| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2007, p. 2359-2371, Vol. 27, No. 6
0270-7306/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.02189-06
1 Receptor
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 22 November 2006/ Accepted 2 January 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene (TR
1PV) were created previously to explore the roles of mutated TR
1 in vivo. TR
1PV is a dominant negative mutant with a frameshift mutation in the carboxyl-terminal 14 amino acids that results in the loss of T3 binding and transcription capacity. Homozygous knock-in TR
1PV/PV mice are embryonic lethal, and heterozygous TR
1PV/+ mice display the striking phenotype of dwarfism. These mutant mice provide a valuable tool for identifying the defects that contribute to dwarfism. Here we show that white adipose tissue (WAT) mass was markedly reduced in TR
1PV/+ mice. The expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), the key regulator of adipogenesis, was repressed at both mRNA and protein levels in WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice. Moreover, TR
1PV acted to inhibit the transcription activity of PPAR
by competition with PPAR
for binding to PPAR
response elements and for heterodimerization with the retinoid X receptors. The expression of TR
1PV blocked the T3-dependent adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells and repressed the expression of PPAR
. Thus, mutations of TR
1 severely affect adipogenesis via cross talk with PPAR
signaling. The present study suggests that defects in adipogenesis could contribute to the phenotypic manifestation of reduced body weight in TR
1PV/+ mice. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1, ß1, ß2, and ß3. TRs bind to specific DNA sequences (thyroid hormone response elements) on promoters to regulate target gene transcription (3). TR transcription is regulated at multiple levels (10). In addition to that by T3 and types of thyroid hormone response elements, TR transcription is modulated by tissue- and development-dependent TR isoform expression (3) and by a host of corepressors and coactivators (7, 30). Given the important biological functions of TRs, it is reasonable to expect that mutations of TRs could have deleterious effects. Indeed, mutations of the TRß gene are known to cause the genetic syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH) (45). TRß mutants identified in patients with RTH lose T3 binding activity and transcription capacity and act in a dominant negative manner to cause clinical phenotypes (43, 45). Patients with RTH are usually heterozygotes with only one mutated TRß gene (43). Some of the reported clinical features include goiter, short stature, decreased weight, tachycardia, hearing loss, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, decreased IQ, and dyslexia (5, 43). One patient homozygous for a mutant TRß who displayed an extraordinary and complex phenotype of extreme RTH, with very high levels of thyroid hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), has been reported (31).
A mouse model that faithfully recapitulates human RTH has been created (TRßPV mouse [23]). This knock-in mutant mouse harbors a potent dominant negative TRß mutation found in an RTH patient known as PV (29, 33). This mouse model not only allows the elucidation of the molecular basis of RTH in vivo (9) but also enables the discovery of other diseases caused by the mutations of both TRß alleles. Indeed, homozygous TRßPV/PV mice spontaneously develop follicular thyroid carcinoma (39, 47) and pituitary tumors (16), indicating the severe consequences of mutations of both TRß alleles (8, 11, 12).
One central issue in understanding the biology of TR is whether TR
1 and TRß serve redundant or specific roles. Studies of mice deficient for either of the two TR genes or for both TR genes indicate that TR isoforms have both redundant roles and specific functions (14). To ascertain whether mutations of the TR
gene cause common or distinct abnormalities compared with mutations of the TRß gene, we have created another knock-in mouse (TR
1PV mouse [22]) by targeting the same PV mutation to the corresponding locus of the TR
gene. Strikingly, the TR
1PV mouse exhibits a phenotype distinct from that of the TRßPV mouse. In contrast to the case with TRßPV mice, TR
1PV mice do not display the RTH phenotype. This lack of an RTH phenotype is consistent with the observation that no mutations of the TR
gene have ever been detected in patients with RTH. Homozygous mutations of the TR
gene are more deleterious than are homozygous mutations of the TRß gene in that TR
1PV/PV mice die either near the end of the gestation period or very shortly after birth (22). Moreover, TR
1PV/+ mice are dwarfs with reduced body lengths and weights, have reduced fertility and high mortality rates, and display distinct abnormal T3 target gene expression profiles (22). These observations indicate that mutations of TR
1 and TRß genes result in different abnormalities, suggesting that the actions of these two TR mutant isoforms are distinct in vivo.
We have previously shown that the reduced body lengths of TR
1PV/+ mice are due to delayed bone development and shorter long bones (32). To further understand the molecular action of TR
1PV in vivo, the purpose of this study was to identify the defects contributing to severe weight reduction of TR
1PV/+ mice. We found that TR
1PV/+ mice had impairments in the adipogenesis of white adipose tissue (WAT) but not brown adipose tissue (BAT). The impaired adipogenesis of WAT was, at least in part, due to the repression of the expression and transcription activity of the master regulator of adipogenesis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
). Thus, TR
1PV mediates the reduction of WAT mass via the repression of critical genes in adipogenesis, contributing to the phenotypic expression of severe reduced body weight observed in dwarfism.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1PV mice was performed using specific primers for TR
1 (22). Wild-type littermates were used for the comparison of phenotypes. To determine the effect of T3 on target gene expression in vivo, wild-type male mice (age, 2 to 3 months) were divided into three groups (n = 4 to 5). One group of mice was rendered into a hypothyroid state by feeding with a low-iodine diet supplemented with 0.15% propylthiouracil (PTU) (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI) for 35 days. Another group of mice was fed the same diet (low-iodine with PTU) for 35 days, but was rendered into a hyperthyroid state by daily T3 intraperitoneal injections (5 µg per 20 g of body weight) during the last 5 days. They were dissected 24 h after the last T3 injection. Control groups received no treatment. The hypothyroid or hyperthyroid state of mice was confirmed by the determination of serum thyroid hormone levels (48).
Construction of pcDNA3.1-TR
1 and pcDNA3.1-TR
1PV.
The plasmid pCLC61 (26) was used as the PCR template to clone human TR
1PV into pFLAG-CMV2 (Sigma). To replace the human TR
1 C-terminal region (amino acids 394 to 410) with the human PV mutation (16 amino acids derived from TRß PV), two primers (TR
1-EcoRI, GCGAATTCAGAACAGAAGCCAAGCAAGGTG, and TR
1PV-BamHI, AATGGATCCTCAGTCTAATCCTCGAACACTTCCAAGAACAAAGGG [underlined portions of sequences indicate restriction sites]) and an adaptor (TR
1PV adaptor, CTTCCAAGAACAAAGGGGGGAAGAGTTCTGTGGGGGCACTCGACTTTCATG) were used in the PCR. This cloned plasmid was designated Flag-TR
1PV. To generate pcDNA3.1-TR
1 and pcDNA3.1-TR
1PV expression plasmids, pCLC61 and Flag-TR
1PV were used as templates, respectively, and primers hTR
1-BamHI-5' (CGCGGATCCATGGAACAGAAGCCAAGC), hTR
1-EcoRI-3' (CCGGAATTCTTAGACTTCCTGATCCTC), and hTRß PV-EcoRI-3' (CCGGAATTCTCAGTCTAATCCTCGAAC) were designed. Underlined portions of sequences indicate the restriction sites. All of the plasmid constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Determination of serum hormones and glucose. Serum levels of total T4 and T3 were determined by using a GammaCoat T4 or T3 radioimmunoassay kit (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Serum glucose (nonfasting) was determined by using the method of glucose oxidation (Accu-Chek glucose monitor; Roche Diagnostics Co., Indianapolis, IN). Triglycerides and free fatty acids were measured using assay kits (catalog no. TR22421 [Thermo Trace Ltd., Melbourne, Australia] and catalog no. 1383175 [Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany], respectively) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Serum adiponectin, insulin, and leptin were measured by radioimmunoassays (catalog no. MADP-60HK, SRI-13K, and ML-82K, respectively; Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO).
Glucose tolerance test. Fasted mice were given 1.5 g glucose per kilogram of body weight intraperitoneally. One drop of whole blood was obtained from the mouse tails and placed on a LifeScan glucometer glucose test strip immediately. Blood was obtained 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after the glucose injection.
Insulin tolerance test. Fasted mice were given 1 mU of regular insulin per gram body weight intraperitoneally. Blood glucose levels were measured 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after the insulin injection, by a method similar to that described above for the glucose tolerance test.
Determination of G6PDH activity.
Inguinal fat was dissected and processed, and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) activity was measured as described previously (6), with modifications. Briefly, inguinal fat was minced, homogenized in 5 volumes of ice-cold 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.32 M sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and filtered through two layers of gauze. After centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min and skimming off of the top fat layer, the supernatant was centrifuged for 1 h at 100,000 x g to obtain the cytosolic fraction. G6PDH activity was determined in 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM glucose 6-phosphate, 1 mM NADP+, and a suitable amount of diluted cytosolic protein (
50 to 100 µg). The formation of NADPH at room temperature (absorbance, A340) was measured for 10 min at 30-s intervals. The enzyme activity was expressed as the change in optical density per minute per milligram of protein.
Lipolysis assay. Epididymal adipose tissue was removed and washed in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4). Fat cells were isolated as previously described (27, 35). The lipolysis assays were carried out similarly as previously described (13, 27, 42). Briefly, fat cells (500 cells/100 µl) were incubated in a 96-well microtiter plate for 2 h at 37°C in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 40 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 3 µmol of glucose, and 0.1 mg/ml ascorbic acid in the absence or presence of an increasing concentration of norepinephrine, forskolin, or dibutyryl cyclic AMP (cAMP). Lipolytic activity was determined by glycerol release using a standard kit assay (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Each assay was run in triplicate.
For the comparison of adipocytes in WAT between TR
1PV/PV mice and wild-type mice, inguinal fat pads were removed and tissues with same weight (150 mg) were minced and digested using 1 ml type 2 collagenase (0.2% in Hanks' balanced salt solution containing 1% bovine serum albumin, 3 mM CaCl2, and 50 ng/ml gentamicin). The digestion was carried out in a 37°C shaker for about 20 to 30 min to complete the dissociation of cells. After centrifugation at 1,000 rpm for 10 min, the mature adipocytes on the top white layer and the stromal vascular fraction containing preadipocytes in the pellet were resuspended in 10% fetal bovine serum-Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and counted using a Beckman Coulter Z1.
Cell cultures. The 3T3-L1 cells (ATCC CL-173) were maintained in DMEM with 4.5 g/liter glucose, 10% calf serum, and penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) in a humidified incubator at 5% CO2. Cells were subcultured at a split ratio of 1:4. Adipocyte differentiation was induced as described previously (38, 44), with modifications. After cells reached confluence, they were incubated with DMEM containing 10% resin-stripped calf serum with or without 2 nM T3 for 36 h, at which time (day 0) the cells were treated with 1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma, MO) and 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methyl xanthine (IBMX) (Sigma) in the presence or absence of 2 nM T3 for 60 h. Thereafter, the cells were fed every other day with DMEM containing 10% resin-stripped fetal bovine serum with or without 2 nM T3 until being stained by Oil Red O or harvested for Western blot analysis at day 9.
For Oil Red O staining of cells, 35-mm dishes or six-well plates were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline, and cells were fixed in 10% formalin solution (Sigma) for 50 min, followed by staining with Oil Red O for 1 h. Oil Red O was prepared by diluting a stock solution (0.12 g of Oil Red O [Sigma] in 24 ml of isopropanol) with water (6:4), followed by filtration. After staining, dishes or plates were washed three times in water and scanned by the Astra 6450 scanner (UMAX Technologies, Dallas, TX) or photographed with an Eclipse TE2000 (Nikon Instruments, Inc., NY) inverted microscope system at x100 magnification or an Eclipse TS100 with a Coolpix (Nikon) digital camera at x40 magnification.
To determine the effect of TR
1PV on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells, cells were transfected with 4 or 6 µg of the expression vector for TR
1PV (FLAG-TR
1PV) or pFLAG-CMV2, as a control, using the Nucleofector II device with cell line Nucleofector solution V according to the manufacturer's protocol (Amaxa, Inc.). After transfection, cells were plated into 35-mm dishes or six-well plates and cultured for 24 h and induced to differentiate by the protocol described above. Eleven days after transfection, cells were stained with Oil Red O. Cells were also lysed for Western blot analysis by using anti-Flag and C4 antibodies to detect Flag-TR
1PV and TR
1, respectively.
For the generation of the cell lines stably expressing Flag-TR
1PV, human TR
1PV cDNA was cloned into pFH-IRESneo (a generous gift of Robert G. Roeder, Rockefeller University, New York, NY) to obtain pFH-TR
1PV as described previously (28, 46). 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with pFH-TR
1PV or with pFH-IRESneo as a control by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as a transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol and selected with 350 µg/ml of G418 (Gibco) as previously described (28, 46). Pooled G418-resistant clones were expanded in selection medium. The expression of the stably transfected gene was confirmed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG (Sigma) and TR
1PV antibodies (C3 or 302).
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
RNA from fat tissues was extracted using an RNeasy lipid tissue mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The determination of mRNA by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out as described previously by Ying et al. (47) by using total fat RNA (100 ng) and the following primers and sequences: mTR
1 forward (nucleotides [nt] 1286 to 1304), CAGCTCAAGAATGGTGGCT, and reverse (nt 1660 to 1639), GACTTCCTGATCCTCAAAGACC; mTRß1 forward (nt 889 to 908), ACAGCAAGAGGCTAGCCAAG, and reverse (nt 1154 to 1135), ACTGAAGGCTTCCAGGTCAA; mAdipsin forward (nt 273 to 292), TCCGCCCCTGAACCCTACAA, and reverse (nt 591 to 572), TAATGGTGACTACCCCGTCA; maP2 forward (nt 219 to 241), CTGGACTTCAGAGGCTCATAGCA, and reverse (nt 106 to 82), TACTCTCTGACCGGATGGTGACCAA; mACC forward (nt 6036 to 6056), GAGACGCTGGTTTGTAGAAGT, and reverse (nt 6285 to 6267), TCGCTGGGTGGGTGAGATG; mFAS forward (nt 65 to 84), CGGTATGTCGGGGAAGTTGC, and reverse (nt 346 to 326), CGGAGTGAGGCTGGGTTGATA; mG6PD forward (nt 642 to 662), GAGGAGTTCTTTGCCCGTAAT, and reverse (nt 968 to 948) CATCTCTTTGCCCAGGTAGTG; and m18S forward, ACCGCAGCTAGGAATAATGGA, and reverse CAAATGCTTTCGCTCTGGTC.
The primer sequences for lipoprotein lipase (LpL), PPAR
, and the control glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) have been described previously by Ying et al. (47).
Western blot analysis.
The liver and fat tissues were dissected, cut into small pieces, and homogenized with Dounce homogenizer in 0.32 M sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4). This homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 10 min. The top fat layer of white fat homogenate was discarded, and the pellets were resuspended for the preparation of nuclear or cytosolic extract using a NE-PER kit (Pierce; catalog no. 78833) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) with bovine serum albumin (Pierce Chemical Co.) as the standard. Western blot analysis was carried out as described previously (16). For the detection of PPAR
, nuclear fractions (25 µg) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The primary antibody used in the Western blot analysis was monoclonal anti-PPAR
antibody (1:100 dilution; catalog no. sc-7273; Santa Cruz, Inc.). For the control of protein loading of nuclear extracts, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) was used (anti-PARP antibody [1:100 dilution; catalog no. sc-7150; Santa Cruz, Inc.]).
Transient transfection.
Transient transfection experiments were carried out in CV1 cells as described previously by Araki et al. (2). Cells (1.5 x 105 cells/well) in six-well plates were transfected with pPPRE-TK-Luc (0.5 µg) and PPAR
1 expression vector (1 µg of pSG5/stop-mPPAR
) in the absence of TR
1 or PV expression plasmids (pcDNA3.1-TR
1 and pcDNA3.1-TR
1PV, respectively). Twenty-four hours after transfection, 20 µM troglitazone (TZD) or 100 nM T3 was added and incubated for an additional 24 h before harvesting of the cells to determine the luciferase activity. All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times. The results shown are the means ± standard errors of the means (SEM).
Electrophoretic motility shift assay (EMSA).
The double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) (PPRE-5', GAACGTGACCTTTGTCCTGGTCCCCTTTGCT, and PPRE-3', GGGACCAGGACAAAGGTCACGTTCGGGAAAGG; underlined is the PPRE for acyl coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) oxidase, a target gene for PPAR
[19]) was labeled with [32P]dCTP as described previously by Araki et al. (2). About 0.2 ng of probe (3 x 104 to 5 x 104 cpm) was incubated with in vitro-translated PPAR
1, TR
1, or TR
1PV with or without RXRß (2 µl) in the binding buffer. DNA-bound proteins were detected by autoradiography.
Preparation of nuclei and ChIP.
Nuclei from thyroid tissues were isolated as described above for the Western blot analysis. Nuclei pellets were suspended in 0.74 ml of buffer, and the cross-link and subsequent steps were carried out as previously described (1). The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay was performed using a ChIP assay kit (Upstate, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Chromatin solution (1 ml) was immunoprecipitated with 5 µl of anti-TRb1 antibody C4 (4) or anti-PV (T1 [49] or 302 [4]), anti-PPAR
(1 µg; Santa Cruz; catalog no. sc-7196), or anti-NCoR antiserum (5 µl; a generous gift of J. Wong, Baylor College of Medicine); immunoglobulin G (IgG) (2 µg) and MOPC (2 µg) were used as negative controls. The recovered DNA was used as a template for amplification using real-time PCR. Two percent of the chromatin solution (20 µl) was used for the control of input DNA. The primer sequences for the lipoprotein lipase PPRE were 5'-CCTCCCGGTAGGCAAACTG-3' (forward) and 5'-AACGGTGCCAGCGAGAAG-3' (reverse).
The amplified DNA was analyzed on a 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide staining.
Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of analysis of variance, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1PV/+ mice.
TR
1PV/+ mice were created by targeted mutation of TR
1PV into the TR
gene locus (22). The mutated TR
1PV sequence is shown in Fig. 1A. The severe reduced body weight exhibited by TR
1PV/+ mice prompted us to ascertain whether a reduction in fat tissues is one of the impairments contributing to dwarfism. Compared with that in the wild-type siblings, among TR
1PV/+ mice there was a reduction in the mass of inguinal, epididymal, and perirenal fat tissues (WAT). Figure 1B, panel a, shows the percentage ratios of fat mass versus body weight. Figure 1B, panel b, shows that compared with wild-type siblings, TR
1PV/+ mice had a significant reduction in body weight consistent with the previous observation (22). As shown in Fig. 1B, panel a, compared with those of the wild-type siblings, significant 38, 32, and 60% reductions in ratios of fat mass per body weight for inguinal (bar 1, versus bar 2), epididymal (bars 3 versus 4), and perirenal fat (bars 5 versus 6), respectively, were observed in male mice at ages 3 to 6 months (n = 15 to 16; P < 0.01). However, no significant differences in interscapular fat (BAT) mass between TR
1PV/+ mice and wild-type siblings (Fig. 1B, panel a, bar 7 versus bar 8) were observed. Thus, the decrease in WAT mass accounts for the 40% reduction in the total fat mass of TR
1PV/+ mice (Fig. 1B, panel a, bar 9 versus bar 10). The reduction in WAT mass persisted up to the age of more than 1 year. A similar reduction in WAT mass was also observed for female mice (data not shown).
|
1PV/+ mice. On the contrary, TR
1PV/+ mice consumed significantly more food (
34%) than did their wild-type siblings (P < 0.001; n = 15 to 16) (Fig. 1C). Table 1 shows the changes in lipid-related serum hormones and factors accompanied by reductions in adipose tissues in TR
1PV/+ mice compared to those in their wild-type siblings. Among males, there was a significant reduction in the serum levels of free fatty acids (36% [P < 0.01]), total triglycerides (31% [P < 0.05]), and leptin levels (70% [P < 0.0001]) in TR
1PV/+ mice but a significant increase in serum levels of adiponectin (22% [P < 0.05]). In contrast, no significant changes in glucose or insulin were detected in TR
1PV/+ mice relative to those in their wild-type siblings (Table 1). No significant differences in glucose tolerance and insulin tolerance tests were observed between TR
1PV/+ and wild-type mice (data not shown). Similar serum hormonal changes were observed in female TR
1PV/+ mice except that a smaller reduction in leptin was detected in female mice than in male mice (36% [P < 0.05]) (Table 1). The reduction in serum leptin levels is consistent with an increase in food consumption by TR
1PV/+ mice (Fig. 1C). The patterns in changes of serum adipokine levels in TR
1PV/+ mice (i.e., a decrease in leptin and an increase in adiponectin levels) are consistent with the reduced adipose mass (17, 25).
|
1PV/+ mice. We hypothesized that TR
1PV could interfere with the critical functions of wild-type TR
1 during the differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes. Indeed, recent findings indicate that during the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells, TR
1 mRNA is constitutively expressed in preadipocytes (15). Its expression continues to increase during adipogenesis, concurrent with the appearance of lipid droplets (15, 21). In contrast, very little, if any, TRß1 mRNA is detectable in either preadipocytes or adipocytes (15, 21). These findings suggest a critical role of TR
1 during adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells (21). Because discordance in the expression of TR isoforms at the mRNA and protein levels has been reported (37), we evaluated the protein abundance of TR isoforms in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and mature adipocytes. Consistent with the mRNA expression, Fig. 2A shows that, indeed, TR
1 protein was detected in preadipocytes (Fig. 2A, lane 1), and its abundance was increased in mature adipocytes (Fig. 2A, lane 2). However, no TRß1 proteins were detectable in either preadipocytes or adipocytes.
|
1 and TRß1 in these two fractions. Figure 2B shows that TR
1 was the major TR isoform expressed in preadipocytes (bar 1 versus bar 2), whereas TRß1 was more abundantly expressed in mature adipocytes than in preadipocytes (bar 2 versus bar 4). The differential TR isoform expression patterns are consistent with those reported by Fu et al. (15). Taken together, these differential expression patterns of TR isoforms suggest that TR
1 could play a critical role in the adipogenesis of WAT.
TR
1PV-mediated impairment in adipogenesis via repression of PPAR
functions.
The reduction in WAT prompted us to determine first whether it was due to an increase in catecholamine-induced lipolysis. We therefore compared catecholamine-induced lipolysis levels in the WAT of wild-type and TR
1PV/+ mice. Figure 3 shows that the dose-dependent, norepinephrine-induced lipolysis levels measured by glycerol release did not differ significantly between the white fat cells of wild-type and TR
1PV/+ mice. Similar results were found when the release of glycerol was induced by forskolin and dibutyl cAMP (data not shown), indicating that the reduced fat accumulation in the adipocytes of TR
1PV/+ mice was not due to an increase of catecholamine-induced lipolysis.
|
1PV/+ mice have reduced mature adipocytes. We therefore fractioned WAT and separated mature adipocytes from the stromal vascular fraction enriched with preadipocytes. Figure 4A shows that in TR
1PV/+ mice, the number of mature adipocytes was reduced by
50% (compare bars 1 and 2), and the number of preadipocytes was increased by
20% (compare bars 3 and 4). These results show that there were fewer mature adipocytes and more preadipocytes in TR
1PV/+ mice, indicative of impaired adipogenesis in TR
1PV/+ mice.
|
1PV/+ mice (compare bars 2, 4, and 6 with 1, 3, and 5, respectively). Furthermore, the G6PD enzymatic activity was also significantly reduced (Fig. 4C). The reduced expression of these key lipogenic enzymes further supports the notion that the reduced WAT mass of TR
1PV/+ mice is due to impairment in adipogenesis.
To understand how TR
1PV mediates impaired adipogenesis, we focused on the study of PPAR
, the key regulator of adipogenesis in adipocytes. Fig. 5A, bar 2, shows that the expression levels of PPAR
mRNA were reduced by 80% in the WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice compared with those in their wild-type siblings (bar 1). We further determined PPAR
protein levels by Western blot analysis. Figure 5B further shows that the PPAR
protein abundance was reduced in WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice compared with that in their wild-type siblings (panel a, lanes 4 to 5 versus lanes 1 to 3). Quantitative analysis showed an 80% reduction in TR
1PV/+ mice compared with that in their wild-type siblings (Fig. 5B, panel b). Figure 5B, panel c, shows the protein loading control using the nuclear marker PARP.
|
, the expression levels of LpL, adipsin, and aP2, for the PPAR
downstream target genes involved in adipogenesis, were all significantly reduced (Fig. 5A, compare bars 4, 6, and 8 with bars 3, 5, and 7, respectively). These results suggest that mutations of TR
1 led to the reduced expression of PPAR
and the attenuation of its signaling to reduce the expression of several downstream target genes to impair adipogenesis in WAT.
The above findings suggest that the PPAR
gene could be a T3-regulated gene. To test this possibility, we rendered wild-type mice into a hypothyroid state by treating them with PTU and subsequently treated these mice with T3. The PTU-induced hypothyroid state and the subsequent T3-induced hyperthyroid state were confirmed by thyroid function tests (Table 2). As expected, hypothyroid mice induced by PTU had significantly reduced total T4 and highly elevated TSH levels (Table 2) and, upon injection of T3, total T3 was elevated 15-fold accompanied by a lowering of TSH (Table 2). We then compared the expression levels of the PPAR
gene in PTU-induced hypothyroid mice and T3-treated hyperthyroid mice. As shown by quantitative RT-PCR analysis, PPAR
mRNA was reduced by 50% in hypothyroid mice but T3 treatment restored its expression to a level similar to that in the euthyroid state (Fig. 6). We also isolated primary adipocytes and showed that T3 activated the expression of PPAR
mRNA (data not shown). These data indicate that the expression of the PPAR
gene is regulated by T3. These findings are consistent with the repression of the PPAR
gene expression detected in WAT in TR
1PV/+ mice in which TR
1 is mutated (Fig. 5).
|
|
transcription activity by TR
1PV.
In addition to the repression of the PPAR
gene at both the mRNA and protein levels, we postulated that TR
1PV could also act to interfere with the transcription activity of PPAR
. We therefore evaluated the effect of TR
1PV on TZD-dependent, PPAR
-mediated transcription activity (Fig. 7). Compared with bar 1, Fig. 7, bar 2, shows the PPAR
-mediated, TZD-dependent activation of transcription (14-fold). In the absence of T3, the unliganded TR
1 (Fig. 7, bar 4) as well as TR
1PV (bar 6) repressed the TZD-dependent, PPAR
-mediated transcription activity (compare bars 4 and 6 with bar 2). In the presence of T3, the repression effect on the TZD-dependent, PPAR
-mediated transcription activity was derepressed by the liganded TR
1 (Fig. 7, bar 8 versus bar 4). However, no such derepression was observed for TR
1PV (Fig. 7, bar 10 versus bar 6). Thus, the reduced activity of PPAR
induced by TR
1PV was mediated two ways: by the repression of expression and by the inhibition of the transcription activity. These data suggest that the impairment in adipogenesis in WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice was due, at least in part, to the TR
1-mediated, reduced activity of PPAR
.
|
1PV competes with PPAR
for binding to PPRE.
To understand how TR
1PV inhibited TZD-dependent PPAR
transcription activity, we considered the possibility that the repression could be due to the competition of TR
1PV with PPAR
for binding to PPRE. We therefore evaluated the binding of TR
1PV to PPRE by EMSA (Fig. 8). Fig. 8, lane 2, shows that PPAR
binds to PPRE strongly as a heterodimer with RXRß (band a), but binding to PPRE as a homodimer was not detectable under the experimental conditions (lane 1). Although no binding of RXR homodimers to PPRE was observed (Fig. 8, lane 3), the binding of TR
1 to PPRE as a homodimer (lane 4) or as a heterodimer with PPAR
was detected (lane 5). The latter was confirmed by using supershift experiments in which anti-TR
1 antibody C4 (Fig. 8, lane 6) specifically shifted the PPRE-bound PPAR
/TR
1 heterodimers to a more retarded position by EMSA (band b), but not by an irrelevant antibody (MOPC) (Fig. 8, lane 7). TR
1PV also bound to PPRE as a homodimer (Fig. 8, lane 8) or as a heterodimer with PPAR
(lane 9). The latter was confirmed by supershifting the PPRE-bound PPAR
/PV to a more retarded position with anti-PV antibody T1 (Fig. 8, lane 10, band c). However, an irrelevant antibody failed to do so (Fig. 8, lane 11), indicating the specific interaction of PPRE-bound TR
1PV with anti-PV antibody T1.
|
1 or TR
1PV also bound to PPRE as a heterodimer with RXRß (band d in Fig. 8, lanes 12 and 14, respectively). This binding was confirmed by supershifting the PPRE-bound TR
1/RXRß or TR
1PV/RXRß with anti-TR
1 antibody C4 or anti-PV antibody T1 to a more retarded position (Fig. 8, lane 13, band e, and lane 15, band f, respectively). These results indicate that TR
1 and the mutant TR
1PV can bind to PPRE as homodimers and as heterodimers with PPAR
or RXRß.
Since both PPAR
and TRs heterodimerize with RXR on their cognate hormone response elements, the finding that both TR
1 and TR
1PV bound to PPRE as heterodimers with RXRß or PPAR
suggests that TR
1 or TR
1PV could compete with PPAR
for binding to PPRE as a heterodimer with RXR or PPAR
. Figure 9 shows that, indeed, compared with PPRE-bound PPAR
/RXR in the absence of TR
1 (Fig. 9A, lane 2), binding of PPAR
/RXRß to PPRE was decreased in the presence of increasing concentrations of TR
1 (Fig. 9A, lanes 4 to 6) or TR
1PV (Fig. 9A, lanes 7 to 9). This concentration-dependent decrease in the binding by TR
1 or TR
1PV can be seen more readily in Fig. 9B, in which the band intensities in Fig. 9A are quantified and graphed. Taken together, these findings indicate that TR
1PV could act to repress the transcription activity of PPAR
by competition with PPAR
for PPRE and for heterodimerization with RXR. Thus, the TR
1PV-mediated repression of the PPAR
transcription leads to the repression of expression of downstream target genes, thereby contributing to impairment in the adipogenesis of WAT.
|
1PV to the promoter of a PPAR
target gene, the lipoprotein lipase, in WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice.
To further support the notion that the constitutive association of TR
1PV with corepressors, such as nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR), could lead to the repression of PPAR
transcription activity, we carried out ChIP assays using WAT nuclear extracts of TR
1PV/+ mice to determine whether TR
1PV and NCoR were recruited to the promoter of the LpL gene in vivo. The LpL gene is a direct target of PPAR
that contains a PPRE in its promoter between positions 169 and 157 (36). Its mRNA expression is repressed in the WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice (Fig. 5A). Figure 10 shows the recruitment of TR
1PV, NCoR, and PPAR
to the LpL promoter by ChIP assays. TR
1PV was clearly recruited to the LpL promoter since an 81-bp PCR product was detected when DNA-protein complexes were immunoprecipitated by either polyclonal anti-PV-specific antibody T1 (Fig. 10, lane 10) or the monoclonal antibody 302 (Fig. 10, lane 12). As expected, no positive signals were detected in wild-type mice (Fig. 10, lanes 9 and 11). A clear signal for wild-type TRs was detected in wild-type mice (Fig. 10, lane 13) when anti-TR antibody (C4) was used in the assay. As shown in Fig. 10, lane 14, a weak signal was also apparent in TR
1PV/+ mice. That NCoR was also recruited to the LpL promoter was demonstrated with TR
1PV/+ mice (by the positive signal shown in Fig. 10, lane 16) but not with wild-type mice (lane 15). When anti-PPAR
antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the DNA-protein complexes, clear signals were detected to indicate the recruitment of PPAR
to the LpL promoter in TR
1PV/+ mice (Fig. 10, lane 18) as well as in wild-type mice (lane 17). No antibody (Fig. 10, lanes 1 and 2), rabbit IgG (lanes 3 and 4), and MOPC (lanes 5 and 6), an irrelevant mouse monoclonal antibody, were the negative controls for immunoprecipitation, and Fig. 10, lanes 7 and 8, shows the input.
|
1PV.
The studies of TR
1PV/+ mice support the notion that TR
1PV impairs the adipogenesis of WAT by the repression of PPAR
expression and also by the inhibition of PPAR
transcription activity. To demonstrate directly the inhibitory effect of adipogenesis by TR
1PV, we adopted the approach of using a well-characterized 3T3-L1 adipogenesis model (15). Consistent with findings by Jiang et al. (21), we found that T3 increased the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells as indicated by an increased number of adipocytes with lipid droplets (Fig. 11A and B, compare panels a and c). This T3-induced adipogenesis was concurrently accompanied by an increased abundance of PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins in adipocytes (Fig. 11C, compare lanes 3 and 4), while no PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins were visible in preadipocytes (Fig. 11C, lanes 1 and 2). The expression of the transfected TR
1PV (Fig. 11D, panel a, lanes 4 and 5) significantly blocked the T3-induced adipogenesis as evidenced by the reduction of mature adipocytes (Fig. 11A and B, compare panels a and b). The reduction of lipid droplet accumulation in TR
1PV-expressed cells was accompanied by a concurrent reduction of T3-activated expression of the PPAR
1 and PPAR
2 proteins (Fig. 11C, compare lanes 4 and 6). Figure 11D, panel b, shows that TR
1 protein was detected in the preadipocytes (Fig. 11D, panel b, lane 1) as well as in the adipocytes (lanes 2 to 5). Taken together, these cell-based findings further support the notion that TR
1PV interferes with the functions of TR
1 in adipogenesis via the repression of expression and the transcription activity of PPAR
.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1PV/+ mice provided us with a tool to understand how mutations of TR
1 affect WAT homeostasis in vivo. One of the mechanisms uncovered in the present study is that TR
1PV acted to interfere with the expression and activity of the master regulator of adipogenesis, PPAR
. We showed that PPAR
is a T3 positively regulated gene, and its expression at the mRNA and protein levels is significantly repressed in the WAT of TR
1PV/+ mice. Importantly, we also found that the transcription activity of PPAR
was repressed by TR
1PV. The dual repression effects of TR
1PV reduce the expression of several PPAR
downstream target genes involved in adipogenesis, resulting in reduced fat mass. In addition to these in vivo findings, we showed directly that the overexpression of TR
1PV blocked the T3-dependent adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells. At present, whether PPAR
is directly or indirectly regulated by T3 and how a mutated TR
1 represses the expression of PPAR
mRNA are unclear. However, we have demonstrated that the repression of the transcription activity of PPAR
was due to the competition of TR
1PV with PPAR
for binding to PPRE and for heterodimerization with RXR. The former results in the recruitment of a corepressor, NCoR, to TR
1PV-bound PPRE as shown in vivo by the ChIP assays, and the latter results in the reduced PPRE-bound PPAR
/RXR heterodimers, both of which contribute to the repression of PPAR
transcription activity.
However, intriguingly, no significant reduction in BAT mass was observed in TR
1PV/+ mice. This was not due to the lack of expression of TRs in BAT because, consistent with reports by others (20, 34), we found that both TR isoforms were expressed in BAT (our unpublished results). However, in spite of the reduced expression of PPAR
mRNA (
50% compared with that of wild-type mice) detected in the BAT of TR
1PV/+ mice, the expression levels of the PPAR
downstream target genes (for LpL, adipsin, and aP2) were not affected (our unpublished results). These observations suggest that there are other compensatory pathways, independent of TRs and specific to BAT, to ameliorate the deleterious effects of TR
1PV/+ mice in the expression and activity of PPAR
and thereby maintain the lipid homeostasis in BAT. Alternatively, it is also possible that PPAR
has both unique and partially redundant functions in WAT and BAT and that some genes, once activated, do not depend on continued PPAR
expression. Such differential effects of PPAR
on gene expression in WAT and BAT are not without precedent. The differential gene expression profiles in WAT and BAT of TR
1PV/+ mice are reminiscent of those observed in BAT of mice with targeted deletions of PPAR
in adipocytes in that there are differences in gene expression profiles of BAT and WAT deficient in PPAR
(18). While the PPAR
downstream genes, such as aP2 and LpL, are repressed in the WAT of PPAR
knockout mice, there are no changes in the expression of these two genes in BAT (18).
In addition to TR
1PV mice, there are two other reported TR
1 knock-in mice harboring different mutations. Liu et al. reported a knock-in mouse with TR
1P398H mutation and (27), and Tinnikov et al. created a knock-in mouse with a TR
1R384C mutation (40). The availability of TR
1 knock-in mice harboring different mutations provides a valuable tool to address an important biological question of whether phenotypic expression of TR
1 knock-in mice is mutation site dependent. Indeed, while there are similar phenotypic expressions, such as embryonic lethality in homozygous mutation and very mild thyroid function disruption, increased mortality, and decreased fertility, shown in heterozygous mice (18, 22, 27), there are distinctive differences among these three TR
1 knock-in mice. TR
1PV mice are dwarfs and TR
1R384C mice exhibit delayed development in young mice, but the growth abnormalities are overcome in adult mice (40). However, TR
1P398H mice have normal sizes for the first 2 to 3 months and then the males display increased body weights (27). Although it is not known whether TR
1R384C mice have metabolic abnormalities, the present study shows that in contrast to TR
1P398H male mice that show age-dependent visceral adiposity, TR
1PV mice exhibit persistent reduced WAT mass in both males and females up to more than 1 year of age. The differences in the phenotypes exhibited by these three knock-in mice could reflect the different effects of the TR
1 mutants on different PPAR
isoforms expressed in tissue-dependent manners. Thus, TR
1 knock-in mice with different mutations share several common phenotypes but also exhibit distinct target tissue- and sex-dependent phenotypes.
The tissue-dependent distinct phenotypic expression among these three mutant mice harboring different mutations could reflect their differences in the degree of the loss of T3 binding and the potency of dominant negative activity of TR
1 mutants. TR
1PV mice completely lose T3 binding and exhibit potent dominant negative activity (22). In contrast, TR
1P398H and TR
1R384C mice only partially lose T3 binding activity (27, 40). The weaker dominant negative activity of TR
1R384C is consistent with the restoration of the target gene expression and the rescue of growth retardation in TR
1R384C mice when serum T4 concentration was increased 10-fold (40). These different degrees of dominant negative activity in these three TR
1 mutants could reflect the different responses to thyroid hormone in a tissue-dependent manner. Indeed, we compared the extent of the effect of troglitazone-dependent PPAR
-mediated transcription activity by TR
1P398H, TR
1R384C, and TR
1PV and found that the mutant-mediated repression correlated with the extent of the loss of T3 binding activity (H. Ying and S.-Y. Cheng, unpublished). In addition, even though all three of these mutant mice have very similar thyroid function profiles, it is known that regional differences of thyroid hormone can differ in a target tissue due to differential expression and activity of deiodinases. Alternatively, the tissue-dependent distinct phenotype could also be due to the different three-dimensional structures of these three TR
1 mutants. TR
1PV has a frameshift mutation in the C-terminal 16 amino acids and is also 1 amino acid shorter than wild-type TR
1 (22). This PV mutation is located in helix 12. TR
1P398H and TR
1R384C have only one mutated amino acid and are located in helices 12 and 11, respectively (41). It is conceivable that these three mutants have different structures such that their interactions with corepressors, coactivators, and heterodimeric partners could differ in tissue-dependent manners, resulting in different abnormal regulations of target genes and different phenotypic expressions. The validation of this possibility will await crystallographic analysis of these three TR
1 mutants.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank J. Wong of Baylor College of Medicine for anti-NCoR antisera, F. Gonzalez of NCI for pPPRE-TK-Luc and pSG5/stop-mPPAR
plasmids, and O. Gavrilova of NIDDK for valuable discussion and expert assistance in some preliminary studies. We are also grateful to D. Berrigan and S. Hursting of NCI for assistance in determining the fat mass in the early phase of the study.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 12 January 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Araki, O., H. Ying, F. Furuya, X. Zhu, and S.-Y. Cheng. 2005. Thyroid hormone ß receptor mutants: dominant negative regulators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16251-16626.
3. Bassett, J. H., C. B. Harvey, and G. R. Williams. 2003. Mechanisms of thyroid hormone receptor-specific nuclear and extra nuclear actions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 213:1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bhat, M. K., P. McPhie, Y. T. Ting, X.-G. Zhu, and S.-Y. Cheng. 1995. Structure of the carboxy-terminal region of thyroid hormone nuclear receptors and its possible role in hormone-dependent intermolecular interactions. Biochemistry 34:10591-10599.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Brucker-Davis, F., M. C. Skarulis, M. B. Grace, J. Benichou, P. Hauser, E. Wiggs, and B. D. Weintraub. 1995. Genetic and clinical features of 42 kindreds with resistance to thyroid hormone. The National Institutes of Health Prospective Study. Ann. Intern. Med. 123:572-583.
6. Carvalho S. D., N. Negrao, and A. C. Bianco. 1993. Hormonal regulation of malic enzyme and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in brown adipose tissue. Am. J. Physiol. 264:E874-E881.
7. Charlier, T. D., and J. Balthazart. 2005. Modulation of hormonal signaling in the brain by steroid receptor coactivators. Rev. Neurosci. 16:339-357.[Medline]
8. Cheng, S. Y. 2004. Abnormalities of nuclear receptors in thyroid cancer. Cancer Treat. Res. 122:165-178.[Medline]
9. Cheng, S.-Y. 2004. New development in thyroid hormone resistance. Hot Thyroidol. www.hotthyroidology.com/editorial_126.html.
10. Cheng, S.-Y. 2000. Multiple mechanisms for regulation of the transcriptional activity of thyroid hormone receptors. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 1:9-18.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Cheng, S.-Y. 2003. Thyroid hormone receptor mutations in cancer. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 213:23-30.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Cheng, S.-Y. 2005. Thyroid hormone receptor mutations and disease: beyond thyroid hormone resistance. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 16:176-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Engfeldt, P., P. Arner, J. Bolinder, and J. Ostman. 1982. Phosphodiesterase activity in human subcutaneous adipose tissue in insulin- and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 55:983-988.[Abstract]
14. Forrest, D., and B. Vennstrom. 2000. Functions of thyroid hormone receptors in mice. Thyroid 10:41-52.[Medline]