Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

CAND1-Mediated Substrate Adaptor Recycling Is Required for Efficient Repression of Nrf2 by Keap1

Shih-Ching Lo, Mark Hannink
Shih-Ching Lo
Department of Biochemistry, Life Science Center, University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65212
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Hannink
Department of Biochemistry, Life Science Center, University of Missouri—Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65212
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hanninkm@missouri.edu
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1235-1244.2006
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    (A) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were transfected with 0.5 μg each of expression vectors for HA-Cul3 and Flag-CAND1 as indicated. Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag (α-Flag) and α-HA antibodies (bottom two panels). α-Flag immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis using α-HA antibodies (top panel). α-HA IP were subjected to immunoblot analysis using α-Flag antibodies (second panel from the top). (B) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were transfected with 0.33 μg each of expression vectors for Keap1-CBD and HA-Cul3 as indicated. The Flag-CAND1 expression vector was either omitted (lanes 1 to 3) or included (lane 4). Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-CBD, α-Flag, and α-HA antibodies (bottom three panels). The lysates were incubated with chitin beads, pelleted by centrifugation (3,000 × g), and washed three times in lysis buffer. Proteins that remained associated with the chitin beads were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel). (C) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Cul3 (lanes 1 to 5) and GAN-CBD (lanes 2 and 3) or sarcosin-CBD (lanes 4 and 5). The Flag-CAND1 expression vector was either omitted (lanes 1, 2, and 4) or included (lanes 3 and 5). Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (bottom three panels) or incubated with chitin beads. Proteins that remained associated with the chitin beads after extensive washing were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    (A) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Ub (0.4 μg), Gal4-Neh2 (0.4 μg, lanes 2 to 7), Keap1 (0.1 μg, lanes 3 to 7), Cul3 (0.1 μg, lanes 3 to 7), and CAND1 (from 0.0125 to 0.1 μg, lanes 4 to 7). The transfected cells were treated with MG132 for 5 h prior to cell lysis. Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Gal4 (α-Gal4) antibodies (bottom panel). α-Gal4 immunoprecipitates (IP) were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel). IgG, immunoglobulin G. (B) Twenty-four-well plates of MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Nrf2 (0.18 μg), Keap1 (0.018 μg, lanes 2 to 5), Cul3 (0.07 μg, lanes 2 to 5), and CAND1 (from 0.035 to 0.14 μg, lanes 3 to 5). Total cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with α-HA (top panel) and α-tubulin (bottom panel) antibodies. (C) Twenty-four-well plates of HeLa cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Nrf2 (0.18 μg), Keap1 (0.018 μg, lanes 2 to 4), and Flag-CAND1 (0.035 to 0.14 μg, lanes 3 and 4). Total cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with α-HA, α-Keap1, α-Flag, and α-tubulin antibodies as indicated.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    (A) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of HeLa cells were transfected with control (lane 4) or anti-CAND1 (α-CAND1) (lane 3) siRNA nucleotides (300 nM), allowed to recover for 24 h, and transfected with 0.5 μg each of expression vectors for HA-Cul3 and Keap1-CBD (lanes 2 to 4). Cell lysates were collected after an additional 24 h and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies (bottom four panels) or incubated with chitin beads. Proteins that remained bound to the chitin beads after extensive washing were analyzed with the indicated antibodies (top two panels). (B) HeLa cells were transfected with control (lane 4) or α-CAND1 (lane 3) siRNA nucleotides (100 nM), allowed to recover for 24 h, and transfected with expression vectors for HA-Ub, Keap1, and Cul3 as indicated. Cell lysates were collected after an additional 24 h and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies (bottom three panels). α-Keap1 immunoprecipitates (IP) were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel). IgG, immunoglobulin G. (C) Twenty-four-well plates of HeLa cells were transfected with α-Nrf2 (lane 3), α-Keap1 (lane 4), or α-CAND1 (lane 5) siRNA nucleotides (50 nM), allowed to recover for 24 h, and then transfected with 0.2 μg each of expression vectors for HA-Nrf2 and Keap1 (lanes 2 to 5). Total cell lysates were collected and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies. (D) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of HeLa cells were first mock transfected (lanes 1 and 3) or transfected with α-CAND1 siRNA nucleotides (300 nM), allowed to recover for 24 h, and then transfected with 0.5 μg each of expression vectors for HA-Nrf2 and Keap1-CBD. The transfected cells were either untreated (lanes 1 and 2) or treated with MG132 for 5 h prior to cell lysis. The lysates were incubated with chitin beads, and levels of HA-Nrf2 proteins that remained bound to the chitin beads were determined by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel). Total lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (bottom three panels).

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    (A) Twenty-four-well plates of HeLa cells were transfected with 100 nM of control siRNA (lane 4) or siRNA nucleotides targeting Keap1 (lane 1) or CAND1 at different regions in CAND1 mRNA (lanes 2 and 3). Levels of endogenous Nrf2 were determined by immunoblot analysis with anti-Nrf2 (α-Nrf2) antibodies (top panel). Levels of CAND1 and tubulin were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (bottom two panels). (B) Twenty-four-well plates of HeLa cells were transfected with α-Nrf2, α-Keap1, or α-CAND1 siRNA nucleotides (300 nM) as indicated and with an ARE-dependent firefly luciferase reporter gene construct (100 ng). A plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase (10 ng) was included as a control for transfection efficiency. The data shown represent the means and standard deviations of results from three independent experiments.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    (A) Sixty-millimeter-diameter dishes of ts41 cells or wild-type CHO cells were cotransfected with 1.0 μg each of expression vectors for HA-Cul3 and Flag-CAND1 as indicated. The transfected cells were either kept at 34°C (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) or shifted to 40°C (lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8) for 24 h. Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag (α-Flag) and α-HA antibodies (bottom two panels). α-HA immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis using α-Flag and α-HA antibodies (top two panels). (B) Sixty-millimeter-diameter dishes of ts41 cells or wild-type CHO cells were cotransfected with expression vectors for HA-Ub (0.7 μg), Gal4-Neh2 (0.8 μg), Keap1 (0.2 μg), and Cul3 (0.3 μg) as indicated. The transfected cells were either kept at 34°C (lanes 1 to 4 and 9 to 12) or shifted to 40°C (lanes 5 to 8 and 13 to 16) for 24 h, and all were treated with MG132 for 2.5 h prior to cell lysis. Total cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-Gal4 and α-tubulin antibodies (bottom two panels). α-Gal4 IP were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies (top panel). IgG, immunoglobulin G.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    (A) Sequence alignment of neddylation sites among five members of the cullin superfamily is shown. The conserved Lys residue for Nedd8 conjugation in the cullin proteins is indicated above the alignment by an arrow (39). Conserved residues in this region are indicated below the alignment by asterisks. Residues in this region of Cul1 that make direct contacts with CAND1 are indicated above the alignment by carets (17). The conserved residues that were substituted with alanine or arginine in the Cul3 mutant proteins utilized in this report are illustrated. Hs., Homo sapiens. (B) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were cotransfected with 0.5 μg each of expression vectors for Flag-CAND1 and the mutant or wild-type (WT) HA-Cul3 proteins as indicated. Cell lysates were collected in the presence of 10 mM NEM and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag (α-Flag) and α-HA antibodies (bottom two panels). α-HA immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblot analysis using α-Flag antibodies (top panel). (C) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Ub (0.4 μg), Gal4-Neh2 (0.4 μg, lanes 2 to 11), Keap1 (0.1 μg, lanes 3 to 11), and the WT or mutant Cul3 proteins (0.1 μg, lanes 4 to 11). The transfected cells were treated with MG132 for 2.5 h prior to cell lysis. α-Gal4 IP from cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with α-HA antibodies. IgG, immunoglobulin G. (D) Twenty-four-well plates of MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA-Nrf2 (0.18 μg), myc-Rbx1 (0.11 μg, lanes 2 to 10), Keap1 (0.018 μg, lanes 2 to 10), and the WT or mutant Cul3 proteins (0.11 μg, lanes 3 to 10). Total cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with α-HA (top and middle panels) and α-tubulin (bottom panel) antibodies.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    (A) Thirty-five-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were cotransfected with expression vectors for Keap1-CBD (0.3 μg, lanes 1, 3, and 4), myc-Rbx1 (0.1 μg, lanes 2 to 4), and the wild-type (WT) or mutant HA-Cul3 proteins (0.3 μg, lanes 2 to 4) as indicated. Cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (bottom three panels) or incubated with chitin beads. Proteins that remained bound to the chitin beads after extensive washing were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (top two panels). (B) Sixty-millimeter-diameter dishes of COS1 cells were transfected with 0.5 μg each of the expression vectors for HA-Nrf2, Keap1-CBD, myc-Rbx1, and the WT or mutant HA-Cul3 proteins, as indicated in lanes 1 to 4. The transfected cells were treated with MG132 for 5 h prior to cell lysis. Lysates from three 60-mm-diameter dishes were pooled for each sample. One percent of the cell lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (bottom four panels), and the rest of the lysates were incubated with chitin beads. After washing, the chitin beads were incubated with E1, E2-UbcH5a, ubiquitin, and ATP. The E1 enzyme was omitted from one sample (lane 1). Subsequently, the chitin beads were pelleted and washed, and proteins that were eluted from the beads after boiling under denaturing conditions were immunoprecipitated with anti-Nrf2 (α-Nrf2) antibodies and then analyzed by immunoblotting with antiubiquitin antibodies (top panel). IP, immunoprecipitate; IgG, immunoglobulin G.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CAND1-Mediated Substrate Adaptor Recycling Is Required for Efficient Repression of Nrf2 by Keap1
Shih-Ching Lo, Mark Hannink
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jan 2006, 26 (4) 1235-1244; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1235-1244.2006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CAND1-Mediated Substrate Adaptor Recycling Is Required for Efficient Repression of Nrf2 by Keap1
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CAND1-Mediated Substrate Adaptor Recycling Is Required for Efficient Repression of Nrf2 by Keap1
Shih-Ching Lo, Mark Hannink
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jan 2006, 26 (4) 1235-1244; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.26.4.1235-1244.2006
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing
NF-E2-Related Factor 2
transcription factors

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549