Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION

Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III

Christin Tse, Takashi Sera, Alan P. Wolffe, Jeffrey C. Hansen
Christin Tse
Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7760, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Sera
Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5431
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan P. Wolffe
Laboratory of Molecular Embryology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5431
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey C. Hansen
Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7760, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.8.4629
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Analysis of core histone octamers purified from HeLa cells and chicken erythrocytes. (A) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Two micrograms of purified histone octamers were electrophoresed on an SDS–18% polyacrylamide gel (37), and bands were visualized by staining with Coomassie blue G-250. Samples were loaded as follows: lane 1, chicken erythrocyte octamers; lane 2, underacetylated octamers isolated from untreated HeLa cells; lane 3, highly acetylated octamers isolated from fraction A of butyrate-treated HeLa cells (see Materials and Methods); lane 4, moderately acetylated octamers isolated from fraction C of butyrate-treated HeLa cells. (B) Resolution of acetylated histone species. Fifteen micrograms of the histone octamers from panel A were electrophoresed on a 6 M acetic acid–6 M urea–0.375% Triton X-100–polyacrylamide gel (12) for 16 h at 5 mA of constant current. The bands were visualized by Coomassie blue G-250 staining. Lanes 1 to 4 correspond to the same histone octamers as in panel A. Histones H2B, H3, and H4 each have four acetylation sites, while H2A has only one acetylation site (53). For each core histone (with the exception of H2A), increasing extents of acetylation lead to progressively slower band migration. In the case of histone H2A, the slower-migrating band corresponds to H2A.1 while the faster-migrating band corresponds to the H2A.2 variant (65).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Reconstitution of underacetylated, moderately acetylated, and highly acetylated 208-12 nucleosomal arrays. (A) Schematic illustration of the 208-12 DNA template used for reconstitution. The 208-12 DNA consists of 12 tandem repeats of a portion of the Lytechinus 5S rRNA gene (51). Each 5S rDNA repeat contains both a preferred nucleosome positioning site (solid box) and a TFIIIA binding site (open box). Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase III occurs ∼90 bp upstream of the major TFIIIA binding site (+1, arrow). The termination sequence of the 5S rRNA gene was deleted during template construction (51), allowing for production of long read-through transcripts.EcoRI digestion sites are located at sequences 1 and 195 of each 5S rDNA repeat. (B) Micrococcal nuclease digestion. Underacetylated (lanes 1 to 8), highly acetylated (lanes 9 to 16), and moderately acetylated (lanes 17 to 24) reconstitutes were digested with 0.05 U of micrococcal nuclease per μg of DNA in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2. Digestion was for 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min (shown from left to right for each reconstitute type) at room temperature. The reactions were quenched by addition of a 1/5 volume of 5% SDS–25% glycerol–10 mM EDTA–0.3% bromophenol blue. Samples were deproteinated by incubation at 37°C for 30 min and subsequently electrophoresed for 5 h at 2 V/cm in a 1% agarose gel buffered with 40 mM Tris-acetate–1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Bands were visualized under UV illumination after incubation of the gel in ethidium bromide. Lambda DNA digested with BstEII (lanes M) was used for the size markers. (C) EcoRI digestion. One microgram (each) of naked 208-12 DNA (lane 1) and underacetylated, highly acetylated, and moderately acetylated nucleosomal arrays (lanes 2 to 4, respectively) was digested with 10 U of EcoRI for 60 min at room temperature in digestion buffer H (Promega). Reactions were quenched by addition of a 1/5 volume of 25% glycerol–10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Digestion products were electrophoresed at 4 V/cm for 3 h in a 1% agarose gel buffered with 40 mM Tris-acetate–1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Lambda DNA digested with BstEII (lanes M) was used for the size markers. (D) Determination of μ0. Shown are plots of the mobilities in 0.2 to 0.5% agarose of underacetylated (○) and highly acetylated (▴) nucleosomal arrays in E buffer. The μ0 was determined from the extrapolated gel-free mobilities as described in Materials and Methods.

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Highly acetylated histones enhance transcription and disrupt folding of 208-12 nucleosomal arrays in transcription buffer. (A) In vitro transcription. Underacetylated (U) and highly acetylated (H) nucleosomal arrays were transcribed in Xenopus oocyte nuclear extracts as described in Materials and Methods. A histone-free plasmid containing one copy of the Xenopus 5S RNA gene (which produces a 120-nt transcript) was included in each reaction as an internal control. Transcription reactions were electrophoresed in a denaturing 9% polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, RNA products were visualized with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.MspI-digested pBR322 was utilized as the size marker. (B) Densitometric trace of the RNA transcripts produced from the highly acetylated arrays shown in panel A. (C) Densitometric quantitation of the total amount of RNA transcripts produced from the highly acetylated nucleosomal arrays (solid bar) expressed as the fold increase over the underacetylated controls. Also shown is the fold increase previously reported by Ura et al. (58) for hyperacetylated dinucleosomes (open bar). (D) Sedimentation velocity analysis of nucleosomal array folding in transcription buffer. Highly acetylated (▴) and underacetylated (○) nucleosomal arrays were incubated in either transcription buffer or transcription buffer containing 50 mM KCl and 7 mM MgCl2 for 1 h at room temperature. For these experiments, the nucleoside triphosphates in transcription buffer were replaced with 2 mM Na5PPPi to avoid interference with the absorbance optical system of the analytical ultracentrifuge as previously described (30, 31). Samples were sedimented at 18,000 rpm in an An-Ti60 rotor, and 20 boundary scans were collected. The temperature of the run was 21°C. Each boundary was divided into 20 equal fractions. The diffusion-corrected sedimentation coefficient at each boundary division was determined by the method of van Holde and Weischet (62), and the data were plotted as boundary fraction versuss 20,w to yield the integral distribution of sedimentation coefficients present in the sample. For both highly acetylated and underacetylated samples, at each boundary fraction the data are expressed as the ratios of thes 20,w in transcription buffer containing 50 mM KCl and 7 mM MgCl2 divided by thes 20,w in transcription buffer lacking salts (s salts/s) to yield the salt-dependent increase in s 20,wacross the entire distribution (30, 31). Thes salts/s expected if no folding occurred is 1.0, while a ratio >1.0 is indicative of folding (see text).

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Comparison of Mg2+-dependent folding of underacetylated, moderately acetylated, and highly acetylated nucleosomal arrays. (A) Illustration of the salt-dependent folding of the 208-12 nucleosomal array as elucidated by sedimentation velocity experiments (27, 48). Shown are schematic representations of array conformations whose extent of compaction would yield the indicated sedimentation coefficients. (B) Sedimentation velocity analysis of underacetylated (U), moderately acetylated (M), and highly acetylated (H), nucleosomal arrays in 2 mM Mg2+. Samples were incubated in TE buffer containing 2 mM free Mg2+ for 1 h at room temperature. Sedimentation was performed as described in the legend for panel D of Fig. 3. Shown are the sedimentation coefficient distributions obtained after analysis of the data by the method of van Holde and Weischet (62). The inset shows theRe s of the same samples determined by quantitative agarose gel analysis in E buffer containing 2 mM free Mg2+ (see Materials and Methods). The indicated values represent the means ± standard deviations of 18 determinations of the Re in 0.2 to 0.8% agarose gels (Pe ≥200 nm). At Pe ≥200 nm, the Re s of 208-12 nucleosomal arrays is constant (20, 26). (C) Sedimentation velocity analysis of moderately acetylated (M) and highly acetylated (H) nucleosomal arrays in 3 mM Mg2+. Samples were incubated in TE buffer containing 3 mM free Mg2+ for 1 h at room temperature. Sedimentation was performed as described in the legend for panel D of Fig. 3. Shown are the sedimentation coefficient distributions obtained after analysis of the data by the method of van Holde and Weischet (62).

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Mg2+-dependent oligomerization of underacetylated, moderately acetylated, and highly acetylated nucleosomal arrays. Oligomerization was assayed by differential centrifugation as previously described (47, 48). Shown are the percentages of the underacetylated (U), moderately acetylated (M), and highly acetylated (H); samples that remained in the supernatant after exposure to the indicated amounts of MgCl2 for 10 min at room temperature and centrifugation at 16,000 × gfor 10 min in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge. Each data point represents the mean of three to four determinations.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Quantitation of the extent of acetylation of the individual core histones

    No. of acetyl groups/histoneAvg % of total acetates (by wt) for each histonea:
    H2AH2BH3H4
    UMHUMHUMHUMH
    0ndb ndnd734116664320985124
    1ndndnd273221272321nd3533
    2nd272872228nd924
    3ndnd35nd921nd515
    4ndndndnd3102nd5
    • ↵a U, underacetylated octamer; M, moderately acetylated octamer; H, highly acetylated octamer.

    • ↵b nd, not detected.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III
Christin Tse, Takashi Sera, Alan P. Wolffe, Jeffrey C. Hansen
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 1998, 18 (8) 4629-4638; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.8.4629

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Disruption of Higher-Order Folding by Core Histone Acetylation Dramatically Enhances Transcription of Nucleosomal Arrays by RNA Polymerase III
Christin Tse, Takashi Sera, Alan P. Wolffe, Jeffrey C. Hansen
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 1998, 18 (8) 4629-4638; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.18.8.4629
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

histones
Nucleosomes
protein folding
RNA polymerase III
Transcription, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549