Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Potthoff, M. J. Articles by Olson, E. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Potthoff, M. J. Articles by Olson, E. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2007, p. 8143-8151, Vol. 27, No. 23
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.01187-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Sarcomere Integrity and Postnatal Muscle Function by Mef2c

Matthew J. Potthoff,¹ Michael A. Arnold,¹ John McAnally,¹ James A. Richardson,^1,2 Rhonda Bassel-Duby,¹ and Eric N. Olson^1*

Departments of Molecular Biology,¹ Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9148²

Received 3 July 2007/ Returned for modification 21 July 2007/ Accepted 8 September 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) transcription factors cooperate with the MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors to drive skeletal muscle development during embryogenesis, but little is known about the potential functions of MEF2 factors in postnatal skeletal muscle. Here we show that skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Mef2c in mice results in disorganized myofibers and perinatal lethality. In contrast, neither Mef2a nor Mef2d is required for normal skeletal muscle development in vivo. Skeletal muscle deficient in Mef2c differentiates and forms normal myofibers during embryogenesis, but myofibers rapidly deteriorate after birth due to disorganized sarcomeres and a loss of integrity of the M line. Microarray analysis of Mef2c null muscles identified several muscle structural genes that depend on MEF2C, including those encoding the M-line-specific proteins myomesin and M protein. We show that MEF2C directly regulates myomesin gene transcription and that loss of Mef2c in skeletal muscle results in improper sarcomere organization. These results reveal a key role for Mef2c in maintenance of sarcomere integrity and postnatal maturation of skeletal muscle.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The formation of skeletal muscle involves the specification of myogenic progenitor cells within the somites followed by the activation of a large array of muscle-specific genes through the synergistic activities of the MyoD and myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) families of transcription factors (9, 32). Members of the MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, i.e., Myf5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF4, are expressed specifically in skeletal muscle and are each capable of activating the muscle gene program when expressed in nonmuscle cells (reviewed in references 5, 41, 49, and 54). Loss-of-function studies have shown that that MyoD^–/–; Myf5^–/– double-knockout mice fail to develop skeletal muscle (50), reflecting redundant roles of these genes in the establishment of the skeletal muscle lineage. Mrf4 has also been implicated in specification of muscle cell fate (25), whereas myogenin is required for skeletal muscle terminal differentiation (23, 36).

The myogenic bHLH factors interact with MEF2 factors to cooperatively activate muscle-specific genes (32). MEF2 factors alone do not possess myogenic activity, but potentiate the activity of bHLH factors (32). The MEF2 proteins, MEF2A, -B, -C, and -D contain a conserved N-terminal MADS (MCM1, agamous, deficiens, SRF) domain and an adjacent MEF2-specific domain which, together, are necessary and sufficient for dimerization, cofactor interactions, and binding to the DNA consensus sequence CTA(A/T)₄TAG (4, 33, 45, 46, 61).

Based on their expression patterns in vivo and activities in vitro, MEF2 factors are believed to function downstream of the bHLH transcription factors in the pathway for skeletal muscle development (18, 31, 34, 57). However, the promoters of the myogenin (12, 16, 19, 60) and Mrf4 (8, 37) genes contain MEF2 binding sites that provide a mechanism for amplifying and maintaining their expression and stabilizing the muscle phenotype (34). The Mef2c gene also serves as a direct target of myogenic bHLH and MEF2 factors, which serve to further reinforce the decision of myoblasts to differentiate (57). Thus, the expression and activities of these two classes of myogenic transcription factors are intimately integrated through multiple regulatory mechanisms (34, 46, 57).

During mouse embryogenesis, MEF2 proteins display distinct but overlapping expression patterns in the skeletal muscle lineage, but unlike the myogenic bHLH transcription factors, MEF2 proteins are also expressed in other cell types, including neurons, cardiomyocytes, neural crest cells, chondrocytes, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells (6, 15, 20). Mef2c is the first member of the MEF2 family to be expressed in the myotome (at ca. embryonic day 9.0 [E9.0]), and its appearance lags approximately 18 h behind that of Myf5, the first bHLH myogenic regulator to be expressed (20). Mef2a and Mef2d are expressed after Mef2c (20).

Because of their overlapping expression patterns and common functions, it has been difficult to discern the functions of individual Mef2 genes during different stages of mammalian development. However, loss of function of the single Drosophila Mef2 gene has been shown to result in a block to differentiation of all muscle cell types (10, 27, 48), demonstrating the central role of MEF2 as a regulator of multiple muscle differentiation programs. Mice that lack Mef2a display an array of cardiovascular defects which cause most mice to die suddenly (38). Mice with homozygous mutations in Mef2d are viable (6), whereas mice lacking Mef2c die at E9.5 from cardiovascular defects (28, 29). The early lethality caused by the Mef2c loss-of-function mutation has therefore precluded analysis of its role in skeletal muscle at later developmental stages.

In addition to its role in muscle development, MEF2 has been implicated in establishing the slow myofiber phenotype by serving as a target for calcium-dependent signaling to drive oxidative and slow-fiber-specific genes (17, 59). Recently, we showed that skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Mef2c in a mixed mouse genetic background results in a substantial reduction of slow skeletal muscle fibers, while overexpression of a superactive form of MEF2C (MEF2C-VP16) promotes the slow-fiber phenotype and enhances endurance exercise (47).

To further explore the functions of Mef2c in developing skeletal muscle, we conditionally deleted a floxed Mef2c allele using two Cre recombinase transgenes that allow early versus late deletion of Mef2c in skeletal muscle. Here we show that early deletion of Mef2c results in neonatal lethality at postnatal day 1 (P1), while mice with a later deletion of Mef2c are viable. In mice with early deletion of Mef2c, skeletal muscle differentiates to form myofibers with abnormally assembled sarcomeres and weakened M lines. Microarray analysis revealed misregulation of genes encoding components of the sarcomere, including the M-line-specific proteins myomesin and M protein. Accordingly, we show that Mef2c directly regulates myomesin transcription in vivo. These results reveal an essential role for Mef2c in myofiber maturation and function and demonstrate an important role for MEF2 proteins in terminal differentiation through maintenance of muscle integrity.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Plasmid constructs, tissue culture, and cell transfection. Wild-type myomesin 1 (bp –1035 to +88) and myomesin 2 (M protein) (bp –1058 to +6) (base pair numbering refers to the location of the DNA fragment relative to the transcriptional start site of the indicated gene) promoters were cloned into TOPO TA (Invitrogen). MEF2 and E-box sites were mutated by two-step PCR directed mutagenesis (myomesin 1 MEF2, CTATATTTAT to CTGGGTTTAT; myomesin 1 E box, CATGTG to TCTGTG; myomesin 2 MEF2, CTAAATATAG to CTAGGGATAG). Primer sequences for promoter cloning and mutagenesis are as follows: myomesin 1, 5'-CTGGCCCTGACCGAATACCACCACCAAGG-3' (forward) and 5'-CGAGGAGCAGGAGAGAATGAGGGCCCACC-3' (reverse); myomesin 2, 5'-GCTGGCCTGCAGGTCAACCTCACGGAGGC-3' (forward) and 5'-CTCCCTGCAGAGCTCTGTGCTTCCCCC-3' (reverse); myomesin 1 MEF2, 5'-CCCCTCCCCATGTGCTGCTGGGTTTATCTGCCTTCCTGGCC-3' and complement sequence; myomesin 1 E box, 5'-GGTTTGGGACTCCCCTCCCTCTGTGCTGCTATATTTATCTGC-3' and complement sequence; myomesin 2 MEF2, 5'-GGAGAGGCAGTCCCTTGCCTGGGTATAGCACCTCCTCTGGCCATAA-3' and complement sequence.

Wild-type and mutant promoters were then cloned into pGL3 and pGHlacZ vectors for luciferase reporter and in vivo expression, respectively.

COS cells and C2C12 myoblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum and antibiotics as described previously (47). For transient-transfection assays, cells were plated and transfected 12 h later using Fugene (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Generation of mutant and transgenic mice. Mice with a Mef2c allele flanked by loxP sites have been described (6). Skeletal muscle-specific transgenic mice expressing Cre recombinase under control of the myogenin promoter (26) or MCK promoter (11) have been described previously. Transgenic mice were generated as previously described (16). Staining of embryos for ß-galactosidase was performed as previously described (16).

RNA in situ hybridization, histology, and electron microscopy. Embryos and tissue for histology were isolated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, processed, and sectioned for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining using standard procedures (52). In situ hybridization samples were processed in 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate-PBS. ³⁵S-labeled RNA probes for Myf5, MyoD (30), and myogenin were generated using a Maxiscript kit (Amersham).

Electron microscopy was performed as previously described (26). Briefly, skeletal muscle from P1 pups was fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS at 4°C and then postfixed in 1% OsO₄ and dehydrated in an ethanol series. Samples were then embedded in Spurr resin (Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and sectioned at 80 nm.

RT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR, and microarray analysis. Total RNA was extracted from wild-type and mutant skeletal muscle with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Four micrograms of RNA from each sample was used to generate cDNA using SuperScript II first-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for the deleted region of Mef2c was performed using the primer pair 5'-GATGAAGAAGGCTTATGAGCTGAGCGTGCTGTGCGACTGTGAG-3' (forward) and 5'-CTGTTATGGCTGGACACTGGGATGGTAACTGGCATCTCAAAG-3' (reverse).

Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using TaqMan one-step chemistry or SYBR green on an ABI PRISM 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Predesigned intron-spanning primers were purchased from Applied Biosystems for TaqMan (myogenin, MyoD, Acta1, Myh7, myozenin 2, Myl4, Myl7, MEF2A, MEF2D, TnnI1, TnnI2, TnnT3, and GAPDH [glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase]). Primer sequences for SYBR green are available upon request.

For microarray analysis, total RNA was extracted from wild-type or Mef2c SKM KO (skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Mef2c) E18.5 hindlimbs using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Microarray analysis was performed using the Mouse Genome 430 2.0 array (Affymetrix), and results were analyzed using PANTHER as previously described (35).

Reporter assays. The myomesin 1- and 2-luciferase constructs contain a DNA fragment extending from bp –1035 bp to +88 and –706 to +6 from the myomesin and M-protein genes, respectively. The Myc-tagged MEF2C expression vector was described previously (44). COS cells in 24-well plates were transfected with 100 ng of reporter plasmids in the presence or absence of MEF2C (5 to 100 ng). The reporter assays were performed as previously described (14).

Gel mobility shift assays. Oligonucleotides corresponding to the conserved MEF2 binding site in the myomesin 1 and 2 promoters, a mutated site, and a bona fide MEF2 site from the MCK enhancer were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies), annealed, labeled with [³²P]CTP using Klenow fragment, and purified with G25 columns (Roche). The following sequences were used: wild-type myomesin 1, 5'-GGGATGTGCTGCTATATTTATCTGCCTT-3'; myomesin 1 MEF2, 5'-GGGATGTGCTGCTACCGGTATCTGCCTT-3'; muscle creatine kinase (MCK), '-GGGGATCGCTCTAAAAATAACCCTGTCG-3'; wild-type myomesin 2, 5'-GGGCCCTTGCCTAAATATAGCACCTCCT-3'; myomesin 2 MEF2, 5'-GGGCCCTTGCCTACCGGTAGCACCTCCT-3'.

Cell extracts were isolated from COS cells transfected with a myc-tagged MEF2C expression plasmid or empty vector. Reaction conditions were as previously described (13, 44). DNA-protein complexes were resolved on 5% polyacrylamide native gels.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Early embryonic deletion of Mef2c causes perinatal lethality. Mice with a homozygous null mutation of Mef2c exhibit early lethality at E9.5 due to cardiovascular defects (28, 29). To determine the function of Mef2c in skeletal muscle at later developmental stages, we deleted a floxed Mef2c allele (6) specifically in skeletal muscle by using the myogenin-Cre (Myo-Cre) transgene, which consists of a Cre recombinase expression cassette controlled by the myogenin promoter and the skeletal muscle-specific enhancer of the Mef2c gene. This transgene is expressed specifically in skeletal muscle beginning at E8.5 (26).

Skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Mef2c (Mef2c SKM KO) resulted in lethality at P1. This postnatal lethality was affected by genetic background. In a C57BL/6 mixed genetic background, 100% lethality was observed. However, other backgrounds (e.g., 129/SvEv) produced some viable Mef2c SKM KO mice, which display a fiber-type switching phenotype described previously (47). Mef2c SKM KO pups in the C57BL/6 mixed genetic background were slightly smaller than wild-type littermates (Fig. 1A) and died several hours after birth, always before P2. At P1, Mef2c SKM KO pups were mobile but lethargic compared to wild-type littermates and did not feed (Fig. 1A). In contrast to the early perinatal lethality resulting from Mef2c deletion with Myo-Cre, mice with a later deletion of Mef2c beginning at E18.5 using a Cre transgene controlled by the muscle creatine kinase promoter (MCK-Cre) (11) were viable.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Skeletal muscle deletion of Mef2c. (A) Mef2c SKM KO mice (Mef2cfl/–; Myo-Cre) are smaller than wild-type (WT) littermates and do not feed (note the absence of milk in the stomach). (B and C) Analysis of efficiency of gene deletion in Mef2c SKM KO postnatal (B) and embryonic (C) muscles. (B) Total RNA was isolated from hind limb muscles of wild-type and Mef2c SKM KO mice at P1 and analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR for MEF2C mRNA. L7 served as a loading control. (C) In situ hybridization for MEF2C in transverse sections of E12.5 WT and Mef2c SKM KO embryos. nt, neural tube; h, heart; lb, limb.

To verify the efficiency of Mef2c gene deletion by Myo-Cre, we performed RT-PCR and in situ hybridization for the deleted region of Mef2c in wild-type and Mef2c SKM KO skeletal muscles. As shown in Fig. 1B and C, Mef2c transcripts were efficiently deleted in muscles from neonates and embryos, respectively.

Notably, Mef2a or Mef2d homozygous mutant mice did not display skeletal muscle developmental defects (reference 47 and data not shown). We conclude that embryonic expression of Mef2c is specifically required for skeletal muscle development.

Loss of Mef2c results in myofiber disarray. Histological analysis showed that the hind limb muscles from Mef2c SKM KO pups at P1 were severely disorganized and fragmented (Fig. 2A). The diaphragms of Mef2c SKM KO mice were especially thin and lacking in well-developed myofibers, which is likely to be the cause of death (Fig. 2B). Notably, mutant myocytes were able to differentiate and fuse into myofibers (Fig. 2A), unlike muscles from myogenin knockout mice, which fail to fully differentiate and form very few myofibers in vivo (23). Skeletal muscle deletion of Mef2c with MCK-Cre did not disrupt myofiber organization (data not shown).

View larger version (87K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Myofiber disarray in Mef2c-deficient muscles. Hind limb muscles and diaphragms of wild-type (WT) and Mef2c SKM KO (Mef2cfl/–; Myo-Cre) mice are shown. (A) H&E staining of histological sections of representative hind limb muscle from P1 WT and Mef2c SKM KO mice (magnifications, x20 and x40; bars, 300 nm). (B) Thinned diaphragm and degenerated fibers in Mef2c SKM KO mice compared to WT littermates at P1 (magnification, x40; bars, 100 nm). (C) Diaphragms from E18.5 Mef2c SKM KO mice are thinner than diaphragms from wild-type controls but less disorganized than Mef2c SKM KO P1 diaphragms (H, heart; D, diaphragm; L, liver; bars, 300 and 200 nm for magnifications of x10 and x20, respectively). (D) H&E staining of histological sections of representative hind limb muscle from E18.5 WT and Mef2c SKM KO mice at E18.5 (magnifications, x10 and x20; bars, 300 nm.). Mef2c-deficient muscles at E18.5 display minor defects in disorganization and fragmentation compared to those of WT littermates.

To define the time of onset of muscle defects in Mef2c SKM KO animals, we analyzed muscle at sequential developmental stages. Muscles appeared to be normal at E12.5, E14.5, and E16.5 (data not shown), whereas disorganization was apparent by E18.5 and became more severe by P1 (Fig. 2C and D).

Ultrastructural analysis showed that sarcomeres of skeletal muscle from Mef2c SKM KO mice at P1 were disorganized and fragmented compared to those from wild-type littermates (Fig. 3A). Fragmented myofibers along the M-line regions were especially apparent in the mutant (Fig. 3B), suggesting a weakening of the M-line structure, which is essential for maintenance of sarcomere integrity.

View larger version (173K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Disorganized sarcomeres in Mef2c SKM KO muscles. (A) Hind limb muscle from P1 wild-type (WT) and Mef2c SKM KO (Mef2cfl/–; Myo-Cre) mice were analyzed by electron microscopy. The sarcomeres in Mef2c mutant mice are disorganized and fragmented compared to those in WT littermates. Magnifications are shown on the left (magnification, x30,000; bar, 500 nm). (B) Higher magnification of alternative regions reveal severed M lines as indicated by the arrows (magnification, x40,000; bar, 500 nm).

Abnormalities of muscle gene expression in Mef2c mutants. To determine whether the absence of Mef2c resulted in downregulation of myogenic bHLH transcription factors, which might cause the skeletal muscle abnormalities in SKM KO mice, we performed in situ hybridization for myogenin, Myf-5, and MyoD. Myogenic bHLH transcription factor expression patterns appeared to be unaltered in Mef2c SKM KO muscles at E9.5 and E12.5 (Fig. 4A) and E16.5 (data not shown). To provide a more quantitative analysis of bHLH expression in Mef2c mutant muscles, we analyzed the expression of myogenin, Myf-5, and MyoD in E12.5 wild-type and Mef2c SKM KO embryos by quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 4B). Expression of myogenin and MyoD was slightly downregulated in Mef2c-deficient muscles.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Analysis of muscle gene expression in Mef2c mutants. (A and B) Expression of myogenin, MyoD, and Myf5 in wild-type (WT) and Mef2c SKM KO (Mef2cfl/–; Myo-Cre) embryos by in situ hybridization at E9.5 (sagital sections) and E12.5 (transverse sections) (A) and quantitative real-time PCR of E12.5 WT and Mef2c SKM KO embryos (B). (C) Gene ontology analysis (PANTHER) of misexpressed genes in Mef2c SKM KO E18.5 hind limbs. Significantly (P < 0.05) enriched biological processes are shown. The –log (P value) is plotted with the threshold set to 1.3 [–log(0.05)] (red line). (D) Molecular functions were assigned to the genes in the most significantly enriched biological process "muscle contraction" in panel C. (E) Validation of microarray targets and analysis of gene expression of structural candidate genes by quantitative real-time PCR. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

To identify MEF2 target genes responsible for the Mef2c SKM KO phenotype, we performed expression profiling of skeletal muscle from wild-type and Mef2c SKM KO E18.5 hindlimbs. Using gene ontology analysis (55) of dysregulated transcripts, we analyzed whether certain pathways or biological processes were more sensitive to loss of Mef2c in skeletal muscle. This analysis revealed that the most significantly enriched biological processes, of downregulated genes, participate in muscle contraction (Fig. 4C). Down-regulated genes in this category were further analyzed by their annotated molecular function, demonstrating that the majority of these genes encode cytoskeletal proteins (Fig. 4D). Among the most dramatically downregulated genes were myomesin 1 and myomesin 2 (also referred to as M protein), which encode muscle-specific structural proteins that stabilize the sarcomere along the M line by forming an elastic (7), lattice structure that interacts with titin and myosin (2, 39, 40). This "elastic web" stabilizes muscles by diminishing thick filament displacement and by returning the sarcomere to its original state after contraction (1, 2). Myomesin proteins are expressed in all types of vertebrate striated muscle, and their importance is supported by their observed fixed expression ratio with myosin (2, 3). Moreover, myomesin proteins and the M line are crucial for sarcomere stability, since loss of M-line protein interaction with titin results in progressive sarcomere damage and lethality (43).

In addition to the myomesin genes, several additional structural, sarcomere, and sarcomere-associated gene products were misregulated in Mef2c SKM KO muscles including myozenin 1 and 2 (also termed calsarcin 2 and 1, respectively), actin, myosin, myotilin, and muscle creatine kinase (MCK) (Fig. 4E). MEF2 proteins were previously shown to be important for expression of thick filament proteins in vivo (24) but were only slightly downregulated in Mef2c SKM KO muscles. Myozenin 1 and 2 are Z-line-interacting proteins that are important stress sensors that link calcineurin with the sarcomere (21). Additionally, myotilin, which encodes an actin cross-linking protein necessary for sarcomere assembly (51), was downregulated in Mef2c SKM KO muscles.

Transcripts encoding the bHLH transcription factors MyoD and myogenin were slightly downregulated at E18.5, as detected by quantitative real-time PCR, while Myf5 transcript levels were unchanged (Fig. 4E). Known MEF2 target genes (e.g., Bop, Srpk3 [MSSK], and desmin) were also slightly downregulated in Mef2c-deficient muscles (Fig. 4B and data not shown).

The myomesin 1 and 2 genes are direct targets of MEF2C. Myomesin 1 and 2 play a crucial role in maintaining sarcomere organization (1), suggesting that their downregulation could be causal in the Mef2c SKM KO phenotype. We therefore searched the myomesin promoters for conserved MEF2 sites that might control their expression in skeletal muscle. As shown in Fig. 5A, ClustalW analysis revealed conserved consensus MEF2 sites located immediately upstream of both genes. In addition, the myomesin 1 promoter contains a conserved MEF2 site directly adjacent to an E box, and this region confers transcriptional regulation to the myomesin 1 gene (53).

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. myomesin 1 and 2 are direct targets of MEF2C. (A) Alignment of mouse and human myomesin 1 and 2 promoters using ClustalW identifies conserved MEF2 binding sites in close proximity to previously identified transcription start sites (arrows) (the MEF2 site [red], E box [green], and TATA box [blue] are labeled; asterisks mark conserved nucleotides). (B) MEF2C transactivates the myomesin promoters. Cotransfection of increasing amounts (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 ng) of a MEF2C expression plasmid with wild-type (WT) myomesin 1 or 2 luciferase reporter constructs in COS cells results in significant activation of the reporter, which is not seen with the reporters containing a mutated MEF2 site (MEF2) in the promoter. Mutation of the E box (E-box) in the myomesin 1 promoter does not abolish responsiveness to MEF2. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (C) Gel mobility shift assays were performed with labeled probes corresponding to the myomesin 1, myomesin 2, or MCK MEF2 consensus binding site and extracts of COS cells overexpressing Myc-MEF2C. The DNA-protein complex was supershifted in the presence of an anti-Myc antibody and was competed by excess unlabeled probe competitor. (D) Transgenic reporter mice harboring a lacZ cassette behind the wild-type myomesin 1 promoter show ß-galactosidase expression in somites, heart, and facial and limb muscle (E11.5). LacZ expression is abolished in transgenic mice when the conserved MEF2 site is mutated (MEF2). Numbers indicate the fraction of F0 transgenic embryos showing lacZ expression in the somites and heart.

The first 1,000 bp and 700 bp of the myomesin 1 and 2 promoters, respectively, were cloned into a luciferase reporter and found to be responsive to MEF2 when cotransfected into COS cells (Fig. 5B). Mutation of the MEF2 sites in both promoters abolished responsiveness to MEF2 (Fig. 5B). In addition, when C2C12 cells were transfected with these luciferase constructs and allowed to differentiate, luciferase activity was observed with the wild-type myomesin promoter but was significantly reduced with the promoters containing a mutated MEF2 site (data not shown). Mutagenesis of the E box in the myomesin 1 promoter reduced but did not eliminate luciferase activity (Fig. 5B).

DNA binding assays using extracts from COS cells transfected with a Myc-MEF2C expression plasmid confirmed that the MEF2 sites in the myomesin 1 and 2 promoters were bona fide MEF2 sites (Fig. 5C). The MEF2 consensus sequences from the myomesin 1 and 2 promoters bound MEF2C comparably to the canonical MEF2 site from the MCK enhancer (22) (Fig. 5C). This DNA-protein complex was abolished in the presence of excess competitor (unlabeled cognate DNA sequence) and was supershifted by an anti-Myc antibody, whereas a sequence containing a mutated MEF2 site was unable to compete for MEF2C binding (Fig. 5C).

To analyze the importance of the MEF2 site in the myomesin 1 promoter in vivo, we generated transgenic mice with a lacZ reporter gene linked to the myomesin 1 promoter. As seen in Fig. 5D, the wild-type myomesin 1 promoter directed expression in the somites, limb muscles, and heart (Fig. 5D) at E11.5. Expression in all of these cell types was abolished by a mutation in the MEF2 site (Fig. 5D). These findings support the conclusion that MEF2C directly activates myomesin gene transcription in vitro and in vivo.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The results of this study show that skeletal muscle-specific deletion of Mef2c results in hypoplastic myofibers, disorganized sarcomeres, and defects of the M line that cause perinatal death. Mef2c-deficient muscles showed reduced expression of genes encoding important structural proteins, including myomesin and M protein, which are localized to the M line and maintain sarcomere integrity. Moreover, our results demonstrate that MEF2C directly regulates myomesin gene transcription. We conclude that Mef2c plays an essential role in the perinatal regulation of genes necessary for proper sarcomere assembly and maintenance of myofiber integrity.

Distinct functions of MEF2 factors in skeletal muscle. Given the early and specific expression of Mef2c in the skeletal muscle lineage and the ability of MEF2C to synergistically activate myofiber genes with members of the MyoD family, it is surprising that Mef2c-deficient myocytes undergo early steps of differentiation, including myofiber formation. It seems likely that other MEF2 proteins compensate for the loss of Mef2c during early stages of embryonic and fetal myogenesis. However, we should point out that we have also found that skeletal muscle deletion of both Mef2c and Mef2d does not exacerbate the Mef2c SKM KO phenotype (data not shown), raising the possibility that residual levels of Mef2a or Mef2b are adequate to support initial steps in muscle development.

Mef2c-deficient muscles display minor defects late in embryonic development but rapidly degenerate immediately after birth. The relatively late onset of the Mef2c mutant muscle phenotype, in which Mef2c was deleted with the Myo-Cre, is surprising considering that this transgene causes gene deletion at E8.5 in muscle. However, this timing may reflect the relative lack of contractility or weight-bearing stress on skeletal muscle before birth. Consistent with this, expression profiling of Mef2c SKM KO muscles revealed misregulated genes associated with muscle contraction and stress responsiveness. Therefore, although MEF2C is removed early in skeletal muscle development, the genes which it regulates (e.g., myomesin) function later to maintain sarcomere integrity and muscle function, possibly explaining why severe defects are not observed until birth. In addition, the lack of muscle defects in mice in which Mef2c is deleted later (E18.5) demonstrates the importance of activation of these MEF2 targets early in development and their integration and association with the sarcomere. Moreover, this importance of MEF2C early in skeletal muscle development may be similar to the case for cardiac muscle, in which MEF2C is important early (29) but is dispensable later in development (56).

It is intriguing that the absence of MEF2C results in such a specific diminution of myomesin expression, despite the continued expression of Mef2a and Mef2d. We suggest two potential explanations for this finding. (i) The myomesin genes might be exquisitely sensitive to the level of MEF2 expression, irrespective of the isoform, such that residual Mef2a and -d cannot drive expression of these genes in the absence of Mef2c. (ii) MEF2C may be specifically required for myomesin expression because of a function not shared with the other MEF2 isoforms, perhaps mediated by a unique structural domain.

Recently, knockdown of mef2c and mef2d in zebrafish was reported to disrupt muscle function and sarcomere assembly as a result of diminished expression of thick filament proteins (24). In contrast, our results demonstrate that loss of Mef2c alone is sufficient to disrupt sarcomere assembly. The differences between the zebrafish and mouse phenotypes may reflect species-specific differences in MEF2C function or the lack of complete takeout of mef2c protein by morpholino knockdown in zebrafish. Consistent with the zebrafish study, muscles lacking Mef2c undergo early steps of muscle differentiation but do not mature properly. Interestingly, Hinits and Hughes reported that muscles from mef2c/d double knockdown zebrafish display a phenotype similar to that of mice lacking titin's M-line region (24). We show that Mef2c SKM KO muscles display M-line defects and that MEF2C directly regulates myomesin expression, which could explain the zebrafish phenotype.

Influence of genetic modifiers on the functions of Mef2c in skeletal muscle. Recently, we reported that mice with a skeletal muscle deletion of Mef2c in a 129/SvEv mixed genetic background were viable and showed a reduction in slow fibers (47). In contrast, the skeletal muscle deletion of Mef2c in a C57BL/6 mixed background shown here results in perinatal lethality with complete penetrance. These findings suggest that the activity of Mef2c in skeletal muscle development is sensitive to genetic modifiers, which are capable of modulating sarcomere structure and function. Notably, the cyto-architectural and mitochondrial defects observed in cardiac muscle of Mef2a-deficient mice are also highly sensitive to genetic modifiers (38).

MEF2 factors as multifunctional regulators of muscle gene expression. Considered together with other studies, it is now apparent that MEF2 factors play important roles in numerous steps of muscle development, including the control of myoblast differentiation and fusion (34, 42), maintenance of myofiber integrity as shown in the present study, and regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and fiber type specification (47, 58). In each of these settings, MEF2 regulates distinct sets of downstream target genes, which likely reflects its ability to associate combinatorially with other coactivators and corepressors and to respond to upstream signaling pathways that vary in response to developmental, physiological and pathological cues. Understanding the molecular basis of target gene recognition and activation by different MEF2 isoforms in these various processes represents a fascinating and important problem for the future.

 
We thank Jennifer Brown for editorial assistance and Alisha Tizenor for graphics. We are grateful to John Shelton for histological sections, to Laurie Mueller for electron microscopy, and to Lillian Sutherland for technical assistance. We thank C. R. Kahn for MCK-Cre transgenic mice.

This work was supported by grants from the NIH, the Donald W. Reynolds Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation to E.N.O.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9148. Phone: (214) 648-1187. Fax: (214) 648-1196. E-mail: eric.olson{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Published ahead of print on 17 September 2007.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Agarkova, I., E. Ehler, S. Lange, R. Schoenauer, and J. C. Perriard. 2003. M-band: a safeguard for sarcomere stability? J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 24:191-203.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Agarkova, I., and J. C. Perriard. 2005. The M-band: an elastic web that crosslinks thick filaments in the center of the sarcomere. Trends Cell Biol. 15:477-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
3
3. Agarkova, I., R. Schoenauer, E. Ehler, L. Carlsson, E. Carlsson, L. E. Thornell, and J. C. Perriard. 2004. The molecular composition of the sarcomeric M-band correlates with muscle fiber type. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 83:193-204.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Andres, V., M. Cervera, and V. Mahdavi. 1995. Determination of the consensus binding site for MEF2 expressed in muscle and brain reveals tissue-specific sequence constraints. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23246-23249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Arnold, H. H., and B. Winter. 1998. Muscle differentiation: more complexity to the network of myogenic regulators. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:539-544.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Arnold, M. A., Y. Kim, M. P. Czubryt, D. Phan, J. McAnally, X. Qi, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, R. Bassel-Duby, and E. N. Olson. 2007. MEF2C transcription factor controls chondrocyte hypertrophy and bone development. Dev. Cell 12:377-389.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
7. Bertoncini, P., R. Schoenauer, I. Agarkova, M. Hegner, J. C. Perriard, and H. J. Guntherodt. 2005. Study of the mechanical properties of myomesin proteins using dynamic force spectroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 348:1127-1137.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
8. Black, B. L., J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1995. The mouse MRF4 promoter is trans-activated directly and indirectly by muscle-specific transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 270:2889-2892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9
9. Black, B. L., and E. N. Olson. 1998. Transcriptional control of muscle development by myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14:167-196.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Bour, B. A., M. A. O'Brien, W. L. Lockwood, E. S. Goldstein, R. Bodmer, P. H. Taghert, S. M. Abmayr, and H. T. Nguyen. 1995. Drosophila MEF2, a transcription factor that is essential for myogenesis. Genes Dev. 9:730-741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Bruning, J. C., M. D. Michael, J. N. Winnay, T. Hayashi, D. Horsch, D. Accili, L. J. Goodyear, and C. R. Kahn. 1998. A muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibits features of the metabolic syndrome of NIDDM without altering glucose tolerance. Mol. Cell 2:559-569.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Buchberger, A., K. Ragge, and H. H. Arnold. 1994. The myogenin gene is activated during myocyte differentiation by pre-existing, not newly synthesized transcription factor MEF-2. J. Biol. Chem. 269:17289-17296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Chang, P. S., L. Li, J. McAnally, and E. N. Olson. 2001. Muscle specificity encoded by specific serum response factor-binding sites. J. Biol. Chem. 276:17206-17212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Chang, S., S. Bezprozvannaya, S. Li, and E. N. Olson. 2005. An expression screen reveals modulators of class II histone deacetylase phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:8120-8125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Chang, S., B. D. Young, S. Li, X. Qi, J. A. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 2006. Histone deacetylase 7 maintains vascular integrity by repressing matrix metalloproteinase 10. Cell 126:321-334.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Cheng, T. C., M. C. Wallace, J. P. Merlie, and E. N. Olson. 1993. Separable regulatory elements governing myogenin transcription in mouse embryogenesis. Science 261:215-218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Chin, E. R., E. N. Olson, J. A. Richardson, Q. Yang, C. Humphries, J. M. Shelton, H. Wu, W. Zhu, R. Bassel-Duby, and R. S. Williams. 1998. A calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway controls skeletal muscle fiber type. Genes Dev. 12:2499-2509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Dodou, E., S. M. Xu, and B. L. Black. 2003. mef2c is activated directly by myogenic basic helix-loop-helix proteins during skeletal muscle development in vivo. Mech. Dev. 120:1021-1032.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Edmondson, D. G., T. C. Cheng, P. Cserjesi, T. Chakraborty, and E. N. Olson. 1992. Analysis of the myogenin promoter reveals an indirect pathway for positive autoregulation mediated by the muscle-specific enhancer factor MEF-2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3665-3677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Edmondson, D. G., G. E. Lyons, J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1994. Mef2 gene expression marks the cardiac and skeletal muscle lineages during mouse embryogenesis. Development 120:1251-1263.[Abstract]
21
21. Frey, N., J. A. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 2000. Calsarcins, a novel family of sarcomeric calcineurin-binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:14632-14637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Gossett, L. A., D. J. Kelvin, E. A. Sternberg, and E. N. Olson. 1989. A new myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor that recognizes a conserved element associated with multiple muscle-specific genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:5022-5033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Hasty, P., A. Bradley, J. H. Morris, D. G. Edmondson, J. M. Venuti, E. N. Olson, and W. H. Klein. 1993. Muscle deficiency and neonatal death in mice with a targeted mutation in the myogenin gene. Nature 364:501-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Hinits, Y., and S. M. Hughes. 2007. Mef2s are required for thick filament formation in nascent muscle fibres. Development 134:2511-2519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Kassar-Duchossoy, L., B. Gayraud-Morel, D. Gomes, D. Rocancourt, M. Buckingham, V. Shinin, and S. Tajbakhsh. 2004. Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice. Nature 431:466-471.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Li, S., M. P. Czubryt, J. McAnally, R. Bassel-Duby, J. A. Richardson, F. F. Wiebel, A. Nordheim, and E. N. Olson. 2005. Requirement for serum response factor for skeletal muscle growth and maturation revealed by tissue-specific gene deletion in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:1082-1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Lilly, B., B. Zhao, G. Ranganayakulu, B. M. Paterson, R. A. Schulz, and E. N. Olson. 1995. Requirement of MADS domain transcription factor D-MEF2 for muscle formation in Drosophila. Science 267:688-693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
28. Lin, Q., J. Lu, H. Yanagisawa, R. Webb, G. E. Lyons, J. A. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 1998. Requirement of the MADS-box transcription factor MEF2C for vascular development. Development 125:4565-4574.[Abstract]
29
29. Lin, Q., J. Schwarz, C. Bucana, and E. N. Olson. 1997. Control of mouse cardiac morphogenesis and myogenesis by transcription factor MEF2C. Science 276:1404-1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Lu, J. R., R. Bassel-Duby, A. Hawkins, P. Chang, R. Valdez, H. Wu, L. Gan, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 2002. Control of facial muscle development by MyoR and capsulin. Science 298:2378-2381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Martin, J. F., J. J. Schwarz, and E. N. Olson. 1993. Myocyte enhancer factor (MEF) 2C: a tissue-restricted member of the MEF-2 family of transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5282-5286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Molkentin, J. D., B. L. Black, J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1995. Cooperative activation of muscle gene expression by MEF2 and myogenic bHLH proteins. Cell 83:1125-1136.[CrossRef][Medline]
33
33. Molkentin, J. D., B. L. Black, J. F. Martin, and E. N. Olson. 1996. Mutational analysis of the DNA binding, dimerization, and transcriptional activation domains of MEF2C. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2627-2636.[Abstract]
34
34. Molkentin, J. D., and E. N. Olson. 1996. Combinatorial control of muscle development by basic helix-loop-helix and MADS-box transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9366-9373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Montgomery, R. L., C. A. Davis, M. J. Potthoff, M. Haberland, J. Fielitz, X. Qi, J. A. Hill, J. A. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 2007. Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 redundantly regulate cardiac morphogenesis, growth, and contractility. Genes Dev. 21:1790-1802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Nabeshima, Y., K. Hanaoka, M. Hayasaka, E. Esumi, S. Li, I. Nonaka, and Y. Nabeshima. 1993. Myogenin gene disruption results in perinatal lethality because of severe muscle defect. Nature 364:532-535.[CrossRef][Medline]
37
37. Naidu, P. S., D. C. Ludolph, R. Q. To, T. J. Hinterberger, and S. F. Konieczny. 1995. Myogenin and MEF2 function synergistically to activate the MRF4 promoter during myogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2707-2718.[Abstract]
38
38. Naya, F. J., B. L. Black, H. Wu, R. Bassel-Duby, J. A. Richardson, J. A. Hill, and E. N. Olson. 2002. Mitochondrial deficiency and cardiac sudden death in mice lacking the MEF2A transcription factor. Nat. Med. 8:1303-1309.[CrossRef][Medline]
39
39. Obermann, W. M., M. Gautel, K. Weber, and D. O. Furst. 1997. Molecular structure of the sarcomeric M band: mapping of titin and myosin binding domains in myomesin and the identification of a potential regulatory phosphorylation site in myomesin. EMBO J. 16:211-220.[CrossRef][Medline]
40
40. Obermann, W. M., P. F. van der Ven, F. Steiner, K. Weber, and D. O. Furst. 1998. Mapping of a myosin-binding domain and a regulatory phosphorylation site in M-protein, a structural protein of the sarcomeric M band. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:829-840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Olson, E. N. 1990. MyoD family: a paradigm for development? Genes Dev. 4:1454-1461.[Free Full Text]
42
42. Ornatsky, O. I., J. J. Andreucci, and J. C. McDermott. 1997. A dominant-negative form of transcription factor MEF2 inhibits myogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 272:33271-33278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43
43. Peng, J., K. Raddatz, S. Labeit, H. Granzier, and M. Gotthardt. 2005. Muscle atrophy in titin M-line deficient mice. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 26:381-388.[CrossRef][Medline]
44
44. Phan, D., T. L. Rasmussen, O. Nakagawa, J. McAnally, P. D. Gottlieb, P. W. Tucker, J. A. Richardson, R. Bassel-Duby, and E. N. Olson. 2005. BOP, a regulator of right ventricular heart development, is a direct transcriptional target of MEF2C in the developing heart. Development 132:2669-2678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Pollock, R., and R. Treisman. 1991. Human SRF-related proteins: DNA-binding properties and potential regulatory targets. Genes Dev. 5:2327-2341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46
46. Potthoff, M. J., and E. N. Olson. MEF2: a central regulator of diverse developmental programs. Development, in press.
47
47. Potthoff, M. J., H. Wu, M. A. Arnold, J. M. Shelton, J. Backs, J. McAnnally, X. Qi., R. Bassel-Duby, and E. N. Olson. 2007. Histone deacetylase degradation and MEF2 activation promote the formation of slow-twitch myofibers. J. Clin. Investig. 117:2459-2467.[CrossRef][Medline]
48
48. Ranganayakulu, G., B. Zhao, A. Dokidis, J. D. Molkentin, E. N. Olson, and R. A. Schulz. 1995. A series of mutations in the D-MEF2 transcription factor reveal multiple functions in larval and adult myogenesis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 171:169-181.[CrossRef][Medline]
49
49. Rudnicki, M. A., and R. Jaenisch. 1995. The MyoD family of transcription factors and skeletal myogenesis. Bioessays 17:203-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
50
50. Rudnicki, M. A., P. N. Schnegelsberg, R. H. Stead, T. Braun, H. H. Arnold, and R. Jaenisch. 1993. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell 75:1351-1359.[CrossRef][Medline]
51
51. Salmikangas, P., P. F. van der Ven, M. Lalowski, A. Taivainen, F. Zhao, H. Suila, R. Schroder, P. Lappalainen, D. O. Furst, and O. Carpen. 2003. Myotilin, the limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 1A (LGMD1A) protein, cross-links actin filaments and controls sarcomere assembly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12:189-203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52
52. Shelton, J. M., M. H. Lee, J. A. Richardson, and S. B. Patel. 2000. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein expression during mouse development. J. Lipid Res. 41:532-537.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53
53. Steiner, F., K. Weber, and D. O. Furst. 1999. M band proteins myomesin and skelemin are encoded by the same gene: analysis of its organization and expression. Genomics 56:78-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
54
54. Tapscott, S. J. 2005. The circuitry of a master switch: Myod and the regulation of skeletal muscle gene transcription. Development 132:2685-2695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55
55. Thomas, P. D., M. J. Campbell, A. Kejariwal, H. Mi, B. Karlak, R. Daverman, K. Diemer, A. Muruganujan, and A. Narechania. 2003. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 13:2129-2141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56
56. Vong, L. H., M. J. Ragusa, and J. J. Schwarz. 2005. Generation of conditional Mef2cloxP/loxP mice for temporal- and tissue-specific analyses. Genesis 43:43-48.[Medline]
57
57. Wang, D. Z., M. R. Valdez, J. McAnally, J. Richardson, and E. N. Olson. 2001. The Mef2c gene is a direct transcriptional target of myogenic bHLH and MEF2 proteins during skeletal muscle development. Development 128:4623-4633.[Medline]
58
58. Wu, H., S. B. Kanatous, F. A. Thurmond, T. Gallardo, E. Isotani, R. Bassel-Duby, and R. S. Williams. 2002. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle by CaMK. Science 296:349-352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59
59. Wu, H., F. J. Naya, T. A. McKinsey, B. Mercer, J. M. Shelton, E. R. Chin, A. R. Simard, R. N. Michel, R. Bassel-Duby, E. N. Olson, and R. S. Williams. 2000. MEF2 responds to multiple calcium-regulated signals in the control of skeletal muscle fiber type. EMBO J. 19:1963-1973.[CrossRef][Medline]
60
60. Yee, S. P., and P. W. Rigby. 1993. The regulation of myogenin gene expression during the embryonic development of the mouse. Genes Dev. 7:1277-1289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61
61. Yu, Y. T., R. E. Breitbart, L. B. Smoot, Y. Lee, V. Mahdavi, and B. Nadal-Ginard. 1992. Human myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 comprises a group of tissue-restricted MADS box transcription factors. Genes Dev. 6:1783-1798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2007, p. 8143-8151, Vol. 27, No. 23
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.01187-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Banduseela, V. C., Ochala, J., Chen, Y.-W., Goransson, H., Norman, H., Radell, P., Eriksson, L. I., Hoffman, E. P., Larsson, L. (2009). Gene expression and muscle fiber function in a porcine ICU model. Physiol. Genomics 39: 141-159 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cohen, T. J., Barrientos, T., Hartman, Z. C., Garvey, S. M., Cox, G. A., Yao, T.-P. (2009). The deacetylase HDAC4 controls myocyte enhancing factor-2-dependent structural gene expression in response to neural activity. FASEB J. 23: 99-106 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lange, M., Kaynak, B., Forster, U. B., Tonjes, M., Fischer, J. J., Grimm, C., Schlesinger, J., Just, S., Dunkel, I., Krueger, T., Mebus, S., Lehrach, H., Lurz, R., Gobom, J., Rottbauer, W., Abdelilah-Seyfried, S., Sperling, S. (2008). Regulation of muscle development by DPF3, a novel histone acetylation and methylation reader of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 22: 2370-2384 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Woods, S., Farrall, A., Procko, C., Whitelaw, M. L. (2008). The bHLH/Per-Arnt-Sim transcription factor SIM2 regulates muscle transcript myomesin2 via a novel, non-canonical E-box sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 3716-3727 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kollias, H. D., McDermott, J. C. (2008). Transforming growth factor-{beta} and myostatin signaling in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 104: 579-587 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Angelelli, C., Magli, A., Ferrari, D., Ganassi, M., Matafora, V., Parise, F., Razzini, G., Bachi, A., Ferrari, S., Molinari, S. (2008). Differentiation-dependent lysine 4 acetylation enhances MEF2C binding to DNA in skeletal muscle cells. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 915-928 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Potthoff, M. J. Articles by Olson, E. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Potthoff, M. J. Articles by Olson, E. N.