| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2008, p. 3873-3881, Vol. 28, No. 11
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.02153-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Molecular Biology, University of Aarhus, C. F. Mollers Alle, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark,1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, UCSF Medical School, Genentech Hall, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, California 941432
Received 3 December 2007/ Returned for modification 25 February 2008/ Accepted 26 March 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mammalian SR proteins are best understood for their roles in constitutive and regulated alternative splicing (reviewed in reference 13). More recently, a role for mammalian SR proteins in mRNA export has also been described (16, 17, 20). Conversely, yeast (S. cerevisiae) Npl3 was first identified by its requirement in mRNA export (21, 35), but we have now shown that Npl3 is also required for the efficient splicing of a subset of intron-containing genes (T. L. Kress and C. Guthrie, unpublished data). Interestingly, a novel role for Npl3 was identified in a genetic screen for mutants in which the efficiency of transcription termination is increased (4). Recently, this function has been correlated in vitro with the ability of high levels of Npl3 to antagonize the recruitment of factors required for 3' mRNA processing (4, 5, 44). Finally, impairment of the ability of Npl3 to shuttle results in increased association with polysomes, suggesting a role for Npl3 in the regulation of translation (43).
In light of the broad range of cellular functions with which Npl3 is associated, it is anticipated that the activity of Npl3 is tightly regulated, likely by multiple mechanisms. One way in which the activity of Npl3 is controlled is via posttranslational modification. The phosphorylation state of Npl3 is critical for its role in mRNA export, where dephosphorylation of RNA-bound Npl3 by the phosphatase Glc7 in the nucleus is coupled to the recruitment of the major mRNA export receptor Mex67 to the RNA (9, 10). Although the precise timing of dephosphorylation is unknown, Glc7 is physically associated with the 3' end machinery (27, 42). This association parallels the situation in mammals, where hypophosphorylated SR proteins act as adaptors for the mammalian homolog of Mex67, TAP/NXF1 (17, 20). Npl3 is exported, together with the mRNA (19), and once in the cytoplasm, Npl3 is phosphorylated by the kinase Sky1, allowing for the dissociation of the newly exported Npl3/RNA complexes and the reimport of Npl3 into the nucleus by the karyopherin Mtr10 (10, 28, 32, 46).
Balanced levels of Npl3 are critical for cell viability; both the overexpression and deletion of Npl3 are toxic (7, 36), indicating that the expression of Npl3 might also be regulated. A particularly effective strategy for controlling the levels of RNA binding proteins is through autoregulation; for example, when binding to a primary RNA target approaches saturation, further gene expression can be down-regulated by binding to secondary RNA targets (in this case, the protein's own RNA). We report here that Npl3 regulates its own expression by a novel mechanism in which appropriate levels of Npl3 are achieved by the inhibition of its normal cleavage and polyadenylation signals. Increasing levels of Npl3 protein suppress the use of these sites, resulting in 3'-extended RNAs that are targeted for degradation. This mechanism fits well with the observation that Npl3 can prevent premature transcription termination by suppressing cryptic 3' end formation (4, 44). Importantly, effective autoregulation requires that Npl3 be phosphorylated. We propose that phosphorylated Npl3 suppresses the use of the productive 3' end formation signals in the 3' untranscribed region (UTR) of NPL3.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
strain from the consortium deletion library. Yeast was grown at 30°C in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose or in selective medium (synthetic dextrose-URA or synthetic dextrose-LEU) when plasmids were present.
|
RNA analysis. RNA was extracted from exponentially growing yeast cultures by the hot-phenol method (31). For 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) experiments, 10 µg total RNA (purified as described above) was mixed with 5.5 µg of the adaptor primer (5'-GTTTCCCAGTCAGATCT19V-3') in 10 µl of annealing buffer (300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 2 mM EDTA), incubated at 65°C for 10 min and transferred to ice. The hybridization mixture was transferred to 40 µl of preheated 1.25x extension mix (1.25 mM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 12.5 mM dithiothreitol, 12.5 mM Tris [pH 8], 7.5 mM MgCl2) and incubated at 45°C for 60 min after the addition of 20 U of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Life Sciences, Inc.). The cDNA was used in PCRs by using a reverse primer annealing to the adaptor primer (5'-GTTTCCCAGTCAGATCT-3'), in combination with either a reverse primer annealing to the ORF of NPL3 or a reverse primer annealing to positions 236 to 255 in the 3' UTR. The PCR products were gel purified and sequenced. Primer extension analyses were performed on 10 µg of total RNA as described previously (2), and the data were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. For Northern blotting analysis, 8 µg of total RNA in H2O was resuspended in denaturing loading buffer (50% formamide, 6% formaldehyde, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mg/ml ethidium bromide, and dyes) and separated in a 1.2% agarose gel (39). Gel and running buffer contained 0.5x Tris-borate-EDTA and no formaldehyde. The RNA was transferred to a HybondN+ (Amersham) membrane and UV cross-linked before the membrane was blocked for 2 h at 65°C with Rapid-Hyb buffer (Amersham). Next, the RNA was hybridized with a 32P-end-labeled probe in Rapid-Hyb buffer at 42°C for 16 to 20 h. The membrane was washed two times with washing buffer (2x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) at 42°C for 10 min and three times at room temperature for 20 min. The RNA was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. At least two independent experiments were carried out in order to confirm reproducibility of the results. The following oligonucleotides were used for the primer extension and Northern analysis: for NPL3 and GFP-NPL3 RNA, 5'-GGTGCTGTTCTTCGACTGGGGCATCG-3'; for GFP RNA, 5'-TGTGCCCATTAACATCACCA-3'; for PGK1 RNA, 5'-ATCTTGGGTGGTGTTCC-3'; and for U2 snRNA, 5'-CAGATACTACACTTG-3'.
Protein analysis. Whole-cell lysate was prepared from equal A600 amounts of exponentially growing yeast cultures by bead-beating in trichloroacetic acid (TCA) buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 50 mM NH4OAc, 2 mM EDTA, 10% TCA) in the presence of protease inhibitors. The lysate was centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in TCA-Laemmli loading buffer (3.5% [wt/vol] SDS, 80 mM Tris-base, 8 mM EDTA, 14% glycerol, 120 mM dithiothreitol). The protein content was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotting was performed with the following antibodies: anti-Npl3 (1:3,000) (34), anti-Rpl3 (1:1,000) (41), and anti-GFP (1:1,000) (Roche).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
NPL3 3' region can confer Npl3 responsiveness on an unrelated reporter. The 3' region of NPL3 is necessary for maintaining wild-type levels of NPL3 RNA and protein (Fig. 1A and B, lanes 3 and 4). Furthermore, the GFP-Npl3 construct that includes nt 1 to 1135 of this downstream region contains all the sequences essential for regulation (Fig. 1). To test whether the presence of the NPL3 3' region would be sufficient to render an unrelated RNA and protein sensitive to the concentration of Npl3, wild-type and NPL3-ADH1UTR strains were transformed with a plasmid containing the coding region of GFP fused to nt 1 to 1135 of the NPL3 3' region (GFP-NPL3UTR) (Fig. 2A) and the expression of the GFP reporter was assayed by Western blotting (Fig. 2B). If the 3' region of Npl3 is sufficient for autoregulation of Npl3, we would predict that the increased concentration of Npl3 in the NPL3-ADH1UTR strain should reduce GFP expression from the plasmid. Indeed, the amount of GFP produced from the GFP-NPL3UTR reporter was dramatically reduced in the presence of the higher Npl3 concentration (Fig. 2B, compare lanes 2 and 4). To confirm that this was a specific feature of the NPL3 3' region, we transformed the wild-type and NPL3-ADH1UTR strains with a plasmid containing GFP fused to the 3' region of DBP5 (GFP-DBP5UTR). The amount of GFP produced from the GFP-DBP5UTR reporter was unaffected (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 3), indicating that the observed regulation was controlled by the NPL3 3' region. Npl3 levels did not affect Dbp5 expression (data not shown). To confirm that Npl3 controls the protein concentration by influencing RNA levels, we performed primer extension on GFP RNA and, as predicted, the lower level of GFP protein in the NPL3-ADH1UTR strain was reflected by reduced GFP RNA levels (Fig. 2C; the reduction in GFP RNA appeared to be smaller than the reduction in GFP protein [see Discussion]). Thus, the 3' region of NPL3 is sufficient to confer sensitivity to Npl3 protein levels on an unrelated RNA and its corresponding protein.
|
|
Because 3'-extended RNAs might be unstable and therefore difficult to detect in a wild-type strain, we carried out the assay with a number of strains deleted for factors functioning in nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA degradation and compared these results to those from the wild-type strain (Fig. 3B, lanes 3 to 5). Upon deletion of the nuclear exosome component RRP6 or the cytoplasmic 5'-3' exonuclease XRN1, the amount of 3'-extended RNA increased substantially (Fig. 3B, compare lanes 3 and 4 to lane 2). An aberrantly extended 3' UTR can also trigger nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) (26). The 3'-extended RNA, however, was not detectably stabilized in a strain deleted for the NMD factor UPF1 (Fig. 3B, lane 5), making it unlikely that the 3'-extended RNA is an NMD target.
If Npl3 does regulate its own expression by promoting read-through/preventing termination, we predict increased Npl3 levels to reduce the amount of the short productive RNA and increase the amount of the nonproductive 3'-extended RNA. To test this prediction, we used the GFP-NPL3UTR reporter that produces transcripts with the coding region of GFP, followed by the 3' region (nt 1 to 1135) of NPL3. 3' RACE identified cleavage/polyadenylation sites at positions 407 and 449 (data not shown), which is similar to the situation found for NPL3 RNA. Thus, the reporter appeared to recapitulate the termination pattern of NPL3 transcripts. This result was confirmed when we transformed both a wild-type strain that has normal levels of endogenous Npl3 and the strain that overexpresses Npl3 (NPL3-ADH1UTR) with the GFP-NPL3UTR plasmid and measured the levels of GFP RNA species by Northern blotting (Fig. 4). While one short RNA (polyadenylation site 230) was predominant in wild-type cells, a minor RNA (polyadenylation site 407/449) and small amounts of a 3'-extended RNA were also present (Fig. 4, lane 1). As predicted, in a strain that overexpressed Npl3 (NPL3-ADH1UTR), the levels of the short GFP RNAs were greatly reduced (Fig. 4, lane 2). We did not observe an increase in the amount of the extended RNA in NPL3-ADH1UTR cells, most likely because the RNA is unstable, as we have shown above (Fig. 3). In order to stabilize the 3'-extended RNA, we deleted the nuclear exosome component RRP6 in the strain overexpressing Npl3 (NPL3-ADH1UTR). Indeed, when RRP6 was deleted, we observed an increase in the 3'-extended RNA (Fig. 4, compare lanes 3 and 4). These results show that excess Npl3 does indeed lead to increased formation of 3'-extended RNA, consistent with the model that Npl3 promotes read-through of the termination sites of its own 3' region, leading to the production of an unstable, nonproductive 3'-extended RNA.
|
If the phosphorylation of Npl3 is required in order for Npl3 to function as an antiterminator of its own transcript, the inhibition of phosphorylation should result in the increased production of short translatable RNAs and a concomitant reduction in read-through product. Northern blot analysis showed that the levels of the short 230 and 407/449 RNAs were increased in the npl3-S411A strain (Fig. 6, compare lanes 1 and 2). Since the amount of the 3'-extended RNA was almost at background levels in the wild-type strain, it was not possible to accurately detect a reduction in the npl3-S411A strain. Therefore, the npl3-S411A mutation was combined with the deletion of both RRP6 and XRN1. The rationale for using this strain background, where both nuclear and cytoplasmic degradation is prevented, is that the npl3-S411A mutation results in defects in mRNA export and therefore might affect the export of the different Npl3 RNA species differentially. In the rrp6
xrn1
strain background, the npl3-S411A mutation did lead to a reduction in the production of the 3'-extended RNA and an increase in 230 and 407/449 RNAs (Fig. 6, lanes 3 and 4). Thus, phosphorylation is critical for the ability of Npl3 to prevent efficient 3' end processing of its own transcript.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular mechanism of Npl3 autoregulation. The formation of mRNA 3' ends in yeast is a two-step procedure. The nascent transcript is cleaved 20 to 30 nt downstream of the polyadenylation signal through the cooperation of cleavage factors (CF) IA and IB and the cleavage/polyadenylation factor, followed by poly(A) tail addition by Pap1 (29). Yeast termination/polyadenylation signals are degenerate, and antitermination factors may associate with the elongating polymerase to prevent the recognition of cryptic sites located in the coding sequence. It has been suggested that Npl3 functions as such an antiterminator by reducing recruitment of the multisubunit factor CF IA (Pcf11, Rna14, Rna15, and Clp1) to weak sites (4), and an increasing amount of data supports this notion. First, NPL3 interacts genetically with RNA15 and the CF IB component HRP1 (15). Second, Npl3 reduces the transcription termination efficiency of reporter transcripts both in vitro and in vivo in a way that is correlated with reduced recruitment of Rna15 to the polyadenylation site in vivo (4). In a manner similar to that described above, the binding of Npl3 to a model substrate in vitro antagonizes Rna15 recruitment (5) and, finally, Npl3 reduces use of cryptic poly(A) sites in the coding sequence of RNA14 by blocking Rna15 and Pcf11 recruitment (44). Our data are consistent with a model in which the 3' region of NPL3 is sensitive to the concentration of Npl3, functioning as a natural substrate for transcription termination/3' end formation antagonizing activity of Npl3. Thus, the general role of Npl3 as a suppressor of cryptic sites is coupled to a specific role in its own regulation. It is likely that Npl3 autoregulation is accomplished through a major activity of Npl3 and, therefore, the role of Npl3 in 3' end formation may be more important than previously anticipated.
In mammalian cells, the U1 snRNP-specific U1A protein negatively autoregulates its own polyadenylation. U1A protein is recruited to an element in the 3' UTR of the U1A gene, allowing U1A to interact with and inhibit the activity of poly(A) polymerase (1, 14). An appealing model is that the autoregulation of Npl3, an RNA binding protein, also involves direct binding of Npl3 to its own 3' region. The identification of the predicted binding site, however, may be a challenging task. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments indicate that Npl3 is recruited to transcribed genes independently of the sequence of the nascent RNA (22), and analysis of cellular RNAs immunoprecipitated together with Npl3 failed to identify strong consensus RNA motifs correlated with Npl3 binding (18). Thus, other factors may contribute to the recruitment/binding of Npl3 to its target RNA.
NPL3 3' UTR is unusual with respect to length and sequence. The distance between NPL3's coding region and termination sites is unusually long (230 to 449 nt); the average 3' UTR in S. cerevisiae is approximately 100 nt long (11). This might reflect inefficient termination/polyadenylation, which in turn is likely to contribute to regulation. To ask whether the use of the distal sites is simply due to the absence of suitable sites closer to the coding region, we submitted a sequence containing the NPL3 ORF and the 1,000 downstream nucleotides to the mRNA 3' processing site predictor (12), a discrete state-space model (DSM) that calculates the likelihood of each position being the 3' end of the transcript. Interestingly, the DSM predictor suggested a number of high-scoring sites within 130 nt after the coding region, implying a more complex explanation. In agreement with our Northern blotting results, the DSM predictor also suggested the presence of strong 3' end processing sites 231 and 407 nt downstream of the coding region of Npl3. The production of the 3'-extended NPL3 RNA, however, suggests that these apparently strong sites are inefficiently used. The DSM predictor does not take the sequence context into account and occasionally makes false predictions in regions where matches to the processing elements are strong but the context for cleavage is poor (12). Thus, inhibitory sequence/structure elements within the NPL3 3' UTR may antagonize the usage of otherwise strong 3' processing signals. This is consistent with the model that Npl3 autoregulation relies on inefficient upstream 3' end formation and an unproductive downstream site.
Additional modes of Npl3 regulation. The mutation of the Sen1 helicase, which functions in the termination of noncoding RNA polymerase II transcripts, results in a reduced association of RNA polymerase II with the 3' end of the NPL3 gene 3' UTR (37). Therefore, we considered the possibility that Sen1 functions, together with Npl3, in suppressing the 3' end processing of NPL3 transcripts under wild-type conditions. However, we found that the mutation of SEN1 did not affect the distribution of NPL3 RNA species (data not shown) and, therefore, Sen1 is unlikely to be involved in Npl3 autoregulation. Future studies should address which additional factors are important for the autoregulatory mechanism.
As reviewed in the Introduction, Npl3 is an RNA binding protein predicted to be involved in an extensive range of cellular functions. The abundance of the majority of yeast proteins is predicted to range from 1,000 to 10,000 molecules per cell, and so with approximately 80,000 Npl3 molecules per cell, Npl3 is a highly expressed protein (8). Given the multitude of processes that can be affected by Npl3 and its high levels, it is likely that multiple mechanisms are involved in maintaining appropriate Npl3 levels. We noted that changes in protein levels in some instances appeared larger than the accompanying change in RNA levels. In particular, the reduction in GFP protein produced from the construct expressing GFP fused to the NPL3 3' region (GFP-NPL3UTR) in cells overexpressing Npl3 appeared to be more dramatic than the corresponding reduction in RNA levels (Fig. 2). The association of Npl3 with translating ribosomes increases when reimport to the nucleus is compromised, suggesting a potential role in translational regulation (43). Our data are consistent with the notion that Npl3 autoregulation includes an additional layer of regulation involving negative translational control.
An additional role for posttranslational modification. Npl3 differs from typical mammalian SR proteins in two significant respects, both of which involve the status of posttranslational modifications. First, while the RS domains of SR proteins are highly phosphorylated, Npl3 phosphorylation depends on the presence of a single serine residue, S411, in the so-called SR domain (10). Second, this C-terminal domain of Npl3 also contains multiple RGG repeats that are arginine methylated, a characteristic of hnRNP proteins (23, 34, 46). Since, in at least some instances, hnRNP proteins function to antagonize SR proteins in the regulation of alternative splicing, it has always been a curiosity that the yeast protein carries both modifications (see reference 34). Here we have shown that the Npl3-S411A mutant protein, which cannot be phosphorylated, fails to be efficiently autoregulated, resulting in elevated levels of Npl3 protein. Our results suggest that phosphorylated Npl3 is the form of the protein that suppresses the use of the productive cleavage/polyadenylation sites in its own 3' region and, by extension, functions generally in the suppression of cryptic 3' sites located in coding regions of other genes. An interesting question for the future is whether methylation, which is known to promote efficient export of Npl3 (25, 45), is also required for its role in transcription termination/autoregulation. Notably, mutations that prevent the methylation of Npl3 have severe growth defects when combined with a deletion of the CBC80 gene, which encodes a subunit of the nuclear cap binding complex (25). This observation, combined with the finding that Cbc80 plays a role in the suppression of cryptic termination/3' end processing sites (44), points to a role for Npl3 methylation in transcription termination/autoregulation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grant GM21119 (to C.G.) and fellowships from the American Heart Organization (to M.K.L.) and the American Cancer Society (to T.L.K.). C.G. is an American Cancer Society Research Professor of Molecular Genetics.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 7 April 2008. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Boorstein, W. R., and E. A. Craig. 1989. Primer extension analysis of RNA. Methods Enzymol. 180:347-369.[Medline]
3. Bossie, M. A., C. DeHoratius, G. Barcelo, and P. Silver. 1992. A mutant nuclear protein with similarity to RNA binding proteins interferes with nuclear import in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 3:875-893.[Abstract]
4. Bucheli, M. E., and S. Buratowski. 2005. Npl3 is an antagonist of mRNA 3' end formation by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J. 24:2150-2160.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Bucheli, M. E., X. He, C. D. Kaplan, C. L. Moore, and S. Buratowski. 2007. Polyadenylation site choice in yeast is affected by competition between Npl3 and polyadenylation factor CFI. RNA 13:1756-1764.
6. Dreyfuss, G., V. N. Kim, and N. Kataoka. 2002. Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:195-205.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Flach, J., M. Bossie, J. Vogel, A. Corbett, T. Jinks, D. A. Willins, and P. A. Silver. 1994. A yeast RNA-binding protein shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8399-8407.
8. Ghaemmaghami, S., W. K. Huh, K. Bower, R. W. Howson, A. Belle, N. Dephoure, E. K. O'Shea, and J. S. Weissman. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425:737-741.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Gilbert, W., and C. Guthrie. 2004. The Glc7p nuclear phosphatase promotes mRNA export by facilitating association of Mex67p with mRNA. Mol. Cell 13:201-212.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Gilbert, W., C. W. Siebel, and C. Guthrie. 2001. Phosphorylation by Sky1p promotes Npl3p shuttling and mRNA dissociation. RNA 7:302-313.[Abstract]
11. Graber, J. H., C. R. Cantor, S. C. Mohr, and T. F. Smith. 1999. Genomic detection of new yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end-processing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:888-894.
12. Graber, J. H., G. D. McAllister, and T. F. Smith. 2002. Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3'-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1851-1858.
13. Graveley, B. R. 2000. Sorting out the complexity of SR protein functions. RNA 6:1197-1211.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Gunderson, S. I., K. Beyer, G. Martin, W. Keller, W. C. Boelens, and L. W. Mattaj. 1994. The human U1A snRNP protein regulates polyadenylation via a direct interaction with poly(A) polymerase. Cell 76:531-541.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Henry, M., C. Z. Borland, M. Bossie, and P. A. Silver. 1996. Potential RNA binding proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified as suppressors of temperature-sensitive mutations in NPL3. Genetics 142:103-115.[Abstract]
16. Huang, Y., R. Gattoni, J. Stevenin, and J. A. Steitz. 2003. SR splicing factors serve as adapter proteins for TAP-dependent mRNA export. Mol. Cell 11:837-843.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Huang, Y., T. A. Yario, and J. A. Steitz. 2004. A molecular link between SR protein dephosphorylation and mRNA export. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:9666-9670.
18. Kim Guisbert, K., K. Duncan, H. Li, and C. Guthrie. 2005. Functional specificity of shuttling hnRNPs revealed by genome-wide analysis of their RNA binding profiles. RNA 11:383-393.
19. Krebber, H., T. Taura, M. S. Lee, and P. A. Silver. 1999. Uncoupling of the hnRNP Npl3p from mRNAs during the stress-induced block in mRNA export. Genes Dev. 13:1994-2004.
20. Lai, M. C., and W. Y. Tarn. 2004. Hypophosphorylated ASF/SF2 binds TAP and is present in messenger ribonucleoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279:31745-31749.
21. Lee, M. S., M. Henry, and P. A. Silver. 1996. A protein that shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm is an important mediator of RNA export. Genes Dev. 10:1233-1246.
22. Lei, E. P., and P. A. Silver. 2002. Intron status and 3'-end formation control cotranscriptional export of mRNA. Genes Dev. 16:2761-2766.
23. Liu, Q., and G. Dreyfuss. 1995. In vivo and in vitro arginine methylation of RNA-binding proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2800-2808.[Abstract]
24. Longtine, M. S., A. McKenzie III, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953-961.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. McBride, A. E., J. T. Cook, E. A. Stemmler, K. L. Rutledge, K. A. McGrath, and J. A. Rubens. 2005. Arginine methylation of yeast mRNA-binding protein Npl3 directly affects its function, nuclear export, and intranuclear protein interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 280:30888-30898.
26. Muhlrad, D., and R. Parker. 1999. Aberrant mRNAs with extended 3' UTRs are substrates for rapid degradation by mRNA surveillance. RNA 5:1299-1307.[Abstract]
27. Nedea, E., X. He, M. Kim, J. Pootoolal, G. Zhong, V. Canadien, T. Hughes, S. Buratowski, C. L. Moore, and J. Greenblatt. 2003. Organization and function of APT, a subcomplex of the yeast cleavage and polyadenylation factor involved in the formation of mRNA and small nucleolar RNA 3'-ends. J. Biol. Chem. 278:33000-33010.
28. Pemberton, L. F., J. S. Rosenblum, and G. Blobel. 1997. A distinct and parallel pathway for the nuclear import of an mRNA-binding protein. J. Cell Biol. 139:1645-1653.
29. Proudfoot, N., and J. O'Sullivan. 2002. Polyadenylation: a tail of two complexes. Curr. Biol. 12:R855-R857.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Russell, I. D., and D. Tollervey. 1992. NOP3 is an essential yeast protein which is required for pre-rRNA processing. J. Cell Biol. 119:737-747.
31. Schmitt, M. E., T. A. Brown, and B. L. Trumpower. 1990. A rapid and simple method for preparation of RNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3091-3092.
32. Senger, B., G. Simos, F. R. Bischoff, A. Podtelejnikov, M. Mann, and E. Hurt. 1998. Mtr10p functions as a nuclear import receptor for the mRNA-binding protein Npl3p. EMBO J. 17:2196-2207.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Siebel, C. W., L. Feng, C. Guthrie, and X. D. Fu. 1999. Conservation in budding yeast of a kinase specific for SR splicing factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:5440-5445.
34. Siebel, C. W., and C. Guthrie. 1996. The essential yeast RNA binding protein Np13p is methylated. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13641-13646.
35. Singleton, D. R., S. Chen, M. Hitomi, C. Kumagai, and A. M. Tartakoff. 1995. A yeast protein that bidirectionally affects nucleocytoplasmic transport. J. Cell Sci. 108:265-272.[Abstract]
36. Sopko, R., D. Huang, N. Preston, G. Chua, B. Papp, K. Kafadar, M. Snyder, S. G. Oliver, M. Cyert, T. R. Hughes, C. Boone, and B. Andrews. 2006. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21:319-330.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Steinmetz, E. J., C. L. Warren, J. N. Kuehner, B. Panbehi, A. Z. Ansari, and D. A. Brow. 2006. Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. Mol. Cell 24:735-746.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Stojdl, D. F., and J. C. Bell. 1999. SR protein kinases: the splice of life. Biochem. Cell Biol. 77:293-298.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Tollervey, D. 1987. A yeast small nuclear RNA is required for normal processing of pre-ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 6:4169-4175.[Medline]
40. Tseng, S. S., P. L. Weaver, Y. Liu, M. Hitomi, A. M. Tartakoff, and T. H. Chang. 1998. Dbp5p, a cytosolic RNA helicase, is required for poly(A)+ RNA export. EMBO J. 17:2651-2662.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Vilardell, J., and J. R. Warner. 1997. Ribosomal protein L32 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae influences both the splicing of its own transcript and the processing of rRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1959-1965.[Abstract]
42. Walsh, E. P., D. J. Lamont, K. A. Beattie, and M. J. Stark. 2002. Novel interactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae type 1 protein phosphatase identified by single-step affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 41:2409-2420.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Windgassen, M., D. Sturm, I. J. Cajigas, C. I. Gonzalez, M. Seedorf, H. Bastians, and H. Krebber. 2004. Yeast shuttling SR proteins Npl3p, Gbp2p, and Hrb1p are part of the translating mRNPs, and Npl3p can function as a translational repressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10479-10491.
44. Wong, C. M., H. Qiu, C. Hu, J. Dong, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 2007. Yeast cap binding complex (CBC) impedes recruitment of cleavage factor IA to weak termination sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6520-6531.
45. Xu, C., and M. F. Henry. 2004. Nuclear export of hnRNP Hrp1p and nuclear export of hnRNP Npl3p are linked and influenced by the methylation state of Npl3p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10742-10756.
46. Yun, C. Y., and X. D. Fu. 2000. Conserved SR protein kinase functions in nuclear import and its action is counteracted by arginine methylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 150:707-718.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|