This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strehl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lalande, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strehl, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lalande, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol. Cell. Biol., 10 1997, 6157-6166, Vol 17, No. 10
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

High-resolution analysis of DNA replication domain organization across an R/G-band boundary

S Strehl, JM LaSalle and M Lalande
Genetics Division, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Establishing how mammalian chromosome replication is regulated and how groups of replication origins are organized into replication bands will significantly increase our understanding of chromosome organization. Replication time bands in mammalian chromosomes show overall congruency with structural R- and G-banding patterns as revealed by different chromosome banding techniques. Thus, chromosome bands reflect variations in the longitudinal structure and function of the chromosome, but little is known about the structural basis of the metaphase chromosome banding pattern. At the microscopic level, both structural R and G bands and replication bands occupy discrete domains along chromosomes, suggesting separation by distinct boundaries. The purpose of this study was to determine replication timing differences encompassing a boundary between differentially replicating chromosomal bands. Using competitive PCR on replicated DNA from flow-sorted cell cycle fractions, we have analyzed the replication timing of markers spanning roughly 5 Mb of human chromosome 13q14.3/q21.1. This is only the second report of high-resolution analysis of replication timing differences across an R/G-band boundary. In contrast to previous work, however, we find that band boundaries are defined by a gradient in replication timing rather than by a sharp boundary separating R and G bands into functionally distinct chromatin compartments. These findings indicate that topographical band boundaries are not defined by specific sequences or structures.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kleckner, N., Zickler, D., Jones, G. H., Dekker, J., Padmore, R., Henle, J., Hutchinson, J. (2004). A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 12592-12597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Price, G. B., Allarakhia, M., Cossons, N., Nielsen, T., Diaz-Perez, M., Friedlander, P., Tao, L., Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M. (2003). Identification of a cis-Element That Determines Autonomous DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 19649-19659 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Watanabe, Y., Fujiyama, A., Ichiba, Y., Hattori, M., Yada, T., Sakaki, Y., Ikemura, T. (2002). Chromosome-wide assessment of replication timing for human chromosomes 11q and 21q: disease-related genes in timing-switch regions. Hum Mol Genet 11: 13-21 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hellman, A., Rahat, A., Scherer, S. W., Darvasi, A., Tsui, L.-C., Kerem, B. (2000). Replication Delay along FRA7H, a Common Fragile Site on Human Chromosome 7, Leads to Chromosomal Instability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 4420-4427 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aladjem, M. I., Rodewald, L. W., Kolman, J. L., Wahl, G. M. (1998). Genetic Dissection of a Mammalian Replicator in the Human beta -Globin Locus. Science 281: 1005-1009 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dimitrova, D., Gilbert, D. (1998). Regulation of mammalian replication origin usage in Xenopus egg extract. J. Cell Sci. 111: 2989-2998 [Abstract]