This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, C E Articles by Worton, R G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campbell, C E Articles by Worton, R G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol Cell Biol. 1981 April; 1(4): 336-346

Segregation of recessive phenotypes in somatic cell hybrids: role of mitotic recombination, gene inactivation, and chromosome nondisjunction.

Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Somatic cell hybrids heterozygous at the emetine resistance locus (emtr/emt+) or the chromate resistance locus (chrr/chr+) are known to segregate the recessive drug resistance phenotype at high frequency. We have examined mechanisms of segregation in Chinese hamster cell hybrids heterozygous at these two loci, both of which map to the long arm of Chinese hamster chromosome 2. To follow the fate of chromosomal arms through the segregation process, our hybrids were also heterozygous at the mtx (methotrexate resistance) locus on the short arm of chromosome 2 and carried cytogenetically marked chromosomes with either a short-arm deletion (2p-) or a long-arm addition (2q+). Karyotype and phenotype analysis of emetine- or chromate-resistant segregants from such hybrids allowed us to distinguish four potential segregation mechanisms: (i) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome; (ii) mitotic recombination between the centromere and the emt or chr loci, giving rise to homozygous resistant segregants; (iii) inactivation of the emt+ or chr+ alleles; and (iv) loss of the emt+- or chr+-bearing chromosome with duplication of the homologous chromosome carrying the emtr or chrr allele. Of 48 independent segregants examined, only 9 (20%) arose by simple chromosome loss. Two segregants (4%) were consistent with a gene inactivation mechanism, but because of their rarity, other mechanisms such as mutation or submicroscopic deletion could not be excluded. Twenty-one segregants (44%) arose by either mitotic recombination or chromosome loss and duplication; the two mechanisms were not distinguishable in that experiment. Finally, in hybrids allowing these two mechanisms to be distinguished, 15 segregants (31%) arose by chromosome loss and duplication, and none arose by mitotic recombination.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hwang, H.-Y., Ullman, B. (1997). Genetic Analysis of Purine Metabolism in Leishmania donovani. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 19488-19496 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hwang, H.-Y., Gilberts, T., Jardim, A., Shih, S., Ullman, B. (1996). Creation of Homozygous Mutants of Leishmania donovani with Single Targeting Constructs. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 30840-30846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kucherlapati, R.S., Ayares, D., Hanneken, A., Noonan, K., Rauth, S., Spencer, J.M., Wallace, L., Moore, P.D. (1984). Homologous Recombination in Monkey Cells and Human Cell-free Extracts. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 49: 191-197 [Abstract]