Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2001, p. 6440-6449, Vol. 21, No. 19
Department of Cell Biology, The Lerner
Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
44195,1 and Department of Biochemistry
and McGill Cancer Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3G 1Y62
Received 13 March 2001/Returned for modification 2 May
2001/Accepted 6 July 2001
Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a glycoprotein secreted by the liver and
monocytic cells and probably plays roles in inflammation and iron
metabolism. We showed previously that gamma interferon (IFN-
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.19.6440-6449.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Translational Silencing of Ceruloplasmin Requires
the Essential Elements of mRNA Circularization: Poly(A) Tail,
Poly(A)-Binding Protein, and Eukaryotic Translation Initiation
Factor 4G
) induced Cp synthesis by human U937 monocytic cells but that the synthesis was subsequently halted by a transcript-specific
translational silencing mechanism involving the binding of a cytosolic
factor(s) to the Cp mRNA 3' untranslated region (UTR). To investigate
how protein interactions at the Cp 3'-UTR inhibit translation
initiation at the distant 5' end, we considered the "closed-loop"
model of mRNA translation. In this model, the transcript termini are
brought together by interactions of poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) with both the poly(A) tail and initiation factor eIF4G. The effect of these
elements on Cp translational control was tested using chimeric reporter
transcripts in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. The requirement for poly(A)
was shown since the cytosolic inhibitor from IFN-
-treated cells
minimally inhibited the translation of a luciferase reporter upstream
of the Cp 3'-UTR but almost completely blocked the translation of a
transcript containing a poly(A) tail. Likewise, a requirement for
poly(A) was shown for silencing of endogenous Cp mRNA. We considered
the possibility that the cytosolic inhibitor blocked the interaction of
PABP with the poly(A) tail or with eIF4G. We found that neither of
these interactions were inhibited, as shown by immunoprecipitation of
PABP followed by quantitation of the poly(A) tail by reverse
transcription-PCR and of eIF4G by immunoblot analysis. We considered
the alternate possibility that these interactions were required for
translational silencing. When PABP was depleted from the reticulocyte
lysate with anti-human PABP antibody, the cytosolic factor did not
inhibit translation of the chimeric reporter, thus showing the
requirement for PABP. Similarly, in lysates treated with anti-human
eIF4G antibody, the cytosolic extract did not inhibit the translation of the chimeric reporter, thereby showing a requirement for eIF4G. These data show that translational silencing of Cp requires
interactions of three essential elements of mRNA circularization,
poly(A), PABP, and eIF4G. We suggest that Cp mRNA circularization
brings the cytosolic Cp 3'-UTR-binding factor into the proximity of the translation initiation site, where it silences translation by an
undetermined mechanism. These results suggest that in addition to its
important function in increasing the efficiency of translation, transcript circularization may serve as an essential structural determinant for transcript-specific translational control.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Cell Biology, The Lerner Research Institute/NC10, Cleveland Clinic
Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. Phone: (216)
444-8053. Fax: (216) 444-9404. E-mail: foxp{at}ccf.org.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»