Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Crucial Role of Bysl in Mammalian Preimplantation Development as an Integral Factor for 40S Ribosome Biogenesis

Kenjiro Adachi, Chie Soeta-Saneyoshi, Hiroshi Sagara, Yoichiro Iwakura
Kenjiro Adachi
1Center for Experimental Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chie Soeta-Saneyoshi
1Center for Experimental Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Sagara
2Fine Morphology Laboratory, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoichiro Iwakura
1Center for Experimental Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: iwakura@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01908-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Bysl is crucial for the development of preimplantation embryos. (A) Bysl expression in various mouse tissues was analyzed by RT-PCR. Oct3/4 is a marker for pluripotent and germ line cells. (B) Bysl expression during the preimplantation period. Oct3/4 expression was restricted to pluripotent stem cells, while Cdx2 and EndoA were specifically expressed in the trophoblast lineage. TS, trophoblast stem; EB, embryoid body 10 days after plating; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast. (C) Three distinct siRNAs against Bysl inhibited blastocyst formation. Fertilized eggs were microinjected with 20 μM siRNA solution at E0.5, and blastocyst formation was evaluated four days after injection (E0.5+4.0). Each value represents the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Total numbers of embryos injected with siEGFP-441, siBysl-773, siBysl-845, and siBysl-976 were 40, 46, 54, and 51, respectively. Significance levels were determined by Student's t test (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). (D) The severity of the phenotype was correlated with the effective downregulation of Bysl mRNA. Bysl expression was analyzed by RT-PCR at E0.5+3.25. (E) Developmental arrest caused by Bysl siRNAs was overcome by coinjecting Bysl mRNA in a dose-dependent manner. Embryos were injected with a mixture containing 5 μM each of siBysl-845 and siBysl-976 and various concentrations of in vitro synthesized Bysl-Venus mRNA used in the experiment whose results are described in Fig. 4B. The embryos were photographed at E0.5+4.0. Scale bar, 100 μm.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    The development of embryos injected with Bysl siRNAs was arrested at the 16-cell stage, resulting in a defect in differentiation toward trophectoderm. (A) Morphological alterations in siRNA-injected embryos were examined during blastocyst formation. Embryos were injected with 20 μM siEGFP-441, siOct3/4-670, or siBysl mixture containing 10 μM each of siBysl-845 and siBysl-976. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Cell numbers were determined periodically. Embryos were exposed to 10 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 and squashed under a coverslip, and the numbers of fluorescent nuclei were counted. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. (C) The proliferative activity was assayed by BrdU incorporation. Untreated, without treatment with BrdU. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Marker gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR at E0.5+3.25. (E) Confocal immunofluorescence imaging of cytokeratin EndoA with TROMA-1 antibody. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (H33342). Fourfold-magnified views of the boxed areas are shown in the smaller, lower panels. Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Immunofluorescent localization of Oct3/4 and Cdx2. Overlapping expression of Oct3/4 and Cdx2 in the nuclei appears white in the merged images. Scale bar, 50 μm. DIC, differential interference contrast.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Episomal expression of Bysl shRNAs inhibited proliferation of embryonic stem cells. (A) MGZ5 ES cells were transfected with 2 μg/ml of the pPPU6 episomal shRNA expression vector. One day following transfection, the cells were selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin. Seven days after transfection, undifferentiated ES cell colonies were visualized by staining for AP activity. Scale bar, 10 mm. (B) Morphological alterations in ES cells cotransfected with 1 μg/ml pHPCAG-Venus and 2 μg/ml pPPU6-shRNA. The cells were selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin and 100 μg/ml hygromycin B, and then photographed under epifluorescence at three days posttransfection. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Marker gene expression was analyzed by RT-PCR at 48 h posttransfection. Cdx2, Hnf4α, and brachyury are markers for trophoblast, endoderm, and mesoderm differentiation, respectively. ZHBTc4 ES cells (43) cultured in the presence of 1 μg/ml tetracycline for 24 h, MGZ5 ES cells cultured in the absence of LIF for six days, and embryoid bodies five days after plating were used as positive controls (P.C.) for Cdx2, Hnf4α, and brachyury, respectively.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Bysl localized to the nucleus and was concentrated in the nucleolus. (A) A Bysl-Venus fusion protein was expressed in COS-7 cells. The cells were fixed at one day posttransfection, immunostained for the nucleolar marker fibrillarin, and observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Venus alone diffusely distributed throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus (upper panels). H33342, Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Bysl-Venus mRNA transcribed in vitro was injected into fertilized eggs and photographed under epifluorescence one day later (upper panels), or injected into both blastomeres of two-cell stage embryos and photographed one day (middle panels) or two days (lower panels) later. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) ZHBTc4 ES cells were transfected with a Bysl-Venus construct and cultured in the absence (undifferentiated; upper panels) or presence (differentiated into trophoblast lineage; lower panels) of 1 μg/ml tetracycline (Tc) for four days. Scale bar, 20 μm. DIC, differential interference contrast.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    RNAi-resistant Bysl, which localizes to the nucleolus/nucleoplasm, overcame the proliferation inhibition caused by Bysl shRNAs. (A) The predicted structures of two shRNAs against Bysl. The three G-U mismatch mutations in the sense strand are presented in lowercase letters. (B) Silent mutations (underlined) were generated within each of the shRNA target sequences in Bysl-Venus to confer RNAi resistance. (C) MGZ5 ES cells were cotransfected with shRNA (2 μg/ml) and wild-type or silently mutated (sm) Bysl-Venus (2 μg/ml) expression vectors. The cells were photographed under epifluorescence at two days posttransfection. Note that smBysl-Venus was resistant to Bysl shRNAs. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Rescue of the knockdown phenotype by expression of RNAi-resistant Bysl. MGZ5 ES cells were first transfected with 2 μg/ml pHPCAG-ByslVenus or -smByslVenus followed by selection with 100 μg/ml hygromycin B. Four days after transfection, equal numbers of cells from each sample were subsequently transfected with 4 μg/ml pPPU6-shRNA followed by selection with 100 μg/ml hygromycin B and 1 μg/ml puromycin. The cells were stained for AP activity six days after the second transfection. Scale bar, 10 mm.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Deletion mutants of Bysl, which retain nucleolar localization, exerted a dominant negative effect. (A) Schematic representation of Bysl deletion mutants fused to Venus. Deletion mutants were generated based on the sequence similarity among humans, mice, and yeast (32.5% and 54.7% amino acid identity and similarity in total). (B) Western blot analysis of the mutant proteins expressed in COS-7 cells using anti-GFP fluorescent protein antibody (SC-8334; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The deletion mutants were detected at the predicted molecular masses (MM), except the d1 mutant, which had an observed MM of 55 to 60 kDa. (C) Subcellular localizations of the mutants were determined in COS-7 cells. Note that d1 and d2 retained nucleolar localization. Scale bar, 10 μm. H33342, Hoechst 33342. (D) Functionalities of the deletion mutants were assessed by rescue of the knockdown phenotype in MGZ5 ES cells as described in the legend to Fig. 5D. (E) MGZ5 ES cells were transfected with 2 μg/ml pPPCAG constructs expressing the mutant proteins followed by selection with 1 μg/ml puromycin. The cells were stained for AP activity at six days posttransfection. Note that overexpression of d1 or d2 suppressed the proliferation of ES cells. (F) Summary of the properties of Bysl deletion mutants. The exact relationship between nucleolar localization and inhibitory effect is noted. Cy, cytoplasm; Np, nucleoplasm; No, nucleolus; NuSp, nuclear speckle-like; ND, not determined.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Bysl is required for 40S ribosome biogenesis. (A) Inhibition of rRNA processing in Bysl shRNA-treated ES cells. MGZ5 ES cells, which had been plated the previous day at a density of 6 × 104 cells/well in 12-well plates, were transfected with 2 μg/ml pPPU6-shRNA followed by selection with 1 μg/ml puromycin. At 48 h posttransfection, the cells were pulse-labeled with l-[methyl-3H]methionine for 30 min and subsequently chased in nonradioactive medium for the indicated time. The expected positions of mature rRNAs and major precursors are indicated on the right. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. (B and C) A deficit in 40S ribosomal subunits in ES cells transfected with Bysl shRNA (B) or deletion mutant (C) expression vectors. At 48 h posttransfection, cytoplasmic extracts from 1.0 × 106 (B) or 1.5 × 106 (C) cells per sample were isolated and centrifuged on 10 to 45% sucrose density gradients at 160,000 × g for 100 min (B, left panel, and C) or at 220,000 × g for 30 min (B, right panel). Absorbancy at 260 nm was continuously monitored. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. (D) Impairment of nucleologenesis and ribosome biogenesis in Bysl siRNA-injected embryos. Embryos injected with siRNAs were fixed at the 16-cell stage (E0.5+2.75) and examined by transmission electron microscopy. The control embryos contained fully differentiated, reticulated nucleoli composed of FCs surrounded by DFCs and GCs. In contrast, the Bysl siRNA-injected embryos contained immature nucleoli in which inactive electron-dense fibrillar spheres (FSs) were apparent at the core. Moreover, in spite of the comparable amounts of preribosomal particles (arrows in left panels) at the nucleolar periphery as well as in the nucleoplasm, only few clustered ribosomes (arrowheads) and rough endoplasmic reticula (arrows in right panel) were observed in the cytoplasm, compared with the control embryos. Scale bar, 1 μm.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Fig. S1 (Dose-dependent effect of Bysl siRNAs), S2 (siRNA injection at the 2-cell stage), S3 (Cell cycle analysis of Bysl shRNA-treated ES cells), S4 (Subcellular localization of Bysl-DsRed), S5 (Rescue of Bysl shRNA-treated mouse ES cells by human BYSL), and S6 (Subcellular localization of a Bysl mutant lacking a putative nucleolar localization signal)
      PDF document, 1.3 MB.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Crucial Role of Bysl in Mammalian Preimplantation Development as an Integral Factor for 40S Ribosome Biogenesis
Kenjiro Adachi, Chie Soeta-Saneyoshi, Hiroshi Sagara, Yoichiro Iwakura
Molecular and Cellular Biology Feb 2007, 27 (6) 2202-2214; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01908-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Crucial Role of Bysl in Mammalian Preimplantation Development as an Integral Factor for 40S Ribosome Biogenesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Crucial Role of Bysl in Mammalian Preimplantation Development as an Integral Factor for 40S Ribosome Biogenesis
Kenjiro Adachi, Chie Soeta-Saneyoshi, Hiroshi Sagara, Yoichiro Iwakura
Molecular and Cellular Biology Feb 2007, 27 (6) 2202-2214; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01908-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Blastocyst
Cell Adhesion Molecules
ribosomal proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549