Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION

Coactivator TIF1β Interacts with Transcription Factor C/EBPβ and Glucocorticoid Receptor To Induce α1-Acid Glycoprotein Gene Expression

Ching-Jin Chang, Ya-Ling Chen, Sheng-Chung Lee
Ching-Jin Chang
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya-Ling Chen
Institute of Molecular Medicine and
H. L. Tsai Memorial Laboratory, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheng-Chung Lee
Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, and
Institute of Molecular Medicine and
H. L. Tsai Memorial Laboratory, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5880
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The transcription of the α1-acid glycoprotein gene is induced by inflammatory cytokines and glucocorticoids. C/EBPβ is a major transcription factor involved in the induction of the agpgene by some cytokines. In this report, we have identified a novel transcriptional intermediary factor, TIF1β, which could enhance the transcription of the agp gene by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and C/EBPβ. TIF1β belongs to a subgroup of RING (really interesting new gene) finger proteins that contain a RING finger preceding two B box-type fingers and a putative coiled-coil domain (RBCC domain). Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the interaction between GR and TIF1β is ligand independent. The overexpression of the TIF1β gene enhances GR-regulated expression in a ligand- and glucocorticoid-responsive element (GRE)-dependent manner. TIF1β can also augment C/EBPβ-mediated activity on wild-type and GRE-mutated agp genes, but this augmentation is diminished when all three C/EBPβ-binding elements are mutated. Functional and biochemical characterizations indicated that the bZIP domain of C/EBPβ and the RBCC domain, plant homeodomain finger, and bromodomain of TIF1β are crucial for the interactions of these proteins. Taken together, these results suggest that TIF1β serves as a converging mediator of signal transduction pathways of glucocorticoids and some inflammatory cytokines.

The acute-phase reaction to inflammatory stimuli is accompanied by an increase in a variety of serum proteins, collectively named acute-phase proteins. The synthesis of these proteins is regulated by glucocorticoids and inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (5-7, 62). C/EBPβ was initially identified as the key transcription factor involved in the regulation of the α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) gene during the acute-phase response (termed AGP/EBP) (18). C/EBPβ was also shown to be involved in the regulation of a number of other genes, such as those for IL-6 and albumin (termed NF-IL-6, LAP, IL-6DBP, or CRP2) (2, 14, 20, 49, 61). In addition to C/EBPβ-binding motifs, a glucocorticoid-responsive element (GRE) also exists between −120 and −107 in the 5′-flanking region of the agp gene (8, 18). Previous reports showed that maximal induction of theagp gene by glucocorticoids also requires another C/EBPβ-binding element located downstream of GRE (34, 50, 60). The synergistic interaction between cytokines and glucocorticoids has been attributed to protein-protein interactions between C/EBPβ and the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) (45).

GR belongs to a family of nuclear receptors that function as ligand-dependent transcription factors (9, 48). Transcriptional activation of target genes by nuclear receptors is mediated by two activation regions, AF1, located in the N terminus, and AF2, located in the C terminus of the hormone-binding domain of the receptor. GR-mediated transcription is promoter dependent and cell specific (for a review, see reference 24).

Results from studies of transcriptional interference or squelching between AF1 and AF2 of steroid receptors suggested the existence of coactivators or transcriptional intermediary factors which interact specifically with the AF1 and AF2 domains (3, 39, 55). Recent studies have led to the identification of several proteins that interact with nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent manner and play essential roles in mediating their transcriptional activities. These proteins include RIP140 (15), TIF1 (36), Trip1/SUG1 (38, 59), SRC-1/p160 (26, 31, 47), TIF2/Grip1 (29, 58), ARA70 (63), and CBP/p300 (16, 27, 31). Several of these factors showed markedly different affinities for various nuclear receptors (56, 59). CBP and p300 are large nuclear proteins and have been demonstrated to interact functionally with a number of sequence-specific transcriptional activators (for a review, see reference30). Previous data indicated that competition for limiting amounts of CBP may account for many of the inhibitory actions of both GR and the retinoic acid receptor on AP1 activation (31).

Genes for two related TIF1 proteins, TIF1α and TIF1β, have been cloned and shown to be members of the RING (really interesting new gene) finger family (for reviews, see references 12and 52). The RING finger motif can be defined simply as Cys3-His-Cys4, a new class of the zinc finger. At least 80 members of the RING finger family have been identified. Many members, including the tumor suppressor BRCA-1 (42), the oncogene product Mel18 (32), and the mediator of the tumor necrosis factor receptor, TRAF2 (51), have been implicated as being in control of cell growth, cell differentiation, and development. The functions of these RING fingers remain to be defined, although some reports have suggested that they are the interface for protein-protein interactions (4, 10).

To delineate the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of theagp gene by C/EBPβ, we have initiated studies on proteins that interact with C/EBPβ by purifying them using a number of procedures, including anti-C/EBPβ antibody immunoaffinity chromatography (40, 41). In this report, we present results on the identification and characterization of the roles of TIF1β in the activation of the agp gene. These results indicate that the enhancement of GR or C/EBPβ activity by TIF1β occurs through direct protein-protein interactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids and constructs.The EST clone containing partial human TIF1β cDNA (from nucleotides 1882 to 2673) was obtained from Research Genetics. An 0.8-kb DNA fragment insert isolated from the plasmid was used as a probe for screening the day-16 mouse embryo cDNA library (Novagen). A cDNA clone with a 2.8-kb insert containing the complete open reading frame of TIF1β was obtained. Mammalian expression plasmids were constructed by cloning the following TIF1β fragments into cytomegalovirus (CMV) expression vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen): the full-length EcoRI-HindIII fragment (pcDNA3-TIF1β), and EcoRI-SacI fragment (residues 1 to 563), an EcoRI-PvuII fragment (residues 1 to 372), and a fragment resulting fromBamHI deletion (residues 80 to 383 deleted) of the full-length EcoRI-HindIII fragment. AnSfiI-HindIII fragment (residues 14 to 834), aBamHI fragment (residues 80 to 383), aBamHI-SacI fragment (residues 383 to 563), and aBamHI-HindIII fragment (residues 383 to 834) were cloned into the pGEX-1 vector (Pharmacia) for the production of glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. The full-length EcoRI fragment of C/EBPβ, an N-terminalNcoI fragment (amino acids 21 to 151 [C/EBPβ-N), or a C-terminal NcoI-HindIII fragment (amino acids 151 to 296 [C/EBPβ-C]) was ligated to the pRSET vector (Invitrogen) for recombinant protein production.

Other plasmid constructs, such as pCMV-C/EBPβ, rat AGP (wild type [WT])-CAT, AGP (C mutant)-CAT, AGP (D mutant)-CAT, AGP (E mutant)-CAT, AGP (CDE mutant)-CAT, and AGP (GRE mutant)-CAT, were as described previously (40, 59). Briefly, the plasmids were obtained by ligation of the wild-type or mutant (see below) ratagp gene promoter sequence from −736 to +1 to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene. The C, D, E, and GRE mutants correspond to serial 3-base substitutions at positions −74 to −72 (ACA to GTG), −96 to −94 (CAA to TGG), −106 to −104 (AGA to GAG), and −118 to −116 (ACA to GTG), respectively. pMMTV-CAT is the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat ligated to the CAT reporter gene. The mammalian cell expression vector (pRSV-hGR) and recombinant baculovirus containing GR were kindly provided by M.-J. Tsai of Baylor College of Medicine. pRSV-CREB and pCMV-PKAc were obtained from Susan Taylor.

Recombinant proteins and antibodies.Human TIF1β (from nucleotide 1882 to 2673) was cloned into the pRSET vector and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS). This recombinant protein was purified on a nickel column and used for rabbit immunization. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to C/EBPβ were as described previously (18). Anti-GR antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech.

Cell cultures, transient transfection, and CAT assay.BHK, HeLa, and P388D1 cells were cultured in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. DNA transfection was performed by the calcium phosphate precipitation method. BHK cells were grown in 6- or 3.5-cm-diameter petri dishes to 30 to 40% confluence. The amounts of CAT reporter plasmid DNA and expression plasmid DNA used in each experiment are described in the figure legends. pcDNA3 plasmid DNA was used to adjust the total amount of DNA for each transfection to be equal. pCMV/SEAP (Tropix) (0.5 μg) was included in each transfection as an internal control for transfection efficiency. During the 24-h posttransfection period, the cells were placed in fresh medium and, in some experiments, induced with 1 μM dexamethasone (water soluble; Sigma). Cells were harvested 24 h later and extracted with 100 μl of 0.25 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.8). The acetylated forms of chloramphenicol were separated by thin-layer chromatography and quantified with an image analyzer (BAS 1000; Fuji). All transfection experiments were repeated two to four times.

Preparation of whole-cell extracts, immunoprecipitation, and Western blotting.Whole-cell extracts from P388D1 cells were prepared by lysing the cells with buffer containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.3 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). For immunoprecipitation analysis, 1 mg of whole-cell extracts was precleaned with preimmune serum and protein A-Sepharose in 0.5 ml of immunoprecipitation buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 0.25 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 6% glycerol) at 4°C for 2 h. The precleaned supernatants were incubated with 5 μg of anti-TIF1β or anti-C/EBPβ antibody and protein A-Sepharose in the presence or absence of 1 μM dexamethasone at 4°C for 90 min. After extensive washes, the protein complex was dissolved in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The separated polypeptides were blotted onto a Hybond-C membrane (Amersham) and probed with anti-TIF1β, anti-C/EBPβ, or anti-GR antibody. The results were detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham).

Protein-protein interaction assay.Glutathione-Sepharose 8A beads (Pharmacia) were mixed with 3 μg of wild-type or deletion mutant recombinant GST-TIF1β fusion protein or GST only in 500 μl of phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Triton X-100 on a rotary shaker for 20 min at room temperature. The beads were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, combined with 100 ng of recombinant full-length C/EBPβ, truncated C/EBPβ-N, or truncated C/EBPβ-C in a final volume of 500 μl of binding buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 0.25 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, 0.5 mM DTT, 6% glycerol), and incubated on a rotary shaker for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with binding buffer, and the bound proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones for TIF1β.The RING finger protein family consists of members found in animals, plants, and viruses, but the function of the RING finger domain remains to be defined. By comparison with sequences of RING finger domains similar to those of inhibitors of apoptosis or RING-1, a number of human EST clones carrying putative RING finger domains were identified. Sequence analysis revealed that one of these clones, containing an 0.8-kb insert, was highly homologous to a mouse protein, TIF1β (37). Rabbit antibodies were generated by use of a recombinant protein derived from the EST clone. In serendipitous Western blot experiments for identifying C/EBPβ-interacting proteins, we used a rabbit anti-TIF1β antibody as a control. Surprisingly, it reacted with a protein of ∼100 kDa that appeared in the eluent of the anti-C/EBPβ immunoaffinity column (data not shown). This observation prompted us to study the possible physical and functional interactions between TIF1β and C/EBPβ. Using the 0.8-kb DNA fragment as a probe to screen the mouse cDNA library, a 2.8-kb cDNA clone that could encode a protein of 834 amino acids was obtained.

TIF1β and TIF1α are strongly homologous in the N- and C-terminal regions. The N-terminal region is a RING finger preceding two B box-type fingers and a putative coiled-coil domain (RBCC motif) (36). The C-terminal region consists of a plant homeodomain (PHD) finger followed by a bromodomain (36).

TIF1β appears to be widely expressed, since Northern blotting reveals a major 3-kb TIF1β transcript in all human tissues (data not shown). The subcellular localization of TIF1β was then determined by indirect immunofluorescence, which showed granular staining of TIF1β only in the nucleoplasm and not in the nucleolus (data not shown).

TIF1β stimulates the C/EBPβ-mediated activation of theagp gene.The physical interaction of C/EBPβ and TIF1β was examined by an immunoprecipitation assay. P388D1 is a mouse macrophage cell line which expresses C/EBPβ constitutively. Anti-C/EBPβ antibody can bring down TIF1β in P388D1 whole-cell extracts (Fig. 1A). Direct protein-protein interactions were studied by pull-down assays with GST-TIF1β (full length) and both full-length C/EBPβ and truncated forms of C/EBPβ, C/EBPβ-N and C/EBPβ-C (Fig. 1B). The results showed that the bZIP domain of C/EBPβ (i.e., C/EBPβ-C) is sufficient for its direct interaction with TIF1β.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Protein-protein interactions between C/EBPβ and TIF1β. (A) P388D1 whole-cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-C/EBPβ polyclonal antibody (C/EBPβ) or preimmune serum (PI). The precipitated proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-C/EBPβ monoclonal or anti-TIF1β polyclonal antibodies. (B) Several recombinant C/EBPβ constructs were incubated with glutathione bead-immobilized GST-TIF1β (lanes 4 to 6) or GST (lanes 7 to 9). After extensive washes, the protein complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-C/EBPβ antibody. Lanes 1 to 3 represent direct loading of different recombinant C/EBPβ constructs. FL, N, and C represent full-length C/EBPβ, C/EBPβ-N, and C/EBPβ-C, which are described in Materials and Methods.

To characterize the functional role of TIF1β in the activation of theagp gene by C/EBPβ, we performed cotransfection experiments. TIF1β augmented the activation of the agpgene by C/EBPβ in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.2A). To further elucidate the roles of C/EBPβ-binding motifs in the activation effect between C/EBPβ and TIF1β, we performed transfection assays with reporters containing mutated C/EBPβ-binding motifs (C, D, E, and CDE mutants). Compared to the results obtained with the wild-type reporter gene, there was stimulation of C/EBPβ activity by TIF1β with the C-, D-, or E-site-mutated reporter gene (13-fold for the wild type and 26-, 10-, and 24-fold for the C, D, and E mutants, respectively). Induction by these factors was dramatically reduced when a reporter containing mutations of all three C/EBPβ-binding sites (i.e., the CDE mutant) was tested (Fig. 2B). Transactivation of the GRE-mutatedagp gene by C/EBPβ and TIF1β was comparable to that of the wild-type gene (Fig. 2B). Thus, the augmentation effect of TIF1β on the activation of the C/EBPβ gene is exclusively C/EBPβ-binding motif dependent, and GR is apparently not required.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Stimulation of C/EBPβ-mediated gene activation by TIF1β. (A) BHK cells were cotransfected with 2 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT, 0.5 μg of pCMV-C/EBPβ (C/EBPβ), and increasing amounts of pcDNA3-TIF1β (TIF1β) (1, 5, and 10 μg). (B) In 3.5-cm-diameter petri dishes, BHK cells were cotransfected with 0.5 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT, AGP (C mutant)-CAT, AGP (D mutant)-CAT, AGP (E mutant)-CAT, AGP (CDE mutant)-CAT, or AGP (GRE mutant)-CAT and 0.1 μg of pCMV-C/EBPβ with or without 2 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β. The data represent the average activity of two independent duplicate experiments. The fold induction by TIF1β is indicated below the panel. mt, mutant. (C) (Left panel) In 3.5-cm-diameter petri dishes, BHK cells were cotransfected with 0.5 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT and 0.05 μg of pCMV-C/EBPα in the presence or absence of 2 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β. (Right panel) BHK cells were transfected with 0.25 μg of pC/EBPβ-CAT, and 0.1 μg of pCMV-C/EBPβ or both 0.1 μg of pRSV-CREB and 0.1 μg of pCMV-PKAc in the absence or presence of 2 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β. Error bars indicate standard deviations. −, pcDNA3 vector control.

To further assess the activation specificity of TIF1β and other factors, we conducted transient transfection assays with expression vectors for C/EBPα, CREB, and TIF1β. As shown in Fig. 2C, left panel, TIF1β also augmented the C/EBPα-mediated transactivation of the agp gene. The pC/EBPβ-CAT reporter contains the promoter from the c-ebpβ gene (nucleotides −390 to +82) (17). It has been reported that there are C/EBP- and CREB-responsive elements in the regulatory region of c-ebpβ (17, 44). TIF1β potentiated C/EBPβ activity but not CREB activity in the c-ebpβ gene promoter (Fig. 2C, right panel).

To define the regions of TIF1β that could interact with C/EBPβ physically and functionally, we constructed mammalian cell expression vectors and prepared recombinant GST fusion proteins of various deletion mutants of TIF1β (Fig. 3A and B, upper panels). Mutants of TIF1β with either the PHD finger and the bromodomain deleted (amino acids 1 to 563) or the RBCC domain deleted (amino acids 80 to 383 deleted) failed to potentiate the activation of the agp gene by C/EBPβ (Fig. 3A, lower panel). Physical interaction experiments with recombinant proteins derived from C/EBPβ and deletion mutants of TIF1β indicated that the RBCC domain of TIF1β was sufficient to interact with C/EBPβ (Fig. 3B, lower panel). The region of amino acids 383 to 563 seemed to interact weakly with C/EBPβ. Taken together, these results suggest that TIF1β interacts with C/EBPβ through the RBCC domain and enhances C/EBPβ transcriptional activity through the PHD finger and the bromodomain.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Functional and biochemical characterization of C/EBPβ-interacting domains of TIF1β. (A) (Upper panel) Schematic representation of several TIF1β expression vectors; numbers denote amino acid positions. (Lower panel) Transient transfection assays. BHK cells (in 3.5-cm-diameter petri dishes) were transfected with 0.5 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT, 0.1 μg of pCMV-C/EBPβ, and 2 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β (full length [fl] or from amino acid 1 to 563 or 1 to 372, or full length but with amino acids 80 to 383 deleted). (B) (Upper panel) Schematic representation of several GST-TIF1β fusion proteins. (Lower panel) Protein pull-down assay. Glutathione bead-immobilized recombinant GST-TIF1β (fl or from amino acid 80 to 383, 383 to 563, or 383 to 834) incubated with full-length recombinant C/EBPβ (100 ng). After extensive washes, the protein complex was analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-C/EBPβ antibody. −, pcDNA3 vector control.

TIF1β enhances the transcriptional activity of GR.TIF1α was identified as a protein that interacts directly with the ligand-binding domains of several nuclear receptors in a ligand- and AF2-dependent manner both in vivo and in vitro. It was suggested that TIF1α mediates the transcriptional activation of the target gene by the AF2 domain of nuclear receptors (36). TIF1α and TIF1β share highly conserved domains. To further investigate the role of TIF1β in nuclear receptor-mediated transactivation of target gene expression, we performed transient transfection assays. As shown in Fig. 4, in the presence of exogenous GR and dexamethasone, TIF1β stimulated the transcription of mouse mammary tumor virus and the agp promoter in a dose-dependent manner. TIF1β did not augment the transcriptional activity of GR in the absence of dexamethasone (data not shown).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

TIF1β potentiates GR-activated gene expression. (A) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with 2 μg of pMMTV-CAT reporter plasmid, 1 μg of pRSV-hGR (GR), and increasing amounts of pcDNA3-TIF1β (TIF1β) (1, 5, and 10 μg). Each assay was done in the presence of 1 μM dexamethasone. (B) BHK cells were transiently transfected with 2 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT reporter plasmid. Other plasmids and conditions of treatment are as described for panel A. Relative CAT activity normalized with an internal control represents an average of two independent duplicate experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

To determine the molecular basis of target gene activation by TIF1β and GR, we conducted an analysis of the interaction between TIF1β and GR by an immunoprecipitation assay. Polyclonal antibody to TIF1β but not preimmune serum immunoprecipitated GR from P388D1 whole-cell extracts in the absence or presence of dexamethasone (Fig.5A; the anti-GR antibody detected two isoforms, 95 and 90 kDa). This result indicates that TIF1β and GR coexist in a complex. Direct protein-protein interactions were examined by an immunoprecipitation assay with GST-TIF1β fusion protein and recombinant GR. TIF1β interacted with GR in the absence or presence of dexamethasone (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Protein-protein interactions between GR and TIF1β. (A) Immunoprecipitation of GR by anti-TIF1β antibody. P388D1 whole-cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-TIF1β or control (PI) antibody in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μM dexamethasone (DEX) and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-GR polyclonal antibody. (B) Recombinant GST-TIF1β was incubated with recombinant GR in the presence (+) or absence (−) of 1 μM dexamethasone and then immunoprecipitated with anti-TIF1β antibody or preimmune serum. After extensive washes, the protein complex was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-GR antibody. Recombinant GR used for the interaction assay (1/5 input) was included as a control.

Previous studies indicated that maximal induction of the agpgene by glucocorticoid requires the downstream C/EBPβ-binding sequences (34, 50, 60). To further study the TIF1β-mediated GR induction of the agp gene, we performed transfection assays using agp promoters containing mutated C/EBPβ-binding sites or mutated GRE. As indicated by the previous results, the activation of the agp gene by TIF1β and GR was observed only in the presence of dexamethasone (Fig.6). Reporters containing mutated C/EBPβ-binding elements (namely, C, D, and E mutants) remained responsive to TIF1β and GR. In contrast, the reporter containing mutated GRE was unresponsive to TIF1β and GR (Fig. 6). The activation of the agp gene by TIF1β alone in the presence of dexamethasone was likely due to the effect of endogenous GR. These results show that the transcriptional activation of the agpgene by TIF1β and GR is dependent on GRE but independent of C/EBPβ-binding motifs.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

GRE-dependent and C/EBPβ-binding-element-independent augmentation of the activation of AGP-CAT by GR and TIF1β. AGP (WT)-CAT, AGP (CDE mutant)-CAT, or AGP (GRE mutant)-CAT was used as a reporter (see Materials and Methods). In 3.5-cm-diameter petri dishes, BHK cells were cotransfected with one reporter plasmid (1 μg) and 0.5 μg of pRSV-hGR (GR), 5 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β (TIF1β), or both in the presence or absence of 1 μM dexamethasone (DEX). The fold induction for each experiment is shown. The values are the averages of at least two independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

We further examined the effect of TIF1β on the agp gene by cotransfecting pRSV-GR and pCMV-C/EBPβ simultaneously. As shown in Fig. 7, the net effect of the transactivation of the agp gene by cotransfection of pCMV-C/EBPβ, pRSV-GR, and pCMV-TIF1β seemed to be the result of pRSV-GR plus pCMV-TIF1β. Taken together, these results suggest that there is no additive or synergistic activation of the agpgene by the overexpression of GR, TIF1β, and C/EBPβ under these experimental conditions.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Activation of the agp gene by C/EBPβ, GR, and TIF1β. BHK cells (grown in 6-cm petri dishes) were transfected with 2 μg of AGP (WT)-CAT and 0.5 μg of pCMV-C/EBPβ (C/EBPβ), 1 μg of pRSV-hGR (GR), or 5 μg of pcDNA3-TIF1β (TIF1β) in various combinations in the absence or presence of 1 μM dexamethasone (DEX). Normalized relative CAT activity represents an average of two independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

DISCUSSION

TIF1β was originally identified as a protein that interacts directly with two chromosomal proteins, mHP1α and mMOD1 (37). In this report, TIF1β was identified as a coactivator for C/EBPβ and GR in the activation of the agpgene. The specificity of TIF1β for GR or C/EBPβ was demonstrated by transfection assays with wild-type or mutant reporter plasmids containing GRE and/or C/EBPβ-binding elements. Direct protein-protein interactions between TIF1β and GR or C/EBPβ were apparently responsible for the activation of the agp gene by these proteins. These results suggest that TIF1β may act as an integrator or coactivator for both glucocorticoid and cytokine signaling pathways leading to the activation of C/EBPβ. The identification of TIF1β as a coactivator provides further clues about the mechanisms of transactivation by GR and C/EBPβ and the regulation of their target genes, such as acute-phase response genes.

The competition for a common coactivator, CBP, by AP-1 and the nuclear receptor provides an example of how genes that contain either an AP-1- or a nuclear receptor-binding site could be regulated (31). However, a more complex pattern of regulation was observed for genes containing composite response elements. One GRE and three C/EBPβ-binding sites are located in the upstream regulatory region of the agp gene. The regulation of this gene by interactions between TIF1β, GR, and C/EBPβ seems to be complex and depends on the steady-state levels of these factors. When pRSV-GR, pCMV-C/EBPβ, and pCMV-TIF1β were cotransfected into cells, no apparent changes in the transactivation of the agp gene were seen compared to those seen with pRSV-GR and pCMV-TIF1β (Fig. 7). In fact, the slight decrease in activation observed could have been attributed to competition between C/EBPβ and GR for TIF1β.

Results from the deletion analysis indicated that the RBCC domain and the PHD domain-bromodomain are essential for the function of TIF1β. The RBCC domain is the C/EBPβ-interacting domain. Although the actual functional significance of these domains is unknown, it is currently assumed that they are involved in protein-protein interactions. The RBCC motif has been found in the N-terminal part of several putative transcriptional factors, ribonucleoproteins, and proto-oncogene products, including PML, RFP, RPT-1, SS-A/Ro, XNF7, and PWA33 (for a review, see reference 21). Three RBCC domain-containing proteins, PML, RFP, and TIF1α, have been identified in the context of fusion oncoproteins resulting from chromosomal translocations. The RBCC domain is fused to truncated products of other genes (23, 36, 54). Mutations in the RBCC domain of PML prevent PML nuclear body formation (11). Many PHD finger-containing proteins have been implicated in interactions between chromosomal proteins (1). These include products of theDrosophila genes trithorax andpolycomblike. It is interesting to note that bromodomains are found in the adaptor proteins p300, CBP, and GCN5, as well as in SWI/SNF2 (13, 30, 35). These proteins reside in large multiprotein complexes. Thus, the overall structure of TIF1β implies that it activates gene transcription by taking part in the formation of multiprotein complexes.

A TIF1β-related protein, TIF1α, was found to interact with several nuclear hormone receptors. TIF1α contains a nuclear receptor-binding motif, LXXLL (28, 37). However, there is no motif resembling LXXLL in the TIF1β sequence. Inhibition of RXRα activity was observed as a result of ectopic expression of TIF1α in the transient transfection assays. The RBCC domain-containing protein PML exerts a very powerful enhancing effect on the transactivating properties of several steroid hormone receptors (25). It is likely that a specific functional interaction exists between coactivators and nuclear receptors. The activation effect of TIF1α or TIF1β on GR- or RXRα-induced gene expression, respectively, remains to be studied.

In addition to GR and C/EBPβ, TIF1β has been reported to interact with the transcriptional silencing domain of the DrosophilaKruppel-related KRAB proteins and to serve as a corepressor (22, 33, 43). The mechanism of repression by TIF1β remains elusive. To test the possibility that TIF1β is a general mediator of various transcriptional factors, we performed cotransfection assays with mammalian cell expression vectors for CREB and the protein kinase A catalytic subunit in the presence of the pC/EBPβ-CAT reporter. TIF1β could not enhance CREB activity (Fig. 2C). Another member of the C/EBP family, C/EBPα, was also tested, and the results showed that TIF1β could augment the C/EBPα-activated expression of AGP (WT)-CAT (Fig. 2C). Thus, in addition to C/EBPβ, the transcriptional activity of another member of the C/EBP family may be modulated by TIF1β.

How could TIF1β function as a coactivator? TIF1β seems to be a bifunctional protein involved in the remodeling of the chromatin template in both the repression and the activation of transcription (37). Thus, the interaction between GR and TIF1β or between C/EBPβ and TIF1β may promote the conversion of a transcriptionally inactive heterochromatin-like structure to an active euchromatin-like open structure by triggering the release of HP1 and MOD1 (37). We previously identified a nucleolar phosphoprotein, Nopp140, that functions as a mediator between C/EBPβ and the general transcription factor TIFIIB (40). In light of the analogous features shared by the interactions between C/EBPβ and Nopp140 or TIF1β, we also tested the physical interaction between TIF1β and TFIIB. Our results did not offer conclusive evidence on any physical interaction between TIF1β and TFIIB (data not shown). Thus, the mechanism of activation of the agp gene by C/EBPβ and TIF1β is different from that of C/EBPβ and Nopp140.

The present results revealed a direct protein-protein interaction between TIF1β and GR and showed that this interaction is ligand independent. However, the functional interaction between GR and TIF1β is ligand dependent. It is speculated that TIF1β may participate in the formation of a coactivator complex to activate target gene expression. CBP has been demonstrated to interact with other nuclear receptor coactivators (SRC-1/ACTR/pCIP family) to form a functional complex and to result in a synergistic response to the nuclear receptors (19, 31, 57). These coactivators have been identified as histone acetyltransferases that remodel chromatin structure to facilitate transcriptional activation (19, 46, 53). Further experiments to identify other TIF1β-interacting proteins may yield important mechanistic insights.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by grants NSC86-2311-B001-089 and NSC88-2311-B001-114 (to C.-J.C.) and NSC86-2311-B001-094-Y (to S.-C.L.) from the National Science Council.

We thank Susan Taylor, Sophia Tasi, and Ming-Jer Tasi for plasmids and Bertrand Chin-Ming Tan for critical reading of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 March 1998.
    • Returned for modification 12 June 1998.
    • Accepted 14 July 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aasland R.,
    2. Gilson T. J.,
    3. Stewart A. F.
    The PHD finger: implications for chromatin-mediated transcriptional regulation.Trends Biochem. Sci.2019955659
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Akira S.,
    2. Isshiki H.,
    3. Sugita T.,
    4. Tanabe O.,
    5. Kinoshita S.,
    6. Nishio Y.,
    7. Nakajima T.,
    8. Hirano T.,
    9. Kishimoto T.
    A nuclear factor for IL-6 expression (NF-IL6) is a member of a C/EBP family.EMBO J.9199018971906
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Barettino D.,
    2. Vianco-Ruiz M. D. M.,
    3. Stunnenberg H. G.
    Characterization of the ligand-dependent transactivation domain of thyroid hormone receptor.EMBO J.13199430393049
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barlow P. N.,
    2. Luisi B.,
    3. Milner A.,
    4. Elliott M.,
    5. Everett R.
    Structure of the C3HC4 domain by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. A new structural class of zinc-finger.J. Mol. Biol.2371994201211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Baumann H.,
    2. Firestone G. L.,
    3. Burgess T. L.,
    4. Gross K. W.,
    5. Yamamoto K. R.,
    6. Held W. A.
    Dexamethasone regulation of α1-acid glycoprotein and other acute phase reactants in rat liver and hepatoma cells.J. Biol. Chem.2581983563570
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Baumann H.,
    2. Gauldie J.
    Regulation of hepatic acute phase plasma protein genes by hepatocyte stimulating factors and other mediators of inflammation.Mol. Biol. Med.71990147159
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Baumann H.,
    2. Jahreis G. P.,
    3. Morella K. K.
    Interaction of cytokine- and glucocorticoid-response elements of acute-phase plasma protein genes.J. Biol. Chem.26519902227522281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Baumann H.,
    2. Maquat L. E.
    Localization of DNA sequences involved in dexamethasone-dependent expression of the rat α1-acid glycoprotein gene.Mol. Cell. Biol.6198625512561
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Beato M.,
    2. Herrlich P.,
    3. Schutz G.
    Steroid hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot.Cell831995851857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Borden K. L. B.,
    2. Boddy M. N.,
    3. Lally J.,
    4. O’Reilly N. J.,
    5. Martin S.,
    6. Howe K.,
    7. Solomon E.,
    8. Freemont P. S.
    The solution structure of the RING finger domain from the acute promyelocytic leukemia proto-oncoprotein PML.EMBO J.14199515321541
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Borden K. L. B.,
    2. Lally J. M.,
    3. Martin S. R.,
    4. O’Reilly N. J.,
    5. Solomon E.,
    6. Freemont P. S.
    In vivo and in vitro characterization of the B1 and B2 zinc-binding domains from the acute promyelocytic leukemia protooncoprotein PML.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93199616011606
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Borden K. L. B.,
    2. Freemont P. S.
    The RING finger domain: a recent example of a sequence-structure family.Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.61996395401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Brownell J. E.,
    2. Zhou J.,
    3. Ranalli T.,
    4. Kobayashi R.,
    5. Edmondson D. G.,
    6. Roth S. Y.,
    7. Allis C. D.
    Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homology to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation.Cell841996843851
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cao Z.,
    2. Umek R. M.,
    3. McKnight S. L.
    Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells.Genes Dev.5199115381552
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cavailles V.,
    2. Dauvois S.,
    3. L’Horset F.,
    4. Lopez G.,
    5. Hoare S.,
    6. Kushner P. J.,
    7. Parker M. G.
    Nuclear factor RIP140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor.EMBO J.14199537413751
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chakravarti D.,
    2. LaMorte V. J.,
    3. Nelson M. C.,
    4. Nakajima T.,
    5. Schulman I. G.,
    6. Juguilon H.,
    7. Montminy M.,
    8. Evans R. M.
    Role of CBP/p300 in nuclear receptor signalling.Nature383199699103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Chang C. J.,
    2. Shen B. J.,
    3. Lee S. C.
    Autoregulated induction of the acute-phase response transcription factor gene, agp/ebp.DNA Cell Biol.141995529537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Chang C. J.,
    2. Chen T. T.,
    3. Lei H. Y.,
    4. Chen D. S.,
    5. Lee S. C.
    Molecular cloning of a transcription factor, AGP/EBP, that belongs to members of the C/EBP family.Mol. Cell. Biol.10199066426653
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Chen H.,
    2. Lin R. J.,
    3. Schiltz R. L.,
    4. Chakravarti D.,
    5. Nash A.,
    6. Nagy L.,
    7. Privalsky M. L.,
    8. Nakatani Y.,
    9. Evans R. M.
    Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300.Cell901997569580
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Descombes P.,
    2. Chojkier M.,
    3. Lichtsteiner S.,
    4. Falvey E.,
    5. Schibler U.
    LAP, a novel member of the C/EBP gene family, encodes a liver-enriched transcription activator protein.Genes Dev.4199015411551
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Freemont P. S.
    A novel zinc finger coiled-coil domain in a family of nuclear proteins.Trends Biochem. Sci.171992344345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Friedman J. R.,
    2. Fredericks W. J.,
    3. Jensen D. E.,
    4. Speicher D. W.,
    5. Huang X.-P.,
    6. Neilson E. G.,
    7. Rauscher F. J. III.
    KAP-1, a novel corepressor for the highly conserved KRAB repression domain.Genes Dev.10199620672078
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Goddard A. D.,
    2. Borrow J.,
    3. Freemont P. S.,
    4. Solomon E.
    Characterization of a zinc finger gene disrupted by the t(15;17) in acute promyelocytic leukemia.Science254199113711374
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Gronemeyer H.
    Transcription activation by oestrogen and progesterone receptors.Annu. Rev. Genet.25199189123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Guiochon-Mantel A.,
    2. Savouret J. F.,
    3. Quignon F.,
    4. Delabre K.,
    5. Milgrom E.,
    6. The H. D.
    Effect of PML and PML-RAR on the transactivation properties and subcellular distribution of steroid hormone receptors.Mol. Endocrinol.9199517911803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Halachmi S.,
    2. Marden E.,
    3. Martin G.,
    4. MacKay H.,
    5. Abbondanza C.,
    6. Brown M.
    Estrogen receptor-associated proteins: possible mediators of hormone-induced transcription.Science264199414551458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hanstein B.,
    2. Eckner R.,
    3. DiRenzo J.,
    4. Halachmi S.,
    5. Liu H.,
    6. Searcy B.,
    7. Kurokawa R.,
    8. Brown M.
    p300 is a component of an estrogen receptor coactivator complex.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9319961154011545
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Heery D. M.,
    2. Kalkhoven E.,
    3. Hoare S.,
    4. Parker M. G.
    A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors.Nature3871997733736
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hong H.,
    2. Kohli K.,
    3. Trivedi A.,
    4. Johnson D. L.,
    5. Stallcup M. R.
    GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93199649484952
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Janknecht R.,
    2. Hunter T.
    Transcriptional control: versatile molecular glue.Curr. Biol.61996951954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kamei Y.,
    2. Xu L. H.,
    3. Heinzel T.,
    4. Torchia J.,
    5. Kurokawa R.,
    6. Gloss B.,
    7. Lin S.-C.,
    8. Heyman R.,
    9. Rose D.,
    10. Glass C.,
    11. Rosenfeld M.
    A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors.Cell851996403414
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kanno M.,
    2. Hasegawa M.,
    3. Ishida A.,
    4. Isono K.,
    5. Taniguchi M.
    Mel-18, a polycomb group-related mammalian gene, encodes a transcriptional negative regulator with tumor suppressive activity.EMBO J.141995101107
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Kim S.-S.,
    2. Chen Y.-M.,
    3. O’Leary E.,
    4. Witzgall R.,
    5. Vidal M.,
    6. Bonventre J. V.
    A novel member of the RING finger family, KRIP-1, associates with the KRAB-A transcriptional repressor domain of zinc finger proteins.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9319961529915304
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Klein E. S.,
    2. DiLorenzo D.,
    3. Posseckert G.,
    4. Beato M.,
    5. Ringold G. M.
    Sequences downstream of the glucocorticoid regulatory element mediate cycloheximide inhibition of steroid induced expression from the rat α1-acid glycoprotein promoter: evidence for a labile transcription factor.Mol. Endocrinol.2198813431351
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Laurent B. C.,
    2. Treich I.,
    3. Carlson M.
    The yeast SNF2/SWI2 protein has DNA-stimulated ATPase activity required for transcriptional activation.Genes Dev.71993583591
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Le Douarin B.,
    2. Zechel C.,
    3. Garnier J.-M.,
    4. Lutz Y.,
    5. Tora L.,
    6. Pierrat B.,
    7. Heery D.,
    8. Gronemeyer H.,
    9. Chambon P.,
    10. Losson R.
    The N-terminal part of TIF1, a putative mediator of the ligand-dependent activation function (AF-2) of nuclear receptors, is fused to B-raf in the oncogenic protein T18.EMBO J.14199520202033
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Le Douarin B.,
    2. Nielsen A. L.,
    3. Garnier J.-M.,
    4. Ichinose H.,
    5. Jeanmougin F.,
    6. Losson R.,
    7. Chambon P.
    A possible involvement of TIF-1α and TIF-1β in the epigenetic control of transcription by nuclear receptors.EMBO J.15199667016715
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Lee J. W.,
    2. Ryan F.,
    3. Swaffield J. C.,
    4. Johnston S. A.,
    5. Moore D. A.
    Interaction of thyroid-hormone receptor with a conserved transcriptional mediator.Nature37419959194
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Meyer M.-E.,
    2. Gronemeyer H.,
    3. Turcotte B.,
    4. Bocquel M.-T.,
    5. Tasset D.,
    6. Chambon P.
    Steroid hormone receptors compete for factors that mediate their enhancer function.Cell571989433442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Miau L. H.,
    2. Chang C. J.,
    3. Tsai W. H.,
    4. Lee S. C.
    Identification and characterization of a nucleolar phosphoprotein, Nopp140, as a transcription factor.Mol. Cell. Biol.171997230239
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Miau L. H.,
    2. Chang C. J.,
    3. Shen B. J.,
    4. Tsai W. H.,
    5. Lee S. C.
    Identification of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K) as a repressor of C/EBPβ-mediated gene activation.J. Biol. Chem.27319981078410791
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Miki Y.,
    2. Swensen J.,
    3. Shattuck-Eidens D.,
    4. Futreal P. A.,
    5. Harshman K.,
    6. Tavtigian S.,
    7. Liu Q.,
    8. Cochran C.,
    9. Bennett L. M.,
    10. Ding W.,
    11. et al.
    A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.Science26619946671
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Moosmann K.,
    2. Georgiev O.,
    3. Le Douarin B.,
    4. Bourquin J.-P.,
    5. Schaffer W.
    Transcriptional repression by RING finger protein TIF1β that interacts with the KRAB repressor domain of KOX1.Nucleic Acids Res.24199648594867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Niehof M.,
    2. Manns M. P.,
    3. Trautwein C.
    CREB controls LAP/C/EBPβ transcription.Mol. Cell. Biol.17199736003613
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Nishio Y.,
    2. Isshiki H.,
    3. Kishimoto T.,
    4. Akira S.
    A nuclear factor for interleukin-6 expression (NF-IL6) and the glucocorticoid receptor synergistically activate transcription of the rat α1-acid glycoprotein gene via direct protein-protein interaction.Mol. Cell. Biol.13199318541862
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Ogryzko V. V.,
    2. Schiltz R. L.,
    3. Russanva V.,
    4. Howard B. H.,
    5. Nakatani Y.
    The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases.Cell891996373380
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Onate S. A.,
    2. Tsai S. Y.,
    3. Tsai M.-J.,
    4. O’Malley B. W.
    Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily.Science270199513541357
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Parker M. G.
    Steroid and related receptors.Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.51993499504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Poli V.,
    2. Mancini F. P.,
    3. Cortese R.
    IL-6DBP, a nuclear protein involved in interleukin-6 signal transduction, defines a new family of leucine zipper proteins related to C/EBP.Cell631990643653
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Ratajczak T.,
    2. Williams P. M.,
    3. DiLorenzo D.,
    4. Ringold G. M.
    Multiple elements within the glucocorticoid regulatory unit of the rat α1-acid glycoprotein gene are recognition sites of C/EBP.J. Biol. Chem.26719921111111119
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Rothe M.,
    2. Pan M.-G.,
    3. Henzel W. J.,
    4. Ayres T. M.,
    5. Goeddel A. V.
    The TNFR2-TRAF signaling complex contains two novel proteins related to baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis proteins.Cell83199512431252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Saurin A. J.,
    2. Borden K. L. B.,
    3. Boddy M. N.,
    4. Freemont P. S.
    Does this have a familiar RING? Trends Biochem. Sci. 21 1996 208 214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Spencer T. E.,
    2. Jenster G.,
    3. Burcin M. M.,
    4. Allis C. D.,
    5. Zhou J.,
    6. Mizzen C. A.,
    7. McKenna N. J.,
    8. Onate S. A.,
    9. Tsai S. Y.,
    10. Tsai M.-J.,
    11. O’Malley B. W.
    Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase.Nature3891997194198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Takahashi M.,
    2. Inaguma Y.,
    3. Hiai H.,
    4. Hirose F.
    Developmentally regulated expression of a human “finger”-containing gene encoded by the 5′ half of the ret transforming gene.Mol. Cell. Biol.8198818531856
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Tasset D.,
    2. Tora L.,
    3. Formental C.,
    4. Scheer E.,
    5. Chambon P.
    Distinct classes of transcriptional activating domains function by different mechanisms.Cell62199011771187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    1. Thenot S.,
    2. Henriquet C.,
    3. Rochefort H.,
    4. Cavailles V.
    Differential interaction of nuclear receptors with the putative human transcriptional coactivator hTIF1.J. Biol. Chem.27219971206212068
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Torchia J.,
    2. Rose D. W.,
    3. Inostroza J.,
    4. Kamei Y.,
    5. Westin S.,
    6. Glass C. K.,
    7. Rosenfeld M. G.
    The transcriptional co-activator pCIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function.Nature3871997677684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    1. Voegel J. J.,
    2. Heine M. J. S.,
    3. Zechel C.,
    4. Chambon P.,
    5. Gronemeyer H.
    TIF2, a 160 KDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors.EMBO J.15199636673675
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    1. vom Baur E.,
    2. Zechel C.,
    3. Heery D.,
    4. Heine M. J. S.,
    5. Garnier J. M.,
    6. Vivat V.,
    7. Le Douarin B.,
    8. Gronemeyer H.,
    9. Chambon P.,
    10. Losson R.
    Differential ligand-dependent interactions between the AF-2 activating domain of nuclear receptors and the putative transcriptional intermediary factors mSUG1 and TIF1.EMBO J.151996110124
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Williams P.,
    2. Ratajczak T.,
    3. Lee S. C.,
    4. Ringold G. M.
    AGP/EBP (LAP) expressed in rat hepatoma cells interacts with multiple promoter sites and is necessary for maximal glucocorticoid induction of the rat α1-acid glycoprotein gene.Mol. Cell. Biol.11199149594965
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Williams S. C.,
    2. Cantwell C. A.,
    3. Johnson P. F.
    A family of C/EBP-related proteins capable of forming covalently linked leucine zipper dimers in vitro.Genes Dev.5199115531567
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Won K.-A.,
    2. Baumann H.
    The cytokine response element of the rat α1-acid glycoprotein gene is a complex of several interacting regulatory sequences.Mol. Cell. Biol.10199039653978
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Yeh S.,
    2. Chang C.
    Cloning and characterisation of a specific coactivator, ARA70, for the androgen receptor in human prostate cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93199655175521
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Coactivator TIF1β Interacts with Transcription Factor C/EBPβ and Glucocorticoid Receptor To Induce α1-Acid Glycoprotein Gene Expression
Ching-Jin Chang, Ya-Ling Chen, Sheng-Chung Lee
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 1998, 18 (10) 5880-5887; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5880

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coactivator TIF1β Interacts with Transcription Factor C/EBPβ and Glucocorticoid Receptor To Induce α1-Acid Glycoprotein Gene Expression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Coactivator TIF1β Interacts with Transcription Factor C/EBPβ and Glucocorticoid Receptor To Induce α1-Acid Glycoprotein Gene Expression
Ching-Jin Chang, Ya-Ling Chen, Sheng-Chung Lee
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 1998, 18 (10) 5880-5887; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.10.5880
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DNA-Binding Proteins
Nuclear Proteins
Orosomucoid
Receptors, Glucocorticoid
Repressor Proteins
transcription factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549