| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2007, p. 888-898, Vol. 27, No. 3
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.02356-05
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Trenton L. Place,1
Stanley Winistorfer,2
Robert C. Piper,2 and
Nancy L. Lill1*
Department of Pharmacology,1 Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 522422
Received 9 December 2005/ Returned for modification 10 January 2006/ Accepted 2 November 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The protein c-Cbl modulates EGFR signaling, trafficking, and degradation. Cbl is a RING E3/protein-ubiquitin ligase that is recruited to EGFR through either of two mechanisms. Cbl's N-terminal SH2 domain binds to phosphotyrosine 1045 of ligand-activated receptors (27); C-terminal Cbl sequences associate indirectly with inactive or active EGF receptors via the adaptor protein Grb2 (20, 53). At high but physiological concentrations of EGF (45), the former interaction predominantly effects Cbl-mediated EGFR ubiquitination (19, 27, 29).
The monoubiquitination of a number of plasma membrane proteins correlates with their enhanced endocytosis and lysosomal degradation (16, 18, 34). Extensive investigations have been undertaken to define monoubiquitin-dependent mechanisms that target receptors for degradation. It has been shown that monoubiquitin can bind to the ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs) of endosomal trafficking regulators, such as hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate (Hrs) (4, 41, 44). These associations have been proposed to retain activated receptors at sorting sites on early endosomes and multivesicular bodies, thereby enhancing receptor targeting to lysosomes.
Monoubiquitin-UIM interactions are essential for EGFR degradation (1, 51). Cellular expression of either an Hrs UIM mutant or an EGFR mutant that cannot be efficiently ubiquitinated compromises receptor degradation (27, 51). Furthermore, the covalent attachment of monoubiquitin to the EGFR C terminus enhances ligand-independent receptor internalization and degradation (11, 37). However, the half-life of the EGFR-ubiquitin chimera is significantly longer than that reported for ligand-activated, Cbl-associated EGFR (29, 37). This suggests that receptor monoubiquitination may not be the sole Cbl activity enhancing EGFR degradation.
We hypothesized that additional Cbl-dependent activities regulate receptor fate downstream of EGFR ubiquitination. To address this hypothesis, we used an established human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK 293) model system previously shown to be useful for studies of EGFR signaling and trafficking (29, 52). The system provides several experimental advantages. First, HEK 293 cells have epithelial morphology and are therefore appropriate for studies of EGFR and Cbl function, as the majority of tumors associated with EGFR deregulation are of epithelial origin and the sole EGFR-linked phenotype in Cbl-null mice is manifest in epithelial cells (38). Second, HEK 293 cells express low endogenous levels of EGFR and low to undetectable levels of the related ErbB RTKs. This allows the selective analysis of EGFR homodimers in cells ectopically expressing EGFR with or without recombinant Cbl proteins. Importantly, biochemical and biological readouts obtained in the HEK 293 system have been validated in Cbl knockout cells and other model cell systems (9, 28, 49). The transient-expression system also bypasses a real limitation of some stable expressor cell lines, in which the overexpression of wild-type (wt) Cbl decreases cell surface EGFR levels and/or selects for the outgrowth of cells that have bypassed Cbl-mediated suppression of RTK signaling (36). Using the HEK 293 cell model system, we investigated Cbl-mediated molecular events, downstream of receptor ubiquitination, that determine EGFR fate.
Our results implicate Cbl as a critical regulator of the endosomal protein Hrs. Hrs is an endocytic trafficking regulator that controls the delivery of ubiquitinated cargo to the lumenal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (4, 5). Downstream of EGFR activation by EGF, Hrs is inducibly phosphorylated on tyrosine residues 329 and 334 (48, 51). An E3-deficient Cbl mutant recently was shown to inhibit Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation and EGFR degradation jointly, but it was not established whether the mutant exhibited a loss of wild-type Cbl function or the gain of a novel activity. Hrs phosphorylation might be a normal, Cbl-regulated determinant of receptor fate (43), but no reported results have demonstrated any functional role for Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation.
Here, we report that wild-type Cbl enhances ligand-induced Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation, thereby facilitating functional studies of an expanded phosphoHrs pool. Our Cbl structure-function studies indicate that phosphorylation of Hrs tyrosine 334 correlates with EGFR degradation. We further show that Hrs phosphorylation is not merely a marker for degradative receptor trafficking: mutation of the primary and secondary Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation sites, Y334 and Y329, suppresses Cbl-enhanced EGFR degradation. Mechanistic studies suggest that this is due to phosphorylation-dependent Hrs protein degradation. Our results thus constitute the first evidence of a functional role for Hrs tyrosine 329/334 phosphorylation in regulating Hrs degradation, and thereby EGFR fate.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies.
Anti-EGFR (sc-120; [528] murine immunoglobulin G2a [IgG2a] for immunoprecipitation) antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) antibody (Ab290; rabbit polyclonal) was acquired from Abcam Ltd. Anti-ubiquitin antibody (NCL-UBIQ; rabbit polyclonal; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd.) was purchased from Vector Laboratories, Inc. Anti-EGFR antibody (no. 06-129; sheep polyclonal for immunoblotting) and anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (no. 05-321; [4G10] murine IgG2b) were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-FLAG M2 antibody was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Affinity-purified anti-pY334-Hrs rabbit polyclonal antibody was custom prepared by Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.; the immunogen was the synthetic Hrs phosphopeptide C327ARYLNRNY(PO3)WEKKQEE341. Antibodies reactive with nonphosphorylated Hrs were immunodepleted by passage of the immune serum over a C327ARYLNRNYWEKKQEE341 peptide affinity purification matrix. Flowthrough antibodies specific for pY334-Hrs were then collected on a C327ARYLNRNY(PO3)WEKKQEE341 phosphopeptide affinity purification matrix. Anti-Hrs rabbit polyclonal antiserum 932 (custom prepared by Sigma Genosys, Inc.) was generated against the C-terminal Hrs peptide 764PPAQGSEAQLISFD777. Ascites fluid containing anti-
-tubulin antibody (no. T6557; [GTU-88] murine IgG1) was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc. Anti-HA epitope antibody (MMS-101P; [HA.11] murine IgG1/
) was purchased from Covance Research Products, Inc. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (no. 55563; goat polyclonal) secondary antibody and peroxidase-conjugated protein A (no. 55901) were obtained from ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-sheep IgG, H+L (no. 402100; rabbit polyclonal) was acquired from Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corporation.
Cells. The human embryonic kidney epithelial cell line HEK 293 was the kind gift of David Spector (Penn State College of Medicine). The cells were maintained in an atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and 20 mM HEPES.
Transient transfection, cell stimulation, and cell lysate preparation. HEK 293 cells were transiently transfected using a modification of the calcium phosphate precipitation method (29) and the amounts of DNA indicated in the figure legends. DNA precipitates were removed from the cells after a 14- to 16-h incubation period at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Approximately 40 to 72 h after DNA precipitate addition, the cells were serum starved (0.5% fetal bovine serum in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) for 4 to 6 h to facilitate the accumulation of inactive EGF receptors at the cell surface. The cells then were stimulated at 37°C with 100 ng/ml EGF (17 nM; Sigma) for the periods indicated. Triton X-100 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM sodium chloride, 0.5% Triton X-100 [Fluka], 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.07 trypsin inhibitor units aprotinin/ml, and 1 µg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, antipain, and chymostatin [Sigma]) was used to harvest cellular proteins as described previously (29, 52). Lysate protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay reagent (Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as the protein standard.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Procedures for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting have been described previously (29). Cell lysate proteins and immunoprecipitates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore) in 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid (CAPS) buffer (10 mM CAPS, pH 11 [Sigma], 10% methanol, 0.01% SDS [Bio-Rad Laboratories]). For anti-ubiquitin immunoblots, the filters were rinsed thoroughly in water and then autoclaved for 10 min. Membranes were blocked with 2% gelatin or 2% milk (Bio-Rad Laboratories) in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.025% sodium azide. The filters were incubated with the antibodies indicated, followed by protein detection with Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences). The PVDF membranes were stripped for reprobing as previously described (29).
Fractionation. At 48 h posttransfection, intact cells were harvested in Tris-buffered saline (8% sodium chloride, 0.2% potassium chloride, 3% Tris base) and then collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 200 x g and 4°C. Cell pellets were dispersed in homogenization medium (250 mM sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, plus inhibitors [1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.07 trypsin inhibitor units aprotinin/ml, and 1 µg/ml each of leupeptin, pepstatin, antipain, and chymostatin]). The cells were mechanically lysed at 4°C by 10 passages through a 22-gauge needle. Unbroken cells and intact nuclei were removed from the homogenate upon centrifugation at 600 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting postnuclear supernatant was then centrifuged at 250,000 x g at 4°C for 30 min to pellet the total membrane fraction. The cytosolic fraction (supernatant) was decanted and reserved. The membrane fraction (pellet) was resuspended in Triton X-100 lysis buffer, and membrane proteins were extracted by rocking the suspension for 30 min at 4°C. Membrane extracts were centrifuged at 16,000 x g, and the supernatants were collected. The membrane and cytosolic protein fractions were used for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analyses.
Peptide competition. At 40 to 48 h after transfection, lysates were prepared from HEK 293 cells. The indicated amounts of lysate protein were incubated at 4°C with anti-pY334-Hrs antibody and increasing amounts of Hrs phosphopeptide C327ARYLNRNY(PO3)WEKKQEE341 or its nonphosphorylated counterpart. Immune complex proteins were collected on Protein A-Sepharose, washed with Triton X-100 lysis buffer, and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Following their transfer to PVDF membranes, specific proteins of interest were detected by immunoblotting as described above.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Replicate cultures of HEK 293 cells expressing EGFR and either a GFP control protein or GFP-Cbl wt were serum starved and then incubated over a 90-minute time course with or without EGF. This period encompasses the time necessary for ligand-induced EGFR ubiquitination, downregulation, and degradation to occur but is less than the period required for the synthesis, glycosylation, and plasma membrane delivery of new receptors (46, 47). As observed previously (29), ectopic expression of GFP-Cbl enhanced the ligand-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of EGFR (Fig. 1A, compare lanes 1 to 4 to lanes 5 to 8). The level and kinetics of EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation were similar in GFP- and GFP-Cbl-expressing cells over an expansive time course of stimulation (Fig. 1C, top). However, GFP-Cbl expression reproducibly enhanced the tyrosine phosphorylation of a cellular protein of 110-kDa approximate mass (Fig. 1C, top).
|
Cbl expression alters the apparent molecular mass and phosphorylation kinetics of Hrs. Hrs is found in the cytosol and on the limiting membranes of early endosomes (3, 10, 50). Others have proposed that Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation may relocate Hrs from endosomes to the cytosol (50), thereby restricting its regulation of endosomal protein trafficking. To determine whether increased Cbl expression affects the subcellular location of phosphorylated Hrs, we evaluated the distribution of pY334 Hrs in membrane and cytosolic fractions derived from HEK 293 cells expressing EGFR and either the GFP control protein or GFP-Cbl wt.
Phosphopeptide competition confirmed that the pY334 Hrs antibody specifically recognized phosphorylated Hrs in immunoprecipitation applications (Fig. 2A), which were used subsequently for subcellular-fractionation studies. Cell stimulation with EGF over a 40-minute time course produced detectable pY334 Hrs in both the membrane and cytosolic fractions (Fig. 2B, top). However, pY334 Hrs levels were higher in the membrane and cytosolic fractions of cells expressing GFP-Cbl than in those from cells expressing GFP alone (Fig. 2B, top; compare lanes 2 and 5 and lanes 8 and 11). Phosphorylated Hrs did not wholly segregate to either fraction, but an Hrs species with reduced mobility accumulated preferentially in the cytosol of GFP-Cbl-expressing cells (Fig. 2B, top; compare lanes 5, 8, and 11). This band was detectable in the absence of Cbl overexpression, but at much reduced levels (Fig. 2B, top, lanes 8 and 9).
|
|
Cbl-mediated enhancement of Hrs Y334 phosphorylation requires Cbl's tyrosine kinase-binding and ubiquitin ligase activities. We undertook structure-function studies to define the functional domains of Cbl that are essential to enhance Hrs Y334 phosphorylation. HEK 293 cells were transiently transfected for expression of EGFR and each of the following proteins: GFP-Cbl wt, GFP-Cbl G306E, GFP-Cbl-N, and GFP-Cbl Y371F (Fig. 4A). GFP-Cbl G306E bears a single amino acid substitution that compromises tyrosine kinase-binding (TKB) domain-dependent recruitment of Cbl to activated EGF receptors and thus their ubiquitination (29, 49) (Fig. 4B, middle GFP and top, lanes 1 to 5). GFP-Cbl-N is a transforming truncation mutant that contains a functional TKB domain (Fig. 4B, middle GFP, lanes 11 to 15) but lacks residues 358 to 906, which encompass the linker, RING finger, and RING finger tail regions required for Cbl-enhanced EGFR ubiquitination (26, 28, 29, 52) (Fig. 4B, top, lanes 11 to 15). GFP-Cbl-N also lacks C-terminal Cbl sequences that are dispensable for EGFR regulation in the HEK 293 cell system (29). GFP-Cbl Y371F is a linker region substitution mutant that is efficiently recruited to activated EGFR (Fig. 4B, middle GFP, lanes 16 to 20) but is deficient in ubiquitin ligase activity (Fig. 4B, top, lanes 16 to 20).
|
These results were supported by complementary structure-function studies of the EGF receptor. EGFR Y1045F is a single amino acid substitution mutant that lacks the site for direct binding of the Cbl TKB domain (27). As expected, EGFR Y1045F was compromised for ligand-induced EGFR degradation, which was only modestly enhanced by Cbl overexpression (Fig. 5A, EGFR, compare lanes 13 to 18, 19 to 24, and 7 to 12). The modest increase in degradation correlated with (i) nearly undetectable EGFR Y1045F ubiquitination, presumably mediated by EGFR binding to the Cbl C terminus via Grb2 (53), and (ii) limited Y334 h phosphorylation (Fig. 5A, pY334 Hrs, compare lanes 19 to 24 to lanes 7 to 12 and 13 to 18). The kinetics of Y334 phosphorylation also differed in cells expressing EGFR Y1045F and GFP-Cbl wt: low levels were maintained throughout the stimulation period (Fig. 5A, pY334 Hrs, compare lanes 20 to 24 to lanes 8 to 12, and B). This suggested that both the extent and timing of Hrs Y334 phosphorylation may be important for targeting EGF receptors for efficient degradation.
|
Hrs overexpression was used by Urbe and colleagues to examine the impact of the Y329,334F mutation on Hrs localization and EGFR degradation in HeLa cells (51). In their experiments, wild-type and mutant Hrs accumulated on enlarged endosomes. Overexpression of either Hrs protein blocked EGFR degradation. These limitations, combined with other reports of endosome abnormalities and trafficking defects in Hrs-overexpressing cells (6, 25, 42, 50), dictated the use of an alternative experimental approach: shRNA-mediated Hrs knockdown and reconstitution.
The system that we employed was derived from a previous report of Hrs knockdown and reconstitution in HeLa cells (32). For our experiments, HEK 293 cells were depleted of endogenous Hrs through the expression of a human Hrs-specific shRNA (Fig. 6A, top). shRNA-resistant murine Hrs coding sequences were then used to restore protein expression. The murine Hrs expression constructs encoded HA epitope-tagged wild-type and Y329,334F mutant Hrs proteins, which were expressed to the level of the endogenous protein (Fig. 6A, Hrs, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lane 1). Whereas wild-type HA-Hrs effected Cbl-mediated EGFR degradation to the same extent as endogenous Hrs (Fig. 6B, top, compare lanes 3 and 6), the Hrs phosphorylation site mutant Y329,334F was functionally compromised (Fig. 6B, top, lane 9). Quantitative analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the EGFR levels of Hrs-depleted cells that were reconstituted with wild-type versus Y329,334F mutant Hrs (Fig. 6C). Based on these data, we concluded that phosphorylation of Hrs residue Y329 and/or Y334 is critical for the efficient degradation of ubiquitinated EGF receptors.
|
To determine whether the altered Hrs phosphorylation kinetics in Cbl-expressing cells reflected Hrs degradation, we utilized the experimental Hrs knockdown and reconstitution system employed for our EGFR degradation studies. Endogenous Hrs was knocked down using shRNA and restored by expression of wild-type or Y329,334F murine Hrs. Very low-level Hrs expression was key for these experiments: even modest Hrs overexpression abrogated the Cbl-dependent decrease in Y334 phosphorylation at the 40- and 90-minute stimulation time points (not shown). We assume that reduction of the cellular Hrs pool by knockdown and low-level reconstitution artificially elevated the proportion of Hrs that was recruited to sorting sites and phosphorylated, thereby facilitating analysis of its degradation. As shown in Fig. 7A, cell reconstitution with wild-type Hrs produced phosphorylation kinetics identical to those seen with the endogenous protein (Fig. 1C). The time-dependent decrease in Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation coincided with a reproducible decrease in total Hrs protein (Fig. 7A, top and middle, lanes 2 to 4; quantification provided in Fig. 7B). No decrease in the Hrs level was observed upon expression of the phosphorylation mutant Y329,334F (Fig. 7A, top, lanes 5 to 7; quantification shown in Fig. 7B). Taken together, our data suggested that Hrs degradation is regulated by Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation and that these linked processes control EGFR degradation.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation and Cbl-enhanced EGFR degradation require Cbl's tyrosine kinase-binding and E3/ubiquitin ligase activities (Fig. 4 and 5). Our results are consistent with previous mechanistic models in which receptor-associated monoubiquitin binds to the Hrs UIM, thereby retaining receptors at endosomal sorting sites (1, 43, 51). Cbl's enhancement of Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation may be entirely due to Cbl-mediated EGFR ubiquitination, which would increase the recruitment of activated EGFR/Src family kinase complexes (3) to endosomal Hrs via ubiquitin-UIM interactions. The present study did not address the nature of the Hrs kinase, nor did it test whether Cbl-mediated EGFR ubiquitination is the sole activity required for Cbl-enhanced Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation.
Rather, our results identify molecular events that result from Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation. A key finding of this work is that phosphorylation of Hrs Y329 and/or Y334 programs ubiquitinated Hrs for degradation (Fig. 7A). Monoubiquitinated Hrs is compromised for binding ubiquitinated cargo (17). The depletion of ubiquitinated Hrs from endosomal limiting membranes would facilitate its replacement by nonubiquitinated Hrs at sorting sites. In turn, this would permit additional cycles of ubiquitinated cargo recruitment, thereby sustaining degradative sorting of EGFR. This model is compatible with the fact that Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation is critical for efficient EGFR degradation (Fig. 6).
Our findings are consistent with a recent report addressing the potential regulation of another receptor tyrosine kinase by Hrs (1). Abella and colleagues showed that the Met receptor mutant Y1003F, which lacks the binding site for direct recruitment of Cbl, is deficient for degradation (1). The defect was associated with enhanced signaling through the Ras-MAP kinase pathway and with cellular tumorigenicity. Covalent attachment of ubiquitin to the C terminus of Met Y1003F decreased Met stability and MAP kinase signaling and enhanced Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation. It is noteworthy that, under the experimental conditions used, Met was continuously activated by its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, and was capable of recruiting Cbl indirectly via a Grb2-mediated mechanism. Thus, receptor monoubiquitination enhanced the degradation of activated, Cbl-associated Met. Importantly, the results did not show that receptor monoubiquitination is sufficient to produce efficient receptor degradation without receptor activation, Cbl recruitment, or Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation. As in the EGFR model system, additional effects of the activated receptor and/or receptor-associated Cbl might be important for the regulation of Hrs and receptor fate.
Based on our results in the EGFR system (Fig. 1 and 2B), we propose a role for Cbl's E3 activity in regulating receptor tyrosine kinase trafficking, not only at the cell surface (inducing the receptor ubiquitination needed for endosomal UIM binding), but also at the early endosome. A requirement for Cbl-mediated ubiquitination of endosomal Hrs is consistent with a prior report that Cbl-EGFR interactions must be maintained throughout the endocytic pathway for efficient receptor degradation to occur (31). Our data indicate that two Cbl-dependent posttranslational modifications of Hrs may act through distinct mechanisms to regulate the Hrs trafficking checkpoint. Cbl-mediated Hrs ubiquitination would constitute a switch to inactivate the UIM of cargo-loaded Hrs, thereby facilitating cargo transfer to other ubiquitin-binding proteins downstream in the sorting pathway. Ubiquitination also may enhance the relocation of Hrs to the cytosol (Fig. 2 and unpublished results). Cbl-dependent Hrs phosphorylation would mark the inactive cytosolic Hrs for degradation. Our model accommodates various reports in the literature, in which Hrs has been shown to promote the apparently opposing processes of receptor degradation and receptor recycling (13, 21, 23, 30, 54). With different posttranslational modifications, Hrs may perform both functions. The order in which Hrs phosphorylation and ubiquitination occur at the endosomal limiting membrane is not addressed here. It represents an intriguing subject for future investigations.
A subset of our results is reminiscent of G-protein-coupled receptor regulation by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4. Marchese and colleagues demonstrated that AIP4 promotes the agonist-induced degradation of receptor CXCR4 via ubiquitination of both CXCR4 and Hrs (33). However, AIP4 regulation of CXCR4 differs from Cbl regulation of EGFR at the level of Hrs posttranslational modifications: activation of CXCR4 fails to induce detectable Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation (33). This suggests that, while a variety of activated receptors effect Hrs ubiquitination via a receptor-associated E3, fewer regulate Hrs subcellular location and degradation via Hrs tyrosine phosphorylation.
How might tyrosine phosphorylation target ubiquitinated Hrs for degradation? It is not yet known whether Hrs phosphorylation alters the structure of Hrs, its binding to PI3-P and retention on endosomes, its association with endosomal clathrin domains, or its oligomerization. Such events could induce Hrs relocation from endosomal limiting membranes to the cytosol. They also might facilitate Hrs polyubiquitination and degradation by proteasomes. Further research will be needed to address these possibilities.
Finally, we note that the maintenance of cellular Hrs levels requires proteasome activity and/or a significant pool of free ubiquitin (Fig. 7C), both of which are reduced upon MG132 treatment of cells. This observation may explain, at least in part, prior reports that MG132 blocks EGFR sorting from early to late endosomes (35) and inhibits the translocation of EGFR from the limiting membrane of multivesicular bodies to their lumenal vesicles (31). Both of these outcomes may actually result from MG132-induced decreases in the cellular pool of Hrs.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Research Scholar Grant RSG-03-046-01 from the American Cancer Society (to N.L.L.), a Carver Trust Foundation Collaborative Pilot Grant from the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine (to N.L.L. and R.C.P.), and institutional training grants NRSA T32 DEO14678-04 and DEO14678-03 (from NIDCR to Christopher Squier and the Dows Institute and College of Dentistry at the University of Iowa, for support of K.A.S. and N.L.L., respectively).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 13 November 2006. ![]()
Present address: Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17821. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Asao, H., Y. Sasaki, T. Arita, N. Tanaka, K. Endo, H. Kasai, T. Takeshita, Y. Endo, T. Fujita, and K. Sugamura. 1997. Hrs is associated with STAM, a signal-transducing adaptor molecule. Its suppressive effect on cytokine-induced cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 272:32785-32791.
3. Bache, K. G., C. Raiborg, A. Mehlum, I. H. Madshus, and H. Stenmark. 2002. Phosphorylation of Hrs downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:3881-3887.[Medline]
4. Bilodeau, P. S., J. L. Urbanowski, S. C. Winistorfer, and R. C. Piper. 2002. The Vps27p Hse1p complex binds ubiquitin and mediates endosomal protein sorting. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:534-539.[Medline]
5. Bilodeau, P. S., S. C. Winistorfer, W. R. Kearney, A. D. Robertson, and R. C. Piper. 2003. Vps27-Hse1 and ESCRT-I complexes cooperate to increase efficiency of sorting ubiquitinated proteins at the endosome. J. Cell Biol. 163:237-243.
6. Bishop, N., A. Horman, and P. Woodman. 2002. Mammalian class E vps proteins recognize ubiquitin and act in the removal of endosomal protein-ubiquitin conjugates. J. Cell Biol. 157:91-101.
7. Blagoev, B., S. E. Ong, I. Kratchmarova, and M. Mann. 2004. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1139-1145.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Burke, P., K. Schooler, and H. S. Wiley. 2001. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling by endocytosis and intracellular trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:1897-1910.
9. Duan, L., Y. Miura, M. Dimri, B. Majumder, I. L. Dodge, A. L. Reddi, A. Ghosh, N. Fernandes, P. Zhou, K. Mullane-Robinson, N. Rao, S. Donoghue, R. A. Rogers, D. Bowtell, M. Naramura, H. Gu, V. Band, and H. Band. 2003. Cbl-mediated ubiquitinylation is required for lysosomal sorting of epidermal growth factor receptor but is dispensable for endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 278:28950-28960.
10. Gaullier, J. M., A. Simonsen, A. D'Arrigo, B. Bremnes, H. Stenmark, and R. Aasland. 1998. FYVE fingers bind PtdIns(3)P. Nature 394:432-433.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Haglund, K., S. Sigismund, S. Polo, I. Szymkiewicz, P. P. Di Fiore, and I. Dikic. 2003. Multiple monoubiquitination of RTKs is sufficient for their endocytosis and degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:461-466.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Hammond, D. E., S. Carter, J. McCullough, S. Urbe, G. Vande Woude, and M. J. Clague. 2003. Endosomal dynamics of Met determine signaling output. Mol. Biol. Cell. 14:1346-1354.
13. Hanyaloglu, A. C., E. McCullagh, and M. von Zastrow. 2005. Essential role of Hrs in a recycling mechanism mediating functional resensitization of cell signaling. EMBO J. 24:2265-2283.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Haugh, J. M., A. C. Huang, H. S. Wiley, A. Wells, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1999. Internalized epidermal growth factor receptors participate in the activation of p21(ras) in fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 274:34350-34360.
15. Haugh, J. M., K. Schooler, A. Wells, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1999. Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor internalization on regulation of the phospholipase C-
1 signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274:8958-8965.
16. Hicke, L. 1999. Gettin' down with ubiquitin: turning off cell-surface receptors, transporters and channels. Trends Cell Biol. 9:107-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Hoeller, D., N. Crosetto, B. Blagoev, C. Raiborg, R. Tikkanen, S. Wagner, K. Kowanetz, R. Breitling, M. Mann, H. Stenmark, and I. Dikic. 2006. Regulation of ubiquitin-binding proteins by monoubiquitination. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:163-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Holler, D., and I. Dikic. 2004. Receptor endocytosis via ubiquitin-dependent and -independent pathways. Biochem. Pharmacol. 67:1013-1017.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Huang, F., D. Kirkpatrick, X. Jiang, S. Gygi, and A. Sorkin. 2006. Differential regulation of EGF receptor internalization and degradation by multiubiquitination within the kinase domain. Mol. Cell 21:737-748.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Huang, F., and A. Sorkin. 2005. Growth factor receptor binding protein 2-mediated recruitment of the RING domain of Cbl to the epidermal growth factor receptor is essential and sufficient to support receptor endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:1268-1281.
21. Jekely, G., and P. Rorth. 2003. Hrs mediates downregulation of multiple signalling receptors in Drosophila. EMBO Rep. 4:1163-1168.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Johannessen, L. E., T. Ringerike, J. Molnes, and I. H. Madshus. 2000. Epidermal growth factor receptor efficiently activates mitogen-activated protein kinase in HeLa cells and Hep2 cells conditionally defective in clathrin-dependent endocytosis. Exp. Cell Res. 260:136-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Kanazawa, C., E. Morita, M. Yamada, N. Ishii, S. Miura, H. Asao, T. Yoshimori, and K. Sugamura. 2003. Effects of deficiencies of STAMs and Hrs, mammalian class E Vps proteins, on receptor downregulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 309:848-856.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Komada, M., and N. Kitamura. 1995. Growth factor-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Hrs, a novel 115-kilodalton protein with a structurally conserved putative zinc finger domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6213-6221.[Abstract]
25. Komada, M., R. Masaki, A. Yamamoto, and N. Kitamura. 1997. Hrs, a tyrosine kinase substrate with a conserved double zinc finger domain, is localized to the cytoplasmic surface of early endosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 272:20538-20544.
26. Langdon, W. Y., J. W. Hartley, S. P. Klinken, S. K. Ruscetti, and H. C. Morse III. 1989. v-cbl, an oncogene from a dual-recombinant murine retrovirus that induces early B-lineage lymphomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:1168-1172.
27. Levkowitz, G., H. Waterman, S. A. Ettenberg, M. Katz, A. Y. Tsygankov, I. Alroy, S. Lavi, K. Iwai, Y. Reiss, A. Ciechanover, S. Lipkowitz, and Y. Yarden. 1999. Ubiquitin ligase activity and tyrosine phosphorylation underlie suppression of growth factor signaling by c-Cbl/Sli-1. Mol. Cell 4:1029-1040.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Levkowitz, G., H. Waterman, E. Zamir, Z. Kam, S. Oved, W. Y. Langdon, L. Beguinot, B. Geiger, and Y. Yarden. 1998. c-Cbl/Sli-1 regulates endocytic sorting and ubiquitination of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Genes Dev. 12:3663-3674.
29. Lill, N. L., P. Douillard, R. A. Awwad, S. Ota, M. L. Lupher, Jr., S. Miyake, N. Meissner-Lula, V. W. Hsu, and H. Band. 2000. The evolutionarily conserved N-terminal region of Cbl is sufficient to enhance down-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 275:367-377.
30. Lloyd, T. E., R. Atkinson, M. N. Wu, Y. Zhou, G. Pennetta, and H. J. Bellen. 2002. Hrs regulates endosome membrane invagination and tyrosine kinase receptor signaling in Drosophila. Cell 108:261-269.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Longva, K. E., F. D. Blystad, E. Stang, A. M. Larsen, L. E. Johannessen, and I. H. Madshus. 2002. Ubiquitination and proteasomal activity is required for transport of the EGF receptor to inner membranes of multivesicular bodies. J. Cell Biol. 156:843-854.
32. Lu, Q., L. W. Hope, M. Brasch, C. Reinhard, and S. N. Cohen. 2003. TSG101 interaction with HRS mediates endosomal trafficking and receptor down-regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:7626-7631.
33. Marchese, A., C. Raiborg, F. Santini, J. H. Keen, H. Stenmark, and J. L. Benovic. 2003. The E3 ubiquitin ligase AIP4 mediates ubiquitination and sorting of the G protein-coupled receptor CXCR4. Dev. Cell. 5:709-722.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Marmor, M. D., and Y. Yarden. 2004. Role of protein ubiquitylation in regulating endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene 23:2057-2070.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Melikova, M. S., K. A. Kondratov, and E. S. Kornilova. 2006. Two different stages of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor endocytosis are sensitive to free ubiquitin depletion produced by proteasome inhibitor MG132. Cell Biol. Int. 30:31-43.[Medline]
36. Miyake, S., K. P. Mullane-Robinson, N. L. Lill, P. Douillard, and H. Band. 1999. Cbl-mediated negative regulation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-dependent cell proliferation. A critical role for Cbl tyrosine kinase-binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274:16619-16628.
37. Mosesson, Y., K. Shtiegman, M. Katz, Y. Zwang, G. Vereb, J. Szollosi, and Y. Yarden. 2003. Endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases is driven by monoubiquitylation, not polyubiquitylation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:21323-21326.
38. Murphy, M. A., R. G. Schnall, D. J. Venter, L. Barnett, I. Bertoncello, C. B. Thien, W. Y. Langdon, and D. D. Bowtell. 1998. Tissue hyperplasia and enhanced T-cell signalling via ZAP-70 in c-Cbl-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4872-4882.
39. Oksvold, M. P., E. Skarpen, B. Lindeman, N. Roos, and H. S. Huitfeldt. 2000. Immunocytochemical localization of Shc and activated EGF receptor in early endosomes after EGF stimulation of HeLa cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48:21-33.
40. Oksvold, M. P., E. Skarpen, L. Wierod, R. E. Paulsen, and H. S. Huitfeldt. 2001. Re-localization of activated EGF receptor and its signal transducers to multivesicular compartments downstream of early endosomes in response to EGF. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 80:285-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Raiborg, C., K. G. Bache, D. J. Gillooly, I. H. Madshus, E. Stang, and H. Stenmark. 2002. Hrs sorts ubiquitinated proteins into clathrin-coated microdomains of early endosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:394-398.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Raiborg, C., K. G. Bache, A. Mehlum, E. Stang, and H. Stenmark. 2001. Hrs recruits clathrin to early endosomes. EMBO J. 20:5008-5021.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Row, P. E., M. J. Clague, and S. Urbe. 2005. Growth factors induce differential phosphorylation profiles of the Hrs-STAM complex: a common node in signalling networks with signal-specific properties. Biochem. J. 389:629-636.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Shih, S. C., D. J. Katzmann, J. D. Schnell, M. Sutanto, S. D. Emr, and L. Hicke. 2002. Epsins and Vps27p/Hrs contain ubiquitin-binding domains that function in receptor endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:389-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Sigismund, S., T. Woelk, C. Puri, E. Maspero, C. Tacchetti, P. Transidico, P. P. Di Fiore, and S. Polo. 2005. Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ubiquitinated cargos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:2760-2765.
46. Slieker, L. J., and M. D. Lane. 1985. Post-translational processing of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Glycosylation-dependent acquisition of ligand-binding capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 260:687-690.
47. Slieker, L. J., T. M. Martensen, and M. D. Lane. 1986. Synthesis of epidermal growth factor receptor in human A431 cells. Glycosylation-dependent acquisition of ligand binding activity occurs post-translationally in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 261:15233-15241.
48. Steen, H., B. Kuster, M. Fernandez, A. Pandey, and M. Mann. 2002. Tyrosine phosphorylation mapping of the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1031-1039.
49. Thien, C. B., and W. Y. Langdon. 1997. EGF receptor binding and transformation by v-cbl is ablated by the introduction of a loss-of-function mutation from the Caenorhabditis elegans sli-1 gene. Oncogene 14:2239-2249.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Urbe, S., I. G. Mills, H. Stenmark, N. Kitamura, and M. J. Clague. 2000. Endosomal localization and receptor dynamics determine tyrosine phosphorylation of hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7685-7692.
51. Urbe, S., M. Sachse, P. E. Row, C. Preisinger, F. A. Barr, G. Strous, J. Klumperman, and M. J. Clague. 2003. The UIM domain of Hrs couples receptor sorting to vesicle formation. J. Cell Sci. 116:4169-4179.
52. Visser, G. D., and N. L. Lill. 2005. The Cbl RING finger C-terminal flank controls epidermal growth factor receptor fate downstream of receptor ubiquitination. Exp. Cell Res. 311:281-293.[CrossRef][Medline]
53. Waterman, H., M. Katz, C. Rubin, K. Shtiegman, S. Lavi, A. Elson, T. Jovin, and Y. Yarden. 2002. A mutant EGF-receptor defective in ubiquitylation and endocytosis unveils a role for Grb2 in negative signaling. EMBO J. 21:303-313.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Yan, Q., W. Sun, P. Kujala, Y. Lotfi, T. A. Vida, and A. J. Bean. 2005. CART: an Hrs/actinin-4/BERP/myosin V protein complex required for efficient receptor recycling. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:2470-2482.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||