 h after the shift to 26°C (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30 cells grown at 23°C contained more G1-phase cells, and G2/M arrest was not observed at the 9-h time point after the temperature shift. Consistent with these observations, Rad53p was mostly phosphorylated in orc2-1 and orc2-1 fob1
cells grown at 23°C (Fig. 4C, 0 h) and the amount of phosphorylated Rad53p increased in these cells after the temperature shift. In orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30 cells grown at 23°C (0 h) and treated at 26°C for 3 h, however, a significant proportion of Rad53p remained unphosphorylated. The accumulation of Rad53p after the temperature shift was mitigated in the orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30 cells. Similar results were obtained with orc1-4 diploid cells with reduced copy numbers of rDNA (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). These data clearly indicate that the reduction of the rDNA copy number leads to the suppression of the ts phenotype of orc mutant strains by a weakening of the checkpoint response in the mutant cells at the restrictive temperature. It appeared, therefore, that the generation of DNA lesions in orc mutant cells, and/or the subsequent transmission of the checkpoint signal to Rad53p, would be affected by the reduction of the rDNA copy number.
Reduced rDNA copy numbers affect neither the impaired origin-firing capacities in orc2-1 cells nor the cellular function of DNA damage checkpoint control.
Since the rDNA array contains about 150 ORC-binding sites, one-fourth of the total number of ORC-binding sites in the genome (3), the ratio of ORC molecules to ARS-containing DNA segments may increase in cells with reduced copy numbers of rDNA. It was also shown that the ts phenotype of orc2-1 is suppressed by increasing the level of mutated Orc2p (33). Thus, it seemed probable that the reduction in the total number of ORC-binding sites per cell could restore the impaired ORC function in the orc mutants, thereby decreasing the checkpoint response at the restrictive temperature. To clarify this possibility, we examined the origin-firing capacities in orc2-1 cells with reduced rDNA copy numbers by measuring the loss rates for plasmids carrying either ARS1 or ARSH4 in the orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30 strain grown at a permissive temperature, 23°C. Yeast mutants defective in the origin-firing process, such as orc and mcm mutants, often exhibit a high index of ARS plasmid loss at the permissive temperature because they frequently fail to initiate DNA replication from the plasmid-borne origin in every cell cycle (15). ORC2 wild-type strains (ORC2 fob1
and ORC2 fob1
rdn
30) lost each plasmid at rates of less than 5% per generation under nonselective conditions for the plasmids. On the other hand, the orc2-1 fob1
mutant showed highly elevated plasmid loss rates of 15% for ARS1 and 21% for ARSH4. The high plasmid loss rate, indicative of the impaired origin-firing capacities in orc2-1 cells, was unchanged when the rDNA copy number was reduced to 30 in the orc2-1 mutant (see Fig. S3A in the supplemental material). In addition, we confirmed that intracellular concentrations of mutant Orc2p in orc2-1 fob1
and orc2-1 fob1
rdn
30 strains were the same at 23°C and decreased in similar manners after the temperature shift (see Fig. S3B in the supplemental material). These results clearly indicate that the defective ORC function in the orc2-1 cells was unchanged by the reduction of the rDNA copy number and that the suppression of the ts phenotype of orc2-1 was not due to a recovery of ORC function.
The conclusion described above strongly suggested that the reduction of the rDNA copy number made cells ineffective for activation of the DNA damage checkpoint control against the perturbation of origin firing. This suggested in turn that the DNA damage checkpoint might malfunction when the rDNA copy number is greatly decreased. We therefore examined the DNA damage checkpoint response after treatment of the fob1
rdn
30 cells with a DNA alkylating agent, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). The progression of the cell cycle and the phosphorylation of Rad53p were analyzed for wild-type, fob1
, and fob1
rdn
30 cells grown in liquid medium containing MMS. The cell cycle in fob1
rdn
30 cells was completely arrested at the G2/M boundary by 180 min after the addition of MMS to the medium, with the same pattern of DNA damage checkpoint response as those observed with the wild type (FOB1) and fob1
cells. The time courses and the extents of Rad53p phosphorylation after the MMS treatment were also the same in all three strains (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). From these data, we concluded that the sensing, transmitting, and executing functions of the DNA damage checkpoint control were normal in cells with reduced rDNA copy numbers.
Completion of chromosomal duplication is delayed specifically for Chr XII in orc2-1 cells and is relieved by reducing the rDNA copy number.
Considering that the function of DNA damage checkpoint control was not affected in cells with extensively reduced copy numbers of rDNA, we speculated that the reduction of rDNA repeats to 30 copies would significantly decrease the total number of DNA lesions per cell when origin firing was perturbed in orc mutants at restrictive temperatures. If the DNA lesions induced within the rDNA array accounted for the vast majority of all DNA lesions within the whole genome of orc mutant cells, the reduction of the rDNA copy number would compromise the activation of the checkpoint response and suppress the ts phenotype of the orc mutants. To ascertain that DNA lesions are induced more frequently within the rDNA locus than at other chromosomal loci and that the DNA lesions are reduced by the extensive reduction of the rDNA copy number, we compared the status of Chr XII with that of Chr II in the orc2-1 cells with and without rdn
30 after incubation for 6 h at 26°C, the nonpermissive temperature for the mutant.
Using PFGE, in which chromosomes with branched DNA structures, such as replication forks and recombination intermediates, cannot migrate (18, 23), we measured the proportion of chromosomes undergoing DNA replication or recombination for Chr II and Chr XII (Fig. 5). In exponentially growing wild-type cells at 23°C, 35 to 40% of both chromosomes did not migrate in PFGE, reflecting chromosomes with branched DNA structures. The percentages of immobile Chr II and Chr XII were unchanged when the wild-type cells were grown at 26°C. In orc2-1 cells grown at 23°C, the PFGE-immobile fraction of Chr II was also 35 to 40%. When the orc2-1 cells were incubated at 26°C for 6 h, the percentage of immobile Chr II was unchanged. This clearly indicated that the duplication of Chr II in orc2-1 cells was completed in almost the same time at 23°C and 26°C. On the other hand, the PFGE-immobile fraction of Chr XII increased visibly in the orc2-1 cells; 50% of Chr XII in orc2-1 cells grown at 23°C did not enter the gel, and this proportion increased to 75% when the cells were grown at 26°C. Furthermore, using
-factor-mediated synchronization of the cell cycle, we examined the fate of Chr XII during S phase in wild-type and orc2-1 cells at 23°C (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material). Even at the permissive temperature, the PFGE-immobile fraction of Chr XII in orc2-1, but not wild-type, cells remained beyond the G2/M boundary, whereas duplication of other chromosomes was fully completed by this stage. From these observations, we concluded that completion of chromosomal replication and/or sister chromatid recombination was delayed specifically for Chr XII in orc2-1 cells. This Chr XII-specific delay strongly suggested that DNA lesions were induced more frequently within Chr XII than within other chromosomes in orc2-1 mutant cells. The reduction of the rDNA copy number relieved the delay in Chr XII duplication (Fig. 5), whereas deletion of the FOB1 gene had little effect on the delay (data not shown). The proportion of PFGE-immobile Chr XII was reduced from 75% in orc2-1 cells to 43% in orc2-1 rdn
30 cells grown at 26°C. It appears that the copy number of rDNA affects the delay in the completion of Chr XII duplication and thus determines the extent of DNA lesions occurring within the rDNA locus.
|
|
30 was introduced and thus became comparable to those in the wild-type strain. However, this enhancement of the origin activities of rDNA ARSs was not confined to the orc2-1 strain: the origin activities of rDNA ARSs were also enhanced twofold when the copy number of rDNA was reduced in an ORC2-proficient strain (Fig. 7). Therefore, in the genetic background with rdn
30, the origin activities of rDNA ARSs were affected by orc2-1 mutation, being reduced to about 50% of that in the ORC2-proficient strain (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). This implies that the defect in origin-firing capacity in the orc2-1 strain was not restored per se but was relieved by an increased competence of rDNA ARSs for initiating DNA replication when the copy number of rDNA was reduced to 30. The pausing of replication at 5S rRNA genes was apparently increased in the ORC2 rdn
30 strain as well as in the orc2-1 rdn
30 strain. From these results, we concluded that the level of origin activity for rDNA ARSs or the efficiency of origin firing at rDNA ARSs is an important determinant for activation of DNA damage checkpoint control.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rDNA locus becomes extremely fragile when the initiation program is perturbed.
In orc1-4 and orc2-1 mutant cells incubated at the restrictive temperature for 24 h, size aberrations in Chr XII, attributable to a reduction in the copy number of rDNA repeats, occurred at an extremely high frequency and nearly all the cells suffered. However, this extreme instability of the rDNA array was not seen in orc1-4 cells for the first several hours after the temperature shift. This is because RAD9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint control is activated immediately after the temperature shift and promotes proper repair of the lesions produced in the rDNA locus. In orc1-4 rad9
cells, where the checkpoint control was compromised, hyperinstability of Chr XII was induced immediately in all the cells after the temperature shift. On the other hand, the frequency of chromosomal aberration in Chr III, mostly chromosome loss, increased greatly in orc1-4 rad9
diploid cells grown at the restrictive temperature for 24 h but was detected only in less than 0.1% of the cells (38). Furthermore, in contrast to what was found for the orc1-4 rad9
cells, Chr III was maintained stably in orc2-1 rad9
cells grown at 26°C, the restrictive temperature for the orc2-1 mutant cells, for 24 h (38). This is consistent with the finding that the delay in the completion of chromosomal duplication was confined to Chr XII in orc2-1 cells grown at 26°C. These observations indicate that the rDNA locus is the site most sensitive to PIP DNA lesions within the yeast genome.
PIP DNA lesions induced within the rDNA locus. What is the nature of the lesion induced within the rDNA locus when the initiation program of DNA replication is perturbed? The most likely candidate for the PIP DNA lesion is a stalled replication fork, because completion of chromosomal replication was delayed specifically on Chr XII in orc2-1 cells. It seems probable that a reduction in the efficiency of origin firing would lead to an enlargement in the average size of the replicons. In such a case, replication forks would travel a longer distance and sometimes move in the wrong direction; consequently, there would be more chance for the replication fork to encounter obstacles on the DNA, such as spontaneous DNA damage, proteins bound to DNA for various DNA transactions, and particular chromatin structures unsuitable for DNA replication. Indeed, a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) that contains a 170-kb region lacking efficient replication origins triggers RAD9-dependent checkpoint control, and the YAC becomes unstable in the absence of Rad9p, indicating chronic induction of DNA lesions in cells carrying the origin-deficient YAC (37). Since each rDNA unit (9.1 kb) possesses a replication origin (ARS), the rDNA locus is a unique chromosomal region, having the highest density of ARSs in the yeast genome (7). One in five ARSs in the rDNA array initiates bidirectional DNA replication, and several adjacent ARSs simultaneously fire to replicate a subcluster of the rDNA array (6, 27, 30). Therefore, the size of a replicon involved in rDNA replication seems to be tightly regulated by the initiation program for this specialized chromosomal region, and the replicons in the subcluster would be maintained as the smallest in the yeast genome. If the efficiency of origin firing were reduced in the rDNA array, such small replicons would be substantially enlarged, and the probability for each replication fork to stall would be increased. On the other hand, the gap between each cluster is larger than 60 kb. Although it is not known whether the DNA segment corresponding to the gap is replicated as a single replicon or as clusters of many replicons, the rDNA locus may contain replicons larger than the average size for replicons on other chromosomes, about 46 kb (25, 30). If the gap segment is a single and very large replicon, perturbation of origin firing would result in the emergence of further larger replicons within the rDNA array.
However, the extremely high instability of the rDNA array may not be attributable only to an enlarged replicon in the rDNA array. We reasoned that the stalled replication fork may involve the transcription of 5S rRNA, of which one gene is located in each rDNA segment. In an rDNA unit which initiates bidirectional DNA replication from the origin, one replication fork proceeds in the same direction as the transcription of 5S rRNA and the other proceeds in the same direction as the transcription of 35S rRNA. When the former replication fork reaches the RFB site, it stops and never goes beyond the RFB site. In contrast, the latter proceeds over the RFB site and enters the adjacent rDNA unit if it has not been replicated. This is because RFB is highly orientation dependent (6, 24). Thus, head-on collisions between replication and transcription machineries within the 35S rRNA gene region are always prevented by the RFB, whereas such collisions are unavoidable within the 5S rRNA gene region in passively replicated rDNA units (12). Probably, in wild-type cells, one replication fork moving in the same direction as the 35S rRNA needs to pass through a 5S rRNA gene region several times in a direction opposite to that of the 5S rRNA transcription. When origin firing is perturbed within the rDNA array, each of a reduced number of replication forks would have to traverse a greater number of rDNA segments, leading to a heightened replication stress that arises on passing through the 5S rRNA gene.
The model described above is supported by the results of 2D gel analysis, which indicated that collisions between replication fork and transcription machineries within the 5S rRNA gene were more frequent in orc2-1 cells (Fig. 6) (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). However, an increased frequency of such collisions was also observed in cells with shorter rDNA arrays, even though the function of the ORC was normal. This is probably because, like the increased level of 35S rRNA transcription in cells with reduced copy numbers of rDNA (36), each 5S rRNA gene in the rDNA array would be much more actively transcribed. The reduction of rDNA copy numbers simultaneously enhanced the origin activities of rDNA ARSs, resulting in a reduction of replicon size in the rDNA array. Therefore, in cells with shorter rDNA arrays, collision between replication and transcription machineries may occur in a chromatin context distinct from that in cells with normal-sized rDNA arrays and be processed properly to avoid harmful consequences from the collision.
Interplay between PIP DNA lesions and DNA damage checkpoint control within the rDNA locus. Another unique feature of the rDNA locus is the interplay occurring between the hyperinstability of the rDNA array and DNA damage checkpoint control. In RAD9-proficient orc1-4 cells, checkpoint control was activated by the PIP DNA lesions produced within the rDNA array immediately after the temperature shift and functioned to maintain the integrity of all chromosomes, including Chr XII. However, at some time between 2.5 and 5 h after the temperature shift, Chr XII became unstable, even though checkpoint control continued to suppress rigorously the instability of other chromosomes. This indicates that the PIP DNA lesions within the rDNA locus increased to a level beyond the capacities of repair functions powered by checkpoint control and remained unrepaired thereafter. It is of interest that PIP DNA lesions on chromosomes other than Chr XII were adequately repaired until the catastrophic (10-h) time point, beyond which the cells started to cancel the G2/M cell cycle arrest and to undergo cell death (Fig. 1A). As a result, it seems likely that DNA damage checkpoint control is continuously activated by the unrepaired PIP DNA lesions within the rDNA array in cells with perturbed initiation programs. Thus, the fragility of the rDNA may greatly help cells to monitor abnormalities in the initiation program of DNA replication.
rDNA copy number modulates the sensitivity of DNA damage checkpoint control in monitoring the perturbation of origin firing. When the rDNA copy numbers were extensively reduced in orc1-4 and orc2-1 cells, the activation of checkpoint control after the temperature shift was weakened. It is clear that the reduction of the rDNA copy number affects neither the deficiency of orc mutants in origin-firing capacity nor the cellular capacity of DNA damage checkpoint control. In cells with extensively reduced rDNA copy numbers, the amounts of DNA lesions produced within the shortened rDNA array are probably greatly reduced and more readily repaired, resulting in feeble activation of checkpoint control. The balance between the extent of DNA lesions produced within the rDNA locus and the cell's capacity for DNA repair would determine the duration of the DNA damage checkpoint response: the lower the rDNA copy number, the fewer the PIP DNA lesions produced within the rDNA locus and the shorter the duration of the checkpoint response. Therefore, the rDNA copy number is an important factor that modulates the sensitivity of DNA damage checkpoint control in responding to a reduced capacity for initiation of DNA replication.
The rDNA array plays an important role in genome maintenance.
From the above-described considerations, we propose that the rDNA array functions as a sensor to monitor perturbation in the initiation program of chromosomal replication and counteracts unfavorable fluctuations of initiation potential during the course of S-phase progression. Although little is known about the programmed origin firing for the multiple origins within the eukaryotic genome, the initiation potential is expected to be maintained at a certain level throughout S phase, perhaps fluctuating slightly as is usually found in biological phenomena. As we observed with the orc1-4 rad9
strain, cells could tolerate under initiation as well as overinitiation if the extent of such variation were small. However, even to a small degree, fluctuation of initiation potential could lead to genetic instability. Cells are able to avoid such a fatal risk if they are equipped with a feedback loop for the controlling mechanism. The rDNA array seems to be ideal for such a feedback loop: it is highly sensitive to perturbation of origin firing, is readily reparable by sister chromatid recombination, and is highly plastic because of its repetitive nature. A certain minimum level of repetitiveness is required for the rDNA array to act properly as a monitor for perturbation of the initiation program. We postulate that yeast cells maintain the copy numbers of rDNA at around 150 to attune the sensitivity of this monitoring function to fluctuations of initiation potential.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge the financial support of Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (17013060 to H.M.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. S.I. was supported by the 21st Century Center of Excellence Program (Graduate School of Biological Sciences, NAIST) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 13 November 2006. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
Present address: Cancer Research United Kingdom, London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Potters Bar EN6 3LD, United Kingdom. ![]()
Present address: Tokyo Institute of Technology, Center for Biological Resources and Informatics, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bell, S. P. 2002. The origin recognition complex: from simple origins to complex functions. Genes Dev. 16:659-672.
3. Bell, S. P., and A. Dutta. 2002. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71:333-374.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bell, S. P., R. Kobayashi, and B. Stillman. 1993. Yeast origin recognition complex functions in transcription silencing and DNA replication. Science 262:1844-1849.
5. Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman. 1987. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51:463-471.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman. 1988. A replication fork barrier at the 3' end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes. Cell 55:637-643.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Brewer, B. J., and W. L. Fangman. 1991. Mapping replication origins in yeast chromosomes. BioEssays 13:317-322.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Bruschi, C. V., J. N. McMillan, M. Coglievina, and M. S. Esposito. 1995. The genomic instability of yeast cdc6-1/cdc6-1 mutants involves chromosome structure and recombination. Mol. Gen. Genet. 249:8-18.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Burhans, W. C., M. Weinberger, M. A. Marchetti, L. Ramachandran, G. D'Urso, and J. A. Huberman. 2003. Apoptosis-like yeast cell death in response to DNA damage and replication defects. Mutat. Res. 532:227-243.[Medline]
10. Chernoff, Y. O., A. Vincent, and S. W. Liebman. 1994. Mutations in eukaryotic 18S ribosomal RNA affect translational fidelity and resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. EMBO J. 13:906-913.[Medline]
11. Dani, G. M., and V. A. Zakian. 1983. Mitotic and meiotic stability of linear plasmids in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:3406-3410.
12. Deshpande, A. M., and C. S. Newlon. 1996. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272:1030-1033.[Abstract]
13. Ekholm-Reed, S., J. Mendez, D. Tedesco, A. Zetterberg, B. Stillman, and S. I. Reed. 2004. Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 165:789-800.
14. Elble, R., and B. K. Tye. 1992. Chromosome loss, hyperrecombination, and cell cycle arrest in a yeast mcm1 mutant. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:971-980.[Abstract]
15. Foss, M., F. J. McNally, P. Laurenson, and J. Rine. 1993. Origin recognition complex (ORC) in transcriptional silencing and DNA replication in S. cerevisiae. Science 262:1838-1844.
16. Friedman, K. L., B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman. 1997. Replication profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Genes Cells 2:667-678.[Abstract]
17. Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527-534.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Hennessy, K. M., A. Lee, E. Chen, and D. Botstein. 1991. A group of interacting yeast DNA replication genes. Genes Dev. 5:958-969.
19. Hiraoka, M., K. Watanabe, K. Umezu, and H. Maki. 2000. Spontaneous loss of heterozygosity in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Genetics 156:1531-1548.
20. Hori, Y., K. Shirahige, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa. 1996. Characterization of a novel CDC gene (ORC1) partly homologous to CDC6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:409-418.[Abstract]
21. Huang, D., and D. Koshland. 2003. Chromosome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the interplay of DNA replication initiation factors, elongation factors, and origins. Genes Dev. 17:1741-1754.
22. Jacobson, M. D., C. X. Munoz, K. S. Knox, B. E. Williams, L. L. Lu, F. R. Cross, and E. A. Vallen. 2001. Mutations in SID2, a novel gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cause synthetic lethality with sic1 deletion and may cause a defect during S phase. Genetics 159:17-33.
23. Kaliraman, V., and S. J. Brill. 2002. Role of SGS1 and SLX4 in maintaining rDNA structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 41:389-400.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Kobayashi, T., D. J. Heck, M. Nomura, and T. Horiuchi. 1998. Expansion and contraction of ribosomal DNA repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: requirement of replication fork blocking (Fob1) protein and the role of RNA polymerase I. Genes Dev. 12:3821-3830.
25. Lengronne, A., P. Pasero, A. Bensimon, and E. Schwob. 2001. Monitoring S phase progression globally and locally using BrdU incorporation in TK(+) yeast strains. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:1433-1442.
26. Liang, C., M. Weinreich, and B. Stillman. 1995. ORC and Cdc6p interact and determine the frequency of initiation of DNA replication in the genome. Cell 81:667-676.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Linskens, M. H., and J. A. Huberman. 1988. Organization of replication of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4927-4935.
28. Lipford, J. R., and S. P. Bell. 2001. Nucleosomes positioned by ORC facilitate the initiation of DNA replication. Mol. Cell 7:21-30.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Paciotti, V., G. Lucchini, P. Plevani, and M. P. Longhese. 1998. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 17:4199-4209.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Pasero, P., A. Bensimon, and E. Schwob. 2002. Single-molecule analysis reveals clustering and epigenetic regulation of replication origins at the yeast rDNA locus. Genes Dev. 16:2479-2484.
31. Raghuraman, M. K., E. A. Winzeler, D. Collingwood, S. Hunt, L. Wodicka, A. Conway, D. J. Lockhart, R. W. Davis, B. J. Brewer, and W. L. Fangman. 2001. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294:115-121.
32. Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
33. Shimada, K., P. Pasero, and S. M. Gasser. 2002. ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev. 16:3236-3252.
34. Shirahige, K., Y. Hori, K. Shiraishi, M. Yamashita, K. Takahashi, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, and H. Yoshikawa. 1998. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395:618-621.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
36. Takeuchi, Y., T. Horiuchi, and T. Kobayashi. 2003. Transcription-dependent recombination and the role of fork collision in yeast rDNA. Genes Dev. 17:1497-1506.
37. van Brabant, A. J., C. D. Buchanan, E. Charboneau, W. L. Fangman, and B. J. Brewer. 2001. An origin-deficient yeast artificial chromosome triggers a cell cycle checkpoint. Mol. Cell 7:705-713.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Watanabe, K., J. Morishita, K. Umezu, K. Shirahige, and H. Maki. 2002. Involvement of RAD9-dependent damage checkpoint control in arrest of cell cycle, induction of cell death, and chromosome instability caused by defects in origin recognition complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 1:200-212.
39. Weinberger, M., L. Ramachandran, L. Feng, K. Sharma, X. Sun, M. Marchetti, J. A. Huberman, and W. C. Burhans. 2005. Apoptosis in budding yeast caused by defects in initiation of DNA replication. J. Cell Sci. 118:3543-3553.
40. Yamashita, M., Y. Hori, T. Shinomiya, C. Obuse, T. Tsurimoto, H. Yoshikawa, and K. Shirahige. 1997. The efficiency and timing of initiation of replication of multiple replicons of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Genes Cells 2:655-665.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|