Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Mitotic Cdc6 Stabilizes Anaphase-Promoting Complex Substrates by a Partially Cdc28-Independent Mechanism, and This Stabilization Is Suppressed by Deletion of Cdc55

Susanna Boronat, Judith L. Campbell
Susanna Boronat
Braun Laboratories 147-75, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith L. Campbell
Braun Laboratories 147-75, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jcampbel@cco.caltech.edu
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01745-05
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Steady-state levels of Cdc6p through the cell cycle. (A) Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 and another copy of myc-tagged CDC6 expressed under its own promoter (YSB75) and containing a chromosomal copy of Pds1-HA (YSB441) or Clb2-HA (YSB407) were grown in synthetic medium and arrested with α-factor. Cells were released in rich medium, and samples were taken at 20 min after release and, from then on, every 5 min to be processed for immunoblotting. α-Factor was readded 60 min after release to prevent entry into a new cell cycle. For a comparison of levels of Cdc6 expressed from its own promoter with those reached by GAL overexpression, we measured the levels of Cdc6 F in cells arrested with α-factor in YPRaf medium, treated with galactose for 15 min, and released in YPRaf-Gal. Note that four times less protein was loaded in gels from cells expressing GAL-myc-Cdc6 F than in endogenous myc-Cdc6. (B) Advancement of Pds1 and Clb2 degradation by reduction in Cdc6 levels. Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 and another copy of myc-tagged CDC6 expressed under its own promoter (YSB75) or an empty vector (YSB431) and containing a chromosomal copy of Pds1-HA (YSB441 and YSB442), Clb2-HA (YSB407 and YSB408), or Clb5-HA (YSB410 and YSB411) were grown in synthetic medium without methionine and arrested with α-factor. Cells were released in synthetic medium without methionine, and 30 min after release, methionine was added. At the indicated times, samples were taken to be processed for immunoblotting and flow cytometry. α-Factor was readded 70 min after release to prevent reentry into another cell cycle. Notice that for panel A, cells were released in rich yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium and, in panel B, they were released in synthetic medium. Therefore the peak of accumulation of Cdc6p is slightly delayed in panel B.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    (A) Schematic diagram of Cdc6 protein. Vertical lines represent CDK sites A to F, and the amino acid numbers at the top of the diagram are given for consensus threonines and serines. (B). Cell cycle delay of cells expressing myc-tagged wild-type and mutant Cdc6p. Cells growing logarithmically in YPRaf medium were transferred to 2% galactose-containing medium, and samples were taken for flow cytometry analysis at the indicated times. The strains used were YSB57, empty vector; YSB58, GAL-CDC6; YSB117, GAL-CDC6 A-C; YSB116, GAL-Cdc6 F; YSB60, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB61, GAL-CDC6 A-F; YSB62, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48; and YSB196, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48+F. (C) The degradation of cell cycle-regulated Pds1p and Clb2p is delayed in strains overexpressing Cdc6p. W303 strains expressing either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector and expressing either HA-tagged Pds1p (upper panels) or HA-tagged Clb2p (lower panels) were grown in YPRaf to early log phase and arrested with α-factor. After arrest, Cdc6p expression was induced by the addition of galactose. Fifteen minutes later, cells were washed and released from the arrest into YPRaf-Gal. Samples were taken at the time of release and every 10 min thereafter during a 130-min time course to be processed for immunoblotting to detect Pds1-HA and Clb2-HA. The Pds1-HA strains were YSB169, empty vector; YSB170, GAL-CDC6; YSB171, GAL-Cdc6 F; YSB306, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB307, GAL-CDC6 A-F; and YSB308, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48. The Clb2-HA strains were YSB271, empty vector; YSB272, GAL-CDC6; YSB273, GAL-Cdc6 F; YSB274, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB275, GAL-CDC6 A-F; and YSB304, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48. wt, wild type. (D) Benomyl hypersensitivity of Cdc6 phosphorylation site mutants. W303 strains expressing either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector, described in the legend for panel B, were grown in glucose-containing selective medium to stationary phase, serially diluted 10-fold, spotted in raffinose (as a control) and raffinose plus galactose plates containing 5 μg/ml benomyl, and incubated at room temperature for 1 week. −, absence of; +, presence of.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    (A) Lethality of Cdc6 phosphorylation site mutants in a mih1Δ background. W303 or isogenic mih1Δ (W303 mih1Δ) strains expressing either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector were grown in glucose-containing selective medium to stationary phase, serially diluted 10-fold, spotted in either raffinose (as a control) or raffinose plus galactose selective plates, and incubated at 30°C for 2 days. The mih1Δ strains were YSB198, empty vector; YSB199, GAL-CDC6; YSB157, GAL-CDC6 E+F; YSB201, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB202, GAL-CDC6 A-F; and YSB203, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48. (B) Interaction between Cdc6p and Cdc28p. Strains (YSB161, empty vector; YSB162, GAL-CDC6; YSB163, GAL-Cdc6 F; YSB164, GAL-CDC6 A-C; YSB166, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; and YSB167, GAL-CDC6 A-F) containing HA-tagged Cdc28p under the control of its natural promoter and expressing either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector were grown in YPR to mid-log phase, and galactose was added to induce the expression of Cdc6p. After 2 h, total yeast extracts were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP). The top panel corresponds to HA immunoprecipitates blotted with the 9E10 anti-myc antibody. The bottom panel corresponds to myc immunoprecipitates blotted with the 12CA5 anti-HA antibody. (C) Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 and another copy of myc-tagged wild-type CDC6 (YSB75) or CDC6 A-C (YSB133) expressed under its own promoter and containing a chromosomal copy of Pds1-HA or Clb2-HA were grown in synthetic medium without methionine and arrested with α-factor (the Pds1-HA strains were YSB441 and YSB478, and the Clb2-HA strains were YSB407 and YSB472). The cells were further treated as described in the legend for Fig. 1B. (D) Effect of wild-type and mutant Cdc6p overexpression on Cdc28 kinase activity. W303 strains (YSB359, empty vector; YSB360, GAL-CDC6; YSB361, GAL-CDC6 F; and YSB364, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F) containing HA-tagged p86/91 and expressing the indicated forms of myc-tagged Cdc6p under the GAL1,10 promoter were grown to early log phase in YPRaf and arrested with nocodazole (Noc). After nocodazole arrest, galactose was added for 2.5 h and samples were taken to be processed for Western blotting to detect p86/91. wt, wild type.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Suppression of mitotic delay. (A) W303 and W303 cdc55Δ cells expressing the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter and growing logarithmically in either YPRaf or YPSuc were transferred to 2% galactose-containing medium, and samples were taken for flow cytometry analysis at the indicated times. Flow cytometry profiles of normally cycling cultures (asynchronous; no galactose added) were also obtained. The cdc55Δ strains were YSB335, empty vector; YSB336, GAL-CDC6; YSB337, GAL-CDC6 F; and YSB340, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F. (B) cdc16-264 and cdc16-264 cdc55Δ strains expressing either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector were grown in glucose-containing selective medium to stationary phase, serially diluted 10-fold, spotted in either glucose (as a control) or raffinose plus galactose selective plates, and incubated at 30°C for 2 days. The cdc16-264 strains were YSB172, empty vector; YSB173, GAL-CDC6; YSB176, GAL-CDC6 E+F; YSB177, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB178 GAL-CDC6 A-F; and YSB323 GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48. The cdc16-264 cdc55Δ strains were YSB416, empty vector; YSB417, GAL-CDC6; YSB418, GAL-CDC6 E+F; YSB419, GAL-CDC6 A-C+F; YSB420, GAL-CDC6 A-F; and YSB421, GAL-CDC6 ΔN8-48. (C) Wild-type (YSB169), cdc55Δ (strains described in the legend for panel A), and swe1Δ strains (YSB248) expressing the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6 proteins from the GAL1,10 promoter and expressing HA-tagged Pds1p were grown to early log phase in YPSuc (cdc55Δ) or YPRaf (swe1Δ) and arrested with α-factor. After arrest, Cdc6p expression was induced by the addition of galactose. Fifteen minutes later, cells were washed and released from the arrest into YPSuc-Gal or YPRaf-Gal. Samples were taken at the time of release and every 10 min thereafter during a 130-min time course to be processed for immunoblotting.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    (A) Interaction between Cdc6p and Cdc55p. W303 strains expressing HA-tagged Cdc55p (YSB399) and either the indicated myc-tagged mutant Cdc6p from the GAL1,10 promoter or an empty vector were grown to mid-log phase in YPRaf, galactose was added to induce the expression of Cdc6p for 3 h, and total extracts were prepared. The top and middle panels represent a fraction (1/500) of the total input material in the immunoprecipitation (IP) blotted with the anti-myc-Cdc6 (9E10) and anti-Cdc55-HA (12CA5) antibodies, respectively. The bottom panel represents one-third of the Cdc6-myc immunoprecipitates blotted with the anti-HA antibody 12CA5. The Cdc55-HA strains used were YSB289, empty vector; YSB290, GAL-CDC6; and YSB291, GAL-CDC6 F. wt, wild type. (B) Cell cycle-specific interaction between Cdc6, Cdc55, and Tpd3. Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 and another copy of myc-tagged CDC6 expressed under its own promoter and containing a chromosomal copy of Cdc55-HA (YSB393) was grown in synthetic medium and arrested with α-factor and released in rich medium. Samples were taken, and total cell extracts were prepared from arrested cells and from cells at the indicated times after release. Cdc6-myc immunoprecipitates prepared with the 9E10 antibody were blotted and probed with 9E10, 12CA5, and α-Tpd3 for Cdc6-myc, Cdc55-HA, and Tpd3, respectively. (C and D) Cdc55-PP2A activity during the cell cycle in wild-type cells (C) or in cells depleted of Cdc6 in mitosis (D). Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 and another copy of myc-tagged CDC6 expressed under its own promoter (YSB393) or an empty vector (YSB534) and containing a chromosomal copy of Cdc55-HA were grown in synthetic medium without methionine and arrested with α-factor. They were further treated as described in the legend for Fig. 1B. Extracts, immunoprecipitations, and phosphatase assays were carried out at the indicated time points. Histograms represent the mean values and standard errors of three experiments. Immunoprecipitated HA-Cdc55 from both yeast strains that was used to normalize the phosphatase levels is shown below the graphs. −, absence of; +, presence of.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    (A) Structure/function analysis of the effect of various Cd6p deletion mutations on the extent of interaction with Cdc55p. W303 strains expressing HA-tagged Cdc55p (YSB399) and carrying either an empty vector or vectors expressing the indicated myc-tagged Cdc6p C-terminal deletion mutant from the GAL1,10 promoter were grown to mid-log phase in YPRaf, galactose was added to induce the expression of Cdc6p for 3 h, and total extracts were prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation. The top panel corresponds to myc immunoprecipitates blotted with the 9E10 anti-myc antibody. The bottom panel corresponds to myc immunoprecipitates blotted with the 12CA5 anti-HA antibody. The Cdc55-HA strains were YSB289, empty vector; YSB290, GAL-CDC6; YSB423, GAL-CDC6 Δ401-513; YSB424, GAL-CDC6 Δ428-513; YSB425, GAL-CDC6 Δ494-513; YSB427, GAL-CDC6 Δ401-513 A-C; YSB428, GAL-CDC6 Δ428-513 A-C; and YSB429, GAL-CDC6 Δ494-513 A-C. (B) Pds1-HA degradation kinetics in cells expressing endogenous levels of either wild-type (wt) Cdc6p or different Cdc6 deletion mutants, each of which is indicated to the left of each blot. As a control of nonfunctional Cdc6p, the effect of the expression of Cdc6 K114E is also included. Yeast cells with a copy of MET-CDC6 (K4055) and a plasmid-borne copy of the indicated myc-tagged CDC6 mutant expressed under the control of its own promoter or an empty vector and also containing a chromosomal copy of Pds1-HA were subjected to the same experimental conditions as those described in the legend for Fig. 1B. The strains used were YSB441, CDC6; YSB442, empty vector; YSB488, CDC6 Δ401-513; YSB490, Δ494-513; YSB482, Δ401-513 A-C; YSB483 Δ494-513 A-C; and YSB479, CDC6 K114E.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mitotic Cdc6 Stabilizes Anaphase-Promoting Complex Substrates by a Partially Cdc28-Independent Mechanism, and This Stabilization Is Suppressed by Deletion of Cdc55
Susanna Boronat, Judith L. Campbell
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jan 2007, 27 (3) 1158-1171; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01745-05

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mitotic Cdc6 Stabilizes Anaphase-Promoting Complex Substrates by a Partially Cdc28-Independent Mechanism, and This Stabilization Is Suppressed by Deletion of Cdc55
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mitotic Cdc6 Stabilizes Anaphase-Promoting Complex Substrates by a Partially Cdc28-Independent Mechanism, and This Stabilization Is Suppressed by Deletion of Cdc55
Susanna Boronat, Judith L. Campbell
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jan 2007, 27 (3) 1158-1171; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01745-05
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CDC28 Protein Kinase, S cerevisiae
Cell Cycle Proteins
mitosis
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
Sequence Deletion
Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549