Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MAMMALIAN GENETIC MODELS WITH MINIMAL OR COMPLEX PHENOTYPES

Immune System Dysfunction and Autoimmune Disease in Mice Lacking Emk (Par-1) Protein Kinase

Jonathan B. Hurov, Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck, Christian M. Zmasek, Lynn S. White, Sheila H. Ranganath, John H. Russell, Andrew C. Chan, Kenneth M. Murphy, Helen Piwnica-Worms
Jonathan B. Hurov
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck
Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, 2 Department of Pathology and Immunology, 3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian M. Zmasek
Department of Genetics, 4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn S. White
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 5 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheila H. Ranganath
Department of Pathology and Immunology, 3
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Russell
Department of Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew C. Chan
Department of Pathology and Immunology, 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 5 and Department of Medicine, 6 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth M. Murphy
Department of Pathology and Immunology, 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 5 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Piwnica-Worms
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, 1 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 5 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3206-3219.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Targeted disruption of the mouse Emk gene. (A) Structure of the targeting construct. The genomic organization of the mouse Emk gene was disrupted by replacing part of exon 2 and all of exons 3 and 4 of the Emk gene with the neomycin phosphotransferase cDNA driven by the thymidine kinase promoter (pTK-neo) as a selectable marker. Restriction sites in the introns flanking the targeted exons are indicated. Exons 2 to 8 are represented by shaded boxes. Small arrows depict the location of PCR primers used for genotyping. The probe used for Southern blot analysis is indicated by a bar under the targeted locus. (B) PCR analysis of genomic DNA isolated from tail clippings of F2 Emk mice. Emk +/+ mice produced a 310-bp PCR fragment, Emk −/− mice generated a 437-bp fragment, and Emk +/− mice gave rise to both products. (C) Western blot analysis of Emk protein. Lysates were prepared from 293 cells (lane 1) or from MEFs derived fromEmk +/+ (lane 2), Emk +/−(lane 3), or Emk −/− (lane 4) animals. A 250-μg portion of total cellular protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting was performed using affinity-purified Emk antibody. Endogenous Emk is expressed as two alternatively spliced mRNAs encoding protein products of ∼75 and 80 kDa. (D) Immune complex kinase assays. Homogenates of testis and brain were prepared fromEmk +/+, Emk +/−, andEmk −/− mice. Emk was immunoprecipitated using 2.5 mg of total tissue protein, and kinase assays were performed in vitro using GST-Cdc25C(200–256) as a substrate. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and radiolabeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography. 32P-labeled substrate was excised from the gel, and radioactivity was quantitated by Cerenkov counting.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Expression pattern of Emk in mouse tissues by Western blot analysis. A Western blot analysis of Emk and α-actin protein in selected lymphoid tissues and cells is shown. Enriched populations of T and B lymphocytes were isolated from the spleens ofBLNK −/− and ZAP70 −/−mice, respectively. The 80- and 75-kDa forms of Emk arise by alternative splicing.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Analysis of CD44 expression levels, proliferative capacity, and cytokine production in T lymphocytes ofEmk +/+ and Emk −/− mice. (A and B) CD44 (pgp-1) expression levels were analyzed by FACS on CD4+ T cells isolated from spleens (A) and lymph nodes (B) of Emk +/+ and Emk −/−mice. (C) Cell proliferation (CD4+ T cells) was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation after stimulation with either anti-CD3 or anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28. Standard deviations for triplicate samples obtained from two Emk +/+ and twoEmk −/− mice are shown as error bars along they axis. (D and E) CD4+ splenic T cells pooled from two to three animals were driven to differentiate to Th1, Th2, or neutral phenotypes, and ELISAs for IFN-γ (D) or IL-4 (E) were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Each experiment was performed a minimum of three times, and standard deviations are shown as error bars along the y axis.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Reduced B-cell proliferative capacity inEmk −/− mice. B220+ splenocytes isolated from 8-week-old Emk +/+ andEmk −/− mice were induced to proliferate by incubation with 20 μg of anti-IgM antibody per ml for the indicated times (A), with different concentrations of anti-IgM antibody (5 to 80 μg/ml) for 48 h (B), with PMA and ionomycin (C), or with anti-CD40 antibody (D). Cell proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation using pooled splenocytes from two animals per genotype, and each experiment was repeated a minimum of three times. Standard deviations for triplicate samples are shown as error bars along the y axis.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    The immune response of Emk −/−mice after challenge with T-cell-dependent and -independent antigens.Emk −/− (open diamonds) andEmk +/+ (open squares) littermates (8 weeks old) were injected intraperitoneally with NP-Ficoll (A) or NP-KLH (B). Serum samples were analyzed for IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG3 by ELISA as described in Materials and Methods. The results are expressed as the dilution at which the optical density is 0.2 over background. (A) The log values of the titers were analyzed statistically. T-cell-independent IgM and IgG3 responses were ca. 4-fold lower (P < 0.001) and ca. 3.5-fold lower (P < 0.05) , respectively, in Emk −/− mice than in their Emk +/+ littermates after 17 days. (B) The T cell-dependent IgG2a response in Emk −/−mice was ca. 7.5-fold higher than that in theirEmk +/+ littermates (P < 0.005) after 21 days. Similarly, the IgG1 response inEmk −/− mice (B) was ca. 9.5-fold higher than in their Emk +/+ littermates (P < 0.005) .

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Expansion of Ter119+ HSA+lymphocytes in spleens of Emk −/− mice. (A) Graphical representation of the numbers of B220+, CD4+, and CD8+ splenocytes obtained fromEmk +/+ and Emk −/− mice at 7 to 12 months of age (from Table 2). (B and C) Splenocytes ofEmk +/+ (B) and Emk −/−(C). Splenocytes isolated from mice at ∼7 months of age were double stained with FITC-conjugated anti-HSA and PE-conjugated anti-Ter119. The stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry gated on lymphocytes, and the results are shown as dot plots. The percentage of gated cells in each quadrant is indicated.

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Histological analysis of hematoxylin-eosin-stained organs from Emk +/+ andEmk −/− mice. (A and B) Kidneys from 8-month-old Emk +/+ (A) andEmk −/− (B) mice. Magnification, ×200. (C and D) Lungs from 8-month-old Emk +/+ (C) andEmk −/− (D) mice. Magnification, ×200. (E) High-power magnification of a kidney from an 8-month-oldEmk −/− mouse, showing cellular components of lymphocytic infiltrates. Magnification, ×1,000. Abbreviations: G, glomerulus; T, tubule; BV, blood vessel; LI, lymphocytic infiltrate; B, bronchiolus; PC, plasma cell.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Emk −/− mice develop autoimmune glomerulonephritis. (A and B) Glomeruli of representativeEmk +/+ (A) and Emk −/−(B) mice analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Magnification, ×630 (oil). (C and D) Glomeruli of representativeEmk +/+ (C) and Emk +/+ (D) mice incubated with anti-mouse IgG coupled to Cy3 and visualized by indirect immunofluorescence. Magnification, ×400. (E) The glomerulus seen in panel D was incubated with FITC conjugated to anti-mouse C3 (anti-C3) and was visualized by direct immunofluorescence. Magnification, ×400. (F) Anti-IgG-Cy3 immunofluorescence staining of a representative Emk −/− kidney. Magnification, ×200. (G) Electron micrograph of an Emk +/+kidney capillary loop. Magnification, ×7,700. (H) Electron micrograph of Emk −/− kidney capillary loop. Magnification, ×10,000. Abbreviations: RBC, red blood cell; BL, basal lamina; ID, Ig deposit; CL, capillary lumen; EC, epithelial cell.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Quantitation of T- and B-cell populations in immune tissues of Emk +/+ andEmk −/− micea

    Tissue Genotype Total cell no. ± SD Total no. of CD4+ cells ± SD (% of total)Total no. of CD8+ cells ± SD (% of total)Total no. of B220+ cells ± SD (% of total)
    7–8-wk-old mice
     Spleen Emk +/+ (17.60 ± 6.20) × 107  (n = 9)(2.86 ± 1.25) (16.2) × 107  (n = 8)(1.58 ± 0.57) (8.9) × 107  (n = 8)(9.21 ± 3.89) (52.3) × 107  (n = 9)
    Emk −/− (12.10 ± 5.30) × 107  (n = 10)(1.85 ± 0.82) (15.3) × 107  (n = 8)(1.21 ± 0.59) (10.0) × 107  (n = 8)(5.25 ± 2.60) (43.3) × 107  (n = 10)
     Lymph node Emk +/+ (3.50 ± 2.00) × 106  (n = 6)(1.77 ± 1.13) (50.5) × 106  (n = 6)(0.73 ± 0.53) (20.8) × 106  (n = 6)(0.61 ± 0.50) (17.4) × 106  (n = 6)
    Emk −/− (6.00 ± 2.58) × 106  (n = 7)1 (2.29 ± 1.26) (38.2) × 106  (n = 7)(1.32 ± 0.60) (22.0) × 106  (n = 7)(1.53 ± 0.85) (25.5) × 106  (n = 7)2
     Thymusd Emk +/+ (14.70 ± 7.9) × 107  (n = 7)(1.33 ± 0.96) (10.0) × 107  (n = 7)(0.45 ± 0.16) (3.4) × 107  (n = 7)
    Emk −/− (13.90 ± 6.4) × 107  (n = 10)(1.27 ± 0.80) (9.1) × 107  (n = 8)(0.41 ± 0.23) (3.0) × 107  (n = 8)
    7–12-m-old mice
     Spleen Emk +/+ (14.82 ± 4.98) × 107  (n = 11)(2.85 ± 1.22) × 107 (19.2)  (n = 10)(1.24 ± 0.57) (8.4) × 107  (n = 8)(5.98 ± 3.55) (40.4) × 107  (n = 11)
    Emk −/− b (33.13 ± 11.62) × 107  (n = 8)3 (4.63 ± 3.56) × 107 (14.0)  (n = 8)(1.81 ± 0.94) × 107 (5.5)  (n = 7)(5.09 ± 4.06) (15.4) × 107  (n = 8)
    Emk −/− (10.15 ± 4.36) × 107  (n = 8)(1.98 ± 0.92) × 107 (19.5)  (n = 6)(0.92 ± 0.38) × 107 (9.1)  (n = 5)(4.34 ± 2.92) (42.8) × 107  (n = 8)
     Lymph node Emk +/+ (3.66 ± 4.54) × 106  (n = 9)(1.67 ± 2.31) × 106 (45.6)  (n = 6)NDc (0.94 ± 0.81) (25.6) × 106  (n = 7)
    Emk −/− c (9.90 ± 6.35) × 106  (n = 6)2 (3.09 ± 1.92) × 106 (31.2)  (n = 4)ND (5.74 ± 4.98) (58.0) × 106  (n = 4)4
    Emk −/− (7.07 ± 3.9) × 106  (n = 6)1 (2.06 ± 1.09) × 106 (29.1)  (n = 6)ND (2.57 ± 1.95) (36.4) × 106  (n = 6)2
    • ↵a Quantitation of T- and B-cell populations in immune tissues of Emk +/+ andEmk −/− mice. Cell suspensions prepared from spleen, thymus, and superficial inguipal lymph nodes were analyzed by FACS using antibodies specific for CD4, CD8, and B220. A minimum of four mice per group was analyzed (the number is shown as n). Numbers indicate significant differences betweenEmk +/+ and Emk −/− mice after analysis using a Student t test; 1, P < 0.10 ; 2, P < 0.05 ; 3, P < 0.005 ; 4, P < 0.025 .

    • ↵b Emk −/− with splenomegaly/colorectal prolapse.

    • ↵c ND, not done.

    • ↵d For CD4+/CD8+ cells, values are as follows: Emk +/+, (11.9 ± 7.00) (80.9) × 107 (n = 7);Emk −/−, (11.0 ± 5.20) (79.1) × 107 (n = 8).

  • Table 2.

    Phenotypic summary of F2 generation mice

    Mouse IDaAge (mo)aSexaEnlarged spleenbKidney infiltratescLung infiltratescIgG depositsdProlapsed rectumbUrine analysise (protein/blood)
    Emk +/+
     171 11M N+ − +NNDf
     23211 M N − − − N ND
     250 7M N + − − N −/−
     252 12 MN − ++ − N −/−
     121 7 F N− − ND N ND
     166 12 F N ++ ++ N −/−
     159 8 F N + −− N ND
     242 8 F N − − −N ND
     179 7 F N − + ++ N−/−
     194 8 F N + − − Ntrace/−
     253 11 F N − − ND NND
     254 11 F N − − + N ND
    Emk +/−
     170 11 M Y −ND + Y ND
     172 11 M Y ++ −++ N ND
     199 12 M N + + −N trace/−
     251 12 M N + − +N −/−
     306 12 F N ++ + +++ N−/−
     173 12 F N ++ + ++ Ntrace/−
     175 12 F N + + ++ N−/−
     158 10 Y ++ − ++++ NND
    Emk −/−
     164 7 M Y ++++ − Y −/250
     250 12 M N +++ − N trace/−
     293 7 M Y +++ + Y trace/−
     202 12 M N ++++ ++ N 30/50
     212 12 F N +++++ + N trace/−
     195 12 F N +++ + N trace/−
     307 12 F N +++++ ++++ N −/50
     119 7 F Y ++++++++ ND Y ND
     127 8 F Y ++++++++ ++ Y −/50
     144 8 F Y ++++++ ++++ Y −/250
     1497 F Y +++ +++ +++++ N 500/250
     1847 F Y +++ − − Y −/250
     2358 F Y + + + Y −/250
    • ↵a Mice are specified by an identification (ID) number, and their sex and age (male [M] or female [F]) are indicated.

    • ↵b The presence (Y) or absence (N) of prolapsed rectum and enlarged spleen is indicated. Spleen enlargement was evaluated by weight and/or total splenocyte counts (see the text).

    • ↵c Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to detect lymphocytic infiltrates in the kidneys and lungs; − no infiltrate; +, minor infiltrate; ++++, maximal infiltrate.

    • ↵d IgG deposition on the kidneys was determined by indirect immunofluorescence using anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated to Cy3. Frozen kidney sections were evaluated for intensity and frequency of immunofluorescent glomeruli, and those data were used to determine a score (see Fig. 4C and D for examples of no deposition and maximal deposition, respectively); − no IgG deposition; +, minor deposition; +++++, maximal deposition.

    • ↵e Urine was analyzed for the presence of protein (values on the left) and blood (values on the right). Protein levels range from undetectable (−) to 30–500 mg/dl, and hemoglobin levels varied from undetectable (−) to 50–250 erythrocytes/ml.

    • ↵f Samples that were not evaluated are indicated by ND.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Immune System Dysfunction and Autoimmune Disease in Mice Lacking Emk (Par-1) Protein Kinase
Jonathan B. Hurov, Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck, Christian M. Zmasek, Lynn S. White, Sheila H. Ranganath, John H. Russell, Andrew C. Chan, Kenneth M. Murphy, Helen Piwnica-Worms
Molecular and Cellular Biology May 2001, 21 (9) 3206-3219; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3206-3219.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immune System Dysfunction and Autoimmune Disease in Mice Lacking Emk (Par-1) Protein Kinase
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
Share
Immune System Dysfunction and Autoimmune Disease in Mice Lacking Emk (Par-1) Protein Kinase
Jonathan B. Hurov, Thaddeus S. Stappenbeck, Christian M. Zmasek, Lynn S. White, Sheila H. Ranganath, John H. Russell, Andrew C. Chan, Kenneth M. Murphy, Helen Piwnica-Worms
Molecular and Cellular Biology May 2001, 21 (9) 3206-3219; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.9.3206-3219.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549