Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2008, p. 4142-4151, Vol. 28, No. 12
0270-7306/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.01465-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Departments of Microbiology and Immunology,1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia2
Received 14 August 2007/ Returned for modification 19 October 2007/ Accepted 8 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) plays a dual role in the development of epithelial cancers, acting as both a tumor suppressor and a tumor promoter. This dichotomy is a reflection of its multiple effects on epithelial growth and differentiation. It inhibits carcinogenesis by inducing reversible growth arrest in G1, but it promotes carcinogenesis by stimulating prometastatic processes such as migration, invasion, and epithelial mesenchymal transition (1, 34). The complexity of the biological processes impacted by TGFβ relates to its ability to activate multiple signaling pathways. The canonical Smad pathway is initiated by the ligand-induced formation of a heterodimer consisting of serine-threonine kinase TGFβ receptors I and II (TβRI and TβRII). TβRII activates TβRI, resulting in the phosphorylation of the receptor-activated Smads, i.e., Smad2 and Smad3 in the case of TGFβ1. The phosphorylated Smad alone or together with Smad4 enters the nucleus. The subsequent gene response is controlled by the interaction of Smads with both transcriptional activators and repressors, resulting in a highly cell-type-specific response (29). The growth arrest program appears to be solely dependent on this pathway (7, 30). In addition to the Smad pathway, TGFβ activates several non-Smad pathways including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), JNK, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3)/Akt pathways in a cell-type-specific fashion (3, 4, 18, 20, 50). The molecular interactions linking the TβRs to these pathways are not well defined. It is important to delineate these mechanisms because, although Smad signaling plays a role in epithelial mesenchymal transition and the associated processes of migration and invasion, they are also dependent on non-Smad signaling (5, 44).
The bioactive sphingolipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is produced by two sphingosine kinase isozymes, SphK1 and SphK2. It is the ligand for a family of G protein-coupled S1P receptors 1 to 5 (S1PR1 to S1PR5), and it regulates a wide array of biological effects including growth, survival, and migration, depending on which receptors are expressed (39). There is evidence that some of the overlap in the functions of S1P and TGFβ may result from interactions between their respective signaling pathways. For example, S1P can induce the phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 (36), presumably as a result of a direct interaction between S1PR1 and TβRI (21, 45). The ability to activate Smad3 is a prerequisite for S1P induction of both chemotactic migration and growth arrest in keratinocytes and chemotactic migration of Langerhans cells (33). Although it appears that S1P can directly activate the TGFβ pathway by causing TβR-mediated phosphorylation of Smads, the ability of TGFβ to directly activate S1PR-mediated signaling is less clear. In both fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, TGFβ can increase the activity of SphK1 mainly by increasing its expression 24 h after treatment (22, 47). The present study demonstrates that in cells derived from an esophageal adenocarcinoma, both S1P- and TGFβ-induced chemotactic migration and invasion require Gi-dependent ERK1/2 activation. The abilities of TGFβ to activate ERK1/2 and induce chemotactic migration and invasion also depend on rapid activation of SphK1 and formation of S1P and involve ligation of S1PR2. These studies suggest that interaction or cross talk between these pathways might play a role in the progression of esophageal cancer.
|
|
|---|
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Pittsburgh, PA). Immunoblotting. Total cellular extracts were obtained and protein was quantified as previously described (8). Equal amounts of protein (30 to 50 µg) were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (Bio-Rad), and blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) (Sigma). The blots were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, washed three times with TBST for 10 min, and incubated with the appropriate secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were then washed four times with TBST for 10 min each, developed with ECL Plus (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ), and exposed to X-Omat blue film (Kodak, Rochester, NY). Antibodies used in analyses included anti-ERK1/2 (sc154), anti-phospho ERK1/2 (sc7383), antiactin (clone sc1615), and anti-ERK1 (clone sc-93) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); anti-p38 MAPK (9212) and anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (9211) from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA); and anti-phospho-sphingosine kinase 1 (clone ser-225) (ECM Biosciences, Versailles, KY). Rabbit polyclonal SphK1 and SphK2 antibodies were described previously (16).
Migration and invasion. Cells at 70% confluence were serum starved overnight and detached from culture plates by incubation with Cellstripper solution (Mediatech-Cellgro, Herndon, VA). Cells were then washed and resuspended in RPMI medium with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 1 x 105 cells/ml. For migration assays, cells (2 x 104 cells/well) were added to the upper chamber of Transwell chambers (Corning, Acton, MA) separated by inserts with 8-µm pores in the presence or absence of the indicated inhibitors. Following an 8-h incubation, cells were fixed in 100% methanol, washed three times in double-distilled H2O, stained with 0.1% crystal violet in phosphate-buffered saline at the ambient temperature, and then destained with double-distilled H2O. The nonmigrating cells on the upper surface of the membrane were removed with cotton swabs, and the membrane was mounted on a microscope slide. Migrating cells were counted in five randomly selected high-power fields per membrane using a light microscope, and the number of migrating cells was compared to that of simultaneously run control cells. For invasion assays, Matrigel was diluted 1:6 in RPMI medium with 0.1% BSA, 80-µl aliquots were used to coat 12-µm-pore size (12-well) Transwell chambers (Corning, Acton, MA), and allowed to gel at 37°C for 1 h. Cells (5 x 104/well) were seeded on top of the Matrigel matrix and incubated alone or with the appropriate reagents. After 24 h, the membranes were treated and counted as described above for the migration assay. Each determination represents the average of three membranes. Experiments were performed at least in triplicate.
Transfection. ON-TARGETplus SMARTpool small interfering RNA (siRNA) against SphK1, SphK2, ERK1, and S1PR2 and control siRNAs from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO) were introduced into cells in buffer V, using program T20 of a Nucleofector device (Amaxa, Gaithersburg, MD). Dominant negative MEK and control adenoviral vectors (Vector Biolabs, Philadelphia, PA) were introduced into cells essentially as described previously (46).
Quantitative real-time PCR. Cells were plated at 50 to 75% confluence and cultured overnight. Total RNA was isolated using RNAEasy Plus (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed (RT) with MultiScribe (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For real-time PCR, prevalidated primer-probe sets which have equal efficiencies of amplification were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Quantitative (Q) PCRs were performed with an ABI 7900HT. ABI Prism software was used to construct a calibration curve by plotting the threshold cycle versus the logarithm of the calibrator concentration. Data were normalized to that of GAPDH.
Sphingosine kinase assays.
Cells were harvested and lysed by freeze-thawing in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 20% glycerol, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 mM glycerophosphate, 15 mM NaF, 10 g/ml leupeptin, aprotinin, and soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.5 mM 4-deoxypyridoxine. Lysates were centrifuged at 700 x g for 10 min to remove unbroken cells. SphK1 activity was determined in the presence of 50 µM sphingosine and [
-32P]ATP (10 µCi, 1 mM) containing MgCl2 (10 mM) in 0.25% Triton X-100, which inhibits SphK2, as described previously (28). SphK2 activity was determined with sphingosine added as a complex with 4 mg/ml BSA and [
-32P]ATP in the presence of 1 M KCl, conditions under which SphK2 activity is optimal and SphK1 is strongly inhibited (28). Labeled S1P was extracted and separated by thin-layer chromatography on silica gel G60, with chloroform-acetone-methanol-acetic acid-H2O (10:4:3:2:1 [vol/vol]) as solvent. Radioactive bands corresponding to S1P were quantified with an FX Molecular Imager device (Bio-Rad). SphK-specific activity is expressed as pmol of S1P formed per min per mg protein.
Measurement of S1P. Cells (4 x 105) were treated as indicated and harvested in 25 mM HCl-methanol. The levels of S1P were determined exactly as previously described (9). Briefly, the assay utilizes an alkaline lipid extraction to selectively separate S1P from sphingosine and other phospholipids. Extracted S1P is efficiently converted to sphingosine by alkaline phosphatase treatment. Sphingosine thus formed is quantitated by conversion to [32P]S1P, with recombinant SphK1 as described previously (9). [32P]S1P was extracted and then separated by thin-layer chromatography on silica gel G60, with chloroform-acetone-methanol-acetic acid-H2O (10:4:3:2:1 [vol/vol]) as solvent. Radioactive bands corresponding to S1P were quantified with an FX Molecular Imager device (Bio-Rad).
Statistical analysis. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Activation of MAP kinases by TGFβ and S1P. OE33 cells were treated with 80 pM TGFβ for the indicated times (A), with the indicated concentrations of S1P (µM) for 15 min (B), with 50 nM S1P for the indicated length of time (C), or with either 80 pM TGFβ or 50 nM S1P for 0, 15, and 30 min (D). Cells were lysed, and equal amounts of lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE. Activation of ERK1/2, p38, and Smad3 was determined by immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies as indicated. Blots were stripped and reprobed with ERK1/2, p38, or Smad3 antibodies to demonstrate equal loading.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. TGFβ and S1P stimulate chemotactic migration (chemotaxis) and invasion to similar extents. (A) Transwell migration assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Medium without or with TGFβ (80 pM) or S1P (50 nM) was added to the lower chamber as indicated. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05. (B) Invasion assays were performed with Matrigel-coated membranes as described in Materials and Methods. Medium, without or with TGFβ (80 pM) or S1P (50 nM), was added to the lower chambers as indicated. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Chemotactic migration and invasion induced by TGFβ or S1P is ERK1/2 dependent. (A) OE33 cells were incubated for 15 min in the presence or absence of TGFβ (80 pM), S1P (50 nM), and the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (50 µM) as indicated. Cells were lysed, and activation of ERK1/2 was determined by immunoblotting equal amounts of lysates with anti-phospho ERK1/2. Blots were stripped and reprobed with anti-ERK1/2 as a loading control. (B) Transwell invasion assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. PD98059 (50 µM) was added to the upper chambers, and either TGFβ (80 pM) or S1P (50 nM) was in the lower chamber. OE33 cells were transduced with either control or dominant negative MEK (DN-MEK) adenoviral vectors (C and D) or transfected with control or ERK1 siRNAs (E and F). (C and E) Cells were analyzed by Western blotting as in panel A, except that blots were also stripped and reprobed with actin as a control for equal loading and transfer. Chemotactic migration (D) and invasion (F) assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. ERK1/2 activation, chemotactic migration, and chemotactic invasion are Gi dependent (A to C). OE33 cells were pretreated for 2 h with 100 ng/ml pertussis toxin as indicated. (A) Cells were treated with TGFβ (80 pM) or S1P (50 nM) for 15 min. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed for pERK1/2 and total ERK1/2 by Western analysis. Chemotactic migration (B) and invasion (C) assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from triplicate cultures. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. The SphK inhibitor DMS blocks TGFβ-induced ERK1/2 activation and cell motility. (A) OE33 cells were incubated for 15 min in the absence or presence of TGFβ (80 pM) and DMS (5 µM) as indicated, and ERK1/2 activation was determined by sequential immunoblotting with anti-phospho ERK1/2 and anti-ERK1/2. Chemotactic migration (B) and invasion (C) assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods. TGFβ (80 pM) and DMS (5 µM) were added to the lower and upper chambers, respectively. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. SphK1 and SphK2 have different roles in TGFβ-induced chemotactic migration and invasion. OE33 cells were transfected with control, SphK1, or SphK2 siRNA as indicated. (A) RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed, and SphK1, SphK2 and GAPDH levels were measured by QRT-PCR. SphKs are normalized to GAPDH. Data are expressed as the change with respect to control siRNA. (B) Total cell lysates were assayed for the expression of the indicated proteins by immunoblotting with anti-SphK1 and anti-SphK2 antibodies. Blots were also probed with anti-p65 to show equal loading. Chemotactic migration (C) and invasion (D) were determined, and data were expressed as the change in the ratio of migrating cells in TGFβ treated to untreated cells for each group of transfectants. The results are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05. OE33 cells (E) or SEG1 cells (F) were transfected with the indicated siRNAs and cultured without or with TGFβ (80 pM) as indicated. The activation of ERK1/2 was determined by immunoblotting with pERK1/2 and ERK1/2 as loading controls.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. TGFβ activates SphK to generate S1P. (A) OE33 cells were treated with TGFβ (80 pM) for the indicated time. Activation of SphK1 was determined by immunoblotting with anti-phospho Ser225. Blots were stripped and reprobed with anti-SphK1 antibody to confirm equal loading and transfer. (B and C) OE33 cells were treated with TGFβ for the indicated times and lysed, and SphK1 (B) and SphK2 (C) activities were determined with isoenzyme-specific assays. SphK activity is expressed as pmol/min/mg protein. (D) S1P mass levels were measured in duplicate cultures of 4 x 105 cells as described in Materials and Methods and expressed as pmol. Data are means ± standard errors of the means. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. S1PR2 receptor activation is involved in TGFβ-induced ERK1/2 activation, as well as in chemotactic migration and invasion. (A) S1P receptor mRNA expression in OE33 cells. RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed, and S1PR1 to S1PR5 and GADPH levels were measured by QRT-PCR and normalized to those of GAPDH. Data are expressed relative to S1PR1 mRNA. (B, C, and D) OE33 cells were treated for 15 min without or with TGFβ (80 pM), S1P (50 nM), VPC23019 (10 µM), and JTE013 (JTE013, 1 or 10 µM) as indicated. Activation of ERK1/2 was determined by immunoblotting with pERK1/2 antibody. Blots were stripped and reprobed with anti-ERK1/2 antibody to demonstrate equal loading and transfer. Chemotactic migration (E) and invasion (F) of OE33 induced by 80 pM TGFβ or 50 nM S1P were determined in the absence or presence of VPC23019 (10 µM) and the indicated concentrations of JTE013. Data are means ± standard errors of the means from three separate experiments. Asterisk, P < 0.05.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. S1PR2 ligation is involved in TGFβ-induced ERK1/2 activation, as well as in chemotactic migration and invasion. OE33 cells were transfected with siControl or siS1PR2 RNAs as indicated. (A) RNA was isolated and reverse transcribed, and S1P2 and GAPDH levels were measured by QRT-PCR. Data are expressed as changes after normalization to GAPDH. (B) OE33 cells were treated with TGFβ (80 pM) or S1P (50 nM) for 15 min. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed for pERK1/2 and total ERK1/2 by Western analysis. Chemotactic migration (C) and invasion (D) assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods.
|
|
|
|---|
The molecular mechanisms for Smad-independent activation of non-Smad pathways by TGFβ ligation of its receptors are poorly understood. Potentially, they involve a combination of pathway activation by TβR interactions with scaffold proteins (25) and cross talk with other receptors. In regard to the latter, several studies have demonstrated that S1P induces phosphorylation of Smad3 as a result of cross talk between S1PR3 and TGFβ receptors (33, 36, 45). In OE33 cells, S1P, like TGFβ, rapidly activated ERK1/2 but not p38MAPK. Interestingly, S1P does not stimulate Smad phosphorylation in these cells. OE33 cells express both S1PR2 and S1PR5 but not the other S1P receptors. Thus, unlike S1PR3, S1PR2 appears to be unable to interact with TGFβ receptors to activate Smad-mediated signaling.
Since it is well established that the activation of MAPK pathways plays a central role in the protumorigenic effects of TGFβ (44), delineating the mechanisms underpinning their activation is important for understanding the role of TGFβ in the progression of epithelial cancers. Our observation that both S1P and TGFβ stimulated migration and invasion in an ERK1/2-dependent fashion, together with our finding that both S1P and TGFβ mediation of these processes is Gi protein dependent, raised the possibility that cross talk between TGFβ and S1P signaling pathways is involved in TGFβ activation of ERK1/2 and the associated biologic processes. This idea is supported by the observation that TGFβ activation of ERK1/2, as well as its ability to stimulate migration, is abrogated by the SphK inhibitor DMS, which prevents the generation of intracellular S1P (10). Both SphK1 and SphK2 are expressed in OE33 cells, and TGFβ activation of ERK1/2 is sensitive to inhibition or downregulation of these isozymes. However, they play different roles in TGFβ-induced migration and invasion. Similar to previous results showing that both SphK1 and SphK2 are required for migration of breast cancer cells toward EGF (16), both SphKs were required for TGFβ-induced migration of OE33 cells, although migration was far more sensitive to decreases in the activity of SphK1 than that of SphK2. SphK1, but not SphK2, was required for invasion, indicating that SphK1 and SphK 2 may play different roles in the protumorigenic effects of TGFβ in esophageal cancer.
Although several agonists have been shown to activate SphK1, and a few have been shown to activate both SphK1 and SphK2 (reviewed in reference 15), previous studies indicated that in fibroblasts, TGFβ simulated SphK1 but not SphK2 and that it did so indirectly by increasing expression of SphK1 protein over a prolonged period of time (47). Similarly, SphK expression in myofibroblasts was increased by TGFβ at 24 h (22). However, TGFβ increased intracellular S1P more rapidly in these cells (22), suggesting that it may also activate SphK1 in them. In agreement, TGFβ rapidly and transiently stimulated phosphorylation of SphK1 in OE33 cells, which was accompanied by parallel increases in enzymatic activity. Increases in activity levels of SphK1 and SphK2 were independent of effects on protein expression, as TGFβ did not alter levels of mRNA for either SphK1 or SphK2 within 3 h (data not shown). Since both SphK1 and SphK2 have been shown to be phosphorylated and activated by ERK1/2 in other types of cells (14, 32) and since TGFβ activates ERK1/2 in OE33 cells, our results suggest that activation of ERK1/2 by TGFβ might be responsible for the increased activity of SphK1 and SphK2 in these cells. This is an intriguing possibility since we found that SphK1 and SphK2 are required for the TGFβ activation of ERK1/2. Therefore, some level of SphK-independent, TGFβ-mediated ERK1/2 activation, possibly resulting from TβRI phosphorylation of Shc to activate ERK1/2 (25), may occur. TGFβ activation of SphK1 would then further enhance ERK1/2 activation via an autocrine mechanism involving S1PR2 engagement following S1P release (Fig. 10). If so, SphK1 would constitute an important component of a positive feedback loop that may modulate the amplitude and duration of ERK1/2 activation in response to TGFβ.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Model of cross talk between TGFβ and S1P signaling pathways. See text for more details.
|
Taken together, the studies presented here provide evidence for a new paradigm for TGFβ activation of non-Smad signaling and induction of migration and invasion (Fig. 10). In this scheme, ligation of the TGFβ receptor activates SphKs, resulting in increased levels of cellular S1P that can exit the cell and act in a paracrine and/or autocrine manner to ligate S1PR2. In turn, activated S1PR2 coupled mainly to Gi further activates ERK1/2, which is necessary for TGFβ-induced migration and invasion. This cross talk between the TGFβ and S1P signaling pathways amplifies TGFβ signaling and could play an important role in the progression of esophageal cancer.
We thank Paul Dent for kindly providing the dominant negative MEK and control adenoviral vectors.
Published ahead of print on 21 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»