Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MAMMALIAN GENETIC MODELS WITH MINIMAL OR COMPLEX PHENOTYPES

Loss of S100A9 (MRP14) Results in Reduced Interleukin-8-Induced CD11b Surface Expression, a Polarized Microfilament System, and Diminished Responsiveness to Chemoattractants In Vitro

Marie-Pierre Manitz, Basil Horst, Stephan Seeliger, Anke Strey, Boris V. Skryabin, Matthias Gunzer, Werner Frings, Frank Schönlau, Johannes Roth, Clemens Sorg, Wolfgang Nacken
Marie-Pierre Manitz
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Basil Horst
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Seeliger
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anke Strey
2Institute of Medical Biochemistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris V. Skryabin
3Institute of Experimental Pathology, Zentrum für Molekularbiologie der Entzündung
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Gunzer
4Department of Dermatology, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Cell Biology, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Werner Frings
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Schönlau
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes Roth
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clemens Sorg
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Nacken
1Institute of Experimental Dermatology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nacken@uni-muenster.de
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1034-1043.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Targeted disruption of the S100A9 locus. (A) Recombination strategy. A schematic representation of the S100A9 wild-type gene, the targeting construct, and the mutant allele are shown. Closed boxes represent the three exons of the S100A9 gene; the neomycin resistant gene (Neo) and thymidine kinase gene (HSV-TK) are indicated by open boxes. Arrows represent the direction of transcription. The region indicated as the probe was used for the screening of targeted ES cells. Arrowheads indicate PCR primers used for detection of the mutant allele. The predicted sizes of DNA fragments in Southern blot analysis and PCR are also shown. (B) Southern blot analysis of five selected ES cell clones. Genomic DNA was digested with PvuII and hybridized with the probe shown in panel A. The observed 4.3- and 3.6-kb bands represent the wild-type and mutated alleles, respectively. (C) PCR analysis of tail DNAs from 4-week-old progeny. After PCR amplification of wild-type and targeted alleles, DNA fragments of 4.7 and 5.1 kb were detected.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Expression of S100A8 in mice lacking a functional S100A9 gene. (A) Flow cytometric profiles after S100A9 and S100A8 immunostaining of blood neutrophils are shown. Profiles are representative of three mice for each genotype. Analysis reveals the absence of both proteins in peripheral blood cells. (B) Western blot analysis of S100A9 and S100A8 expression in wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice demonstrates the absence of S100A9 and S100A8 in peripheral S100A9-deficient leukocytes. The upper part of the S100A8 filter was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue to confirm the transfer of the proteins to the filter. P, peritoneal granulocytes; B, bone marrow; S, spleen. (C) Northern blot analysis demonstrates the absence of S100A9 mRNA in thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal PMNs from S100A9-deficient mice, whereas the S100A8 gene is transcribed in wild-type as well as S100A9-deficient cells. Signals presented are shown as gene expression relative to the average expression of the housekeeping gene actin. (D) RT-PCR analysis confirms the absence of S100A9 RNA transcripts in various organs of deficient mice (right panel) and shows the presence of S100A8 RNA transcripts in the same organs (left panel). B, brain; S, spleen; L, liver; Br, brain.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Expression of S100A8 in S100A9-deficient bone marrow and spleen cells. As indicated, spleen and bone marrow cells were stained with the S100A8 antibody. As a control, granulocytes were stained with a commercially available gr1 antibody. S100A8 is present in bone marrow but not detectable in the peripheral tissues of the spleen.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Analysis of the hematopoietic cell population. Bone marrow from wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice were cultured for 4 days (d) in Teflon bags and analyzed daily by immunostaining of cytospin preparations for the expression of indicated cell markers in order to follow the differentiation of myeloid cells. Bars presented are the means from five separate experiments. In all panels, white bars correspond to wild-type mice and black bars correspond to S100A9-deficient mice.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    CFU experiments using wild-type and S100A9-deficient bone marrow leukocytes. Bone marrow cells from wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice were incubated with the cytokines indicated to evaluate the myelopoietic potential of the precursor cells. As a control, bone marrow cells were incubated without any cytokines.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Chemoattractant-induced in vitro TEM assay. TEM of bone marrow cells from wild-type (white bars) and S100A9-deficient (black bars) mice through a bEnd5 monolayer is shown. Values represent the means from four experiments. The stimulation rate was calculated by dividing the number of transmigrated cells after stimulation by the number before stimulation. Values are means ± standard errors of the means and were considered significant at a P of <0.01.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Dynamic parameters of spontaneous and chemokine-induced migration of S100A9-deficient and wild-type peritoneal neutrophils. The data show the means from four independent experiments. In all panels, white bars correspond to wild-type neutrophils and black bars correspond to S100A9-deficient neutrophils. All parameters indicate a reduced chemokinesis of the S100A9-deficient neutrophils upon stimulation with IL-8. Values were considered significant at a P of <0.05.

  • FIG. 8.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 8.

    IL-8-mediated surface expression of CD11b on Gr1-gated cells. Bone marrow cells were incubated at 37°C for 5 min with or without IL-8 and in the presence (upper panel) or absence (lower panel) of Ca2+ and Mg2+. At the end of the incubation period, surface expression of CD11b on Gr1-gated cells was determined by direct-immunofluorescence flow cytometry. The data presented here show one experiment representative of five experiments.

  • FIG. 9.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 9.

    IL-8 failed to enhance the adhesion of S100A9-deficient neutrophils to bEnd5 cells. bEnd5 cells were incubated with TNF-α for 2 h; subsequently, S100A9−/− (B) and wild-type (A) leukocytes were allowed to adhere for 1 h with or without IL-8. After washing, the myeloperoxidase activity was determined to measure the number of neutrophils that adhered. To compare the unstimulated and IL-8-stimulated conditions, the value obtained for the unstimulated neutrophils was set to 1.0.

  • FIG. 10.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 10.

    F-actin content in unstimulated S100A9-deficient PMNs is higher than that in wild-type PMNs. (A) The time course of IL-8-induced changes in the cellular F-actin content in Gr1-gated cells is shown. Broken lines represent data for S100A9+/+ mice, and dotted lines represent data for S100A9−/− mice. Levels of IL-8 are either 0 ng/ml (circle) or 250 ng/ml (square). The values represent the means from five separate experiments. (B) The photographs show the F-actin distribution in unstimulated (left panels) and IL-8-stimulated (right panels) CD11b+ cells isolated from bone marrow.

  • FIG. 11.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 11.

    IL-8-induced emigration of neutrophils into the skin. IL-8 was injected into the ears of wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice. The number of Gr1-stained cells 4 h after IL-8 injection was visually evaluated. There was no difference observed between the number of emigrated neutrophils with respect to the wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice.

  • FIG. 12.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 12.

    Thioglycolate-elicited leukocyte emigration into the peritoneum. (A) The total number of leukocytes migrated into the peritoneum subsequent to intraperitoneal injection of thioglycolate was determined at various time points as indicated (106). No significant difference was observed between S100A9-deficient (black bars) and wild-type (white bars) mice. Each bar represents the mean values for at least 10 mice. (B) Cellular composition of bone marrow cells was analyzed subsequent to thioglycolate-induced peritonitis (4 h). After inflammatory stimulation of the granulopoiesis, the percentage of S100A8-positive cells in the bone marrow was similar in wild-type and S100A9-deficient mice. (C) Cellular composition (percentage of positive cells) of the peritoneal exudate was determined cytochemically with various cellular surface markers as indicated. No deviation was observed between S100A9-deficient and wild-type mice.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Loss of S100A9 (MRP14) Results in Reduced Interleukin-8-Induced CD11b Surface Expression, a Polarized Microfilament System, and Diminished Responsiveness to Chemoattractants In Vitro
Marie-Pierre Manitz, Basil Horst, Stephan Seeliger, Anke Strey, Boris V. Skryabin, Matthias Gunzer, Werner Frings, Frank Schönlau, Johannes Roth, Clemens Sorg, Wolfgang Nacken
Molecular and Cellular Biology Feb 2003, 23 (3) 1034-1043; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1034-1043.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Loss of S100A9 (MRP14) Results in Reduced Interleukin-8-Induced CD11b Surface Expression, a Polarized Microfilament System, and Diminished Responsiveness to Chemoattractants In Vitro
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Loss of S100A9 (MRP14) Results in Reduced Interleukin-8-Induced CD11b Surface Expression, a Polarized Microfilament System, and Diminished Responsiveness to Chemoattractants In Vitro
Marie-Pierre Manitz, Basil Horst, Stephan Seeliger, Anke Strey, Boris V. Skryabin, Matthias Gunzer, Werner Frings, Frank Schönlau, Johannes Roth, Clemens Sorg, Wolfgang Nacken
Molecular and Cellular Biology Feb 2003, 23 (3) 1034-1043; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1034-1043.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CD11b Antigen
Calgranulin B
Interleukin-8

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549