Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2003, p. 4814-4825, Vol. 23, No. 14
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.14.4814-4825.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Sum1 and Ndt80 Proteins Compete for Binding to Middle Sporulation Element Sequences That Control Meiotic Gene Expression
Michael Pierce,1,
Kirsten R. Benjamin,2 Sherwin P. Montano,3 Millie M. Georgiadis,3 Edward Winter,4 and Andrew K. Vershon1*
Waksman Institute and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854,1
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143,2
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202,3
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191074
Received 28 June 2002/
Returned for modification 26 August 2002/
Accepted 25 April 2003
A key transition in meiosis is the exit from prophase and entry into the nuclear divisions, which in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends upon induction of the middle sporulation genes. Ndt80 is the primary transcriptional activator of the middle sporulation genes and binds to a DNA sequence element termed the middle sporulation element (MSE). Sum1 is a transcriptional repressor that binds to MSEs and represses middle sporulation genes during mitosis and early sporulation. We demonstrate that Sum1 and Ndt80 have overlapping yet distinct sequence requirements for binding to and acting at variant MSEs. Whole-genome expression analysis identified a subset of middle sporulation genes that was derepressed in a sum1 mutant. A comparison of the MSEs in the Sum1-repressible promoters and MSEs from other middle sporulation genes revealed that there are distinct classes of MSEs. We show that Sum1 and Ndt80 compete for binding to MSEs and that small changes in the sequence of an MSE can yield large differences in which protein is bound. Our results provide a mechanism for differentially regulating the expression of middle sporulation genes through the competition between the Sum1 repressor and the Ndt80 activator.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Waksman Institute, 190 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020. Phone: (732) 445-2905. Fax: (732) 445-5735. E-mail: vershon{at}waksman.rutgers.edu.
Present address: Lewis-Thomas Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2003, p. 4814-4825, Vol. 23, No. 14
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.14.4814-4825.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zill, O. A., Rine, J.
(2008). Interspecies variation reveals a conserved repressor of {alpha}-specific genes in Saccharomyces yeasts. Genes Dev.
22: 1704-1716
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Safi, A., Wallace, K. A., Rusche, L. N.
(2008). Evolution of New Function through a Single Amino Acid Change in the Yeast Repressor Sum1p. Mol. Cell. Biol.
28: 2567-2578
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ligr, M., Siddharthan, R., Cross, F. R., Siggia, E. D.
(2006). Gene Expression From Random Libraries of Yeast Promoters. Genetics
172: 2113-2122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Valenzuela, L., Gangadharan, S., Kamakaka, R. T.
(2006). Analyses of SUM1-1-Mediated Long-Range Repression. Genetics
172: 99-112
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McDonald, C. M., Cooper, K. F., Winter, E.
(2005). The Ama1-Directed Anaphase-Promoting Complex Regulates the Smk1 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase During Meiosis in Yeast. Genetics
171: 901-911
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Morozov, A. V., Havranek, J. J., Baker, D., Siggia, E. D.
(2005). Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 5781-5798
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Irlbacher, H., Franke, J., Manke, T., Vingron, M., Ehrenhofer-Murray, A. E.
(2005). Control of replication initiation and heterochromatin formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a regulator of meiotic gene expression. Genes Dev.
19: 1811-1822
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lynch, P. J., Fraser, H. B., Sevastopoulos, E., Rine, J., Rusche, L. N.
(2005). Sum1p, the Origin Recognition Complex, and the Spreading of a Promoter-Specific Repressor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 5920-5932
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Doniger, S. W., Huh, J., Fay, J. C.
(2005). Identification of functional transcription factor binding sites using closely related Saccharomyces species. Genome Res
15: 701-709
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wang, W., Cherry, J. M., Nochomovitz, Y., Jolly, E., Botstein, D., Li, H.
(2005). Inference of combinatorial regulation in yeast transcriptional networks: A case study of sporulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 1998-2003
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Fingerman, I. M., Sutphen, K., Montano, S. P., Georgiadis, M. M., Vershon, A. K.
(2004). Characterization of critical interactions between Ndt80 and MSE DNA defining a novel family of Ig-fold transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res
32: 2947-2956
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schindler, K., Benjamin, K. R., Martin, A., Boglioli, A., Herskowitz, I., Winter, E.
(2003). The Cdk-Activating Kinase Cak1p Promotes Meiotic S Phase through Ime2p. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 8718-8728
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.