MCB Accepts, published online ahead of print on 19 February 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lu, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Mol. Cell. Biol. doi:10.1128/MCB.01946-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

A role for interferon regulatory factor 4 in receptor editing

Simanta Pathak, Shibin Ma, Long Trinh, and Runqing Lu*

Department of Genetics, Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Rlu{at}unmc.edu.


arrow
Abstract

Receptor editing is the primary means through which B cells revise antigen receptors and maintain central tolerance. Previous studies have demonstrated that interferon regulatory factor 4 and 8 (IRF-4,8) promote immunoglobulin light chain rearrangement and transcription at the pre-B stage. Here, the role of IRF-4,8 in receptor editing was analyzed. Our results show that secondary rearrangement is impaired in the IRF-4 but not IRF-8 mutant mice, suggesting that receptor editing is defective in the absence of IRF-4. The role of IRF-4 in receptor editing was further examined in B cell receptor transgenic mice. Our results show that secondary rearrangement triggered by membrane bound antigen is defective in the IRF-4 deficient mice. Our results further reveal that defect in secondary rearrangement is more severe at the immunoglobulin {lambda} locus than at the {kappa} locus, indicating that IRF-4 is more critical for the {lambda} rearrangement. We provide evidence demonstrating that expression of IRF-4 is rapidly induced in immature B cells by self antigen and reconstitution of IRF-4 expression in the IRF-4 mutant immature B cells promotes secondary rearrangement. Thus, our studies identify IRF-4 as a nuclear effector of a BCR signaling pathway that promotes secondary rearrangement at the immature B cell stage.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cadera, E. J., Wan, F., Amin, R. H., Nolla, H., Lenardo, M. J., Schlissel, M. S. (2009). NF-{kappa}B activity marks cells engaged in receptor editing. JEM 206: 1803-1816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shaffer, A. L., Emre, N.C. T., Romesser, P. B., Staudt, L. M. (2009). IRF4: Immunity. Malignancy! Therapy?. Clin. Cancer Res. 15: 2954-2961 [Abstract] [Full Text]