| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2008, p. 333-343, Vol. 28, No. 1
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.01528-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Laboratory of Molecular Entomology, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,1 National Institute of Agrobiological Science, Owashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan,2 Biomolecular Characterization Team, Advanced Development and Supporting Center, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan,3 Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan4
Received 21 August 2007/ Returned for modification 27 September 2007/ Accepted 10 October 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism of sex-specific dsx splicing has been well studied. Female-specific splicing of dsx requires TRA, TRA-2, and an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) element located within the untranslated region of the fourth exon (29, 34, 35). Both TRA and TRA-2 contain Arg/Ser-rich (RS) domains, protein interaction domains characteristic of the Ser/Arg (SR) family of essential splicing factors. SR proteins are thought to function by binding to ESEs and by recruiting the splicing machinery to adjacent introns via protein interactions involving the RS domain (4, 13). The dsx ESE, designated dsxRE, serves as a binding site for the cooperative assembly of the multicomponent splicing enhancer complex containing TRA, TRA-2, and one or more SR proteins (26, 27, 45). This complex functions to activate the upstream female-specific 3' splice site, most likely by facilitating interactions of U2AF (11, 12, 49) and/or other general splicing factors (21, 25) with the RNA.
In the silkworm, Bombyx mori, the chromosomal sex determination mechanism is distinct from that of D. melanogaster, with female (ZW) being the heterogametic sex and male (ZZ) the homogametic sex. It has been shown genetically that female sex in B. mori is determined by the presence of a dominant feminizing factor on the W chromosome (16). Despite this difference, we have recently identified a dsx homolog in B. mori (36). Like dsx, the primary transcript of the Bmdsx gene is alternatively spliced in males and females to yield sex-specific mRNAs that encode male-specific (BmDSXM) and female-specific (BmDSXF) polypeptides (36, 42). Transgenic analysis of Bmdsx revealed that Bmdsx functions as a double-switch gene at the final step in the B. mori sex determination cascade (43, 44). Despite these similarities between dsx and Bmdsx, the underlying mechanism for sex-specific splicing is clearly different. We have demonstrated that female splicing of Bmdsx pre-mRNA represents the default mode when tested in HeLa nuclear extracts and also that the female exon is devoid of putative TRA/TRA-2-binding sites (42). These findings indicate that the female exon is selectively repressed in male silk moths by a yet-unknown mechanism.
To understand the molecular basis underlying sex differentiation, we reasoned that utilizing a splicing assay system that exploits cultured cells that differ only in sex would provide a powerful tool for analyzing the regulatory mechanisms of sex-specific alternative splicing. Because there were no reports of sexually differentiated cell lines in B. mori, or in other animals, we established the first sexually differentiated cell lines and used these novel cell lines to develop an in vivo splicing assay system that led to the identification of cis-acting elements and trans-acting cellular factors that negatively regulate splicing of Bmdsx female exons.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
RT-PCR analysis. Five hundred micrograms of DNase-treated poly(A)+ RNA was denatured at 70°C for 10 min and immediately chilled on ice. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer, with random hexamers as primers. A 1/20 portion of the resulting reaction mixture was used for PCR in a 50-µl total volume. To analyze splicing patterns of Bmdsx mRNAs transcribed from pWTE2.5, pMutE2, pMutE3, pMutE4, pCE1Mut1, and pCE1Mut2, PCR was performed using primer pairs A3F3 (5'-AATGGCTCCGGTATGTGCAAG-3') and FR4 (5'-GCGCAGTGTCGTCGCTACAAGG-3'). To analyze splicing patterns of Bmdsx mRNAs transcribed from pMutE5, primer P25E4R4 (5'-GAGTCGCGGCCGCCATTAGGGTTAATGTGGAAG-3') was used instead of primer FR4. To amplify the endogenous Bmdsx mRNAs, primers FF6 (5'-GTATACGGCCGACGAGGACCCAGCAATGG-3') and FR4 were used. All PCRs were performed using LA Taq (Takara Bio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 3 min followed by 31 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds, 57°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 1 min. PCRs were in the linear phase (not in the plateau phase) under these conditions, as verified by using different amounts of cDNA. PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. Product DNAs were quantified using a LAS3000 Bioimage analyzer (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan). The identity of the PCR products was verified by sequence analyses.
Nuclear extract preparation. NIAS-Bm-M1 and NIAS-Bm-F1 cells were maintained in IPL-41 with 10% FBS under a humidifying atmosphere at 27°C. About 2 x 107 cells were harvested, and nuclear extracts were prepared as described by Mine et al. (31) with a slight modification. Briefly, the cells were suspended in five packed cell volumes of buffer C (31) and allowed to swell on ice for 3 min. Nuclei were pelleted and resuspended in 2.2 packed cell volumes of buffer B' (31). For lysis, the nuclei were drawn up in a syringe and rapidly pushed through a 26-gauge needle. This was repeated approximately 10 times. Extraction of nuclei was carried out on ice for 30 min with constant mixing. After extraction, nuclei were pelleted and the supernatant was dialyzed against buffer DB (31). The dialyzed nuclear protein extracts were then frozen in liquid N2 and stored at –80°C.
Synthesis of labeled RNA.
A 130-bp fragment of Bmdsx exon 4 was amplified by PCR using primers EMSAF1 (5'-CCGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCGTTAATAATATAAGTGGTGTA-3') and EMSAR1 (5'-AAATATTTCCGTTGAAATTC-3'). EMSAF1 contains the T7 promoter site (underlined). This PCR product was transcribed using a RiboScribe T7 probe synthesis kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI) in the presence of [
-32P]UTP to generate a radiolabeled E4 RNA. A 140-bp fragment containing the T7 promoter site was amplified from pBluescript SK(+) using M13 to -20 and T3 primers. The resulting product was transcribed using a RiboScribe T7 probe synthesis kit to synthesize an [
-32P]UTP-labeled NC RNA. The CE1, CE2, CE3a, CE3b, CE3c, CE1mut1, CE1mut2, and CE1s DNAs were synthesized as two complementary oligonucleotides containing the T7 promoter. cDNA fragments were combined at equal molar amounts, heated at 95°C for 5 min, and then slowly cooled to anneal. The resulting products were transcribed using a RiboScribe T7 probe synthesis kit in the presence of [
-32P]ATP to generate radiolabeled CE1, CE2, CE3a, CE3b, CE3c, CE1mut1, CE1mut2, and CE1s RNAs. Cold RNA was produced using AmpliScribe T7 transcription kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.
RNA mobility shift assays. RNA mobility shift assays were performed essentially according to the methods of Chabot et al. (7). Binding reactions were performed in a 25-µl reaction mixture under splicing conditions (7). After a 15-min incubation on ice, the sample was adjusted to 1 mg/ml with heparin and incubated on ice for 2 min. For competition experiments, the indicated amount of cold competitor was incubated on ice for 8 min before addition of the probe. The reactions were run on a 4.5% native acrylamide gel (29:1 acrylamide-bisacrylamide, 5% glycerol, 50 mM Tris [pH 8.8], 50 mM glycine) in Tris-glycine running buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8.8], 50 mM glycine). The gels were dried and visualized using a BAS2500 Bioimage analyzer (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan).
UV cross-linking assays. Five µg of nuclear extract or the indicated amount of recombinant protein was incubated with radiolabeled RNA in a final volume of 10 µl in 1x binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 40 mM KCl, 15 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) at room temperature for 20 min. Heparin was added to 1 mg/ml, incubated for 2 min, and UV cross-linked on ice at 254 nm for 10 min in a Bio-Rad GS UV cross-linker, followed by digestion with RNase A at 37°C for 30 min.
RNA affinity chromatography. Twenty nanomoles of RNA oligonucleotide was coupled to adipic acid hydrazide agarose (Sigma) as described previously (5). The beads with bound RNA were then washed with 2 M NaCl and equilibrated with buffer DB. They were incubated with 3 mg of NIAS-Bm-M1 cell nuclear extract for 20 min at room temperature in 1,250 µl (final volume), pelleted by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 3 min, and washed five times with 5 ml of buffer DB containing 4 mM MgCl2. After the final centrifugation, 100 µl of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer was added to the beads and heated for 5 min at 95°C before loading on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The Coomassie-stained band was excised and treated with 0.1 mg of Achromobacter protease I (a gift from Takeharu Masaki, Ibaraki University) at 37°C for 12 h in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0) containing 0.1% SDS. Peptides generated were extracted from the gel and separated on columns of DEAE-5PW (1 by 20 mm; Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) and Inertsil ODS-3 (1 by 100 mm; GL Sciences Inc., Tokyo, Japan) connected in series with a model 1100 liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). Peptides were eluted at a flow rate of 0.02 ml/min using a linear gradient of 0 to 60% solvent B, where solvents A and B were 0.09% (vol/vol) aqueous trifluoroacetic acid and 0.075% (vol/vol) trifluoroacetic acid in 80% (vol/vol) acetonitrile, respectively. Selected peptides were subjected to Edman degradation using a Procise cLC protein sequencing system (Applied Biosystems) and to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry on an Ultraflex apparatus (Bruker-Franzen Analytik, Bremen, Germany) in reflector mode using alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid as a matrix.
Recombinant protein purification. The BmPSI gene was amplified by PCR using a 5' primer containing a SalI site (GTCGACATGAGTGATTATTCTTCTATGG) and a 3' primer containing a NotI site (GCGGCCGCTCACTGCTGGTGGTCGGAGCC). The amplified product was cloned into the pGEX-6P-3 vector using the SalI and NotI sites. The fusion protein was prepared and purified as described previously (24). The fusion protein was subsequently cut with Precision protease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and repurified with glutathione-Sepharose 4B to remove the glutathione-S-transferase protein. The purified protein was extensively dialyzed against buffer DB. The concentration of the recombinant protein was measured by the Bradford method using a protein assay from Bio-Rad.
RNA interference (RNAi) procedure. cRNA strands were transcribed using the AmpliScribe T7 transcription kit, mixed, and annealed by heating to 95°C for 1 min and then allowing to cool to room temperature. For each gene, the following sequences were used to generate double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (based on the start codon of the coding sequence): Bmsqd2, nucleotides (nt) 1 to 493; BmELAV, nt 1 to 616; BmPSI, nt 37 to 298 (dsRNA c), nt 1041 to 1209 (dsRNA b), and nt 1225 to 1467 (dsRNA a). Six µg of dsRNA was transfected into 5 x 105 NIAS-Bm-M1 cells using 24 µl of Cellfectin in IPL-41 medium without FBS. After 5 h, 2 ml of IPL-41 medium with 20% FBS was added to bring the final FBS concentration to 10%.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used a minigene construct (pWTE2.5) transiently transfected into NIAS-Bm-M1 and NIAS-Bm-F1 cells to test whether the minigene Bmdsx exons 3 and 4 underwent sex-specific splicing similar to the endogenous Bmdsx gene (Fig. 2A). Since the intronic sequences of the Bmdsx gene are very long (>40 kbp), the intronic sequences in the minigene were largely deleted. As shown in Fig. 2B, male-specific exclusion of exons 3 and 4 in both the endogenous Bmdsx pre-mRNA and the exogenous pWTE2.5 wild-type minigene pre-mRNA was observed in NIAS-Bm-M1 cells. In contrast, no exon exclusion was observed in the NIAS-Bm-F1 cell line, as all exons from both the endogenous Bmdsx pre-mRNA and the exogenous pWTE2.5 wild-type minigene pre-mRNA were present. Thus, in the minigene pre-mRNA, exons 3 and 4 were skipped or included in a sex-specific manner similar to exons 3 and 4 of the endogenous Bmdsx pre-mRNA. These results indicated that the pWTE2.5 wild-type minigene contained all the cis-acting regulatory elements involved in sex-specific alternative splicing and that the NIAS-Bm-M1 and NIAS-Bm-F1 cells are valid for splicing assay experiments.
Bmdsx exon 4 contains cis-acting elements that regulate the sex-specific splicing. We first tested the possibility that sequences within the exons governed sex-specific splicing. With this reasoning, the Bmdsx exon sequences were replaced with unrelated sequences of approximately the same length from the Bombyx silk protein P25 exon (Fig. 2A). As shown in Fig. 2B, exclusion of exons 3 and 4 was observed in a male-specific manner when the male and female culture cells were transfected with either pMutE2 or pMutE3. These results indicated that substitution of exons 2 and 3 had no effect on sex-specific splicing regulation. In contrast, substitution of exon 4 resulted in nearly complete inclusion of exons 3 and 4 in male culture cells (Fig. 2B, lane 8). Interestingly, this substitution resulted in inclusion of both exons 3 and 4 at the same time, suggesting that the Bmdsx exon 4 contains one or more sequences that repress inclusion of not only exon 4 itself but also exon 3 in male cells. No amplified products were observed in either male or female culture cells transfected with the mutant exon 5 construct pMutE5 (Fig. 2B, lanes 9 and 10). These results are not a PCR artifact, since the same reactions using pMutE5 as a template successfully amplified the appropriate size of DNA fragment (data not shown). This result therefore indicated that the pMutE5 transcripts were degraded in both male and female culture cells. At present we do not know exactly the reason for this degradation but surmise that substitution of exon 5 inhibited splicing of the pMutE5 minigene pre-mRNA, with the resultant unspliced pre-mRNA degraded in the nuclei of the male and female culture cells. These results indicated that one or more sequences necessary for male-specific exon skipping are present in the Bmdsx exon 4. The same results were obtained when the Bmdsx exon sequences were replaced with unrelated sequences of approximately the same length from the bacterial ampicillin resistance gene (data not shown).
Linker scan mutations define distinct regulatory elements in Bmdsx exon 4. To identify the sequences within Bmdsx exon 4 that govern male-specific alternative splicing, we generated linker scan (ls) mutants by consecutively replacing 10-bp segments within the 167-bp Bmdsx of exon 4 with a 10-bp linker sequence (Fig. 3A). After transient transfection into NIAS-Bm-F1 cells, none of the mutations impaired female splicing (data not shown). On the other hand, a number of ls mutations had significant effects on male-specific splicing: 85 to 100% of the transcripts in male culture cells transfected with mutants ls2, ls3, ls7, ls11, ls12, ls13, and ls14 contained exons 3 and 4 (Fig. 3B and C). These effects were similar to those observed following substitution of exon 4 (compare Fig. 2B, lane 8,with 3B, ls2, ls3, ls7, ls11, ls12, ls13, and ls14). Thus, we concluded that the regions of exon 4 encompassing nucleotides 15 to 34, 65 to 74, and 105 to 144 most likely represent strong ESSs that repress the inclusion of exons 3 and 4. As a matter of convenience, we have denoted these elements as CE1, CE2, and CE3, respectively. About 50% of the transcripts from mutants ls8, ls9, and ls10 represented female splicing (Fig. 3C, ls8, ls9, and ls10), with exclusion of exon 3 occasionally observed (Fig. 3B; band below the band representing female-splicing in lane ls8). These results indicated that the region encompassing nucleotides 75 to 104 might function as a weak and incomplete ESS.
|
|
|
|
CE1 RNA beads specifically retain an 80-kDa protein, BmPSI. UV cross-linking was used to identify proteins in a NIAS-Bm-M1 cell nuclear extract that bind to CE1. Following incubation with a NIAS-Bm-M1 cell nuclear extract, 32P-labeled RNA probes were digested with RNase A and proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Comparing the cross-linking patterns of the mutant RNA (CEmut1) with the pattern of CE1 RNA revealed a specific band migrating at approximately 80 kDa (Fig. 7A, left panel).
|
In addition to BmPSI, CE1 RNA also specifically pulled down 35-kDa and 42-kDa proteins. Internal sequencing analysis of these bands revealed that the 35-kDa protein is Bmsqd2 protein (a member of hnRNP A/B) and the 42-kDa protein corresponds to Bombyx ELAV homologous protein (BmELAV). However, these proteins may reflect experimental artifacts of the affinity chromatography, since prominent bands corresponding to these proteins were not observed in the UV cross-linking experiment (Fig. 7A, left panel).
Recombinant BmPSI binds specifically to CE1.
To confirm that BmPSI can interact specifically with CE1, recombinant BmPSI protein was prepared using an Escherichia coli expression system (for details, see Materials and Methods). Figure 7C, left panel, shows the purified recombinant BmPSI protein with the expected 80-kDa molecular mass. Figure 7C, right panel, shows that the recombinant BmPSI can specifically cross-link with the 32P-labeled CE1 RNA. The specificity of the interaction of recombinant BmPSI with CE1 was also assessed with the mobility shift assay. 32P-labeled CE1 RNA was incubated in the presence of increasing amounts of recombinant BmPSI. As shown in Fig. 7D, complex formation occurred with CE1 RNA but not with CE1mut1 RNA. It is reasonable to suppose that BmPSI binds with high affinity to CE1, since the amount of the recombinant BmPSI used in the mobility shift assay illustrated in Fig. 7D was very low (1.25 to
10 pmol).
Down-regulation of BmPSI by RNA interference increases female-specific splicing. To further test whether BmPSI plays a role in regulating male-specific splicing of Bmdsx pre-mRNA, we tried an RNAi approach to reduce BmPSI expression in male cells. To prevent the identification of false positives through "off-target effects," several nonoverlapping dsRNAs were designed to different regions of the Bmpsi sequence (Fig. 8A) and then transfected into NIAS-Bm-M1 cells. Although we were not able to completely block Bmpsi expression, all three dsRNAs caused a consistent and significant increase in female-specific splicing (Fig. 8B and C). No variation in sex-specific splicing pattern and/or BmPSI endogenous level was observed when the cells were transfected with dsRNAs targeting Bmsqd2 or Bmelav. Therefore, we decided to rule out these proteins as candidates for the cellular factor implicated in Bmdsx sex-specific splicing. The treatment by the above dsRNAs targeting Bmpsi did not affect alternative splicing in other genes examined, such as BmSxl (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), suggesting a relative specificity of BmPSI in regulation of Bmdsx gene sex-specific splicing.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The substitution experiments using a novel in vivo sex-specific splicing assay system with the two sexually different cell lines revealed that Bmdsx exon 4 contains male-specific negative regulatory elements referred to as CE1, CE2, and CE3 (Fig. 3). It is clear from our studies that a CE1-nuclear protein interaction is essential for male-specific splicing and that this interaction is required for repressing female-specific splicing (i.e., inclusion of exons 3 and 4) in male cells (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the fact that the trans-acting factor interacting with CE1 exists in male cells but not in female cells (Fig. 5) is consistent with our finding that CE1 is essential for male-specific splicing. We have identified BmPSI, a Bombyx homolog of PSI, as the factor that binds specifically to CE1. PSI is a KH-domain RNA-binding protein that is responsible for alternative splicing of P-element transposase pre-mRNA in Drosophila somatic tissues (1, 39). In vitro and in vivo assays support the role of BmPSI in CE1 activity. First, recombinant BmPSI specifically interacts with CE1 in UV cross-linking and gel mobility shift assays. Second, down-regulation of endogenous BmPSI expression in male culture cells by RNAi leads to an increase in female-specific splicing. Collectively, these results indicate that BmPSI mediates the repressing activity of CE1. Based on the data reported here, we propose a possible model for the regulatory mechanism underlying sex-specific alternative splicing of Bmdsx. In male cells, an interaction between BmPSI and CE1 prevents the use of exons 3 and 4, leading to an enhancement in the production of male-type Bmdsx. However, in female cells, exons 3 and 4 are selected to generate female-type Bmdsx mRNA because of either insufficient levels of BmPSI or the presence of a trans-acting factor(s) that counteracts the activity of BmPSI. Northern blot analysis showed that no differences in expression patterns of BmPSI mRNAs were seen between male and female cells (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material), suggesting the possibility that the activity of BmPSI is different between males and females. For several KH-domain RNA-binding proteins, their ability to bind RNA is negatively regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation (14, 30, 47). The KH-domain protein Sam68 is acetylated in vivo, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA-binding activity (2). Likewise, the RNA-binding activity of BmPSI may be sex specifically regulated by some posttranslational modifications.
How does BmPSI binding mediate inhibition of female-specific splicing? D. melanogaster PSI specifically binds to a cis-acting negative regulatory element within the exon upstream of IVS3, which contains pseudo-5'-splice sites. PSI recruits U1 snRNP to the pseudo-splice site, thereby preventing U1 snRNP from binding to the accurate IVS3 5' splice site (40). The functional interaction between PSI and U1 snRNP is mediated by the C-terminal domain of the U1 snRNP-specific 70K (U1-70K) protein and the AB motif of PSI (24). Interestingly, a sequence showing weak homology to the 5' splice site consensus sequence lies 13 nt upstream of the CE1 cis-acting element (Fig. 9). Like PSI, BmPSI may recruit U1-snRNP to the 5' splice site-like sequence upstream of CE1, thereby preventing U1snRNP from binding to the accurate 5' splice site. As shown in Fig. 9, the 5' splice site-like sequence lies within the 3' splice site immediately upstream of exon 4. Therefore, recruitment of U1-snRNP to this 5' splice site-like sequence may preclude binding of the splicing factor(s) assembling on the 3' splice site, such as U2AF, leading to exon 4 skipping. However, the binding site of BmPSI is 141 nt upstream of the 5' splice site, whereas the binding site of PSI is so close to the 5' splice site (14 nt upstream of the 5' splice site) that it has been proposed to interfere with spliceosome assembly at the 5' splice site (40). Thus, it seems unlikely that BmPSI can inhibit the use of the 5' splice site of Bmdsx exon 4, or other components may be required to act together with BmPSI to block the 5' splice site. At present, it remains unknown how BmPSI induces exon 3 skipping. Studies are under way to clarify this point.
|
In our previous study, an in vitro splicing reaction utilizing HeLa cell nuclear extracts showed that female-type Bmdsx mRNA represented default splicing (42). In contrast, default processing in Drosophila yields male-type dsx mRNA with exon 4 excluded. In females, TRA/TRA-2 promote the incorporation of exon 4. This pattern of sex-specific splicing is also observed in the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, the Phorid fly, Megaselia scalari, and the housefly, Musca domestica, where it occurs at equivalent positions in the corresponding dsx genes (18, 22, 37). The presence of putative TRA/TRA-2-binding sites in the female-specific exon of dsx in Bactrocera, Megaselia, and Musca gives further support to the notion that female exon selection by activation is common in dipteran insects. In contrast, TRA/TRA-2-binding motif-related sequences are not present in the Bmdsx genomic sequence (42). Our data presented here provide evidence for BmPSI-mediated regulation of Bmdsx pre-mRNA sex-specific alternative splicing. Since BmPSI does not exhibit any sequence relationship to known SR proteins, such as TRA and TRA-2, the regulatory mechanism of sex-specific alternative splicing of Bmdsx pre-mRNA is distinct from that of dsx. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge there are no reports describing PSI involvement in regulating sex-specific splicing of dsx pre-mRNA or the sex determination cascade. Further work is needed to elucidate how BmPSI represses inclusion of female-specific exons in a male-specific manner.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the Bioarchitect Research Program and the Chemical Biology Research Project from RIKEN and by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), 17780045, 2006.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 29 October 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Babic, I., A. Jakymiw, and D. J. Fujita. 2004. The RNA binding protein Sam68 is acetylated in tumor cell lines, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA binding activity. Oncogene 23:3781-3789.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Baker, B. S., and M. F. Wolfner. 1988. A molecular analysis of doublesex, a bifunctional gene that controls both male and female sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 2:477-489.
4. Blencowe, B. J. 2000. Exonic splicing enhancers: mechanism of action, diversity and role in human genetic diseases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:106-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Buratti, E., T. Dork, E. Zuccato, F. Pagani, M. Romano, and F. E. Baralle. 2001. Nuclear factor TDP-43 and SR proteins promote in vitro and in vivo CFTR exon 9 skipping. EMBO J. 20:1774-1784.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Burtis, K. C., and B. S. Baker. 1989. Drosophila doublesex gene controls somatic sexual differentiation by producing alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding related sex-specific polypeptides. Cell 56:997-1010.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Chabot, B., M. Blanchette, I. Lapierre, and H. La Branche. 1997. An intron element modulating 5' splice site selection in the hnRNP A1 pre-mRNA interacts with hnRNP A1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1776-1786.[Abstract]
8. Charpentier, B., and M. Rosbash. 1996. Intramolecular structure in yeast introns aids the early steps of in vitro spliceosome assembly. RNA 2:509-522.[Abstract]
9. Deshler, J. O., and J. J. Rossi. 1991. Unexpected point mutations activate cryptic 3' splice sites by perturbing a natural secondary structure within a yeast intron. Genes Dev. 5:1252-1263.
10. Erdman, S. E., and K. C. Burtis. 1993. The Drosophila doublesex proteins share a novel zinc finger related DNA binding domain. EMBO J. 12:527-535.[Medline]
11. Graveley, B. R., and T. Maniatis. 1998. Arginine/serine-rich domains of SR proteins can function as activators of pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 1:765-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Graveley, B. R., K. J. Hertel, and T. Maniatis. 1999. SR proteins are "locators" of the RNA splicing machinery. Curr. Biol. 9:R6-R7.[Medline]
13. Graveley, B. R. 2000. Sorting out the complexity of SR protein functions. RNA 6:1197-1211.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Haegebarth. A., D. Heap, W. Bie, J. J. Derry, S. Richard, and A. L. Tyner. 2004. The nuclear tyrosine kinase BRK/Sik phosphorylates and inhibits the RNA-binding activities of the Sam68-like mammalian proteins SLM-1 and SLM-2. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54398-54404.
15. Handa, N., O. Nureki, K. Kurimoto, I. Kim, H. Sakamoto, Y. Shimura, Y. Muto, and S. Yokoyama. 1999. Structural basis for recognition of the tra mRNA precursor by the sex-lethal protein. Nature 398:579-585.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Hashimoto, H. 1933. The role of the W chromosome for sex determination in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Jap. J. Genet. 8:245-258.[CrossRef]
17. Hawkins, J. R. 1993. Mutational analysis of SRY in XY females. Hum. Mutat. 2:347-350.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Hediger, M., G. Burghardt, C. Siegenthaler, N. Buser, D. Hilfiker-Kleiner, A. Dubendorfer, and D. Bopp. 2004. Sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster and Musca domestica converges at the level of the terminal regulator doublesex. Dev. Genes Evol. 214:29-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Hodgkin, J. 1999. Sex, cell death, and the genome of C. elegans. Cell 98:277-280.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Hodgkin, J. 2002. The remarkable ubiquity of DM domain factors as regulators of sexual phenotype: ancestry or aptitude? Genes Dev. 16:2322-2326.
21. Kan, J. L., and M. R. Green. 1999. Pre-mRNA splicing of IgM exons M1 and M2 is directed by a juxtaposed splicing enhancer and inhibitor. Genes Dev. 13:462-471.
22. Kuhn, S., V. Sievert, and W. Traut. 2000. The sex-determining gene doublesex in the fly Megaselia scalaris: conserved structure and sex-specific splicing. Genome 43:1011-1020.[Medline]
23. Kuwabara, P. E. 1999. Developmental genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans sex determination. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 41:99-132.[Medline]
24. Labourier, E., M. D. Adams, and D. C. Rio. 2001. Modulation of P-element pre-mRNA splicing by a direct interaction between PSI and U1 snRNP 70K protein. Mol. Cell 8:363-373.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Li, Y., and B. J. Blencowe. 1999. Distinct factor requirements for exonic splicing enhancer function and binding of U2AF to the polypyrimidine tract. J. Biol. Chem. 274:35074-35079.
26. Lynch, K. W., and T. Maniatis. 1995. Synergistic interactions between two distinct elements of a regulated splicing enhancer. Genes Dev. 9:284-293.
27. Lynch, K. W., and T. Maniatis. 1996. Assembly of specific SR protein complexes on distinct regulatory elements of the Drosophila doublesex splicing enhancer. Genes Dev. 10:2089-2101.
28. Marin, I., and B. S. Baker. 1998. The evolutionary dynamics of sex determination. Science 281:1990-1994.
29. McKeown, M., J. M. Belote, and R. T. Boggs. 1988. Ectopic expression of the female transformer gene product leads to female differentiation of chromosomally male Drosophila. Cell 53:887-895.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Messias, A. C., C. Harnisch, A. Ostareck-Lederer, M. Sattler, and D. H. Ostareck. 2006. The DICE-binding activity of KH domain 3 of hnRNP K is affected by c-Src-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation. J. Mol. Biol. 361:470-481.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Mine, E., H. Sakurai, S. Izumi, and S. Tomino. 1995. The fat body cell-free system for tissue-specific transcription of plasma protein gene of Bombyx mori. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:2648-2653.
32. Mougin, A., A. Gregoire, J. Banroques, V. Segault, R. Fournier, F. Brule, M. Chevrier-Miller, and C. Branlant. 1996. Secondary structure of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae pre-U3A snoRNA and its implication for splicing efficiency. RNA 2:1079-1093.[Abstract]
33. Muro, A. F., M. Caputi, R. Pariyarath, F. Pagani, E. Buratti, and F. E. Baralle. 1999. Regulation of fibronectin EDA exon alternative splicing: possible role of RNA secondary structure for enhancer display. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:2657-2671.
34. Nagoshi, R. N., M. McKeown, K. C. Burtis, J. M. Belote, and B. S. Baker. 1988. The control of alternative splicing at genes regulating sexual differentiation in D. melanogaster. Cell 53:229-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Nagoshi, R. N., and B. S. Baker. 1990. Regulation of sex-specific RNA splicing at the Drosophila doublesex gene: cis-acting mutations in exon sequences alter sex-specific RNA splicing patterns. Genes Dev. 4:89-97.
36. Ohbayashi, F., T. Shimada, T. Sugasaki, S. Kawai, K. Mita, T. Oshiki, and H. Abe. 1998. Molecular structure of the copia-like retrotransposable element Yokozuna on the W chromosome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Genes Genet. Systems 73:345-352.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Shearman, D. C. A., and M. Formmer. 1998. The Bactrocera tryoni homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster sex-determination gene doublesex. Insect Mol. Biol. 7:1-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Shi, H., B. E. Hoffman, and J. T. Lis. 1997. A specific RNA hairpin loop structure binds the RNA recognition motifs of the Drosophila SR protein B52. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:2649-2657.[Abstract]
39. Siebel, C. W., and D. C. Rio. 1990. Regulated splicing of the Drosophila P transposable element third intron in vitro: somatic repression. Science 248:1200-1208.
40. Siebel, C. W., L. D. Fresco, and D. C. Rio. 1992. The mechanism of somatic inhibition of Drosophila P-element pre-mRNA splicing: multiprotein complexes at an exon pseudo-5' splice site control U1 snRNP binding. Genes Dev. 6:1386-1401.
41. Sinclair, A. H., P. Berta, M. S. Palmer, J. R. Hawkins, B. L. Griffiths, M. J. Smith, J. W. Foster, A. M. Frischauf, R. Lovell-Badge, and P. N. Goodfellow. 1990. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature 346:240-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Suzuki, M. G., F. Ohbayashi, K. Mita, and T. Shimada. 2001. The mechanism of sex-specific splicing at the doublesex gene is different between Drosophila melanogaster and Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 31:1201-1211.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Suzuki, M. G., S. Funaguma, T. Kanda, T. Tamura, and T. Shimada. 2003. Analysis of the biological functions of a doublesex homologue in Bombyx mori. Dev. Genes Evol. 213:345-354.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Suzuki, M. G., S. Funaguma, T. Kanda, T. Tamura, and T. Shimada. 2005. Role of the male BmDSX protein in the sexual differentiation of Bombyx mori. Evol. Dev. 7:58-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Tian, M., and T. Maniatis. 1994. A splicing enhancer exhibits both constitutive and regulated activities. Genes Dev. 8:1703-1712.
46. Volff, J. N., D. Zarkower, V. J. Bardwell, and M. Schartl. 2003. Evolutionary dynamics of the DM domain gene family in metazoans. J. Mol. Evol. 57:S241-S249.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Wang, L. L., S. Richard, and A. S. Shaw. 1995. p62 association with RNA is regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:2010-2013.
48. Zhu, L., J. Wilken, N. B. Phillips, U. Narendra, C. Chan, S. M. Stratton, S. B. Kent, and M. A. Weiss. 2000. Sexual dimorphism in diverse metazoans is regulated by a novel class of intertwined zinc fingers. Genes Dev. 14:1750-1764.
49. Zuo, P., and T. Maniatis. 1996. The splicing factor U2AF35 mediates critical protein-protein interactions in constitutive and enhancer-dependent splicing. Genes Dev. 10:1356-1368.
| |||||||||||