Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Turning Off Estrogen Receptor β-Mediated Transcription Requires Estrogen-Dependent Receptor Proteolysis

Yukiyo Tateishi, Raku Sonoo, Yu-ichi Sekiya, Nanae Sunahara, Miwako Kawano, Mitsutoshi Wayama, Ryuichi Hirota, Yoh-ichi Kawabe, Akiko Murayama, Shigeaki Kato, Keiji Kimura, Junn Yanagisawa
Yukiyo Tateishi
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raku Sonoo
2Ankhs Incorporated, Tsukuba Industrial Liaison and Cooperative Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu-ichi Sekiya
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nanae Sunahara
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miwako Kawano
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsutoshi Wayama
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryuichi Hirota
2Ankhs Incorporated, Tsukuba Industrial Liaison and Cooperative Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoh-ichi Kawabe
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko Murayama
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeaki Kato
3Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keiji Kimura
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Junn Yanagisawa
1Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
2Ankhs Incorporated, Tsukuba Industrial Liaison and Cooperative Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: junny@agbi.tsukuba.ac.jp
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00713-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Turning Off Estrogen Receptor β-Mediated Transcription Requires Estrogen-Dependent Receptor Proteolysis - December 21, 2012

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shed light on the ligand-dependent transactivation mechanisms of nuclear receptors (NRs). When the ligand dose is reduced, the transcriptional activity of NRs should be downregulated. Here we show that a ubiquitin-proteasome pathway plays a key role in turning off transcription mediated by estrogen receptor β (ERβ). ERβ shows estrogen-dependent proteolysis, and its degradation is regulated by two regions in the receptor. The N-terminal 37-amino acid-region is necessary for the recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase, i.e., the carboxyl terminus of HSC70-interacting protein (CHIP), to degrade ERβ. In contrast, the C-terminal F domain protects ligand-unbound ERβ from proteolysis to abrogate proteasome association. Suppression of CHIP by interfering RNA inhibited this switching off of receptor-mediated transcription when the ligand dose was reduced. Our results suggest that after ligand withdrawal, the active form of the NR is selectively eliminated via ligand-dependent proteolysis to downregulate receptor-mediated transcription.

Estrogen is a growth factor that stimulates cell growth and differentiation in diverse tissues. Dramatic changes in the levels of estrogen in the blood occur during the normal human menstrual cycle. During the first 7 to 10 days, the level of estrogen is low. In the middle of the cycle (days 11 to 15), it rises and then falls abruptly. The effects of estrogen are mediated through the estrogen receptors (ERs), ERα and ERβ, which function as ligand-induced transcription factors and belong to the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily (2, 5, 12, 20, 31, 33, 41, 49). When the estrogen level is high, estrogen binds to ERs to activate the transcription of target genes. This induces the ligand-binding domain (LBD) to undergo a characteristic conformational change, whereupon the receptor dimerizes, binds to DNA, and subsequently stimulates gene expression (10). ERα is stimulated by two distinct activation regions, activation function 1 (AF-1) and AF-2, which are located in the LBD and exert ligand-dependent transcriptional activity. Crystal structure analysis of ERs and other NRs has revealed the presence of 12 conserved helices in their LBDs (46). The LBD forms a structure described as a sandwich of 12 α-helices (helices 1 to 12) with a central hydrophobic ligand-binding pocket. Helix 12, the most C-terminal of these helices, has been identified as the critical core (AD core) of the AF-2 function of the receptor and plays an important role in coactivator binding to the ligand-bound receptor (6, 19, 24, 25, 33, 35, 39, 43, 45, 55, 56).

When the level of estrogen is decreased, receptor-mediated transcription should be downregulated. Because the response to estrogen is tightly controlled, the downregulation of ER-mediated transcription should also be tightly regulated. Although such regulation of the NRs has generated intense interest, the molecular mechanisms regulating these processes are not understood (38). To switch off transcription, there are at least two possible mechanisms. The first involves the dissociation of ligands from the hormone-binding pocket of the receptor. However, the dissociation rate of the ligand from its receptor is very low, because the receptor locks the hormone within its activation pocket and covers it with coactivators (16). Another possible mechanism is the rapid degradation of active receptors. Several nuclear receptors, such as the ER and those for progesterone, glucocorticoid, thyroid hormone receptor, retinoid X, and retinoic acid, are ubiquitinated and degraded in the course of their nuclear activities (8, 11, 13, 26, 29, 32, 36, 47, 51, 57). These degradation steps might be involved in turning off NR-mediated transcription.

Evidence now suggests that proteasome-dependent degradation of receptors is necessary for the activation of these receptors (38). Moreover, this requires NR-mediated transcriptional activity, implying that the degradation and the transactivation of NRs are mutually independent processes. In the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, proteins destined for degradation are conjugated by polyubiquitin chains, in which one ubiquitin molecule is conjugated by another through one of its seven lysine residues, typically K48. These polyubiquitin chains are then recognized by the regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome.

Here we show that there is a ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for ERβ that is not coupled to transactivation. To investigate this, we purified the ubiquitin ligase complex for ERβ and identified a protein complex containing the carboxyl terminus of heat shock cognate 70 (HSC70)-interacting protein (CHIP) (1). CHIP binds directly to the N-terminal 37-amino-acid region of ERβ and ubiquitinates it to induce ERβ degradation. In contrast, the C-terminal F domain inhibits the binding of proteasome to the receptor and protects it from proteolysis in the absence of estrogen. Suppression of CHIP by interfering RNA (RNAi) inhibited the switching off of receptor-mediated transcription that occurs when the ligand dose is reduced. Our results suggest that ligand-dependent degradation selectively and rapidly eliminates the active form of a nuclear receptor to downregulate receptor-mediated transcription after ligand withdrawal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Expression vectors.The ERα/β and CHIP expression plasmids and their deletion mutants have been described previously (48). ERE-TATA-Luc and ERE-TATA-LucCP were constructed by inserting three consensus estrogen response elements into a luciferase reporter plasmid encoding a TATA box, pGL3-Basic or phRG(R2.2)-Basic. pGL3-Basic, phRG(R2.2)-Basic, and pGL3-Control vectors were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI).

Antibodies.Anti-FLAG-M2 mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-hemagglutinin (HA) mouse monoclonal antibody (Roche), anti-human ERα antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), anti-human ERβ antibody (PPMX), and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase mouse monoclonal antibody (American Research Products, Inc.) were used at appropriate dilutions, according to the manufacturers' instructions. A rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against CHIP was provided by T. Chiba (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science).

Cell culture and transfection.MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells and human embryonic kidney 293 cells were routinely maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Twenty-four hours before transfection, the medium was changed to phenol red-free DMEM containing 4% charcoal-stripped FBS. Transfection was performed using PerFectin transfection reagent (Gene Therapy Systems) or TransFast transfection reagent (Promega) according to the manufacturers' protocols. The cells were treated with or without MG132 (10−6 M) and estrogen (10−8 M). Twenty-four hours after the addition of estrogen, the cells were harvested and analyzed by Western blotting using the appropriate antibodies.

Coimmunoprecipitation and Western blotting.The 293 cells were transfected with the appropriate plasmids and lysed in TNE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 0.5% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 μM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 1 μg/ml aprotinin). Extracted proteins were immunoprecipitated with antibody-coated protein A/G-Sepharose (Amersham) or anti-FLAG M2 agarose (Sigma). The bound proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), and detected with the appropriate antibodies and secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Specific proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blot detection system (Amersham).

Luciferase assay.For luciferase assays, ERE-TATA-Luc plasmids were cotransfected with expression vector encoding ERβ or its mutants. As a reference plasmid with which to normalize transfection efficiency, the pRSVβGAL vector or the pRL-CMV vector was cotransfected in all experiments. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 0.2% FBS, either estrogen (10−8 M) or ethanol vehicle was added, and the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. Cell extracts were prepared, and luciferase assays were performed following the manufacturer's protocol (Promega). β-Galactosidase activity was measured to control for the efficiency of each transfection. Individual transfections, each consisting of triplicate wells, were repeated at least three times.

Protein purification.Glutathione S-transferase (GST) protein or an immobilized 37-amino-acid region that we designated the “domain required for degradation” (DRD) fused to GST (GST-DRD) was preincubated for 1 h at 4°C in GST-binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 180 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) containing bovine serum albumin (BSA; 1 mg/ml). Bead-immobilized proteins were then incubated at 4°C for 6 to 10 h with 293 cell extracts. After the beads had been washed three times with GST buffer (GST-binding buffer with 0.1% NP-40), they were washed again with GST buffer containing 0.2% N-lauroyl sarcosine. Proteins bound to the DRD were eluted with 15 mM reduced glutathione in elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.3], 150 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF, 5 mM NaF, 0.08% NP-40, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, and 10% glycerol). Recombinant CHIP was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using Ni-agarose.

Immunofluorescence.The 293 cells were grown on poly-l-lysine-coated 12-well culture dishes and transfected with plasmids. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min and permeabilized with Triton buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.5% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA) for 15 min. The cells in each well were blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.5% goat serum for 3 h at 37°C. The cells were incubated with the appropriate antibody in PBS containing 1% BSA for 2 h at 37°C. After the cells had been washed with PBS, they were incubated with Alexa-Fluor-488-conjugated goat anti-rat immunoglobulin G or Alexa-Fluor-594-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 37°C and washed with PBS. The samples were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and analyzed using a Keyence Biozero BZ-8000.

Pulse-chasing.The 293 cells were transfected with ERβ, and 48 h after transfection the cells were labeled for 30 min at 37°C with [35S]methionine (50 μCi/ml) in methionine-free DMEM. The cells were then washed twice and incubated in DMEM containing 0.2% FBS for the indicated periods (chase). At each time point, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-ERβ antibody. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. A phosphorimager was used to quantify the metabolically labeled ERβ present at each time point.

RNAi.The 293gp cells were transfected with pSINsi-hU6 vector (Takara) containing the target sequence of CHIP or LacZ (control) and with vesicular stomatitis virus-encoded envelope protein G to generate the small interfering RNA (siRNA) retroviral supernatant. MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with retroviral supernatant in the presence of Polybrene (8 μg/ml). Twenty-four hours after transfection, the viral supernatant was replaced with fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS. The transfected cells were selected with G418 (1 mg/ml). The target sequences were 5′-GCACGACAAGTACATGGCGGA-3′ for CHIP and 5′-GCTACACAAATCAGCGATT-3′ for LacZ.

RESULTS

An N-terminal 37-amino-acid region is essential for ERβ degradation.The level of ERβ protein was reduced by the addition of estrogen to the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line. This degradation was inhibited by the proteasome inhibitors MG132 (Fig. 1A) and lactacystin (data not shown). In a ubiquitination assay, ERβ was ubiquitinated in both the presence and the absence of estrogen (Fig. 1B). Thus, ERβ is degraded via ubiquitin-proteasome pathways. Preliminary biochemical study showed that a single K48-linked polyubiquitin chain is sufficient to target a substrate to the 26S proteasome. Therefore, we investigated the ubiquitin linage of the chains using a ubiquitin mutant lacking specific lysines, Ub(K48R). HA-tagged ubiquitin (HA-Ub) or Ub(K48R) was transfected into 293 cells, and the level of ERβ protein and the ubiquitination status were determined by Western blotting using an anti-FLAG-M2 or an anti-HA antibody. Expression of Ub(K48R) reduced the degradation (Fig. 1C) and the ubiquitination status (Fig. 1D) of ERβ, suggesting that the polyubiquitin chains of ERβ are linked via K48. These results indicate that whereas ERβ is polyubiquitinated via K48 in ubiquitin in both the presence and the absence of estrogen, the proteolysis is estrogen dependent. Our observations imply that ubiquitination in itself is not the only way to regulate ERβ.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

ERβ is degraded through ubiquitin-proteasome pathways. (A) ERβ is degraded in an estrogen-dependent manner. ERβ-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (10−6 M). ERβ level was analyzed by use of Western blots probed with the indicated antibody. (B) ERβ is degraded via ubiquitin-proteasome pathways. ERβ-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). ERβ was immunoprecipitated (IP) using anti-ERβ antibody. Upper panel: the ubiquitination status of ERβ was analyzed by Western blotting (IB) and probed with an anti-ubiquitin antibody. Lower panel: immunoprecipitated ERβ was detected by Western blotting and probed with an anti-ERβ antibody. IgG, immunoglobulin G; M, molecular mass. (C) The estrogen-dependent degradation of ERβ is inhibited by mutated ubiquitin Ub(K48R). FLAG-tagged ERβ and DNA encoding HA-Ub (1,000 ng) or HA-Ub(K48R) (1,000 ng) were transfected into 293 cells in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). ERβ was detected by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. (D) The polyubiquitin chain of ERβ is linked via K48. FLAG-tagged ERβ and DNA encoding HA-Ub (1,000 ng) or HA-Ub(K48R) (1,000 ng) were transfected into 293 cells in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). FLAG-tagged ERβ was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. Upper panel: the ubiquitination status of ERβ was analyzed by use of Western blots probed with anti-HA antibody. Lower panel: immunoprecipitated ERβ was detected by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG antibody. (E) The A/B domain is necessary for the estrogen-dependent degradation of ERβ. DNA (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ER deletion mutants was transfected into 293 cells. These cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). To evaluate the protein levels of the ER mutants, Western blot analysis was performed using anti-FLAG-M2 antibody.

To investigate the molecular mechanism by which ERβ is degraded, DNA sequences encoding truncated forms of ERα or ERβ were transfected into 293 cells, and the protein levels were examined by Western blot analysis. ERα(Δ181), which does not contain the A/B domain, still underwent ligand-dependent degradation (Fig. 1E). In contrast, truncation of the A/B domain of ERβ, forming ERβ(Δ140), produced no ligand-dependent degradation, suggesting that the A/B domain of ERβ is necessary for its ligand-dependent degradation (Fig. 1E).

We then investigated the region responsible for the degradation of ERβ. The levels of truncated ERβ protein in the presence and the absence of estrogen were examined by Western blotting. As shown in Fig. 2A, ERβ(Δ20), in which the 20 N-terminal amino acids are deleted, was elevated in the presence of estrogen compared with wild-type ERβ. ERβ(Δ37) exhibited almost no degradation, indicating that the N-terminal 37 amino acids are essential for the ligand-dependent degradation of ERβ (Fig. 2A). To assess whether this region is sufficient for the ligand-dependent degradation of ERβ, it was fused to ERβ(Δ140), which does not contain the A/B domain and shows little ligand-dependent degradation. In contrast to that of ERβ(Δ140), the level of ERβ(Δ38-140) protein, in which the 37-amino-acid region is fused to ERβ(Δ140), was reduced in an estrogen-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). This reduction was abrogated by the addition of MG132, indicating that ERβ(Δ38-140) is degraded by proteasomal pathways. Interestingly, the degradation of ERβ(mC), which has three amino acid substitutions in the DNA-binding domain (C domain) and has almost no ability to bind DNA (30), was similar to that of wild-type ERβ (Fig. 2A), indicating that binding to the DNA element is not necessary for ligand-dependent receptor degradation. Similar results were obtained when other cell lines, such as MCF-7 or MDA-MB-231, were used (data not shown). From these observations, we concluded that the N-terminal 37-amino-acid region of ERβ is involved in its ligand-dependent degradation and designated this region the DRD. We next determined the ubiquitination status of the truncated forms of ERβ. The DRD deletion accumulated a monoubiquitinated form and showed a reduced level of the polyubiquitinated form (Fig. 2B), suggesting that the DRD is required for the polyubiquitination of ERβ.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

DRD-mediated degradation is involved in the downregulation of ERβ-mediated transcription. (A) The N-terminal 37-amino-acid region is essential for estrogen-mediated ERβ degradation. DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ERβ deletion mutants were transfected into 293 cells. These cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). To evaluate the protein levels of the ERβ mutants, Western blot analysis was performed using an anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. (B) DRD-regulated ubiquitination of ERβ. DNA (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ERβ mutants and DNA (1,000 ng) encoding HA-tagged ubiquitin were transfected into 293 cells in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). Upper panel: FLAG-tagged ERβ mutants were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. The ubiquitination status of ERβ was analyzed by use of Western blots probed with anti-HA antibody. Lower panel: immunoprecipitated ERβ mutants were detected by use of Western blots probed with an anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. I.B., Western blotting.

Purification and identification of an E3 ubiquitin ligase that specifically binds to the DRD of ERβ.To investigate why the DRD induces ubiquitination, we examined two possibilities. First, the DRD may contain a lysine residue that is ubiquitinated by a ubiquitin ligase specific for ERβ. Second, there may be a ubiquitin ligase that specifically recognizes and binds to the DRD to ubiquitinate ERβ.

To test the first possibility, we introduced an amino acid substitution at the lysine residue in the DRD. ERβ(K4A), in which the lysine residue in the DRD is replaced by alanine, showed ligand-dependent degradation similar to that of the wild type (Fig. 2A), implying that the lysine residue in the DRD is not a target for ubiquitination. Therefore, we investigated the other possibility.

We generated a GST-fused 37-amino-acid region (GST-DRD) with which to purify proteins that specifically bind to the DRD. Whole-cell extracts prepared from 293 cells were incubated with either GST-DRD or GST. The bound proteins were precipitated with glutathione beads and separated using SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3A). Mass fingerprinting methods revealed that the proteins that specifically bound to the DRD were the carboxyl terminus of CHIP, HSP70, and HSP90 (Fig. 3A).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

The DRD associates with a protein complex containing the carboxyl terminus of HSC70-interacting protein (CHIP) and HSC/HSP70. (A) Purification and identification of DRD-interacting proteins. Whole-cell extracts (WCE) prepared from 293 cells were incubated with GST-DRD or with GST as the control. Bound proteins were precipitated with GST-conjugated beads, eluted with glutathione, and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining. The fractions eluted from GST and GST-DRD are shown. Proteins eluted from the DRD peptide were examined by mass spectrometry. (B) CHIP binds the DRD. Recombinant CHIP was incubated with GST-DRD or GST. The bound proteins were precipitated with glutathione beads. CHIP bound to GST-DRD was separated by SDS-PAGE. (C) Interaction between ERβ and CHIP in vivo. ERβ-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated (I.P.) with anti-ERβ antibody in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). The precipitates were Western blotted (I.B.) and probed with antibodies directed against CHIP and HSP70. IgG, immunoglobulin G. (D) DRD is necessary for the interaction between ERβ and CHIP. ERβ or ERβΔDRD was transfected into 293 cells. These cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. The precipitates were Western blotted and probed with antibodies directed against CHIP and HSP70. (E) CHIP induces the ubiquitination of ERβ. DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ and DNA (1,000 ng) encoding HA-tagged ubiquitin were transfected into 293 cells with or without DNA (50 ng) encoding CHIP in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). FLAG-tagged ERβ or ERβ(ΔDRD) was immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. The ubiquitination status of ERβ was analyzed by use of Western blots probed with anti-HA antibody.

CHIP has E3 ubiquitin ligase activity mediated by its carboxyl-terminal U-box domain and has the ability to bind to chaperones HSP/HSC70 via its tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain (7, 48). A pull-down assay showed that recombinant CHIP bound to the GST-DRD (Fig. 3B). A coimmunoprecipitation assay demonstrated specific binding of CHIP and HSP70 to ERβ in both the absence and the presence of estrogen (Fig. 3C). ERβΔDRD showed no ability to bind CHIP (Fig. 3D). Therefore, we tested whether CHIP enhances ERβ ubiquitination. When ERβ was coexpressed with CHIP, smeary bands of ubiquitin-conjugated ERβ products were observed (Fig. 3E). In contrast, CHIP expression had no effect on the ubiquitination status of ERβ(ΔDRD). Thus, CHIP appears to mediate the ubiquitination of ERβ.

CHIP participates in the degradation of ERβ.ERβ is known to localize predominantly in the nucleus. Although a large proportion of the CHIP protein was localized in the cytoplasm, a small amount was observed in the nucleus by immunostaining (Fig. 4A) and Western blot analysis (Fig. 4B, left panel). To test whether CHIP-mediated ubiquitination induces the degradation of ERβ, DNA encoding ERβ was transfected into 293 cells with or without DNA encoding CHIP. Western blot analysis revealed that the steady-state level of ERβ decreased in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm when CHIP was produced (Fig. 4B, left panel). ERβ in MDA-MB-231 cells also decreased with the production of CHIP (Fig. 4B, right panel). We further determined CHIP's function by producing MDA-MB-231 cells in which endogenous CHIP expression was suppressed by the introduction of a siRNA complementary to sequences present in the CHIP mRNA. The introduction of the siRNA vector into MDA-MB-231 cells suppressed the expression of CHIP mRNA (data not shown) and protein (Fig. 4C, left panel) and the accumulation of ERβ protein (Fig. 4C, right panel). In contrast, a control vector failed to alter the CHIP or ERβ protein levels (Fig. 4C, right panel). Thus, CHIP appears to be involved in estrogen-dependent ERβ degradation. To confirm this, pulse-chase experiments were performed. In the presence of estrogen, the half-life of ERβ exceeded 8 h, but it had a half-life of about 4 h when CHIP was expressed (Fig. 4D).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

CHIP enhances the degradation of ERβ. (A) CHIP protein was observed in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The 293 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding HA-tagged CHIP and FLAG-tagged ERβ. Mounted cells were examined by immunofluorescence microscopy as described in Materials and Methods. (a) The distribution of CHIP in the cell is shown. (b) The distribution of ERβ is shown. (c) Merged images of panels a and b. (B) CHIP expression reduced the steady-state level of ERβ. DNA (50 ng) encoding HA-tagged CHIP was cotransfected into 293 or MDA-MB-231 cells with DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ in the absence or the presence of estrogen (10−8 M). The level of ERβ protein was examined by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG (293) or anti-ERβ (MDA-MB-231) antibody. (C) ERβ accumulated after the siRNA-mediated suppression of endogenous CHIP. Plasmids encoding a siRNA specific for CHIP or the control vector were introduced into MDA-MB-231 cells. These cells were selected with G418. Levels of CHIP and ERβ proteins were assessed by immunoblotting the whole-cell lysates with specific antibodies, as indicated. (D) CHIP facilitates the degradation of ERβ. 293 or MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with DNA (50 ng) encoding CHIP or with DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ in the presence of estrogen (10−8 M). Cells were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine and then chased for the indicated times in medium containing unlabeled methionine. 35S-labeled ERβ in the immunoprecipitate was quantified by phosphorimaging, and the levels in control cells (closed circles) and CHIP-expressing cells (open circles) were plotted relative to the amount present at time zero.

To confirm that the DRD is necessary for CHIP-dependent ERβ degradation, DNA sequences encoding truncated forms of ERβ were transfected into 293 cells with or without DNA encoding CHIP. CHIP expression enhanced the degradation of ERβ, ERβ(mC), ERβ(DRD;Δ140), and ERβ(AF-1), all of which contain the DRD, but did not enhance the degradation of ERβ(ΔDRD) or ERβ(Δ140), neither of which contains the DRD (Fig. 5A). To test the specificity of this effect, we created constructs in which the TPR and U-box domains of CHIP were deleted (ΔTPR and ΔU-box, respectively). CHIP binds to HSP/HSC70 via its TPR motif and displays E3 ubiquitin ligase activity mediated by its U-box domain. Although the expression of these truncated proteins was similar to that of full-length CHIP (data not shown), deletion of either of these domains abolished the effects of CHIP on ERβ (Fig. 5B). Such a requirement for a TPR motif indicates that CHIP may have to interact with HSP/HSC70 to promote ERβ degradation. The functional requirement for the U-box confirms that CHIP regulates ERβ ubiquitination.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

CHIP regulates DRD-mediated ubiquitination and degradation. (A) The DRD is necessary for CHIP-dependent ERβ degradation. DNA (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ERβ mutants was transfected into 293 cells, with or without DNA encoding CHIP. These cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). To evaluate the levels of ERβ mutant proteins, Western blot analysis was performed using anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. (B) Both the TPR and U-box domain of CHIP are necessary for ERβ degradation. DNA (50 ng) encoding CHIP, CHIPΔTPR, or CHIPΔUbox was transfected into 293 cells with or without DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ. Levels of ERβ protein were examined by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. (C) The CHIP-dependent ERβ degradation is not affected by ERα. DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ was transfected into 293 cells with or without DNA (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERα and DNA (50 ng) encoding CHIP. Levels of ERβ and ERα protein were examined by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody.

In a previous report, we showed that CHIP binds ERα in the absence of estrogen (48). Since ERα and ERβ heterodimerize readily in the presence of each other, we examined the effect of cointroducing ERα on CHIP-dependent degradation of ERβ. As shown in Fig. 5C, the degradation of ERβ was not affected by coexpression of ERα.

The F domain regulates ERβ degradation negatively.Our results showed that whereas CHIP binds and ubiquitinates ERβ in both the presence and the absence of estrogen, the degradation of ERβ is estrogen dependent. To investigate this discrepancy, DNA sequences encoding truncated forms of ERs were transfected into 293 cells and the protein levels were examined. The AD core domain is necessary for estrogen-dependent degradation of ERα (29, 48). Consistent with this observation, ERα(ΔAD) was stabilized by ligand binding and thus accumulated in response to estrogen (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, the deletion of the AD core of ERβ resulted in a dramatic reduction in ERβ in the absence of estrogen (Fig. 6A). This observation raises the possibility that the C-terminal region of ERβ is necessary for the stabilization of ERβ. To test this possibility, DNA sequences encoding deletion mutants of the C terminus of ERβ were transfected into 293 cells and levels of expressed protein were determined by Western blot analysis. When the F domain was deleted [ERβ(ΔF)], a dramatic reduction in ERβ protein was observed in the absence of estrogen (Fig. 6B). This reduction in ERβ was inhibited by MG132, indicating that the F domain suppresses the proteasome-dependent degradation of ERβ. The degradation of ERβ(ΔF) required the DRD, because ERβ(ΔDRD;ΔF) was not degraded in the absence of estrogen. In contrast, the degradation of ERβ(Δ140;ΔF) was enhanced by fusion with the DRD [ERβ(DRD;Δ140;ΔF)] in both the presence and the absence of estrogen (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that the F domain suppresses the DRD-dependent degradation of ERβ in the absence of estrogen.

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

The F domain suppresses DRD-mediated proteolysis of ERβ. (A) AD core deletion in ERβ increased the degradation of ligand-unbound receptor. DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ER deletion mutants were transfected into 293 cells. These cells were cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). To evaluate the protein levels of the ER mutants, Western blot analysis was performed using anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. (B) F domain protects ERβ from DRD-mediated degradation. DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ERβ deletion mutants were transfected into 293 cells cultured in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M) and MG132 (10−6 M). To evaluate the protein levels of the ERβ mutants, Western blot analysis was performed using anti-FLAG-M2 antibody.

In contrast to what was seen for ERβ, the deletion of the F domain in ERα did not affect its degradation. To study this, we generated a chimeric ERβ, ERβ (αF), in which the F domain was substituted with an ERα F domain. However, there is almost no homology between the ERα F and ERβ F domains, and the F domain of ERα was able to protect ERβ from proteolysis in the absence of estrogen (Fig. 6B).

Next, we determined the ubiquitination statuses of ERβ and ERβ(ΔF). That of ERβ(ΔF) was similar to that of full-length ERβ (Fig. 7A), indicating that the F domain does not regulate the ubiquitination step of ERβ. Thus, the F domain may inhibit the accession of 26S proteasome to ERβ structurally. Therefore, we evaluated the binding between ERβ and proteasomes. FLAG-tagged ERβ or ERβ(ΔF) was transfected into 293 cells with SUG-1, which is one of the components of regulatory subunit of 26S proteasome. A coimmunoprecipitation experiment revealed that deletion of the F domain enhanced association between ERβ and SUG-1 (Fig. 7B). In addition, SUG-1 efficiently reduced ERβ(ΔF) rather than ERβ (Fig. 7C). Thus, in the absence of estrogen, the F domain appears to abrogate the binding of the 26S proteasome to ERβ to protect the receptor from proteolysis.

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

F domain abrogates the association of proteasomes with ERβ. (A) Deletion of the F domain does not alter the ubiquitination status of ERβ. DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding the indicated FLAG-tagged ERβ mutants and DNA (1,000 ng) encoding HA-tagged ubiquitin were transfected into 293 cells in the presence or the absence of estrogen (10−8 M). Upper panel: FLAG-tagged ERβ mutants were immunoprecipitated (I.P.) with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. The ubiquitination status of ERβ was analyzed by use of Western blots probed with anti-HA antibody. I.B., Western blotting. Lower panel: immunoprecipitated ERβ mutants were detected by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG antibody. (B) The F domain abrogates the association of SUG-1 with ERβ. DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding either ERβ or ERβ(ΔF) were transfected into 293 cells. FLAG-tagged ERβ or ERβ mutants were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody. The precipitates were Western blotted and probed with an antibody against SUG-1. T.F., transfection. (C) The F domain protects ERβ from SUG-1-dependent degradation. DNA sequences (100 ng) encoding SUG-1 were cotransfected into 293 cells with or without DNA sequences (500 ng) encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ or ERβ(ΔF). The levels of ERβ or ERβ(ΔF) protein were examined by Western blotting and probed with anti-FLAG antibody.

Receptor degradation is involved in the downregulation of transcription of the gene for ERβ after ligand withdrawal.Recent evidence indicates that receptor degradation is coupled to transactivation and that the transcriptional activity of the gene for ERα is abrogated by the addition of MG132. The transcriptional activity of ERβ was also reduced by MG132 (Fig. 8A). Thus, it is likely that receptor degradation is necessary for the ligand-dependent transactivation of the ERβ gene. To investigate the association between CHIP-mediated receptor degradation and transactivation, we evaluated the transcriptional activities of ERβ deletion mutants by use of a transient reporter assay. As shown in Fig. 8B, ERβ(ΔDRD) exhibited a transcriptional activity higher than that of full-length ERβ. However, ERβ(Δ140) still showed transcriptional activity. When the DRD was fused to ERβ(Δ140) to form ERβ(DRD;Δ140), its transcriptional activity was reduced (Fig. 8B). Similarly, ERβ(Δ140; ΔF) exhibited higher transcriptional activity than ERβ(ΔF), but fusion of DRD decreased its transcriptional activity (Fig. 8B). In agreement with these results, CHIP expression downregulated the transcriptional activity of the ERβ gene (Fig. 8C). In contrast, CHIP siRNA enhanced transcriptional activity (Fig. 8C). The transcriptional activity of ERβ(ΔDRD) was not affected by expression of CHIP (Fig. 8C). Overall, our results indicate that CHIP-mediated degradation is not necessary for receptor-mediated transactivation. In addition, CHIP is able to ubiquitinate and to degrade ERβ(mC) (Fig. 5A), indicating that binding to the DNA element is not necessary for CHIP-mediated receptor degradation. These results show that large amounts of liganded ERβ protein are selectively and rapidly degraded independently of receptor-mediated transcription by CHIP.

FIG. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 8.

CHIP decreases transcriptional activity of ERβ by degradation. (A) Proteasome-dependent degradation is necessary for the transactivation of ERs. DNA sequences (0.05 ng) encoding the ERβ or ERα were cotransfected into 293 cells with ERE-TATA-Luc (50 ng) and pRSVβGAL (50 ng) in the presence or absence of MG132 (10−6 M), and the cell extracts were used in a luciferase assay. (B) DRD-mediated degradation is not coupled to ligand-dependent receptor transactivation. DNA sequences (0.05 ng) encoding the indicated ERβ mutants were cotransfected into 293 cells with ERE-TATA-Luc (50 ng) and pRSVβGAL (50 ng), and the cell extracts were used in a luciferase assay. (C) CHIP production reduced the transcriptional activity of ERβ. ERE-TATA-Luc (50 ng), pRSVβGAL (50 ng), and DNA sequences (0.05 ng) encoding either ERβ or ERβ(ΔDRD) were cotransfected into 293 cells with or without DNA encoding CHIP and CHIP RNAi, and the cell extracts were used in a luciferase assay.

To investigate the biological significance of this “wastefulness,” we hypothesized that CHIP-mediated degradation selectively and rapidly degrades the active form of ERβ to shut off ERβ-mediated transcription when the estrogen dose is reduced. To test this hypothesis, we measured the transcriptional activities of constructs encoding ERβ and ERβ(ΔDRD) after estrogen withdrawal. DNA sequences encoding either ERβ or ERβ(ΔDRD) were transfected into 293 cells together with a plasmid in which the PEST sequence was fused to the luciferase gene (ERE-TATA-LucCP), and the luciferase activity was measured at various time points after estrogen withdrawal. As shown in Fig. 9A, the transcriptional activity of the ERβ sequence was reduced much faster than that of ERβ(ΔDRD). Using MDA-MB-231 cells that stably express either control siRNA or CHIP siRNA, we tested whether CHIP is involved in the downregulation of ERβ-mediated transcription after reduction of the ligand dose. Plasmids containing the PEST-fused luciferase gene were transfected into MDA-MB-231 cells expressing either control siRNA or CHIP siRNA. ERβ gene-mediated transcription was downregulated faster in the MDA-MB-231 cells expressing control siRNA than in the cells expressing CHIP siRNA (Fig. 9A).

FIG. 9.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 9.

CHIP switches off ERβ-mediated transcription after the estrogen dose is reduced. (A) Downregulation of CHIP inhibits the turning off of ERβ-mediated transcription after estrogen withdrawal. Upper panel: DRD-mediated degradation is involved in the downregulation of ERβ-mediated transcription after estrogen withdrawal. The 293 cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding FLAG-tagged ERβ or ERβ(ΔDRD), together with ERE-TATA-LucCP (50 ng) and pRSVβGAL (50 ng). Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were treated with estrogen (10−8 M) for an additional 24 h, after which the estrogen was withdrawn (time 0). These cells were harvested for luciferase assays and Western blotting at the indicated time points after estrogen withdrawal. Lower panel: CHIP is involved in the downregulation of ERβ-mediated transcription when the ligand dose is reduced. Plasmids encoding a siRNA specific for CHIP or control vector were introduced into MDA-MB-231 cells. These cells were selected with G418. FLAG-tagged ERβ (100 ng), ERE-TATA-LucCP (400 ng), and pGL3-Control (10 ng) were transfected into these cell lines. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were treated with estrogen (10−8 M) for an additional 24 h, after which the estrogen was withdrawn (time 0). These cells were harvested for luciferase assays and Western blotting at the times indicated after estrogen withdrawal. (B) Dose-response curve of the estrogen-induced CHIP-dependent degradation of the ERβ. DNA (500 ng) encoding the FLAG-tagged ERβ was transfected into 293 cells, with or without DNA encoding CHIP. These cells were cultured in the presence of the indicated concentration (conc.) of estrogen (from 10−11 M to 10−7 M). Levels of ERβ protein were examined by use of Western blots probed with anti-FLAG-M2 antibody.

The serum estrogen concentration varies from 1.5 × 10−10 M to 1.8 × 10−9 M during the menstrual cycle. Therefore, we investigated the dose response of the CHIP-dependent degradation of ERβ. As shown in Fig. 9B, CHIP-dependent ERβ degradation was changed in the levels of estrogen in the blood during the menstrual cycle.

Overall, these results suggest that CHIP-mediated degradation selectively and rapidly eliminates the active form of the NR to downregulate receptor-mediated transcription after ligand withdrawal.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we have shown that ERβ is ubiquitinated and degraded in an estrogen-dependent manner. We identified two regions within ERβ that are essential for the regulation of ERβ ubiquitination and degradation. The N-terminal 37-amino-acid region, the DRD, is necessary for the polyubiquitination of ERβ. Thus, ERβ seems to be constitutively exposed to attack by ubiquitin ligases because it contains the DRD. The C-terminal F domain abrogates DRD-dependent ERβ degradation, and the ubiquitination status of ERβ(ΔF) was similar to that of full-length ERβ. In addition, coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the F domain inhibits the binding of unliganded ERβ to the regulatory subunit of 26S proteasome. Thus, the F domain may regulate not ubiquitination itself but the step involving proteasomal degradation. When estrogen binds to ERβ, the conformation of the C-terminal region, including the F domain, is changed, and the protective effect of the F domain is abolished to induce degradation. Some members of the NR superfamily have an F domain, but its function is unknown. Our observations provide the first evidence that the F domain of ERβ is involved in the regulation of its proteasome-dependent degradation.

The activation of NRs appears to be coupled to their degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (3, 4, 8). Furthermore, several components of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, including SUG1/TRIP1 (17, 27, 32), RSP5/RPF1 (23), E6-AP (37), and UBC9 (42), have been identified as NR-interacting proteins. TBL1/TBLR1, which are components of the NR corepressor complex, also mediate corepressor/coactivator exchange by the ligand-dependent recruitment of the ubiquitin-19S proteasome complex (40). Thus, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway appears to play an important role in regulating NR levels and restricting the duration and magnitude of receptor activity in response to ligands. Furthermore, proteasome-dependent degradation of the steroid receptor requires transcriptional activity, suggesting that receptor degradation and receptor transactivation are mutually interdependent.

Several recent studies have focused on the involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the estrogen-dependent transactivation of ERα (14, 29, 36, 44, 48, 50). Moreover, ERα and its coactivators cycle onto and off of estrogen-responsive promoters in ligand-dependent manners (35, 44, 45). In this process, ERα is reportedly ubiquitinated after each round of transcription, facilitating its release from the promoter, which may be essential for subsequent ERα-mediated transcription. We have shown that there is a degradation pathway for ERβ that is not coupled to transcription. Using ERβ(ΔDRD), we also have shown that transcription-uncoupled receptor degradation is necessary to abolish transcription via the proteolysis of the liganded receptor when the ligand dose is reduced. ERβ(ΔDRD) still exhibited slight ligand-dependent degradation, indicating that there may be other degradation pathways for ERβ. These pathways could be coupled to the transactivation of ERβ.

To investigate the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for ERβ, we purified the ubiquitin ligase complex that specifically binds to the DRD and identified a protein complex containing CHIP. CHIP was first reported to induce the ubiquitination of GR bound to HSP90 for proteasomal degradation (7). Recent observations have indicated that CHIP targets a number of HSP70/90-associated proteins for ubiquitination and degradation (15, 18, 21, 22, 28, 34, 48, 52-54). We (48) and others (9) have previously shown that CHIP binds unliganded ERα as a protein complex containing HSP90, HSC70, HSP70, HSP40, BAG-1, and BAG-2, all of which possess or assist chaperone functions, and a DnaJ-like protein, KIAA0678. CHIP preferentially induces the hydrolysis of abnormal or mutant forms of ERα, acting as an E3 ubiquitin ligase capable of distinguishing the nonnative states from the native states of the receptor in vivo.

Our results obtained from the analysis of ERβ suggest that CHIP is involved both in the “quality control” of receptor proteins and in switching off receptor-mediated transcription (Fig. 10). The response of endocrine target tissues to hormones is tightly regulated and is dependent upon circulating levels of available hormonal ligands. When the dose of circulating ligand is reduced, receptor-mediated transcription should be downregulated. The dissociation rate of estrogen from its receptor is very low because a coactivator complex contacts the protein surface above the ligand pocket (16). Thus, it is difficult to cause rapid downregulation by ligand dissociation from its receptor. Our results provide the first evidence that receptor degradation is involved in the cessation of transcription when the ligand dose is reduced. Several nuclear receptors are reported to exhibit agonist-dependent degradation. Therefore, it is possible that other forms of receptor-mediated transcription are downregulated by the same mechanism as ERβ when the agonist dose is reduced.

FIG. 10.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 10.

Schematic representation of the degradation pathways of ERα and ERβ. ERα binds CHIP in the absence of estrogen. When the estrogen binds ERα, CHIP dissociates. ERβ binds CHIP in both the absence and the presence of estrogen. In the absence of estrogen, the degradation of ubiquitinated ERβ is inhibited by the F domain. When the estrogen binds ERβ, the conformation of the F domain is changed to recruit 26S proteasome.

ERβ is subject to proteasome-mediated degradation in the presence of estrogen, which subsequently limits transcriptional output of ERβ regardless of whether estrogen is removed or persistently available. As shown in Fig. 8C, CHIP downregulates the ERβ-mediated transactivation in the presence of estrogen. Thus, the CHIP-dependent degradation is involved both in the downregulation of ERβ activity and in switching off ERβ-mediated transcription.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 April 2006.
    • Returned for modification 12 June 2006.
    • Accepted 17 August 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Ballinger, C. A., P. Connell, Y. Wu, Z. Hu, L. J. Thompson, L. Y. Yin, and C. Patterson. 1999. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol. Cell. Biol.19:4535-4545.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Beato, M., P. Herrlich, and G. Schutz. 1995. Steroid hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot. Cell83:851-857.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Blanquart, C., O. Barbier, J. C. Fruchart, B. Staels, and C. Glineur. 2002. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) turnover by the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls the ligand-induced expression level of its target genes. J. Biol. Chem.277:37254-37259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Boudjelal, M., Z. Wang, J. J. Voorhees, and G. J. Fisher. 2000. Ubiquitin/proteasome pathway regulates levels of retinoic acid receptor gamma and retinoid X receptor alpha in human keratinocytes. Cancer Res.60:2247-2252.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Chambon, P. 1996. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J.10:940-954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Cheskis, B. J., N. J. McKenna, C. W. Wong, J. Wong, B. Komm, C. R. Lyttle, and B. W. O'Malley. 2003. Hierarchical affinities and a bipartite interaction model for estrogen receptor isoforms and full-length steroid receptor coactivator (SRC/p160) family members. J. Biol. Chem.278:13271-13277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Connell, P., C. A. Ballinger, J. Jiang, Y. Wu, L. J. Thompson, J. Hohfeld, and C. Patterson. 2001. The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nat. Cell Biol.3:93-96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Dace, A., L. Zhao, K. S. Park, T. Furuno, N. Takamura, M. Nakanishi, B. L. West, J. A. Hanover, and S. Cheng. 2000. Hormone binding induces rapid proteasome-mediated degradation of thyroid hormone receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:8985-8990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Dai, Q., S. B. Qian, H. H. Li, H. McDonough, C. Borchers, D. Huang, S. Takayama, J. M. Younger, H. Y. Ren, D. M. Cyr, and C. Patterson. 2005. Regulation of the cytoplasmic quality control protein degradation pathway by BAG2. J. Biol. Chem.280:38673-38681.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    DeMayo, F. J., B. Zhao, N. Takamoto, and S. Y. Tsai. 2002. Mechanisms of action of estrogen and progesterone. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.955:48-59, 86-88, 396-406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Dennis, A. P., R. U. Haq, and Z. Nawaz. 2001. Importance of the regulation of nuclear receptor degradation. Front. Biosci.6:D954-D959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Deroo, B. J., and K. S. Korach. 2006. Estrogen receptors and human disease. J. Clin. Investig.116:561-570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Deroo, B. J., C. Rentsch, S. Sampath, J. Young, D. B. DeFranco, and T. K. Archer. 2002. Proteasomal inhibition enhances glucocorticoid receptor transactivation and alters its subnuclear trafficking. Mol. Cell. Biol.22:4113-4123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Fan, M., A. Park, and K. P. Nephew. 2005. CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein) promotes basal and geldanamycin-induced degradation of estrogen receptor-alpha. Mol. Endocrinol.19:2901-2914.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Galigniana, M. D., J. M. Harrell, P. R. Housley, C. Patterson, S. K. Fisher, and W. B. Pratt. 2004. Retrograde transport of the glucocorticoid receptor in neurites requires dynamic assembly of complexes with the protein chaperone hsp90 and is linked to the CHIP component of the machinery for proteasomal degradation. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.123:27-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Gee, A. C., K. E. Carlson, P. G. Martini, B. S. Katzenellenbogen, and J. A. Katzenellenbogen. 1999. Coactivator peptides have a differential stabilizing effect on the binding of estrogens and antiestrogens with the estrogen receptor. Mol. Endocrinol.13:1912-1923.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Gianni, M., A. Bauer, E. Garattini, P. Chambon, and C. Rochette-Egly. 2002. Phosphorylation by p38MAPK and recruitment of SUG-1 are required for RA-induced RAR gamma degradation and transactivation. EMBO J.21:3760-3769.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. 18.↵
    He, B., S. Bai, A. T. Hnat, R. I. Kalman, J. T. Minges, C. Patterson, and E. M. Wilson. 2004. An androgen receptor NH2-terminal conserved motif interacts with the COOH terminus of the Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP). J. Biol. Chem.279:30643-30653.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Heery, D. M., E. Kalkhoven, S. Hoare, and M. G. Parker. 1997. A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature387:733-736.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Hewitt, S. C., and K. S. Korach. 2002. Estrogen receptors: structure, mechanisms and function. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord.3:193-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Hohfeld, J., D. M. Cyr, and C. Patterson. 2001. From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation. EMBO Rep.2:885-890.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Imai, Y., M. Soda, S. Hatakeyama, T. Akagi, T. Hashikawa, K. I. Nakayama, and R. Takahashi. 2002. CHIP is associated with Parkin, a gene responsible for familial Parkinson's disease, and enhances its ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol. Cell10:55-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Imhof, M. O., and D. P. McDonnell. 1996. Yeast RSP5 and its human homolog hRPF1 potentiate hormone-dependent activation of transcription by human progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors. Mol. Cell. Biol.16:2594-2605.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Ito, M., C. X. Yuan, H. J. Okano, R. B. Darnell, and R. G. Roeder. 2000. Involvement of the TRAP220 component of the TRAP/SMCC coactivator complex in embryonic development and thyroid hormone action. Mol. Cell5:683-693.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Kamei, Y., L. Xu, T. Heinzel, J. Torchia, R. Kurokawa, B. Gloss, S. C. Lin, R. A. Heyman, D. W. Rose, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1996. A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell85:403-414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Lange, C. A., T. Shen, and K. B. Horwitz. 2000. Phosphorylation of human progesterone receptors at serine-294 by mitogen-activated protein kinase signals their degradation by the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:1032-1037.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Lee, J. W., F. Ryan, J. C. Swaffield, S. A. Johnston, and D. D. Moore. 1995. Interaction of thyroid-hormone receptor with a conserved transcriptional mediator. Nature374:91-94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Li, L., H. Xin, X. Xu, M. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, S. Zhang, X. Y. Fu, and Z. Chang. 2004. CHIP mediates degradation of Smad proteins and potentially regulates Smad-induced transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.24:856-864.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Lonard, D. M., Z. Nawaz, C. L. Smith, and B. W. O'Malley. 2000. The 26S proteasome is required for estrogen receptor-alpha and coactivator turnover and for efficient estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation. Mol. Cell5:939-948.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Mader, S., V. Kumar, H. de Verneuil, and P. Chambon. 1989. Three amino acids of the oestrogen receptor are essential to its ability to distinguish an oestrogen from a glucocorticoid-responsive element. Nature338:271-274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Mangelsdorf, D. J., C. Thummel, M. Beato, P. Herrlich, G. Schutz, K. Umesono, B. Blumberg, P. Kastner, M. Mark, P. Chambon, et al. 1995. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell83:835-839.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Masuyama, H., and P. N. MacDonald. 1998. Proteasome-mediated degradation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and a putative role for SUG1 interaction with the AF-2 domain of VDR. J. Cell. Biochem.71:429-440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    McKenna, N. J., and B. W. O'Malley. 2002. Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators. Cell108:465-474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Meacham, G. C., C. Patterson, W. Zhang, J. M. Younger, and D. M. Cyr. 2001. The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation. Nat. Cell Biol.3:100-105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Metivier, R., G. Penot, M. R. Hubner, G. Reid, H. Brand, M. Kos, and F. Gannon. 2003. Estrogen receptor-alpha directs ordered, cyclical, and combinatorial recruitment of cofactors on a natural target promoter. Cell115:751-763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Nawaz, Z., D. M. Lonard, A. P. Dennis, C. L. Smith, and B. W. O'Malley. 1999. Proteasome-dependent degradation of the human estrogen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:1858-1862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Nawaz, Z., D. M. Lonard, C. L. Smith, E. Lev-Lehman, S. Y. Tsai, M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1999. The Angelman syndrome-associated protein, E6-AP, is a coactivator for the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Mol. Cell. Biol.19:1182-1189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Nawaz, Z., and B. W. O'Malley. 2004. Urban renewal in the nucleus: is protein turnover by proteasomes absolutely required for nuclear receptor-regulated transcription? Mol. Endocrinol.18:493-499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Onate, S. A., S. Y. Tsai, M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1995. Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science270:1354-1357.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Perissi, V., A. Aggarwal, C. K. Glass, D. W. Rose, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 2004. A corepressor/coactivator exchange complex required for transcriptional activation by nuclear receptors and other regulated transcription factors. Cell116:511-526.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Pettersson, K., and J. A. Gustafsson. 2001. Role of estrogen receptor beta in estrogen action. Annu. Rev. Physiol.63:165-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Poukka, H., P. Aarnisalo, U. Karvonen, J. J. Palvimo, and O. A. Janne. 1999. Ubc9 interacts with the androgen receptor and activates receptor-dependent transcription. J. Biol. Chem.274:19441-19446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Rachez, C., B. D. Lemon, Z. Suldan, V. Bromleigh, M. Gamble, A. M. Naar, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and L. P. Freedman. 1999. Ligand-dependent transcription activation by nuclear receptors requires the DRIP complex. Nature398:824-828.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Reid, G., M. R. Hubner, R. Metivier, H. Brand, S. Denger, D. Manu, J. Beaudouin, J. Ellenberg, and F. Gannon. 2003. Cyclic, proteasome-mediated turnover of unliganded and liganded ERalpha on responsive promoters is an integral feature of estrogen signaling. Mol. Cell11:695-707.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Shang, Y., X. Hu, J. DiRenzo, M. A. Lazar, and M. Brown. 2000. Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor-regulated transcription. Cell103:843-852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Shiau, A. K., D. Barstad, P. M. Loria, L. Cheng, P. J. Kushner, D. A. Agard, and G. L. Greene. 1998. The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell95:927-937.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    Tanaka, T., M. L. Rodriguez de la Concepcion, and L. M. De Luca. 2001. Involvement of all-trans-retinoic acid in the breakdown of retinoic acid receptors alpha and gamma through proteasomes in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol.61:1347-1355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Tateishi, Y., Y. Kawabe, T. Chiba, S. Murata, K. Ichikawa, A. Murayama, K. Tanaka, T. Baba, S. Kato, and J. Yanagisawa. 2004. Ligand-dependent switching of ubiquitin-proteasome pathways for estrogen receptor. EMBO J.23:4813-4823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Tontonoz, P., and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 2003. Liver X receptor signaling pathways in cardiovascular disease. Mol. Endocrinol.17:985-993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    Valley, C. C., R. Metivier, N. M. Solodin, A. M. Fowler, M. T. Mashek, L. Hill, and E. T. Alarid. 2005. Differential regulation of estrogen-inducible proteolysis and transcription by the estrogen receptor alpha N terminus. Mol. Cell. Biol.25:5417-5428.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Wallace, A. D., and J. A. Cidlowski. 2001. Proteasome-mediated glucocorticoid receptor degradation restricts transcriptional signaling by glucocorticoids. J. Biol. Chem.276:42714-42721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    Wang, X., and D. B. DeFranco. 2005. Alternative effects of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway on glucocorticoid receptor down-regulation and transactivation are mediated by CHIP, an E3 ligase. Mol. Endocrinol.19:1474-1482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.
    Wickner, S., M. R. Maurizi, and S. Gottesman. 1999. Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins. Science286:1888-1893.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Xin, H., X. Xu, L. Li, H. Ning, Y. Rong, Y. Shang, Y. Wang, X. Y. Fu, and Z. Chang. 2005. CHIP controls the sensitivity of transforming growth factor-beta signaling by modulating the basal level of Smad3 through ubiquitin-mediated degradation. J. Biol. Chem.280:20842-20850.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    Yanagisawa, J., H. Kitagawa, M. Yanagida, O. Wada, S. Ogawa, M. Nakagomi, H. Oishi, Y. Yamamoto, H. Nagasawa, S. B. McMahon, M. D. Cole, L. Tora, N. Takahashi, and S. Kato. 2002. Nuclear receptor function requires a TFTC-type histone acetyl transferase complex. Mol. Cell9:553-562.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    Yanagisawa, J., Y. Yanagi, Y. Masuhiro, M. Suzawa, M. Watanabe, K. Kashiwagi, T. Toriyabe, M. Kawabata, K. Miyazono, and S. Kato. 1999. Convergence of transforming growth factor-beta and vitamin D signaling pathways on SMAD transcriptional coactivators. Science283:1317-1321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    Zhu, J., M. Gianni, E. Kopf, N. Honore, M. Chelbi-Alix, M. Koken, F. Quignon, C. Rochette-Egly, and H. de The. 1999. Retinoic acid induces proteasome-dependent degradation of retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARalpha) and oncogenic RARalpha fusion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:14807-14812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Turning Off Estrogen Receptor β-Mediated Transcription Requires Estrogen-Dependent Receptor Proteolysis
Yukiyo Tateishi, Raku Sonoo, Yu-ichi Sekiya, Nanae Sunahara, Miwako Kawano, Mitsutoshi Wayama, Ryuichi Hirota, Yoh-ichi Kawabe, Akiko Murayama, Shigeaki Kato, Keiji Kimura, Junn Yanagisawa
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 2006, 26 (21) 7966-7976; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00713-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Turning Off Estrogen Receptor β-Mediated Transcription Requires Estrogen-Dependent Receptor Proteolysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Turning Off Estrogen Receptor β-Mediated Transcription Requires Estrogen-Dependent Receptor Proteolysis
Yukiyo Tateishi, Raku Sonoo, Yu-ichi Sekiya, Nanae Sunahara, Miwako Kawano, Mitsutoshi Wayama, Ryuichi Hirota, Yoh-ichi Kawabe, Akiko Murayama, Shigeaki Kato, Keiji Kimura, Junn Yanagisawa
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 2006, 26 (21) 7966-7976; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00713-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Estrogen Receptor beta
Estrogens
Gene Expression Regulation
Transcription, Genetic

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549