Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2007, p. 789-790, Vol. 27, No. 2
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.02173-06
| AUTHOR'S CORRECTION |
Department of Molecular Cellular Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Volume 26, no. 13, p. 5120-5130, 2006. In the course of examining the experiments in
this paper, we detected an error in that some of the strains used in the experiments shown in Fig. 5 and 6 were incorrect. In addition, an error was made in the preparation of Fig. 5, where a polysome tract was inadvertently used twice. To correct these errors, we reconstructed the pat1
sbp1
double mutants (yRP2168 and yRP2169) and
repeated the experiments with the correct strains.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] | FIG. 5. |
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] | FIG. 6. |
strain was able to repress translation essentially like the wild-type strain. This is in contrast to our earlier report that this single mutant was partially defective in translational repression during glucose deprivation. Second, we observed that the pat1
sbp1
double mutant is still defective at translation repression but to a more modest degree than previously reported.
Specifically, while the wild type undergoes
95% repression, the pat1
sbp1
strain undergoes approximately 40 to 50% repression (in contrast to the 11% repression that we previously reported). Thus, we still saw a two- to threefold decrease in translational repression in a pat1
sbp1
strain as compared to a pat1
strain, whereas previously, we saw almost a complete loss of translational repression in the pat1
sbp1
strain.
The differences in the degree of repression do not invalidate the conclusion of the paper that
Sbp1p can affect the process of translation repression and targeting of mRNAs to P-bodies for decapping, but they reduce the magnitude of the effect that sbp1
has on this process. Moreover, our
reexamination of this work argues that all the other figures in this paper are still valid and accurate.
We offer our sincere apologies for any inconvenience or wasted effort these errors may have caused for members of the scientific community.
Page 5125, legend to Fig. 5, line 1: "sbp1
fails to repress translation" should read "Translational repression is
affected in sbp1
strains."
Page 5126, legend to Fig. 6, line 1: "sbp1
strains" should read "pat1
sbp1
strains."
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»