| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2008, p. 3943-3951, Vol. 28, No. 12
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00013-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Kathryn Austgen,1,
Mari Nishino,1
Kristen M. Coakley,1
Andrew Hagen,2
Dan Han,2
Feroz R. Papa,2 and
Scott A. Oakes1*
Departments of Pathology,1 Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 941432
Received 4 January 2008/ Returned for modification 6 February 2008/ Accepted 5 April 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, PERK, and ATF6 are the major effectors of the UPR in mammalian cells and initially expand the ER network, upregulate chaperones, and arrest global translation in order to restore homeostasis. However, if the ER damage is extensive or prolonged, the cell initiates apoptosis through activation of the multidomain proapoptotic BCL-2 proteins BAX and BAK at the outer mitochondrial membrane (21). Several caspases (caspase-4 and caspase-12), calcium regulatory proteins, and BH3-only proteins (NOXA, PUMA, and BIM) have been implicated in contributing to apoptotic signaling downstream of ER stress (8, 9, 10, 13, 20, 22, 23). Nevertheless, the molecular chain of events leading from ER stress to mitochondrial BAX/BAK activation remains poorly understood. Mounting evidence suggests that apoptosis triggered by excessive stress on the protein-folding capacity of the ER contributes to pathological cell loss in many common human degenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and type 2 diabetes) (14, 18). Hence, there is great interest among the biomedical community in understanding how this occurs and whether this apoptotic pathway might be a good therapeutic target for these diseases. Until now, the signaling events that connect ER stress with the mitochondrial apoptotic machinery have remained elusive.
Here we report the discovery of two key apoptotic players that signal the mitochondrial death machinery in response to excessive or prolonged stress on the ER. Using rigorous in vitro and in vivo biochemical assays, we show that caspase-2 cleavage of the BH3-only protein BID is a major apoptotic switch downstream of ER stress, which if blocked protects cells against this form of injury.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
), and cycloheximide were obtained from Sigma. All recombinant caspases were purchased from Calbiochem. Caspase-2 small inhibiting RNA (siRNA; catalog no. L-044184-00-0005) and control siRNA (catalog no. D-001810-10), along with DharmaFECT 3 reagent, were used per the manufacturer's (Dharmacon) protocol. An RNeasy kit (Qiagen) was used for RNA extraction according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lipofectamine and Plus transfection regents were purchased from Invitrogen. Cellular fractionation and cytochrome c release assay. MEFs were resuspended in mitochondrial experimental buffer (MEB; 125 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-MOPS [morpholinepropanesulfonic acid] [pH 7.4], 5 mM glutamate, 1.25 mM malate, 2 µM EGTA) plus 1x PIC and mechanically disrupted, using a 400-µm chamber attached to an M-110S Microfluidizer processor (Microfluidics). Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 60 min at 4°C; the resulting supernatant was termed the S100 fraction. To isolate mitochondria, diced mouse liver or pelleted Jurkat cells were resuspended in MEB plus 1x PIC, stroked 10 times through a 27-gauge needle, and centrifuged at 700 x g for 10 min at 4°C to remove nuclei and unbroken cells. The supernatant was centrifuged at 7,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C to pellet the isolated mitochondria. For cytochrome c release assays, 100 µg of S100 extract was incubated with 25 µg of isolated mitochondria for 45 min at room temperature (RT) in MEB. Subsequently, the reactions were centrifuged at 16,100 x g for 5 min at 4°C, and the pellet was lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris-MOPS [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% NP-40) to release the remaining cytochrome c. For experiments using mouse liver mitochondria, the supernatant and pellet fractions were immunoblotted as detailed below. For experiments using Jurkat mitochondria, the supernatant and resuspended pellet fractions were incubated with human cytochrome c enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates (R&D Systems) per the manufacturer's instructions. The percentage of cytochrome c release was calculated by dividing the amount of cytochrome c found in the supernatant fraction by the sum of the amount of cytochrome c found in the supernatant and pellet fractions.
Antibodies, immunoprecipitation, in vitro BID cleavage assays, and Western blot analysis.
Antibodies used for Western blot analysis included antiactin from Chemicon, anti-BAK, anti-BAX, anti-
subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (anti-eIF2
), anti-phospho-eIF2
, anti-BAD, anti-BIK, anti-PUMA, and anti-poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (anti-PARP) from Cell Signaling Technology, anti-BCL-XL from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, anti-BID from R&D Systems, anti-caspase-2 from Chemicon, anti-full-length caspase-8 from Alexis, anti-cleaved caspase-8 from Imgenex, BD Pharmingen anti-cytochrome c, anti-BIM from ProSci Incorporated, and anti-V5 from Sigma. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (anti-mouse, anti-rat, and anti-rabbit antibodies) and Bio-Rad (anti-goat antibody). For immunoprecipitation experiments, S100 extracts were incubated with anti-BID or an isotype-matched control antibody and protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 60 min at 4°C and centrifuged at 2,200 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The subsequent supernatant fractions were used in a cytochrome c release assay on isolated Jurkat mitochondria as described above. For in vitro BID cleavage assays, 100 µg of each S100 extract was incubated for 1 h with recombinant BCL-XL, anti-BCL-XL, and protein A/G beads and centrifuged at 2,200 x g. The supernatant fraction was then either left alone or pretreated for 10 min with a caspase inhibitor before recombinant BID was added. Recombinant caspases were incubated with caspase activity buffer (10 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM Tris-MOPS [pH 7.4], 200 mM KCl) and, if necessary, pretreated with various inhibitors for 10 min before recombinant BID was added. All BID cleavage assay samples were then incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Whole-cell lysates were prepared by disruption of the cells with RIPA buffer plus 1x PIC for 5 min on ice, centrifugation at 16,000 x g to remove insoluble materials, and boiling at 100°C for 5 min. The samples were resolved by 10% NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). Antibodies were detected by using the chemiluminescence method (PerkinElmer), Pierce film, and a Konica SRX-101A developer. Gels were quantified via densitometry by using the open-source ImageJ software (rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Production of recombinant proteins. To produce recombinant GST-BCL-XL, 1 µg of pGEX-2T-Bcl-XL plasmid was transformed into BL21 bacteria by heat shocking the bacteria in the presence of the plasmid at 42°C for 1 min. The bacteria were subsequently grown on a 100-µg/ml ampicillin-selective LB agar plate. The resulting colonies were expanded into LB plus 100 µg/ml ampicillin and induced to express GST-BCL-XL via treatment with 0.5 mM IPTG. The bacteria were cultured at 37°C until they reached an optical density at 600 nm of 0.6. They were then pelleted via centrifugation at 3,000 x g for 10 min and subsequently resuspended in 1x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) plus 1% Triton X-100 with PIC and 1 mg/ml lysozyme. The resuspended cells were then frozen overnight at –80°C, thawed, and lysed through a 0.1-µm Microfluidizer chamber (Microfluidics). Cell debris was removed via centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min and by passing the supernatant through a 0.1-µm filter. The lysate was then incubated with glutathione-agarose beads at 4°C for 2 h on a rocker. The beads were then pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 5 min and washed twice in 1x PBS. The GST-Bcl-XL was eluted from the beads by incubation with 50 mM Tris-50 mM reduced glutathione for 30 min at RT on a rocker. To produce recombinant BID, pGEX-2T-BID was expressed and purified from bacteria as described above. After being bound to the agarose beads, BID was cleaved off by the addition of 1 ng of thrombin in 1x thrombin buffer for 60 min at RT. The beads were pelleted, and the supernatant was cleared of thrombin by passing it through a benzamidine-Sepharose matrix at 16,100 x g.
XBP-1 splicing assay.
An XBP-1 splicing assay was performed as described previously (2). After being treated, the total RNA was extracted from cells by using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen) per the manufacturer's instructions. After being treated with DNase I, a 600-bp cDNA product encompassing the IRE1
cleavage site was amplified by a one-step reverse transcription-PCR kit (Invitrogen), using the sense primer mXBP1.3S (5'-AAACAGAGTAGCAGCGCAGACTGC-3') and the antisense primer mXBP1.2AS (5'-GGATCTCTAAAACTAGAGGCTTGGTG-3'). This fragment was further digested by PstI to reveal a restriction site that is lost upon the splicing of XBP-1 by IRE1
. The products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel.
Annexin V staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed twice in 1 x PBS, and incubated with annexin V binding buffer (2 mM CaCl2, 80 mM NaCl, 1% HEPES plus 1 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate-annexin V for 5 min. The cells were subsequently passed through a FACSCalibur machine (Becton Dickinson) and detected with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Statistical analyses were completed using Student's t test.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To this end, we induced ER stress in SV40-transformed DKO MEFs via treatment with BFA for 24 h. Following treatment, a cytosolic extract (the S100 fraction) was isolated by mechanical disruption of the cells in an isotonic buffer (to keep organelles intact) followed by high-speed (100,000 x g) centrifugation. To test for the presence of ER stress-induced BAX/BAK activating signals, we incubated the S100 fractions from untreated and BFA-treated DKO MEFs with mitochondria isolated from human Jurkat T cells and then assayed them for cytochrome c release. As shown in Fig. 1A, the S100 fraction from untreated DKO MEFs did not induce significant mitochondrial cytochrome c release above the level seen with buffer alone. In contrast, the S100 of BFA-treated DKO cells released greater than 90% of the mitochondrial cytochrome c into the supernatant (as measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay against human cytochrome c). The addition of the Ca2+ chelator EGTA or the pancaspase inhibitor zVAD-fmk had no effect on the cytochrome c-releasing activity of the S100 of BFA-treated DKO cells (data not shown). Moreover, to confirm that the S100 fraction from the BFA-treated MEFs was causing cytochrome c release by specifically activating BAX/BAK and not by generally disrupting mitochondrial integrity, we incubated the S100 fractions from BFA-treated and untreated DKO MEFs with isolated liver mitochondria from age-matched wild-type (WT) or conditionally targeted (Baxf/f Bak–/–) mice with a liver-specific Cre deletion (albumin-Cre) (Fig. 1B). The S100 fraction from treated DKO MEFs induced robust cytochrome c release from the WT mitochondria but not from BAX/BAK-deficient mitochondria (Fig. 1C). Together, these data strongly indicate that ER stress induces a cytosolic activity capable of triggering BAX/BAK-dependent cytochrome c release from isolated mitochondria.
|
-helical BH3 domain (4, 27). Therefore, we assayed S100 fractions from untreated and BFA-treated DKO MEFs for differences in expression or posttranslational modifications of known BH3-only proteins. The cytosolic levels of most of the known BH3-only proteins, including BAD, PUMA, and BIK, remain unchanged with ER stress (Fig. 1D). The BH3-protein BIM has recently been implicated in ER stress-induced apoptosis (23). While the levels of mitochondrion-associated BIM clearly increased upon BFA treatment, there was no detectable BIM in our cytosolic extracts either before or after ER stress (Fig. 1D), ruling out the possibility that BIM significantly contributes to the BFA-induced cytosolic cytochrome c-releasing activity. Surprisingly, we found that while the vast majority of the BH3-only protein BID in the untreated S100 is full-length (
22 kDa), nearly all the BID present in the S100 from the BFA-treated cells is of a smaller size (
14 kDa) (Fig. 1E). In response to certain death signals, BID is activated by proteolytic cleavage into a smaller 14 -kDa truncated form, termed tBID, which then translocates to mitochondria, where it potently activates BAX and/or BAK (12, 17, 31, 32). The presence of tBID in the BFA S100 fraction from DKO cells suggested the possibility that this activated protein might be an apoptotic signal that links ER stress to the mitochondrial death machinery. To test this hypothesis, we immunodepleted BID/tBID from the S100 fraction of BFA-treated cells and subsequently assayed the ability of this fraction to induce cytochrome c release (Fig. 1F). Interestingly, BFA-treated S100 extract that had been immunodepleted for BID contained approximately a third less cytochrome c releasing-activity than the nonimmunodepleted sample (Fig. 1F). These data indicate that tBID represented one of the major ER stress-induced apoptotic activities in our cytosolic extract.
If BID is essential for ER stress-induced death in vivo, then the loss of BID should confer resistance to this form of cell injury. To test this, we challenged SV40-transformed WT, DKO, and Bid–/– MEFs with various concentrations of BFA and TG. The Bid–/– MEFs displayed significant resistance to treatment with both BFA (Fig. 2A) and TG (Fig. 2B), albeit less than did the DKO cells. To rule out the possibility that the apoptotic resistance of Bid–/– and DKO cells was due to changes in UPR signaling, we measured the major downstream targets of both IRE1
and PERK in response to the same doses of BFA and TG used in the apoptotic studies. Unfolded proteins in the ER activate the RNase domain of IRE1
to initiate splicing of the XBP1 mRNA (2, 5). As a consequence of IRE1
-mediated intron removal, XBP1 mRNA is frame shifted and translated to produce XBP1 protein, a transcription factor whose downstream effects increase protein-folding capacity (25). As assessed through an reverse transcription-PCR-based assay, the levels of spliced XBP1 mRNA were essentially identical among the three cell types at baseline and in response to the same doses of BFA and TG used in our apoptosis studies (Fig. 2C). PERK is an ER-localized transmembrane kinase that, when activated by misfolded proteins, phosphorylates eIF2
at Ser51 (7), leading to a global attenuation in cap-dependent protein translation. As shown in Fig. 2C, ER stress-induced phosphorylation of eIF2
at Ser51 occurs equally among the three cell types. These results suggest that the apoptotic resistance of the Bid–/– and DKO cells to ER stress is not attributable to gross differences in UPR signaling at the ER membrane. Moreover, the Bid–/– MEFs did not display resistance to STS (a pankinase inhibitor) treatment, a death stimulus known to induce mitochondrial BAX/BAK-dependent apoptosis (Fig. 2D). These results indicate that Bid–/– cells have a specific resistance to apoptosis induced by ER stress but not to all intrinsic apoptotic stimuli. To ensure that the transformed nature of the MEFs was not affecting our results, we also challenged primary WT and Bid–/– thymocytes with various concentrations of BFA and TG. Again, the Bid–/– thymocytes displayed significantly greater resistance to both BFA (Fig. 2E) and TG (Fig. 2F) than their WT counterparts. Together, these data demonstrate that loss of BID confers cytoprotection against ER stress, confirming that tBID is one of the major apoptotic signals that link the ER and the mitochondrion.
|
-cycloheximide (which is known to induce BID cleavage via caspase-8 [12, 17]), the level of full-length V5-tagged WT BID was greatly reduced, indicative of its being cleaved (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the level of full-length D59E BID remained constant in the TNF-
-cycloheximide-treated cells, as it is resistant to caspase-8 activity. Moreover, through activation of initiator caspase-8, TNF-
-cycloheximide led to the processing of caspase-3 and the cleavage of its target, PARP, independently of mitochondrial permeabilization. When the transfected cells were treated with BFA, the level of full-length V5 WT BID was substantially reduced, consistent with our finding that BID is cleaved during ER stress. Yet the D59E mutant of BID remained at a constant level after BFA treatment (Fig. 3A). As expected, BFA was unable to activate caspase-3 in the DKO cells where mitochondrial permeabilization was blocked, which suggests that the ER stress-induced protease is an initiator (premitochondrial) caspase and cleaves BID at this site. As mentioned previously, the classical BID protease is caspase-8, but we found no evidence to suggest that it is cleaved or enzymatically activated in MEFs following BFA treatment (Fig. 3C).
|
As caspase-2 is resistant to z-VAD-fmk and has been reported to cleave BID in response to heat shock (1), we decided to further investigate whether this protease plays a role in ER stress. The caspase-2-specific inhibitor z-VDVAD-fmk completely blocked the in vitro cleavage of recBID by the pcS100 fraction from BFA-treated DKO MEFs (Fig. 4A). Moreover, we found that caspase-2 is cleaved in the S100 extract from BFA-treated DKO MEFs (Fig. 4B), indicating that it is activated by ER stress upstream of mitochondrial permeabilization. To determine if caspase-2 is responsible for BID activation within intact cells, DKO MEFs were left untreated or were pretreated with z-VDVAD-fmk and then challenged with BFA. In whole-cell extracts, we were not able to consistently detect tBID with our antibody; however, a reduction in the level of full-length BID was obvious. Similar to the in vitro results, caspase-2 inhibition blocked ER stress-induced cleavage of BID (Fig. 4D). To confirm that the observed effects on BID cleavage were a direct result of caspase-2 inhibition and not an off-target effect of the inhibitor, we transfected DKO MEFs with control siRNA or siRNA directed against caspase-2 (Fig. 4C) and then induced ER stress with BFA. In cells with reduced caspase-2 expression, the level of full-length BID did not decrease after BFA treatment (Fig. 4D). Together, these results strongly indicate that caspase-2 is the primary protease that activates BID following ER stress.
|
|
Compared to caspase-8, little is known about the activation and function of caspase-2. A role for caspase-2 is best documented in response to genotoxic stress, where it seems to act upstream of mitochondrial permeabilization (11, 24, 29). While there have been hints that caspase-2 may be involved in ER stress (3, 19), we are the first to show that it plays an essential role in this apoptotic pathway and to define its critical target. However, it remains unclear how caspase-2 is activated by ER stress and whether it is downstream of one or more of the stress sensors (IRE1
, ATF6, and PERK) that monitor ER homeostasis. This is a topic we are actively investigating.
Our data offer novel insights into the biochemical links between the ER and the mitochondria during times of ER stress. Given the role of ER stress in the pathogenesis of many prevalent human degenerative disorders, our findings may promote the development of rational antiapoptotic therapeutic strategies to preserve cell viability and function in such diseases.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grants K08 AI054650 (S.A.O.), KO8 DK065671 (F.R.P.), and DP2-OD001925 (F.R.P.), an HHMI Physician-Scientist Early Career Award (S.A.O.), the Steward Trust Foundation (S.A.O.), the Sandler Program in Basic Sciences (S.A.O. and F.R.P.), the Burroughs Wellcome Foundation (F.R.P.), the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (F.R.P.), the Hillblom Foundation (F.R.P.), the Partnership for Cures (F.R.P.), and the UC Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (S.A.O.).
We dedicate this work to the late Stanley J. Korsmeyer (1950-2005), whose mentorship, love of science, and generosity positively influenced so many.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 21 April 2008. ![]()
These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Calfon, M., H. Zeng, F. Urano, J. H. Till, S. R. Hubbard, H. P. Harding, S. G. Clark, and D. Ron. 2002. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. Nature 415:92-96.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Cheung, H. H., N. Lynn Kelly, P. Liston, and R. G. Korneluk. 2006. Involvement of caspase-2 and caspase-9 in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis: a role for the IAPs. Exp. Cell Res. 312:2347-2357.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Chipuk, J. E., L. Bouchier-Hayes, and D. R. Green. 2006. Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization during apoptosis: the innocent bystander scenario. Cell Death Differ. 13:1396-1402.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Credle, J. J., J. S. Finer-Moore, F. R. Papa, R. M. Stroud, and P. Walter. 2005. On the mechanism of sensing unfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:18773-18784.
6. Du, C., M. Fang, Y. Li, L. Li, and X. Wang. 2000. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase- activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell 102:33-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Harding, H. P., Y. Zhang, and D. Ron. 1999. Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature 397:271-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Hayashi, T., and T. P. Su. 2007. Sigma-1 receptor chaperones at the ER-mitochondrion interface regulate Ca2+ signaling and cell survival. Cell 131:596-610.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Hitomi, J., T. Katayama, Y. Eguchi, T. Kudo, M. Taniguchi, Y. Koyama, T. Manabe, S. Yamagishi, Y. Bando, K. Imaizumi, Y. Tsujimoto, and M. Tohyama. 2004. Involvement of caspase-4 in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and Aβ-induced cell death. J. Cell Biol. 165:347-356.
10. Kieran, D., I. Woods, A. Villunger, A. Strasser, and J. H. Prehn. 2007. Deletion of the BH3-only protein puma protects motoneurons from ER stress-induced apoptosis and delays motoneuron loss in ALS mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:20606-20611.
11. Lassus, P., X. Opitz-Araya, and Y. Lazebnik. 2002. Requirement for caspase-2 in stress-induced apoptosis before mitochondrial permeabilization. Science 297:1352-1354.
12. Li, H., H. Zhu, C. J. Xu, and J. Yuan. 1998. Cleavage of BID by caspase- 8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway of apoptosis. Cell 94:491-501.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Li, J., B. Lee, and A. S. Lee. 2006. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis: multiple pathways and activation of p53-up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and NOXA by p53. J. Biol. Chem. 281:7260-7270.
14. Lin, J. H., P. Walter, and T. S. Yen. 2008. Endoplasmic reticulum stress in disease pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3:399-425.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Lindsten, T., A. J. Ross, A. King, W. X. Zong, J. C. Rathmell, H. A. Shiels, E. Ulrich, K. G. Waymire, P. Mahar, K. Frauwirth, Y. Chen, M. Wei, V. M. Eng, D. M. Adelman, M. C. Simon, A. Ma, J. A. Golden, G. Evan, S. J. Korsmeyer, G. R. MacGregor, and C. B. Thompson. 2000. The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bak and Bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues. Mol. Cell 6:1389-1399.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Liu, X., C. N. Kim, J. Yang, R. Jemmerson, and X. Wang. 1996. Induction of apoptotic program in cell-free extracts: requirement for dATP and cytochrome c. Cell 86:147-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Luo, X., I. Budihardjo, H. Zou, C. Slaughter, and X. Wang. 1998. Bid, a Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c release from mitochondria in response to activation of cell surface death receptors. Cell 94:481-490.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Marciniak, S. J., and D. Ron. 2006. Endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling in disease. Physiol. Rev. 86:1133-1149.
19. Murakami, Y., E. Aizu-Yokota, Y. Sonoda, S. Ohta, and T. Kasahara. 2007. Suppression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced caspase- activation and cell death by the overexpression of Bcl-xL or Bcl-2. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 141:401-410.
20. Nakagawa, T., H. Zhu, N. Morishima, E. Li, J. Xu, B. A. Yankner, and J. Yuan. 2000. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-β. Nature 403:98-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Oakes, S. A., S. S. Lin, and M. C. Bassik. 2006. The control of endoplasmic reticulum-initiated apoptosis by the BCL-2 family of proteins. Curr. Mol. Med. 6:99-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Obeng, E. A., and L. H. Boise. 2005. Caspase-12 and caspase-4 are not required for caspase-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 280:29578-29587.
23. Puthalakath, H., L. A. O'Reilly, P. Gunn, L. Lee, P. N. Kelly, N. D. Huntington, P. D. Hughes, E. M. Michalak, J. McKimm-Breschkin, N. Motoyama, T. Gotoh, S. Akira, P. Bouillet, and A. Strasser. 2007. ER stress triggers apoptosis by activating BH3-only protein Bim. Cell 129:1337-1349.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Robertson, J. D., M. Enoksson, M. Suomela, B. Zhivotovsky, and S. Orrenius. 2002. Caspase-2 acts upstream of mitochondria to promote cytochrome c release during etoposide-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 277:29803-29809.
25. Ron, D., and P. Walter. 2007. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:519-529.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Scorrano, L., S. A. Oakes, J. T. Opferman, E. H. Cheng, M. D. Sorcinelli, T. Pozzan, and S. J. Korsmeyer. 2003. BAX and BAK regulation of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+: a control point for apoptosis. Science 300:135-139.
27. Strasser, A. 2005. The role of BH3-only proteins in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5:189-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Susin, S. A., H. K. Lorenzo, N. Zamzami, I. Marzo, B. E. Snow, G. M. Brothers, J. Mangion, E. Jacotot, P. Costantini, M. Loeffler, N. Larochette, D. R. Goodlett, R. Aebersold, D. P. Siderovski, J. M. Penninger, and G. Kroemer. 1999. Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature 397:441-446.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Tinel, A., and J. Tschopp. 2004. The PIDDosome, a protein complex implicated in activation of caspase-2 in response to genotoxic stress. Science 304:843-846.
30. Verhagen, A. M., P. G. Ekert, M. Pakusch, J. Silke, L. M. Connolly, G. E. Reid, R. L. Moritz, R. J. Simpson, and D. L. Vaux. 2000. Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell 102:43-53.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Wang, K., X. M. Yin, D. T. Chao, C. L. Milliman, and S. J. Korsmeyer. 1996. BID: a novel BH3 domain-only death agonist. Genes Dev. 10:2859-2869.
32. Wei, M. C., T. Lindsten, V. K. Mootha, S. Weiler, A. Gross, M. Ashiya, C. B. Thompson, and S. J. Korsmeyer. 2000. tBID, a membrane-targeted death ligand, oligomerizes BAK to release cytochrome c. Genes Dev. 14:2060-2071.
33. Wei, M. C., W. X. Zong, E. H. Cheng, T. Lindsten, V. Panoutsakopoulou, A. J. Ross, K. A. Roth, G. R. MacGregor, C. B. Thompson, and S. J. Korsmeyer. 2001. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: a requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Science 292:727-730.
34. Yin, X. M. 2006. Bid, a BH3-only multi-functional molecule, is at the cross road of life and death. Gene 369:7-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|