Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
CELL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Isoform-Specific Localization of A-RAF in Mitochondria

Anton Yuryev, Makoto Ono, Stephen A. Goff, Frank Macaluso, Lawrence P. Wennogle
Anton Yuryev
Novartis Institute for Biomolecular Research, Summit, New Jersey;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Makoto Ono
Novartis Agricultural Biotechnology Research Unit, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen A. Goff
Novartis Agricultural Biotechnology Research Unit, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Macaluso
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence P. Wennogle
Novartis Institute for Biomolecular Research, Summit, New Jersey;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.13.4870-4878.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Alignment of the N-terminal regulatory domain of the three RAF isoforms. Amino acid sequences of human A-, C-, and B-isoforms are aligned. Identical residues are colored red, homologous residues are blue, and nonconserved residues are black. The RBD and CRD are indicated (top and bottom). While both domains are relatively conserved across isoforms, important differences exist which may account for isoform-specific protein interactions (see text). The amino acids for each isoform are numbered to the right. The end of the N-terminal domain is indicated by the gold block and corresponds to A/C/B-RAF as number 308/347/453, respectively. Similarly, the RBD and CRD begin at amino acids 14/55/148 and 98/135/232, respectively, for A/C/B-RAF. The N-terminal domain baits used for subsequent experiments end at amino acids (A/C/B) 314/348/460, as detailed in Table 1.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Similarity of A-RAF-specific binding protein to TIM mitochondrial transport proteins from lower organisms. The amino acid sequence of hTIM44 as predicted from the gene sequence is presented with its alignment to yeast TIM44. Identical amino acids are shown in red, and conserved substitutions are in blue. The alignment was done using the BESTFIT program with a gap penalty of 0.25, which resulted in a 74% homology score. The 5′-end 77 residues of the hTIM44 gene were cloned by RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) PCR using a human hypocampus Marathon-Ready cDNA (Clontech catalog no. 7419-1). The original two-hybrid clone, which interacted with A-RAF, begins from amino acid 77 and is highlighted.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Similarity of A-RAF-specific binding protein to TOM mitochondrial transport proteins from lower organisms. The amino acid sequence of hTOM protein is presented as predicted from the gene sequence. The 5′-end sequence was obtained by RACE PCR as in Fig. 2. TPRs, also found in yeast (yMAS70; also called yTOM70) and N. crassa (nMOM72; also called nTOM72) mitochondrial transport proteins, are separated by breaks. Key repetitive hydrophobic and proline residues (17) are indicated in blue. The predicted transmembrane domain is shown in green. Charged amino acids in the membrane-proximal region are in red. Below the sequence is a schematic comparison of hTOM, yeast MAS70, and N. crassa MOM72 proteins. hTOM resembles nMOM72 and yMAS70 by overall protein domain organization and structure. Among these three proteins, the charged region was 26% and the transmembrane region was 20% homologous. For the TPRs, the best homology was with hTOM amino acids 216 to 904, the 11 C-terminal TPRs. This region was 25% homologous with the TPR regions of yMAS70 and nMOM72. Analysis of overlapping clones from the two-hybrid screen showed that the minimal region required for hTOM interaction with A-RAF contained TPR5 through TPR15; this region is highlighted.

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Purification of rat liver mitochondria. (A) Outline of the mitochondrial fractionation scheme. Mitochondria from rat liver were isolated as described by Mihara and Omura (19) with subsequent purification by a linear Nycodenz gradient (10) in 0.22 M mannitol–0.075 M sucrose–10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4)–1 mM EDTA. (B) Electron micrograph of the purified mitochondria, demonstrating a high level of enrichment, estimated at >90% purity.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Western analysis of fractions from rat liver mitochondrial preparation. (A) Western analysis of fractions performed with 50 μg of protein per lane (except the lowest lane, where 100 μg was used) using SDS-PAGE with 10% polyacrylamide gels. Standard procedures were used to blot gels to nitrocellulose membranes and to perform Western analysis with enhanced chemiluminescence detection using appropriate alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies (except with the lowest panel). Purified mitochondria were treated with protease K (10) to judge if A-RAF would be protected. Anti-A-RAF polyclonal antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (catalog no. sc-408). Monoclonal antibodies to various proteins were as follows: C-RAF (Transduction Laboratories catalog no. R19120), ERK-1 (Transduction Laboratories catalog no. M37520), cytochrome c(Cyt C) (PharMingen catalog no. 65981A), cytochrome oxidase subunit IV (COX-IV) (Molecular Probes catalog no. A-6403), and RACK-1 (Transduction Laboratories catalog no. R20620). For the lowest panel, Western analysis was performed as described above except that an iodinated secondary antibody (ICN catalog no. 68086) was used to increase the resolution. This method gave sharper bands than a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated second antibody–chemiluminescence method, where broad bands were detected and the doublet could not be resolved. (B) Experiment to judge the protection of A-RAF immunoreactivity upon preparation of mitoplasts using Western analysis with the technique described for panel A. The mitoplast preparation was performed as described by Glick (9). Note that (low-resolution) chemiluminescence was used, and therefore only a single band of A-RAF was detected.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Transmission electron micrographs of thin sections of mitochondrial preparations. (A) Rat liver was treated with either A-RAF or C-RAF antibody and stained with gold as described below for mitochondrial sections. The bar equals 1 μm. (B and C) Purified mitochondrial samples were fixed for immunogold labeling with 4% paraformaldehyde-0.1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in LR White resin (London Resin Company). Sections of embedded mitochondria were blocked with TBS containing first 50 mM glycine and then containing 5% BSA and 5% goat serum. After overnight incubation in TBS with 1% BSA containing different primary antibody dilutions of anti-A-RAF polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies catalog no. sc-408) (B) or anti-C-RAF polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies catalog no. sc-227) (C), sections were washed six times with 1× TBS–1% BSA and incubated for 2 h with a 1:10 dilution of goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to 10-nm colloidal gold (Goldmark Biologicals). The bar equals 0.5 μm. (D) Enlargement of a section of panel B showing the gold particles.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Model for the localization of RAF isoforms relative to mitochondria. The model summarizes the information from this study showing A-RAF localization inside and outside mitochondria and C-RAF localization uniquely outside mitochondria. The model implies a role of mitochondria A-RAF influencing the proliferation and activity of this organelle (see text). Protein 14-3-3 is an abundant cytosolic protein shown to bind the C- but not A-RAF N-terminal domain.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Interactions observed in the two-hybrid assays

    GAL4 DNA binding domain fusion (bait)GAL4 activation domain fusion (prey)
    A-RAFB-RAFC-RAFR-RAShTIM44hTOM14-3-3β
    A-RAF++++++−
    C-RAF++−++++
    hTOM++−−−+/−+++/−
    mCTD−−−−−−−
    • a The two-hybrid method used was similar to that described by Chevray and Nathans (4). The relative strength of interaction is depicted as ++, +/−, and − to indicate the intensity of yeast growth resulting from the protein-protein interaction between RAF bait and prey fusion proteins. Lack of an entry indicates that the experiment was not performed. Human A-RAF bait contained amino acids 2 to 314, rat A-RAF 2 to 311, human C-RAF 2 to 348, and human B-RAF 2 to 460. B-RAF–GAL4 DNA binding domain is self-active in the two-hybrid assay, and so this construct was not used extensively. mCTD is the mouse C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.

  • Table 2.

    Analysis of marker proteins during purification of mitochondriaa

    FractionTotal protein (mg)A-RAFCytochromecC-RAFERK-1
    % RecoveryEnrichment% RecoveryEnrichment% RecoveryEnrichment% RecoveryEnrichment
    S12,2401001100110011001
    S21,197571.060.010.014991.891522.8
    P23152821198.640.272.30.17
    Mitochondrial58.54.61.72490.30.09ND
    • ↵a Western analysis was performed with125I-labeled secondary antibodies. The intensity of bands on the gel was quantitated on a Molecular Dynamics Storm PhosphorImager, and percent recovery is expressed as relative units. The results are from a typical experiment performed on four occasions.

    • b ND, not detectable in purified mitochondrial fractions.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Isoform-Specific Localization of A-RAF in Mitochondria
Anton Yuryev, Makoto Ono, Stephen A. Goff, Frank Macaluso, Lawrence P. Wennogle
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jul 2000, 20 (13) 4870-4878; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.13.4870-4878.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Isoform-Specific Localization of A-RAF in Mitochondria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Isoform-Specific Localization of A-RAF in Mitochondria
Anton Yuryev, Makoto Ono, Stephen A. Goff, Frank Macaluso, Lawrence P. Wennogle
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jul 2000, 20 (13) 4870-4878; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.13.4870-4878.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Carrier Proteins
membrane proteins
Mitochondria, Liver
Mitochondrial Proteins
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf
Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549