This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keeler, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gloor, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keeler, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gloor, G. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol. Cell. Biol., 02 1997, 627-634, Vol 17, No. 2
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Efficient gap repair in Drosophila melanogaster requires a maximum of 31 nucleotides of homologous sequence at the searching ends

KJ Keeler and GB Gloor
Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Double-strand breaks (DSB) were generated in the Drosophila melanogaster white gene by excision of the P-w(hd) element. An ectopic P-element vector carrying a modified white gene was used as a template for DSB repair. All template-dependent repair events were examined, and four different classes of events were recovered. The two most common products observed were gene conversions external to the P-w(hd) element and gene conversions (targeted transpositions) internal to the P-w(hd) element. These two events were equally frequent. Similar numbers for both orientations of internal conversion events were recovered. The results suggest that P-element excision occurs by a staggered cut that leaves behind at least 33 nucleotides of single-stranded sequence. Our results further demonstrate that an efficient homology search is conducted by the broken end with less than 31 nucleotides.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Puchta, H. (2005). The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J Exp Bot 56: 1-14 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rong, Y. S., Golic, K. G. (2000). Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination in Drosophila. Science 288: 2013-2018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bellaiche, Y., Mogila, V., Perrimon, N. (1999). I-SceI Endonuclease, a New Tool for Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms in Drosophila. Genetics 152: 1037-1044 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sepp, K. J., Auld, V. J. (1999). Conversion of lacZ Enhancer Trap Lines to GAL4 Lines Using Targeted Transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 151: 1093-1101 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Beall, E. L., Rio, D. C. (1997). Drosophila P-element transposase is a novel site-specific endonuclease. Genes Dev. 11: 2137-2151 [Abstract] [Full Text]