This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Widom, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Widom, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2001, p. 3830-3839, Vol. 21, No. 11
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.11.3830-3839.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Poly(dA-dT) Promoter Elements Increase the Equilibrium Accessibility of Nucleosomal DNA Target Sites

J. D. Anderson1 and J. Widom1,2,*

Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology1 and Department of Chemistry2, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208

Received 27 November 2000/Returned for modification 3 January 2001/Accepted 12 March 2001

Polypurine tracts are important elements of eukaryotic promoters. They are believed to somehow destabilize chromatin, but the mechanism of their action is not known. We show that incorporating an A16 element at an end of the nucleosomal DNA and further inward destabilizes histone-DNA interactions by 0.1 ± 0.03 and 0.35 ± 0.04 kcal mol-1, respectively, and is accompanied by 1.5- ± 0.1-fold and 1.7- ± 0.1-fold increases in position-averaged equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites. These effects are comparable in magnitude to effects of A16 elements that correlate with transcription in vivo, suggesting that our system may capture most of their physiological role. These results point to two distinct but interrelated models for the mechanism of action of polypurine tract promoter elements in vivo. Given a nucleosome positioned over a promoter region, the presence of a polypurine tract in that nucleosome's DNA decreases the stability of the DNA wrapping, increasing the equilibrium accessibility of other DNA target sites buried inside that nucleosome. Alternatively (if nucleosomes are freely mobile), the presence of a polypurine tract provides a free energy bias for the nucleosome to move to alternative locations, thereby changing the equilibrium accessibilities of other nearby DNA target sites.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell Biology, Northwestern University, 2153 Sheridan Rd., Evanston, IL 60208-3500. Phone: (847) 467-1887. Fax: (847) 467-1380. E-mail: j-widom{at}northwestern.edu.


Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2001, p. 3830-3839, Vol. 21, No. 11
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.11.3830-3839.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stein, A., Takasuka, T. E., Collings, C. K. (2009). Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone-DNA sequence preferences?. Nucleic Acids Res 0: gkp1043v1-gkp1043 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Raveh-Sadka, T., Levo, M., Segal, E. (2009). Incorporating nucleosomes into thermodynamic models of transcription regulation. Genome Res 19: 1480-1496 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wippo, C. J., Krstulovic, B. S., Ertel, F., Musladin, S., Blaschke, D., Sturzl, S., Yuan, G.-C., Horz, W., Korber, P., Barbaric, S. (2009). Differential Cofactor Requirements for Histone Eviction from Two Nucleosomes at the Yeast PHO84 Promoter Are Determined by Intrinsic Nucleosome Stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 2960-2981 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kharchenko, P. V., Woo, C. J., Tolstorukov, M. Y., Kingston, R. E., Park, P. J. (2008). Nucleosome positioning in human HOX gene clusters. Genome Res 18: 1554-1561 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mavrich, T. N., Ioshikhes, I. P., Venters, B. J., Jiang, C., Tomsho, L. P., Qi, J., Schuster, S. C., Albert, I., Pugh, B. F. (2008). A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res 18: 1073-1083 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hendrix, D. A., Hong, J.-W., Zeitlinger, J., Rokhsar, D. S., Levine, M. S. (2008). Promoter elements associated with RNA Pol II stalling in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 7762-7767 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gutierrez, J., Paredes, R., Cruzat, F., Hill, D. A., van Wijnen, A. J., Lian, J. B., Stein, G. S., Stein, J. L., Imbalzano, A. N., Montecino, M. (2007). Chromatin Remodeling by SWI/SNF Results in Nucleosome Mobilization to Preferential Positions in the Rat Osteocalcin Gene Promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 9445-9457 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, Y., McLaughlin, N., Lindstrom, K., Tsukiyama, T., Clark, D. J. (2006). Activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 Results in Gcn4p-Dependent, SWI/SNF-Dependent Mobilization of Nucleosomes over the Entire Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 8607-8622 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cioffi, A., Fleury, T. J., Stein, A. (2006). Aspects of large-scale chromatin structures in mouse liver nuclei can be predicted from the DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 1974-1981 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yuan, G.-C., Liu, Y.-J., Dion, M. F., Slack, M. D., Wu, L. F., Altschuler, S. J., Rando, O. J. (2005). Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309: 626-630 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Anderson, J. D., Thastrom, A., Widom, J. (2002). Spontaneous Access of Proteins to Buried Nucleosomal DNA Target Sites Occurs via a Mechanism That Is Distinct from Nucleosome Translocation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 7147-7157 [Abstract] [Full Text]