Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2009, p. 20-30, Vol. 29, No. 1
0270-7306/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00544-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
in Human Skeletal Muscle Cells
,
Min Kim,1,
Byoung-Soo Youn,2
Nam Seok Lee,2
Ji Woo Park,2
In Kyu Lee,3
Yun Sok Lee,4
Jae Bum Kim,4
Young Min Cho,1
Hong Kyu Lee,1 and
Kyong Soo Park1*
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea,1 AdipoGen Inc., College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Korea University, Rm 641-B, 1, 5-ka, Anam-dong, Sungbuk-ku, Seoul, South Korea,2 Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea,3 Research Center for Functional Cellulomics, Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea4
Received 4 April 2008/ Returned for modification 7 May 2008/ Accepted 10 October 2008
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) agonists, improve insulin sensitivity and are currently used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we show that TZD prevents oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle cells, as indicated by the increase in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and insulin signaling. Importantly, TZD-mediated activation of PPAR
induces gene expression of glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3), which reduces extracellular H2O2 levels causing insulin resistance in skeletal muscle cells. Inhibition of GPx3 expression prevents the antioxidant effects of TZDs on insulin action in oxidative stress-induced insulin-resistant cells, suggesting that GPx3 is required for the regulation of PPAR
-mediated antioxidant effects. Furthermore, reduced plasma GPx3 levels were found in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and in db/db/DIO mice. Collectively, these results suggest that the antioxidant effect of PPAR
is exclusively mediated by GPx3 and further imply that GPx3 may be a therapeutic target for insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. |
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) is a member of the superfamily of nuclear receptors. PPAR
heterodimerizes with retinoid X receptor
(RXR
) and binds to a specific DNA sequence called peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE). PPAR
is activated when specific ligands bind to the ligand-binding domain. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone, are well-known PPAR
ligands and have been used for the treatment of diabetes. PPAR
is most abundantly expressed in adipose tissues and plays a key role in adipocyte differentiation (42, 46). Since the expression level of PPAR
in muscle is low, the effect of PPAR
ligands on insulin sensitivity in muscle has been explained by the connection between adipose tissue and muscle: activation of PPAR
in adipose tissue decreases the plasma fatty acid levels and modulates the expression of adipokines that contribute to improving insulin resistance in muscle (13). However, the direct role of PPAR
on insulin sensitivity in muscle has been demonstrated in a muscle-specific PPAR
-knockout mouse model (23). Several reports have demonstrated that TZDs, being used to improve insulin sensitivity, also have antioxidant effects; however, little is known regarding the mechanism involved in the antioxidant effect of TZDs (9, 26, 32).
Glutathione peroxidases (GPxs) are members of the family of antioxidant enzymes that scavenge hydrogen peroxide in the presence of reduced glutathione, and seven isoforms having different substrate specificities and tissue distribution have been identified (5, 11, 44). GPx is a selenium-dependent enzyme that contains a selenium atom incorporated within the selenocysteine residue (30). GPx3, also called plasma GPx, is an extracellular enzyme that catalyzes organic hydroperoxides and lipid hydroperoxides as well as hydrogen peroxide (35, 51). GPx3 is highly expressed in the kidney; however, GPx3 mRNA is also found in the lung, heart, liver, eyes, and white adipose tissue (8, 37, 39, 52).
In this study, in order to examine the antioxidant effects of TZDs, human muscle cells were exposed to H2O2 that was being generated continuously from glucose oxidase and glucose in the medium. Destruction of insulin signaling by treatment with H2O2 or glucose oxidase in vascular smooth muscle cells and adipocytes has been reported (16, 45). Here, we show that high levels of H2O2 destroy the insulin signaling pathway, and TZDs prevent H2O2-induced insulin resistance in human skeletal muscle cells. This study also provides evidence that PPAR
directly regulates the expression of a gene coding for an antioxidant enzyme, namely, GPx3, and the antioxidant effect of TZDs in human skeletal muscle cells is mediated mainly by GPx3.
|
|
|---|
(Ad-PPAR
) and β-galactosidase (Ad-βGal) were constructed as described previously (25). Adenoviruses expressing hGPx3 (Ad-GPx3) were constructed by insertion of the hGPx3 gene (+1/+1,539 bp) containing the coding region and the 3' untranslated region of the GPx3 gene into pAd Treck-CMV. The 3' untranslated region of the GPx3 gene has been reported to be important for production of the full-size protein containing the selenocysteine residue (3). The control virus generated from pAdYCII expresses green fluorescent protein (Ad-GFP). Antibodies against GFP, PPAR
, p38, IKK
/β, and insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA. The following antibodies were used: antibody against pIRS-1 (Y612) (Biosource, Camarillo, CA); antibodies against pAkt (Ser473), Akt, pIKK
/β, Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), Erk1/2, and pSer307 IRS (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA); antibodies against pJNK, p-p38, and p-pErk1/2 (Promega, Madison, WI); and the antibody against GPx3 (Adipogen, Seoul, Korea).
Cell culture and animals.
Human muscle tissue was obtained by biopsy of healthy nondiabetic subjects and was immediately dissociated according to previously described methods (22). Satellite cells from the dissociated muscle were grown in skeletal muscle basal medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and singleQuots skeletal muscle growth medium without insulin (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD). When the cells reached confluence, they were maintained in
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2% FBS (Welgene, Daegu, Korea) and insulin to induce cell fusion. C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS, and differentiation was induced by changing the medium to DMEM with 2% horse serum (38). COS-7 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. C57BLKSJ/db/db mice and their littermate C57BL/6J mice were used for these experiments (SCL, Japan). Nine-week-old male mice were divided into two groups, i.e., those fed on normal chow (n = 5) and those fed on a high-fat diet (n = 5). In the latter case, the mice were exposed to a high-fat diet (60% calories from fat; Research Diet, New Brunswick, NJ) for 20 days. Mice belonging to the high-fat diet group (n = 5) were treated with rosiglitazone (30 mg/kg of body weight/day; GlaxoSmithKline) for an additional 8 days. The study animals comprised the following: normally fed mice (body weight, 25.9 ± 0.9 g; blood glucose level, 147.0 ± 13.9 mg/dl), high-fat-fed mice (body weight, 31.0 ± 1.5 g; blood glucose level, 213.6 ± 11.2 mg/dl), and high-fat/rosiglitazone-treated mice (body weight, 28.7 ± 0.6 g; blood glucose level, 155.6 ± 10.8 mg/dl). The animals were handled in compliance with the Guidelines for Experimental Animal Research from the Laboratory for Experimental Animal Research, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital.
Measurement of glucose uptake in human skeletal muscle cells.
Human muscle cells were differentiated and treated with PPAR
agonists (10 µM) for 48 h, and then 100 mU/ml glucose oxidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to the medium for 3 h before the addition of insulin. Glucose oxidase oxidizes β-D-glucose to D-gluconolactone and H2O2. After washing with salt-HEPES buffer (130 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.25 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 2.5 mM NaH2PO4, and 10 mM HEPES), 0.2 µCi of [3H]deoxyglucose was added into the salt-HEPES buffer for 15 min. Glucose uptake was stopped by aspiration of the buffer and washing the cells five times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The cells were lysed with 0.5 N NaOH and neutralized by HCl, followed by liquid scintillation counting in a beta counter. For normalization, total protein was measured by the Bradford assay.
Western blot analysis. Cell lysates (20 µg of protein) were separated on an sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel. Proteins on the SDS-polyacrylamide gel were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Blocking was performed using 5% skim milk, and primary antibody in 0.1% Tween 20-Tris-buffered saline was then added. Hybridized primary antibodies were detected using a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated species-specific immunoglobulin G antibody. The bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Northern blot analysis.
Total RNAs were isolated by using the TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogen) or RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNAs (20 µg) were separated by electrophoresis and transferred onto a Nytran membrane (NY 13-N; Schleicher & Schuell, Stanford, ME). The membranes were prehybridized in QuickHyb hybridization solution (Stratagene), hybridized with [
-32P]dATP-labeled cDNA fragments of GPx3 or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and exposed to X-ray films. To prepare RNA from tissues, fresh frozen tissues were ground in a mortar chilled with liquid nitrogen, the powdered tissues were added to TRIzol (Invitrogen), and total RNA was prepared.
Treatment with glucose oxidase and measurement of H2O2.
Human muscle cells were differentiated, and the medium was then changed to phenol red-free minimum essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 2% FBS. Cells were treated with PPAR
agonists, adenovirus, or short interfering RNA (siRNA) for 48 h, and then glucose oxidase was added to the medium. The amount of H2O2 in the medium was measured using a method described previously (36). Absorbance was measured at 491 nm (VersaMax; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) using t-butyl hydroperoxide as the standard. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC; 10 mM; Sigma-Aldrich) and recombinant catalase (1,600 mU/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) treatment was performed prior to the addition of glucose oxidase.
Determination of intracellular ROS. Human muscle cells were treated with glucose oxidase and were washed three times with PBS. The cells were incubated with 10 µg/ml 2',7'-dichlorohydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA; Invitrogen) in PBS for 5 min and were washed. Fluorescence was detected by excitation at 485 nm and emission at 535 nm using a Victor 3 instrument (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA).
Microarray analysis. Human skeletal muscle cells were differentiated and treated with troglitazone (10 µM) or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (control) for 48 h. Total RNAs were isolated by using the RNeasy midiprep kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected to microarray analysis (Human Oligo 10K chip; Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea).
Transient-transfection and reporter assays.
COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with luciferase reporter vectors containing different lengths of the human GPx3 promoter (0.3 µg), pcDNA-PPAR
(0.05 µg), pFLAG-RXR
(0.05 µg), and pCMV-βGal (0.05 µg) using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen). COS-7 cells were transfected with 0.15 µg of the reporter vectors [pGL2P, pGL2P (–2186) PPRE, or pGL2P (–2186) PPREmt], pcDNA-PPAR
(0.03 µg), pFLAG-RXR
(0.03 µg), and pCMV-βGal (0.05 µg). Troglitazone (10 µM) and 9-cis-retinoic acid (1 µM) were added 3 h after transfection, and the cells were incubated for 40 h. The cells were harvested for the analysis of luciferase activity (Promega), and the relative transfection efficiency was determined by measuring β-galactosidase activity.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA).
Oligonucleotides for hGPX3 (–2186) PPRE (–2195/–2169 bp) (TAGACCACCAGGGCTGGGATTAAGGTG, upper strand) and the (–2186) PPRE mutant (TAGACCACCAGGGCTGcctaatAGGTG, upper strand) were used as a probe or competitor. The sequence of consensus PPRE competitor was CAGGGGACCAGGACAAAGGTCACGTTGCGGA. The probes were labeled with [
-32P]dATP using Klenow polymerase (Ambion, Austin, TX), and the labeled probe (25,000 cpm) was incubated with the nuclear extracts of the human skeletal muscle cells treated with troglitazone or rosiglitazone for 48 h in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 50 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.25 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.1 mg/ml poly(dI-dC), 0.01% Nonidet P-40, and 10% glycerol at room temperature for 10 min. Competitors were added at 50- or 100-fold molar excesses to the labeled probe. The DNA-protein complexes were separated on 5% polyacrylamide gels and were detected by autoradiography.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).
The differentiated human skeletal muscle cells were treated with rosiglitazone for 48 h. The cells were cross-linked in 1% formaldehyde at 37°C for 10 min and were resuspended in buffer 1 (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.4; 10 mM DTT; protease inhibitors). The nuclei were isolated in buffer 2 (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 0.25% X-100; 0.5% NP-40; 10 mM EDTA; 0.5 mM EGTA; 1 mM DTT; protease inhibitors) by centrifugation. Nuclear extracts were prepared in buffer 3 (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 1 mM EDTA; 0.5 mM EGTA; 1 mM DTT; protease inhibitors) and sonicated. The nuclear extracts (500 µl) were then incubated overnight with anti-PPAR
antibody (3 µg), salmon sperm DNA (2 µg), and protein G-Sepharose (20 µl) at 4°C in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. After being washed several times, the immunoprecipitates were eluted using an elution buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3). To reverse the cross-linking, the immunoprecipitates were incubated in 200 mM NaCl, and the DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation. The following primers were used for PCR: 5'-GCCCATGGGAAGTAGGATGT-3' and 5'-TGGGATTATAGGCACCACCA-3' (–7234 PPRE candidate), 5'-TGTGACCAGCCCCTAACAAA-3' and 5'-GGAGGACTCACAGAACTCAGCA-3' (–5442 PPRE candidate), 5'-CAGCACAGATCAGTTTGTACTAGCC-3' and 5'-GAAAACCTTAGCGGCTTTCCT-3' (–4651 PPRE candidate), and 5'-AGCAATCCAGGGGTAGCATC-3' and 5'-CCCTGCTCTCAAAGGTGTTTC-3' (–2186 PPRE candidate).
Transfection of siRNA.
The siRNAs of hGPx3 and hPPAR
were purchased from Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO. The siRNA of the negative control (NS) was purchased from Bioneer, Seoul, South Korea. The siRNA (On-Targetplus Smart pool or NS; 100 nM) was incubated with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in 100 µl serum-free medium for 15 min. The siRNA-Lipofectamine 2000 complex was then added to the cells in 400 µl of serum-containing medium and maintained for 3 days.
GPx3 ELISA. The gene encoding human GPx3 whose internal selenocysteine had been mutated to cysteine was amplified by PCR. For producing the recombinant GPx3 protein in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, the DNA sequence encoding hGPx3 (Gln21 to Lys226) was tagged with FLAG at the C terminus, and its secretion was facilitated using PAI-1 leader peptide. Polyclonal antibody was prepared from rabbits according to the general protocols. Immunoglobulin fractions were prepared from serum. A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format that used FLAG-tagged GPx3 was designed. The extracellular GPx3 protein levels in the medium were measured by using ELISA kits. The plasma GPx3 concentration was also measured in 49 subjects with type 2 DM and in age- and sex-matched subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 57) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 48) by using ELISA kits. The status of NGT, IGT, and DM was determined on performing the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test according to the diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association (1).
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad InStat (version 3.05; GraphPad Software Inc.). The differences between the means were assessed by Student's t test or one-way analysis of variance. The data have been expressed as the means ± standard errors of the means. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to denote a statistically significant difference.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of troglitazone on the insulin signaling pathway and impairment of glucose uptake by H2O2 in human skeletal muscle cells. (A) Human skeletal muscle cells were prepared and differentiated as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were treated with glucose oxidase (100 mU/ml) for 3 h and then with insulin (100 nM) for 30 min. For troglitazone treatment, the cells were pretreated with troglitazone for 48 h and then with glucose oxidase and insulin. The cells were harvested, and 20 µg of proteins was subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis. (B) Glucose uptake was measured as described in Materials and Methods. The cells were treated with glucose oxidase (100 mU/ml) for 3 h and then incubated with or without insulin (100 nM) for 30 min. For troglitazone treatment, the cells were pretreated with troglitazone for 48 h and then with glucose oxidase and insulin. The glucose uptake of untreated cells was set as 100, and the other values were expressed relative to it. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of four independent experiments; *, P < 0.01 versus the basal value of control cells not treated with troglitazone; **, P < 0.01 versus the corresponding value of control cells not treated with troglitazone, , P < 0.01 versus the corresponding value of cells treated with glucose oxidase but not with TZDs.
|
is involved in the antioxidant effect of TZDs.
To determine whether the protective effect of TZDs against ROS was PPAR
dependent, a PPAR
antagonist, GW9662, was added to the medium. The antioxidant effect of troglitazone almost disappeared in the presence of GW9662 (Fig. 2A). A similar effect was observed when PPAR
expression was knocked down by transfection with PPAR
siRNAs: the antioxidant effect of rosiglitazone was completely abolished by knockdown of PPAR
(Fig. 2B). These results suggested that the antioxidant effect of TZDs was PPAR
dependent. When the cells were treated with troglitazone for 3 h instead of 48 h, insulin-induced phosphorylation of IRS-1 and Akt was not observed in the presence of glucose oxidase (Fig. 2C). In addition, the antioxidant effect of troglitazone disappeared when the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium before treatment with glucose oxidase (Fig. 2D). To summarize these results, an extracellular protein was involved in the antioxidant effect of TZDs, and the expression of this protein was induced by PPAR
activation.
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Antioxidant effects of TZDs are PPAR dependent. Western blot analysis. For each figure, at least three independent experiments were performed, and similar results were obtained. (A) Cells were treated with troglitazone in the presence or absence of GW9662 (10 µM), a PPAR antagonist, for 48 h and then with glucose oxidase for 3 h. (B) The cells were transfected with siRNAs of PPAR (siPPAR ) or control (siNS) using Lipofectamine 2000. The cells were treated with rosiglitazone 24 h after siRNA transfection and were incubated for an additional 48 h. (C) The cells were treated with troglitazone for 3 h or 48 h, and then glucose oxidase was added. (D) The cells were treated with troglitazone for 48 h, and a set of cells (+*) was washed with PBS and incubated with fresh medium prior to the addition of glucose oxidase.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of TZDs on extracellular H2O2 concentration. (A) The amount of H2O2 in the medium was measured after the human skeletal muscle cells were treated with troglitazone for 48 h and different doses of glucose oxidase for 1 h. The graph represents the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05 (versus the control). (B) Cells were treated with troglitazone for the indicated periods of time and with glucose oxidase for 1 h. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01 versus the H2O2 concentration at 0 h. (C) Cells were treated with various PPAR agonists, namely, troglitazone, rosiglitazone, or pioglitazone, for 48 h and with glucose oxidase for 1 h (n = 5); *, P < 0.01 versus the value of control cells. (D) Cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) was added to the cells along with TZDs (n = 5). *, P < 0.01 versus the value of control cells. (E) After the cells were treated with glucose oxidase for 1 h in the absence or presence of TZDs (48 h), the intracellular ROS level was detected by DCF-DA as described in Materials and Methods. The value of cells not treated with glucose oxidase was set to 100, and the other values were presented in relation to that value. The bar graph shows the mean ± standard errors of four independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 versus the value of control cells not treated with glucose oxidase; **, P < 0.05 versus the value of cells treated with glucose oxidase but not with TZDs. (F) Cells treated with troglitazone or rosiglitazone for 48 h and then treated with glucose oxidase for 1 h. The cells were harvested, and the proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies against phospho-JNK, p38, Erk1/2, IKK /β, and Ser307 IRS-1 or total JNK, p38, Erk1/2, IKK /β, and IRS-1.
|
Effect of PPAR
activation on the expression of GPx3.
To determine the gene whose expression is induced by PPAR
activation and which is involved in the antioxidant effect of TZDs, we used microarray analysis to examine the expression patterns of many genes in human skeletal muscle cells treated with troglitazone. Several genes, such as CD 36, adipose differentiation-related protein, and apolipoprotein E, which are known to be targets of PPAR
, were induced by PPAR
activation (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, the expression of GPx3 was dramatically increased by PPAR
activation; however, the expression of a number of genes encoding other antioxidant enzymes was hardly changed (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). To confirm the findings of the microarray analysis, the mRNA level of GPx3 was determined by Northern blot analysis. The GPx3 mRNA level was dramatically increased by troglitazone and was further increased by PPAR
overexpression in the cultured human skeletal muscle cells (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the GPx1 mRNA level was not increased by troglitazone, suggesting that this effect is specific to the GPx3 gene and cannot be generalized to other members of the GPx family. While rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, and troglitazone increased the mRNA level of GPx3, wy14643—a PPAR
ligand—did not increase the GPx3 mRNA level (Fig. 4B). Expression of the GPx3 gene was gradually increased by rosiglitazone up to 48 h (Fig. 4C). Similar results were obtained with troglitazone and pioglitazone (data not shown). Since PPAR
and RXR
bind to a target DNA sequence (PPRE) as a heterodimer, we tested the effect of an RXR
agonist, 9-cis-retinoic acid, on the expression of GPx3. A synergistic increase in GPx3 mRNA expression was detected after simultaneous treatment with troglitazone and 9-cis-retinoic acid (Fig. 4D). When PPAR
was activated by TZDs in mouse C2C12 myotubes, GPx3 expression was also increased (data not shown), indicating that the regulation of the GPx3 gene by PPAR
is conserved between species. In addition to the determination of GPx3 at the mRNA level, the increase in GPx3 by PPAR
activation was also determined at the protein level by ELISA, and the result showed that extracellular GPx3 protein level was increased by troglitazone (Fig. 4E).
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. TZDs induce GPx3 expression in human skeletal muscle cells. For Northern blot analysis in panels A to D, at least three independent experiments were performed, and similar results were obtained. (A) Human skeletal muscle cells were infected with Ad-βGal or Ad-PPAR and then treated with troglitazone for 48 h. Total RNA was prepared and subjected to Northern blot analysis. The band intensity of GPx3 was normalized to that of GAPDH and presented as a bar graph. The GPx3 mRNA level of Ad-βGal- and troglitazone-treated cells was set as 100, and the other values were represented in relation to it. The graph represents the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 versus the value obtained from cells treated with Ad-βGal and troglitazone. (B) Human skeletal muscle cells were treated with 10 µM of troglitazone, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, or wy14643 (a PPAR agonist) for 48 h. (C) Human skeletal muscle cells were treated with rosiglitazone for the indicated periods of time. (D) Cells were treated with troglitazone (10 µM) and 9-cis-retinoic acid (1 µM) for 48 h. (E) After treatment with troglitazone for 48 h, extracellular GPx3 was determined by ELISA. The bar graph shows the mean ± standard error of four independent experiments. *, P < 0.01.
|
directly affects GPx3 promoter activity, DNA fragments representing the human GPx3 promoter were linked to the luciferase reporter gene. Activation of PPAR
and RXR
increased the promoter activity of hGPx3 (–2294) Luc by approximately 3.5-fold in COS7 cells (Fig. 5A). In contrast, PPAR
activation had little effect on the activity of a smaller construct, hGPx3 (–809) Luc. A DNA sequence similar to the consensus PPRE was found at –2186/–2174 bp of the human GPx3 gene. We also performed ChIP: four regions in the GPx3 promoter presumed to contain PPRE candidates (–7234, –5442, –4651, and –2186 PPRE candidates) were tested. Among these candidates, only the PPRE candidate at –2186 in the hGPx3 promoter could be immunoprecipitated with the anti-PPAR
antibody (Fig. 5B). In our study, the binding activity of PPAR
was not changed by rosiglitazone, and similar phenomena have been reported by other researchers (10, 19). EMSA with in vitro-translated PPAR
and RXR
showed that they specifically bound to hGPx3 (–2186) PPRE (data not shown). In addition, EMSA using nuclear extracts of human skeletal muscle cells and competitors also proved that this sequence is a specific PPRE (Fig. 5C). An oligomer containing a mutated sequence in hGPx3 (–2186) PPRE did not compete with the probe (lanes 5 and 6), and an oligomer representing the consensus PPRE competed well with the hGPx3 PPRE probe (lanes 7 and 8). To further investigate the function of this sequence as a PPRE, a DNA fragment representing two copies of this sequence was inserted into the region upstream of the SV promoter in the pGL2-pro vector. PPAR
activation increased the promoter activity of GPx3 (–2186) PPRE Luc (Fig. 5D). In contrast, when the PPRE sequence was mutated, the effect of PPAR
activation on the transcriptional activity was totally abolished. These results suggested that PPAR
directly regulates the expression of GPx3 by binding to the PPRE.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Identification of a PPRE in the hGPx3 gene. (A) COS-7 cells were transfected with the indicated vectors containing the hGPx3 promoter (hGPx3 (–2294) Luc or hGPx3 (–809) Luc), the expression vectors of PPAR , RXR , and β-galactosidase. Rosiglitazone (Rosi) (10 µM) and 9-cis-retinoic acid (RA) (1 µM) were added for 48 h. β-Galactosidase activity was used as an internal control to monitor the transfection efficiency. The luciferase activity of hGPx3 (–2294) Luc in the absence of PPAR /RXR expression and agonists was set as 1, and other activities were expressed relative to it. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of six independent experiments. *, P < 0.01 versus the activity of hGPx3 (–2294) Luc without PPAR /RXR and their agonists. (B) ChIP was performed on human skeletal muscle cells treated or not treated with rosiglitazone. Immunoprecipitation was performed using control immunoglobulin G or anti-PPAR antibody ( -PPAR ). PCR was performed using the primers described in Materials and Methods, and 10% of the cell lysates used for immunoprecipitation was used as the input. Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments. (C) EMSA was performed using an oligomer representing hGPx3 PPRE at –2186 as a probe and nuclear extracts of human skeletal muscle cells treated with rosiglitazone. For competition assays, unlabeled oligomers representing the hGPx3 (–2186) PPRE (self) (lanes 3 and 4), PPRE mutant (mt) (lanes 5 and 6), or a consensus PPRE (PPRE) (lanes 7 and 8) were used at a 50- or 100-fold molar excess. Lane 1 shows only the probe, and lane 2 shows the control without the competitor. (D) COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with pGL2P, pGL2P (–2186) PPRE, or pGL2P (–2186) PPREmt, expression vectors of PPAR and RXR , and pCMV-β-galactosidase. Luciferase activity was normalized by β-galactosidase activity, the value of pGL2P Luc without any treatment was set as 1, and other activities were expressed in relation to it. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of four independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 versus the activity of pGL2P (–2186) Luc without PPAR /RXR and their agonists.
|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effect of GPx3 overexpression on extracellular ROS and insulin resistance induced by glucose oxidase. For each panel, at least three independent experiments were performed. (A) Human skeletal muscle cells were infected with Ad-GPx3 for 48 h. The increase in GPx3 mRNA was determined by reverse transcription-PCR. (B) The cells were infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-GPx3 for 48 h, and the extracellular H2O2 concentrations were measured 1 h after incubation with glucose oxidase. The amount of H2O2 in the medium of glucose oxidase-treated cells was set as 100, and other values were expressed in relation to it. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.01 versus the value of cells transfected with the same multiplicity of infection (moi) of Ad-GFP. (C) The cells were treated with the adenovirus, i.e., with Ad-GFP (control) or Ad-GPx3, at a multiplicity of infection of 50 for 48 h and then with glucose oxidase for 3 h. The cellular proteins were prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis. (D) The cells were treated with the adenovirus and glucose oxidase as described for panel C and then with insulin for 30 min. The cellular proteins were prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis.
|
siRNA or GPx3 siRNA significantly reduced the level of PPAR
or GPx3 mRNA, respectively (Fig. 7A). In addition, induction of GPx3 expression by TZDs was also repressed by PPAR
siRNA, clearly suggesting that GPx3 expression is regulated by PPAR
. The extracellular H2O2 concentration in the presence of TZDs was significantly increased by the suppression of PPAR
or GPx3 expression (Fig. 7B). Consistent with this finding, the antioxidant effect of rosiglitazone observed on the ROS-responsive factors, including JNK, p38, and Erk1/2, was abolished when GPx3 expression was suppressed by specific siRNAs (Fig. 7C). In addition, rosiglitazone could not restore the insulin signaling pathway impaired by glucose oxidase in the presence of GPx3 siRNA (Fig. 7D). A similar effect was observed in the glucose uptake levels: the antioxidant effect of troglitazone was inhibited by knockdown of GPx3 (Fig. 7E). Based on these results, we conclude that GPx3 is a major protein involved in the antioxidative effect of TZDs.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effect of GPx3 siRNA on the extracellular H2O2 concentration and the insulin signaling pathway. For each panel, at least three independent experiments were performed, and similar results were obtained. (A) Human skeletal muscle cells were transfected with siRNAs of NS (control), PPAR , or GPx3 for 24 h and then treated with troglitazone or rosiglitazone for an additional 48 h. RNAs were prepared, and the reduction of mRNAs of PPAR or GPx3 was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR. (B) The cells were transfected with siRNAs and TZDs as described for panel A. The H2O2 level was measured 1 h after treatment with glucose oxidase (G/Oxidase). The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of five independent experiments. *, P < 0.01 versus the value of control (NS) siRNA-treated cells treated in the same way with TZDs. (C) The cells were transfected with siRNAs of NS (siNS) or GPx3 (siGPx3) for 24 h and treated with rosiglitazone for an additional 48 h. The cells were harvested after treatment with glucose oxidase (3 h), and the cellular proteins were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis. (D) The cells were treated with siRNAs, rosiglitazone, and glucose oxidase sequentially as described above and then with insulin for 30 min. Western blot analysis was then performed. (E) Glucose uptake was measured using siRNA-treated cells. The value from the cells that had been transfected with NS siRNA and not treated with either glucose oxidase or troglitazone was set as 100, and the other values were shown in relation to it. The bar graph shows the mean ± standard error of five independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 versus troglitazone- and glucose oxidase-treated cells of siNS.
|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. The expression of GPx3 in diabetic patients and animal models. (A) Plasma GPx3 levels among subjects with NGT (n = 57), IGT (n = 48), and type 2 DM (n = 49) were measured by ELISA. *, P < 0.01 versus NGT. (B) Total RNA was prepared from normal or db/db mouse muscles, and Northern blot analysis was performed using GPx3 and GAPDH probes. The intensity of the GPx3 band was normalized with that of the GAPDH band, and the mean value from the control mice was set as 100. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error of six normal and six db/db mice. *, P < 0.05. (C) Total RNA was prepared from the skeletal muscle of standard chow-fed (control, n = 5), high-fat diet-fed (HF; n = 5), and high-fat diet-fed/rosiglitazone-treated (HF + Rosi; n = 5) mice, and Northern blot analysis was performed using GPx3 and GAPDH probes. The intensity of the GPx3 band was normalized with that of the GAPDH band, and the mean value from the control mice was set as 100. The bar graph represents the mean ± standard error. *, P < 0.05 versus the control mice; **, P < 0.05 versus high-fat diet-fed mice.
|
|
|
|---|
The results shown in Fig. 2 and 3 indicate that an extracellular protein whose expression was induced by TZDs mediated the antioxidant effect of TZDs by reducing the extracellular ROS levels. Therefore, we need to confirm whether addition of an antioxidant protein to the medium can modulate intracellular ROS levels and the insulin signaling pathway by reducing extracellular ROS levels. Recombinant catalase, a well-known antioxidant enzyme, was added to the medium, and its protective effect against glucose oxidase treatment was examined. In the presence of catalase, the glucose oxidase-induced increase in the extracellular and intracellular ROS levels was significantly suppressed (see Fig. S3A and B in the supplemental material), and insulin signaling occurred normally (see Fig. S3C in the supplemental material), suggesting that induction of an extracellular antioxidant protein may modulate the intracellular oxidative status.
Among the antioxidant enzyme genes, a functional PPRE in the rat catalase promoter has been reported (17). However, the microarray analysis results of our study (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) showed that GPx3 expression in skeletal muscle cells was significantly increased by TZD treatment, while the expression of the other antioxidant enzyme-encoding genes such as the other GPx family members, Mn superoxide dismutases and catalase, were hardly affected. Therefore, we could hypothesize that in skeletal muscle, the PPAR
-dependent-antioxidant effect of TZDs is exclusively mediated by GPx3. Finally, we observed that GPx3 knockdown by siRNA treatment almost abolished the antioxidant effects of TZDs in the skeletal muscle cells, which strongly supported our hypothesis. We, however, could not exclude the possibility that another mechanism(s) is also involved in the antioxidant effect of TZDs. PPAR
activation has been reported to negatively regulate the expression of NADPH oxidase, resulting in decreased ROS production in endothelial cells (27). Troglitazone has been reported to have a direct antioxidant-scavenging activity on free radicals, unlike other TZDs (9). Eventually, however, we believe that the increased expression of GPx3 is the major mechanism for the antioxidant effect of TZDs in skeletal muscle cells because PPAR
and a secreted protein are important for the antioxidant effect of TZDs (Fig. 2), and GPx3 siRNA significantly inhibits the antioxidant effect of TZDs (Fig. 7).
The mitochondrion is a major organelle concerned with the production of ROS in cells, and chronic treatment of glucose and free fatty acids increases the ROS levels in muscle and other tissues (14). In addition, inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) also increase ROS levels and the increased ROS may contribute to the induction of insulin resistance, although other mechanisms are also involved in the induction of insulin resistance by these factors (34). To test whether TZD-mediated GPx3 expression can affect insulin resistance induced by TNF-
, human muscle cells were treated with TNF-
(see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). As expected, TNF-
treatment impaired the insulin signaling pathway, and rosiglitazone partially alleviated insulin resistance. Interestingly, GPx3 knockdown partially inhibited the effect of rosiglitazone, suggesting an important role of GPx3 in the protective function of TZDs against insulin resistance.
In this study, we showed that the plasma GPx3 level is decreased in newly diagnosed, drug-naive diabetic patients compared to subjects with IGT or NGT. Plasma ROS levels have been reported to be significantly higher in diabetic animals (28); therefore, reduction of plasma GPx3 may be an important reason for the elevation of plasma ROS levels. Several reports illustrate the relationship between GPx3 levels and the pathogenesis of various diseases. Renal GPx3 expression is reduced in long-term diabetic NOD mice but is increased in new-onset diabetic NOD mice (50). Decreased GPx3 levels are associated with arterial thrombosis in ischemic heart disease patients (41) and familial childhood stroke (29). A promoter polymorphism in the GPx3 gene is associated with reduced gene expression and arterial ischemic stroke (48). Plasma GPx3 deficiency impairs normal inhibition of platelet activation by NO, thereby resulting in hyperreactive platelet aggregation (29). These observations suggest that a low level of GPx3 is associated with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. We also observed that GPx3 expression in the muscle tissues of db/db mice and high-fat diet-fed mice was lower than that of normal mice. In contrast, little difference was observed between the renal tissues—where GPx3 is most abundantly expressed—obtained from these two groups of mice (data not shown). We are unaware regarding the contribution of each type of tissue expressing GPx3 to the determination of the plasma GPx3 level; however, it is possible that a reduction in GPx3 expression in the muscle tissue in diabetic subjects can at least influence the oxidative stress around the muscle. The mechanism behind the downregulation of GPx3 in DM is currently unknown. Since GPx3 expression was observed to have decreased in the muscle tissue of type 2 diabetic patients and of db/db and DIO mice, it may be due to common factors in these insulin-resistant states such as hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, or low-grade inflammation. Recently, we and our coworkers found that in adipose tissue, GPx3 expression is reduced by inflammation or hypoxia (33). Little is known regarding the regulation of GPx3 expression, and therefore, further intensive study is required to elucidate the mechanism by which the GPx3 level is downregulated in DM. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that GPx3 plays an important role against oxidative stress and may be a therapeutic target for insulin resistance and DM.
Published ahead of print on 20 October 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
These two authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»