Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2000, p. 5847-5857, Vol. 20, No. 16
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Artificially Recruited TATA-Binding Protein Fails
To Remodel Chromatin and Does Not Activate Three Promoters That
Require Chromatin Remodeling
Michael P.
Ryan,1
Grace A.
Stafford,1
Liuning
Yu,2 and
Randall H.
Morse1,2,*
Molecular Genetics Program, Wadsworth Center,
New York State Department of Health,1 and
SUNY School of Public Health,2 Albany,
New York 12201-2002
Received 9 December 1999/Returned for modification 4 February
2000/Accepted 22 May 2000
Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by
recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein
(TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also
contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether
these two activities represent distinct functions of activation
domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin
remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of
reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1,
that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA
elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing the
HIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a
RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate
the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin
structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation,
artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning
via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as
GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at the
CHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of the
GAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin
remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that
remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID
can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular
Genetics Program, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of
Health, Albany, NY 12201-2002. Phone: (518) 486-3116. Fax: (518)
474-3181. E-mail: Randall.Morse{at}wadsworth.org.
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2000, p. 5847-5857, Vol. 20, No. 16
0270-7306/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zawadzki, K. A., Morozov, A. V., Broach, J. R.
(2009). Chromatin-dependent Transcription Factor Accessibility Rather than Nucleosome Remodeling Predominates during Global Transcriptional Restructuring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell
20: 3503-3513
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, Q., Yu, C., Morse, R. H.
(2008). Dispersed Mutations in Histone H3 That Affect Transcriptional Repression and Chromatin Structure of the CHA1 Promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell
7: 1649-1660
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Young, E. T., Tachibana, C., Chang, H.-W. E., Dombek, K. M., Arms, E. M., Biddick, R.
(2008). Artificial Recruitment of Mediator by the DNA-Binding Domain of Adr1 Overcomes Glucose Repression of ADH2 Expression. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 2509-2516
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
He, Q., Battistella, L., Morse, R. H.
(2008). Mediator Requirement Downstream of Chromatin Remodeling during Transcriptional Activation of CHA1 in Yeast. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 5276-5286
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dhasarathy, A., Kladde, M. P.
(2005). Promoter Occupancy Is a Major Determinant of Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme Requirements. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 2698-2707
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sabet, N., Volo, S., Yu, C., Madigan, J. P., Morse, R. H.
(2004). Genome-Wide Analysis of the Relationship between Transcriptional Regulation by Rpd3p and the Histone H3 and H4 Amino Termini in Budding Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 8823-8833
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yarragudi, A., Miyake, T., Li, R., Morse, R. H.
(2004). Comparison of ABF1 and RAP1 in Chromatin Opening and Transactivator Potentiation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24: 9152-9164
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sabet, N., Tong, F., Madigan, J. P., Volo, S., Smith, M. M., Morse, R. H.
(2003). Global and specific transcriptional repression by the histone H3 amino terminus in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 4084-4089
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yatherajam, G., Zhang, L., Kraemer, S. M., Stargell, L. A.
(2003). Protein-protein interaction map for yeast TFIID. Nucleic Acids Res
31: 1252-1260
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fourel, G., Miyake, T., Defossez, P.-A., Li, R., Gilson, E.
(2002). General Regulatory Factors (GRFs) as Genome Partitioners. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 41736-41743
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, D.-Y., Carson, D. J., Ma, J.
(2002). The role of TFIIB-RNA polymerase II interaction in start site selection in yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 3078-3085
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stafford, G. A., Morse, R. H.
(2001). GCN5 Dependence of Chromatin Remodeling and Transcriptional Activation by the GAL4 and VP16 Activation Domains in Budding Yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 4568-4578
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sewack, G. F., Ellis, T. W., Hansen, U.
(2001). Binding of TATA Binding Protein to a Naturally Positioned Nucleosome Is Facilitated by Histone Acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.
21: 1404-1415
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, L., Sabet, N., Chambers, A., Morse, R. H.
(2001). The N-terminal and C-terminal Domains of RAP1 Are Dispensable for Chromatin Opening and GCN4-mediated HIS4 Activation in Budding Yeast. J. Biol. Chem.
276: 33257-33264
[Abstract]
[Full Text]