Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION

Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Expression by Adipocyte Differentiation and Determination Factor 1/Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1: Implications for Adipocyte Differentiation and Metabolism

Lluis Fajas, Kristina Schoonjans, Laurent Gelman, Jae B. Kim, Jamila Najib, Genevieve Martin, Jean-Charles Fruchart, Michael Briggs, Bruce M. Spiegelman, Johan Auwerx
Lluis Fajas
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristina Schoonjans
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Gelman
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jae B. Kim
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamila Najib
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Genevieve Martin
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Charles Fruchart
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Briggs
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, California 92121
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce M. Spiegelman
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Auwerx
LBRE, U 325 INSERM, Institut Pasteur, F-59019 Lille, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.8.5495
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Increased expression of ADD-1, SREBP-1, or SREBP-2 induces PPARγ mRNA expression. (A) RNase protection assay of total RNA from HepG2 cells transfected with either an empty vector (control [cont]; lane 1), an SREBP-1a expression vector (lane 2), an ADD-1 expression vector (lane 3), or an SREBP-2 expression vector (lane 4) or from human white adipose tissue (hWAT [as a positive control]; lane 5). Protected fragments corresponding to PPARγ1 and 3 mRNAs are indicated. Results were normalized with a 36B4 probe. Densitometric quantification of the results is shown. (B) RNase protection assay of total RNA from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (lanes 3 to 5) or differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes (lanes 6 to 8) infected with an empty retroviral vector (lanes 3 and 6) or a retrovirus encoding ADD1-403 (lanes 4 and 7) or the full-length form of ADD-1 (lanes 5 and 8) as indicated. Lanes 1 and 2 show the undigested probes used to analyze PPARγ and actin mRNA. An actin probe was used for normalization in this RNase protection assay. The fold induction of PPARγ mRNA as determined by densitometric quantification of the results is shown in parentheses underneath the number of the lane.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Cholesterol depletion induces PPARγ expression. (A) Western blot analysis of nuclear extracts of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with an anti-PPARγ antibody. Preconfluent cells (lane 1) were incubated for 24 h (lane 2) in cholesterol-depleted medium. After 24 h of incubation in cholesterol-depleted medium, a mixture containing 10 μM cholesterol and 1 μM 25-OH-cholesterol was added to the medium for 6 additional h (24 + 6 chol) (lane 3). The fold induction of PPARγ or SREBP as determined by densitometric quantification of the results is shown in parentheses underneath the number of the lane. (B) Similar Western blot experiments as described for panel A, but with HepG2 nuclear extracts instead of 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts. (C) Expression of SREBP-1 protein as detected after Western blot analysis of the 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts used in panel A. Western blotting was performed with an anti-SREBP-1 antiserum. (D) Western blot analysis of nuclear extracts of CCL-39 cells transfected with the constitutively active form of ADD-1, ADD-1 403. Cells were exposed to the same cholesterol depletion as specified for panel A.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Inhibition of de novo cholesterol synthesis by statins induces PPARγ expression. (A) Analysis of the PPARγ protein by Western blotting of cell extracts from HepG2 cells incubated with medium supplemented with simvastatin (0.5 μM) for either 6 or 12 h. Fold induction of PPARγ protein levels is shown in parentheses. (B) Quantification of PPARγ protein levels in nuclear extracts from 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Cells were lipid starved as in Fig. 2, and a mixture of linoleic acid (150 μM) and linolenic acid (150 μM) was added to the medium for a period of 12 h. An anti-PPARγ specific antibody was used for Western blot analysis. Fold induction of PPARγ protein levels is shown in parentheses.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 transactivate the PPARγ1 and -3 promoters. (A) ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 transactivate the PPARγ1 and -3 promoters, but not the PPARγ2 promoter. Relative luciferase activity as determined after transfection of CCL-39 cells with the reporter constructs pGL3γ1p2000, pGL3γ2p1000, and pGL3γ3p800. Cells were either cotransfected with an empty expression vector (control) and exposed to medium containing cholesterol (10 μM) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μM), cotransfected with an empty expression vector and maintained in cholesterol-depleted medium (Chol depletion), or cotransfected with an expression plasmid for SREBP-1 (SREBP-1) or SREBP-2 (SREBP-2) in medium containing cholesterol (10 μm) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μM). Results are expressed as fold induction and represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences by Student’st test (P < 0.05) are indicated. (B) A scheme of the genomic structure of the 5′ end of the human PPARγ gene and of the approximate location of the response elements. Exons 1 to 6 are shared by all three subtypes. PPARγ1 contains in addition the untranslated exons A1 and A2; PPARγ2 contains exon B, which is translated; and PPARγ3 contains only the untranslated exon A2. The respective hPPARγ promoters are indicated by arrows. The approximate locations of the E-boxes are indicated.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Binding of ADD-1/SREBP-1 to the PPARγ1 and -3 promoters. (A) EMSA with a partially purified baculovirus-produced SREBP-1a protein, a different splice variant of ADD-1, and a labelled double-stranded oligonucleotide representing the PPARγ1-E-box. Competition experiments were performed with cold oligonucleotides representing either the PPARγ1-E-box (γ1-E-box; LF-141), the consensus HMG-CoA synthase SRE site (SREcons) (42), or the mutated PPARγ1-E-box (γ1-E-boxmut; LF-143) at either 10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess. (B) Sequence of the wild-type and mutated PPARγ1-E-box. The consensus E-box is indicated in bold characters. The three bases which are mutated are indicated underneath the original bases. (C) EMSA performed under exactly the same conditions as described for panel A with the PPARγ3-E-box (LF-102) as a labelled double-stranded oligonucleotide and the mutated PPARγ3-E-box (γ3 E-boxmut; LF-106) as a competitor instead of the PPARγ1-E-box and γ1-E-boxmut, respectively. (D) Sequence of the wild-type and mutated PPARγ3 E-boxes. The consensus E-box is underlined, whereas a potential SRE is indicated in boldface. The three bases mutated are indicated underneath the original bases.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    The PPARγ1-E-box and the PPARγ3-E-box mediate the induction of the PPARγ gene by ADD-1/SREBP-1 and SREBP-2. Relative luciferase activity as determined after transfection of CCL39 cells with the reporter constructs pGL3γ1p2000, pGL3γ1p2000-E-boxmut, pGL3γ3p800, and pGL3γ3p800-E-boxmut. Cells were cotransfected with either an empty expression vector (control) or an expression plasmid for SREBP-1 or SREBP-2. Values are the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) by Student’s t test are indicated by asterisks.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Transactivation of PPARγ is enhanced under conditions of cholesterol depletion. (A and B) Promoter activity of the PPRE-driven luciferase reporter vector J3-TK-Luc after addition of different doses of BRL 49,653 in cells maintained in medium with (dashed squares) or without added cholesterol (10 μM) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μM) (open squares). The results in RK-13 cells (A) and in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (B) are shown. The results represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Differences between the two conditions were statistically significant. RLU, relative light units. (C) Activity of the J3-TK-Luc reporter gene is stimulated by linolenic acid (C18:3 [400 μM]) in RK-13 cells. Cells were transfected with J3-TK-Luc reporter constructs and maintained for an additional 16 h in medium with (open bars; upper part of the graph) or without added cholesterol (10 μM) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (1 μM) (hatched bars; lower part of the panel). Cells grown under these basal conditions (control cells [C]) were compared with cells treated with BRL 49653 (1 μM [BRL]) or linolenic acid (400 μM [FA]). The results represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The asterisks are indicative of significant differences between the stimulated cells and controls by Student’st test (P < 0.05). (D) Activity of both the J3-TK-Luc and ACO-TK-Luc reporter genes is stimulated by cholesterol depletion in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells. Cells were transfected with J3-TK-Luc or ACO-TK-Luc reporter constructs and incubated under the same conditions than in panel C. The results represent the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. The asterisks are indicative of significant differences by Student’s t test (P < 0.05).

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Scheme summarizing the different links between ADD-1/SREBP activation and PPARγ activity. The present report provides evidence that PPARγ expression is induced by ADD-1/SREBP, whereas the role of ADD-1/SREBP in inducing PPARγ ligands was described before (22).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Oligonucleotides used in this study

    OligonucleotideSequence (5′→3′)
    LF-60cgttaaaggctgactctcgtttga
    LF-63gtcacatgaatgacgatacctc
    LF-68tcatgtaggtaagactgtgtagaa
    LF-102ctagcgtcattcatgtgacataaa
    LF-106ctagcgtcattcatgcatcataaa
    LF-107ccatcttttatgatgcatgaatga
    LF-141caggaggatcacttgagcccaggag
    LF-143caggaggatgcattgagcccagga
    LF-144tcctgggctcaatgcatcctcctg
    LF-145tggcttgcccttcacacggcgatc
    LF-146ggtcaagcgattctactgcctcag
    SREgatcctgatcacgtgatcgaggag
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Expression by Adipocyte Differentiation and Determination Factor 1/Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1: Implications for Adipocyte Differentiation and Metabolism
Lluis Fajas, Kristina Schoonjans, Laurent Gelman, Jae B. Kim, Jamila Najib, Genevieve Martin, Jean-Charles Fruchart, Michael Briggs, Bruce M. Spiegelman, Johan Auwerx
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 1999, 19 (8) 5495-5503; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.8.5495

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Expression by Adipocyte Differentiation and Determination Factor 1/Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1: Implications for Adipocyte Differentiation and Metabolism
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Expression by Adipocyte Differentiation and Determination Factor 1/Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1: Implications for Adipocyte Differentiation and Metabolism
Lluis Fajas, Kristina Schoonjans, Laurent Gelman, Jae B. Kim, Jamila Najib, Genevieve Martin, Jean-Charles Fruchart, Michael Briggs, Bruce M. Spiegelman, Johan Auwerx
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 1999, 19 (8) 5495-5503; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.19.8.5495
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

adipocytes
CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins
DNA-Binding Proteins
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
Nuclear Proteins
Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
transcription factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549