Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
CELL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

Sequestosome 1/p62 Is a Polyubiquitin Chain Binding Protein Involved in Ubiquitin Proteasome Degradation

M. Lamar Seibenhener, Jeganathan Ramesh Babu, Thangiah Geetha, Hing C. Wong, N. Rama Krishna, Marie W. Wooten
M. Lamar Seibenhener
1Program in Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeganathan Ramesh Babu
1Program in Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thangiah Geetha
1Program in Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hing C. Wong
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Rama Krishna
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie W. Wooten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: wootemw@auburn.edu
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8055-8068.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    UBA domain binds polyubiquitin noncovalently and is required for aggregate formation. (A) The p62 constructs employed were myc-tagged wild-type (WT) p62; full-length p62 (amino acids 1 to 440); p62ΔN-term, a construct missing amino acids 1 to 229; and p62ΔUBA, a construct missing the UBA domain (amino acids 386 to 440). (B) myc-tagged full-length p62 construct or myc-tagged construct lacking the UBA domain (p62ΔUBA) were transfected into HEK cells along with HA-tagged ubiquitin (HA-Ub). Lysis and immunoprecipitation (IP) were carried out in either PNAS buffer (lacking SDS) or SDS lysis buffer (SDS) followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (WB) for HA-tagged ubiquitin. (C) Shown are laser scanning confocal microscopy images of immunofluorescence staining for exogenous myc-p62 (red) and HA-ubiquitin (green) of wild-type myc-p62-expressing (top), myc-p62ΔUBA-expressing (middle), and myc-p62ΔN-term-expressing (bottom) HEK cells with (+) or without (−) proteasomal inhibitor ALLN (50 μM) for 24 h. Cells were incubated with rabbit anti-myc IgG or mouse anti-HA IgG and labeled with Texas Red-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (red) or Oregon Green-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies (green), respectively. Merged images with overlapping immunoreactivity are shown in yellow. Note that cells expressing p62 lacking its UBA domain (p62ΔUBA) fail to form aggregates or to colocalize with ubiquitin. All experiments were replicated three independent times with similar results. (D) HEK cells (in a 24-well plate) were transfected with myc-tagged wild-type p62, p62ΔUBA, or p62ΔN-term along with HA-tagged ubiquitin constructs. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were treated with or without ALLN (50 μM) for 30 h. Cell survival was assessed by the addition of MTS reagent for 2 h. Values shown are means ± standard error of the means of four different experiments. Survival was significantly diminished between the control and p62ΔUBA (P < 0.001) and between wild-type p62 and p62ΔN-term (P < 0.001).

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    UBA domain binds K63-linked polyubiquitinated substrates. (A) HEK cells were transfected either with HA-tagged wild-type ubiquitin (HA-Ub) or K29R, K48R, or K63R point mutants of ubiquitin (left) or with HA-tagged wild-type ubiquitin or K63R, K29,48R, or K29,48,63R mutants of ubiquitin (right). An equal protein concentration of cell lysate was interacted with the UBA domain of p62 in a pull-down assay. Binding of polyubiquitin chains was determined by Western blot analysis with HA antibody to detect ubiquitin (WB:HA). The expression of ubiquitin constructs was verified by blotting an aliquot of the transfected cell lysate (40 μg) with HA tag antibody. (B) HEK cells were transfected with GFP-p62 followed by treatment with (+) or without (−) ALLN for 18 h prior to fixation. The cells were stained with antibody to TRAF6 with Texas Red as the secondary antibody. The colocalization of TRAF6 and p62 was determined by confocal microscopy. (C) HEK cells were pretreated with increasing doses (0, 50, 75, 150, and 300 μM) of control or TRAF6 inhibitory peptide for 5 h followed by treatment with IL-1 (10 ng/ml) for 15 min. Lysates were prepared (200 μg) and included in a GST-p62 UBA pull-down followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with antiubiquitin antibody. In parallel, the lysates (750 μg) were immunoprecipitated (IP) with TRAF6 antibody and blotted (WB) for p62. Lysates (40 μg) were blotted with both p62 and TRAF6 antibodies as shown. (D) HEK cells were transfected with GFP-p62 followed by treatment with TRAF6 inhibitory peptide (150 μM) for 2 h, followed by the addition of ALLN for an additional 12 h prior to fixation and visualization by confocal microscopy. All experiments were replicated three independent times with similar results.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Critical determinants of p62-polyubiquitin interaction. (A) Sequence alignment of the UBA domain of p62 with UBA containing proteins hHR23A UBA1, hHR23A UBA2, and Ddi1, indicating conserved residues and α-helix formation. Arrows indicate residues mutated for analysis as well as their location on a three-dimensional model of the p62 UBA domain. (B) Overlaid circular dichroism spectra of UBA peptides. (C) HEK cells were transfected with HA-tagged wild-type ubiquitin (WT-Ub) or left untransfected as the control. Pull-down assays were carried out by using the GST-UBA domain of p62 and its mutants UBA1, UBA2, UBA3, UBA4, and UBA5. The lysates (500 μg) were interacted with 5 μg of GST-UBA in a pull-down assay. The interaction of polyubiquitin chains with each UBA construct was analyzed by immunoblotting (WB) with antibody to ubiquitin. The findings were replicated three independent times with similar results. To validate equal amounts of GST-UBA in the pull-down assay, the blot (∼32kDa) was probed with GST antibody. The expression of HA-tagged ubiquitin was verified by immunoblotting with HA antibody.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    UBA-polyubiquitin interaction is required for aggregate formation. HEK cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged ubiquitin (HA-Ub) together with myc-tagged full-length and UBA mutants of p62 expression constructs treated with (+) or without (−) proteasomal inhibitor ALLN (50 μM) for 24 h and then labeled with antibodies to HA and myc. Images of a representative cell are shown. Anti-myc labeling (red) detects wild-type (WT) myc-p62 and its UBA domain mutants. Anti-HA labeling (green) detects ubiquitin. Merged images show the overlap between the individual staining patterns as yellow. The findings are representative of two independent experiments.

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    p62 interacts with the proteasome. (A) myc-tagged constructs wild-type (WT) p62, p62ΔUBA, and p62ΔN-term were expressed in HEK cells, and lysates were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. An equal amount of GST-S5a agarose was added to 500 μg of lysate from each sample and incubated for 2 h at 30°C. Following interaction, beads were washed, and myc-tagged constructs bound to S5a were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (WB) with myc antibody. Construct expression and the amount of GST-S5a input into the assay were also analyzed by Western blot with the appropriate antibody as shown. All experiments were replicated three independent times with similar results. (B) p62 interacts with proteasomes in a stimulus-dependent manner. HEK cells were treated with IL-1 (10 ng/ml) for 5 min followed by immunoprecipitation (IP) with p62 antibody and immunoblotting with Rpt1 (left). Alternatively, myc-tagged p62 constructs were expressed in HEK cells followed by stimulation with IL-1 (10 ng/ml). The lysates (750 μg) were immunoprecipitated with Rpt1 antibody and immunoblotted with myc to detect the tagged p62 constructs (right; shown with an asterisk). As the control, the expression of the proteins in the lysate (40 μg) was determined. (C) p62 interacts directly with the proteasome. Immobilized bacterially expressed GST-p62 (5 μg) or GST control was incubated with purified 26S proteasomes (0 to 1 μg). After washing, bound subunit Rpt1 was detected by immunoblotting. (D) p62 aggregates contain proteasomal subunits. HEK cells were cotransfected with GFP-p62 and treated with ALLN (50 μM) for 18 h and then labeled with antibodies to Rpn10/S5a, Rpt1, or proteasomal subunits as indicated. Images of a representative cell are shown. Green detects the GFP-p62 and red detects the endogenous proteins. Merged images show the overlap between the individual staining patterns in yellow.

    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    p62 is involved in ubiquitin proteasome degradation of polyubiquitinated proteins. (A) HEK cells were transfected with full-length antisense p62 (ASp62) construct or not. The levels of endogenous p62 were examined by immunoblotting lysates (40 μg) with p62 antibody. (B) Control or antisense p62-transfected HEK cells were treated with 20 mg of cycloheximide/ml as indicated. Whole-cell lysates (40 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (WB) with antiubiquitin antibody. (C) The relative expression of five prominent polyubiquitinated proteins present in both control and antisense p62 lysates was determined and plotted as shown. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Relationship of p62 aggregates to cell survival a

    Treatment% of cells
    With aggregates Without aggregates
    DeadAliveDeadAlive
    Without ALLN39616535
    With ALLN52486238
    • ↵ a Cells were scored as aggregate positive or negative based upon the expression of GFP-p62. Cells were scored as dead or alive employing either the green or red stain (Molecular Probes).

  • TABLE 2.

    Estimation of secondary structures in UBA peptides based on CD data

    ProteinMethod of data analysis and averageb% of peptides with the following secondary structuresa:
    HrHdBrBdTurnCoil
    UBA (wild type)CDSSTR52.215.33.67.64.416.7
    CONTIN/LL51.018.60.02.15.323.1
    Average51.617.01.84.94.919.9
    UBA1CDSSTR54.814.72.78.03.416.7
    CONTIN/LL56.617.20.02.54.019.8
    Average55.716.01.45.33.718.3
    UBA2CDSSTR48.412.56.110.53.319.1
    CONTIN/LL49.611.90.03.07.827.8
    Average49.012.23.16.85.623.5
    UBA3CDSSTR49.813.86.28.95.716.4
    CONTIN/LL51.316.70.03.46.022.8
    Average50.615.33.16.25.919.6
    UBA4CDSSTR53.614.04.68.63.515.4
    CONTIN/LL43.811.90.03.16.933.4
    Average48.713.02.35.95.224.4
    UBA5CDSSTR50.515.03.96.94.219.5
    CONTIN/LL56.716.70.03.74.019.0
    Average53.615.92.05.34.119.3
    • ↵ a Abbreviations: Hr, regular α-helix; Hd, distorted α-helix (number of amino acids equal to or less than 4); Br, regular β-strand; Bd, distorted β-strand (number of residues equal to or less than 2).

    • ↵ b The readings of CONTIN/LL are the averages of the results from the CONTIN and CONTINLL programs. Average, average of the results from CDSSTR and CONTIN/LL methods.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Sequestosome 1/p62 Is a Polyubiquitin Chain Binding Protein Involved in Ubiquitin Proteasome Degradation
M. Lamar Seibenhener, Jeganathan Ramesh Babu, Thangiah Geetha, Hing C. Wong, N. Rama Krishna, Marie W. Wooten
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 2004, 24 (18) 8055-8068; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8055-8068.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sequestosome 1/p62 Is a Polyubiquitin Chain Binding Protein Involved in Ubiquitin Proteasome Degradation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sequestosome 1/p62 Is a Polyubiquitin Chain Binding Protein Involved in Ubiquitin Proteasome Degradation
M. Lamar Seibenhener, Jeganathan Ramesh Babu, Thangiah Geetha, Hing C. Wong, N. Rama Krishna, Marie W. Wooten
Molecular and Cellular Biology Aug 2004, 24 (18) 8055-8068; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8055-8068.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Cysteine Endopeptidases
Multienzyme Complexes
Polyubiquitin
Proteins
ubiquitin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549