Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
CELL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Inhibits the Raf-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Binding to Raf-1

Emira Ayroldi, Ornella Zollo, Antonio Macchiarulo, Barbara Di Marco, Cristina Marchetti, Carlo Riccardi
Emira Ayroldi
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ornella Zollo
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Macchiarulo
2Department of Drug Chemistry and Technology, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Di Marco
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Marchetti
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carlo Riccardi
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pharmacology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: riccardi@unipg.it
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7929-7941.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    GILZ overexpression inhibits the binding of AP-1 to its DNA motif. (A) EMSA was performed with nuclear extract from untreated and anti-CD3-treated (1 μg/ml, 1 h) 3DO cells (lanes 2 and 6) or pcDNA3-transfected PV6 (lanes 3 and 7), pcDNA3-GILZ-transfected ST7 (lanes 4 and 8), or GIRL-19 (lanes 5 and 9) clones. Lane 1, probe alone. (B) Nuclear extract from untreated or anti-CD3-treated 3DO cells, alone (lane 5) or added with competitor cold probe (lane 3), with anti-c-Jun (lane 4), or with anti-c-Fos antibody (lane 6). Lane 1, labeled probe alone. C, untreated cells. (C) EMSA performed with NF-AT as the probe. Nuclear extract from untreated and anti-CD3-treated (1 μg/ml, 1 h) 3DO cells (lanes 2 and 6) or PV6 (lanes 3 and 7), ST7 (lanes 4 and 8), or GIRL-19 (lanes 5 and 9) clones. Lane 1, probe alone. The results are representative of three experiments. (D) 3DO cells were transfected with the AP-1 luciferase reporter geneand pcDNA3 (solid bar) or with the reporter gene and pcDNA3-GILZ (open bar) and stimulated for 4 and 18 h with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. The values are expressed as the increase (n-fold) in luciferase activity. Each transfection was performed in triplicate. The standard errors were <10%.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    GILZ overexpression inhibits c-Fos but not c-Jun trascription. Western blot analysis of c-Fos (A) and c-Jun (B) expression was performed. Nuclear cell lysates (10 μg) from PV6 and GIRL-19, stimulated for 1 h with immobilized anti-CD3 MAb (1 μg/ml), were probed with anti-c-Fos or anti-c-Jun antibodies (1 μg/ml). C, untreated cells. (C) The expression level of endogenous and exogenous GILZ was evaluated by Western blotting with anti-GILZ antiserum.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    GILZ overexpression inhibits ERK-1/2, MEK-1/2, and Raf-1 but not JNK phosphorylation. Clones transfected with pcDNA3 (PV6) or pcDNA3-GILZ (GIRL-19) were stimulated for 5 or 60 min with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. Whole-cell lysates were probed with an antibody specific for phosphorylated ERK-1/2 (pERK-1/2) (A), MEK-1/2 (pMEK) (B), or Raf-1 (pRaf-1) (C). Western blots were also performed with anti-ERK-1/2, anti-MEK-1/2, or anti-Raf-1 antibodies to verify that no modulation of protein expression occurred or with β-tubulin to verify that an equivalent amount of proteins was loaded in each lane. PV6 or GIRL-19 was stimulated for the times indicated with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. (D) Whole-cell lysates were probed with an antibody recognizing both phosphorylated forms of JNK: p54 and p46 (pSAPK/JNK). C, untreated cells.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    GILZ interacts with endogenous Raf-1 in mouse thymocytes. Mouse thymocytes were treated for 6 h with DEX (100 nM), and cell lysates were incubated with GST or GST-GILZ beads. Binding of Raf-1 (A), MEK-1/2 (B), and ERK-1/2 (C) was visualized by Western blotting. Whole-cell lysates from thymocytes left untreated or treated with DEX were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Raf-1 or control isotype antibody (4 μg/500 μg of protein). (D and E) Nitrocellulose membrane was probed with an anti-GILZ antiserum (D) and then stripped and reprobed with anti-Raf-1 antibody (E).

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    GILZ interacts with Raf-1 in COS-7-transfected cells. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with pUSEamp-Raf-1 (2 μg) and myc-GILZ (2 μg) vectors. Immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-myc antibody (3 μg/500 μg of protein), and immunoreactive proteins were visualized with anti-Raf-1 (A) or anti-myc (B) antibodies. Whole-cell lysates were loaded to control GILZ and Raf-1 expression. Serum-starved COS-7 cells, either untransfected or transfected with myc-GILZ, were treated for 15 min with PMA (10 ng/ml). Raf-1 immunoprecipitates were analyzed for kinase activity in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP by using GST-MEK (C) or GST-MEK, GST-ERK, and MBP (D) as substrates. P.C., positive control performed with 10 U of purified Raf-1 kinase; N.C., negative control performed with Raf-1 immunocomplex from PMA-stimulated cells in the absence of MEK substrate. (E) MEK phosphorylation was also assayed by Western blot with an antibody specific for phosphorylated MEK (pMEK). myc-GILZ-Raf-cotransfected COS-7 cells were immunostained with anti-myc and anti-Raf antibodies. Single staining and superimposed images are shown. (F) Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    (A) GILZ sequence alignment with a set of TSC family proteins (upper part of diagram) and alignment of NH2-terminal sequence of GILZ to 1vig as proposed by threading server (3DPSSM) (lower part of diagram). PSS indicates the predicted secondary structure for the N-terminal domain. SS indicates the known secondary structure of the library template 1vig. (B) 3D model of human GILZ. α-Helices are represented as light blue cylinders, β-sheets are represented as red ribbons, and proline residues are indicated in red CPK. (C) Molecular modeling of Raf-1-GILZ interaction. Distribution of solutions (i.e., the 100, 50, and 10 top solutions found) of docking experiments of Raf-1 and GILZ; the red balls indicate the center of mass of Raf-1, for each solution, interacting with GILZ.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    The GST-Raf-RBD interacts with the GILZ amino-terminal region. (A) GST pulldown was performed with GST-Raf-RBD fusion protein corresponding to the human RBD (residues 1 to 149) of Raf or GST alone, attached to glutathione-Sepharose beads as bait and whole-cell lysates from untreated and DEX-treated thymocytes. The membrane was probed with anti-GILZ antiserum. Total lysates from DEX-treated and untreated thymocytes were loaded to control GILZ expression. (B) GST-Raf-RBD fusion protein was incubated for 18 h with the 35S-labeled in vitro-transcribed and translated proteins GILZ (lane 3), mutant 6 (lane 6), and mutant 13 (lane 9). Lane 1, GILZ; lane 2, GST plus GILZ; lane 4, mutant 6; lane 5, GST plus mutant 6; lane 7, mutant 13; lane 8, GST plus mutant 13. (C) GST-Raf-RBD fusion protein was incubated for 18 h with the 35S-labeled in vitro-transcribed and -translated protein GILZ (lane 3) or mutant 2 (lane 6) or mutant 117 (line 9). Lane 1, GILZ; lane 2, GST plus GILZ; lane 4, mutant 2; lane 5, GST plus mutant 2; lane 7, mutant 117; lane 8, GST plus mutant 117. (D) 3DO cells were transfected with the AP-1 luciferase reporter gene, along with GILZ, mutant 2, mutant 6, mutant 117, mutant 13, or GILZ plus activated Raf-1, and then stimulated for 18 h with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. The values are expressed as the increase (n-fold) of luciferase activity compared to that in unstimulated cells. The values of transfected control groups are comparable; only one of them is shown in the figure. Each transfection was performed in triplicate. The standard errors were < 10%. (E) 3DO cells, transfected with the indicated vectors, were stimulated for 1 h with anti-CD3 MAb (1 μg/ml). Phosphorylation of ERK and MEK was visualized by Western blotting.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    GILZ interferes with Ras-Raf-1 complex. (A) Activated Ras was expressed in COS-7 cells, and 100 μg of cellular extracts was incubated for 1 h with 2.5 μg of GST-Raf-RBD. The complex was purified by adsorption to glutathione-Sepharose beads, washed, and resuspended in PBS. Purified GILZ was added at the concentrations indicated. After 1 h at 4°C, the GST-Raf-RBD beads were washed and examined for associated proteins by Western blotting with anti-Ras, anti-GILZ, and anti-GST antibodies. N.T., nontransfected cells. Clones transfected with pcDNA3 (PV6) or pcDNA3-GILZ (GIRL-19) were stimulated for 1 h with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. A total of 200 μg of cellular extracts was incubated for 1 h with 2.5 μg of GST-Raf-RBD. (B) Western blotting was performed with anti-Ras antibody. (C) The nitrocellulose membrane was then stripped and reprobed with anti-GILZ antibody.

  • FIG. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 9.

    DEX inhibits Raf-1, MEK, and ERK-1/2 phosphorylation. Mouse thymocytes left untreated or pretreated for 6 h with DEX (100 nM) were stimulated for 1 h with plastic-bound anti-CD3 MAb. Western blotting was performed with an anti-pERK-1/2 (A), anti-pMEK-1/2 (B), anti-pRaf-1 (C), or anti-GILZ (D) antibody. Western blotting was also performed with an anti-ERK-1/2, anti-MEK-1/2, or anti-Raf-1 antibody to verify that no modulation of protein expression occurred or with β-tubulin to verify that equivalent amounts of proteins were loaded in all lanes.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Production of IL-2 and IFN-γ by pcDNA3-transfected and pcDNA3-GILZ-transfected clones

    Transfecting plasmidMean cytokine concn ± SD
    Control cellsAnti-CD3 antibody-treated cells
    IL-2 (pg/ml)IFN-γ (ng/ml)IL-2 (pg/ml)IFN-γ (ng/ml)
    pcDNA3a -b -745 ± 108 ± 0.5
    pcDNA3-GILZ--20 ± 1.512 ± 1
    • ↵ a 3DO clones containing pcDNA3 or pcDNA3-GILZ were treated for 18 h with adherent anti-CD3 MAb (1 μg/ml). Supernatants were harvested and used in an ELISA.

    • ↵ b -, None detected.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Inhibits the Raf-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Binding to Raf-1
Emira Ayroldi, Ornella Zollo, Antonio Macchiarulo, Barbara Di Marco, Cristina Marchetti, Carlo Riccardi
Molecular and Cellular Biology Nov 2002, 22 (22) 7929-7941; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7929-7941.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Inhibits the Raf-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Binding to Raf-1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper Inhibits the Raf-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway by Binding to Raf-1
Emira Ayroldi, Ornella Zollo, Antonio Macchiarulo, Barbara Di Marco, Cristina Marchetti, Carlo Riccardi
Molecular and Cellular Biology Nov 2002, 22 (22) 7929-7941; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7929-7941.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

MAP Kinase Signaling System
mitogen-activated protein kinases
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf
transcription factors
Transcriptional Activation

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549