Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Prep1 Deficiency Induces Protection from Diabetes and Increased Insulin Sensitivity through a p160-Mediated Mechanism

Francesco Oriente, Luis Cesar Fernandez Diaz, Claudia Miele, Salvatore Iovino, Silvia Mori, Victor Manuel Diaz, Giancarlo Troncone, Angela Cassese, Pietro Formisano, Francesco Blasi, Francesco Beguinot
Francesco Oriente
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Cesar Fernandez Diaz
3IFOM (FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology), via Adamello 16, 20134 Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Miele
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salvatore Iovino
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Mori
3IFOM (FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology), via Adamello 16, 20134 Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Manuel Diaz
4Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giancarlo Troncone
2Dipartimento di Scienze Biomorfologiche e Funzionali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Cassese
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pietro Formisano
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Blasi
3IFOM (FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology), via Adamello 16, 20134 Milan, Italy
4Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesco Beguinot
1Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare & Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: beguino@unina.it
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00117-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We have examined glucose homeostasis in mice hypomorphic for the homeotic transcription factor gene Prep1. Prep1-hypomorphic (Prep1i/i) mice exhibit an absolute reduction in circulating insulin levels but normal glucose tolerance. In addition, these mice exhibit protection from streptozotocin-induced diabetes and enhanced insulin sensitivity with improved glucose uptake and insulin-dependent glucose disposal by skeletal muscle. This muscle phenotype does not depend on reduced expression of the known Prep1 transcription partner, Pbx1. Instead, in Prep1i/i muscle, we find normal Pbx1 but reduced levels of the recently identified novel Prep1 interactor p160. Consistent with this reduction, we find a muscle-selective increase in mRNA and protein levels of PGC-1α, accompanied by enhanced expression of the GLUT4 transporter, responsible for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in muscle. Indeed, using L6 skeletal muscle cells, we induced the opposite effects by overexpressing Prep1 or p160, but not Pbx1. In vivo skeletal muscle delivery of p160 cDNA in Prep1i/i mice also reverses the molecular phenotype. Finally, we show that Prep1 controls the stability of the p160 protein. We conclude that Prep1 controls insulin sensitivity through the p160-GLUT4 pathway.

Prep1 is an homeodomain transcription factor belonging to the MEINOX subfamily of the TALE (three amino acid loop extension) proteins (32). Prep1 forms DNA-independent dimeric complexes with all isoforms of the Pbx homeodomain transcription factor, enhancing target specificity and regulatory function (4, 6, 24, 36, 39).

Prep1 is an important gene in development: its downregulation in zebrafish and its deletion in mice induces embryonic lethality (9; L. C. Fernandez-Diaz and F. Blasi, unpublished data). Hypomorphic mice expressing about 2% of Prep1 mRNA (Prep1i/i) have a leaky embryo-lethal phenotype with major anomalies in hematopoiesis, oculogenesis, and angiogenesis (15). About 25% of the homozygous Prep1i/i embryos survive, and the mice are born and live a normal-length life. However, they show defects in T-cell development (38).

In all these systems, the reduction or the absence of Prep1 is accompanied by a reduction of its Pbx partners (9, 15, 38). The reduction in the mouse appears to be cell type and isoform specific (15). Direct studies have shown that the reduction of Pbx expression is due largely to a posttranscriptional mechanism (15, 38), in particular to a decrease in the protein half-life. In fact, dimerization with Prep1 protects Pbx from proteasomal degradation (26).

Previous studies also demonstrated that the generation of Pbx-Prep heterodimers is necessary to enable nuclear localization of Prep1 and to prevent nuclear export of Pbx (5, 20). Indeed, the balance of Prep and Pbx has been shown to be functionally important both during embryogenesis and in adult life (9, 15, 26, 46).

We recently discovered that p160 Myb-binding protein (p160) (44) is a new direct Prep1-interacting protein that competes with Pbx1 for Prep1 binding (11). Thus, Prep1 functions may depend on not only its interaction with Pbx but also that with p160. The role of the Prep1-p160 interaction, however, is still unknown. Interestingly, p160 is a repressor of the regulator of glucose and energy metabolism, PPAR-gamma coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) (13).

The importance of Pbx and Hox protein interaction in glucose homeostasis, pancreatic cell proliferation, and pancreas development has been studied. Transgenic mice expressing Pbx interaction-defective Pdx1 genes were used to investigate the requirements for Pdx1-Pbx complexes in pancreatic morphogenesis, islet cell differentiation, and glucose homeostasis (12). In these studies, Pdx1-Pbx complexes were dispensable for glucose homeostasis and differentiation of stem cells into ductal, endocrine, and acinar lineages; however, they were essential for expansion of these cell populations during development. Further studies of transheterozygous Pbx1+/−Pdx1+/− mice revealed in vivo genetic interactions between Pbx1 and Pdx1 that are essential for postnatal pancreatic function (22). Indeed, these mice developed age-dependent overt diabetes mellitus, while Pbx1+/− and Pdx1+/− mice showed only reduced glucose tolerance. Mutations of Pdx1 protein cause diabetes in both mice and humans (1, 18, 27, 43), suggesting that Pbx1 perturbation may also determine susceptibility to diabetes. Whether the perturbation of other MEINOX transcription factors, like Prep1, affects the development and function of the endocrine pancreas and glucose tolerance is presently unknown.

It is not known whether Prep1 has any role in glucose and energy metabolism. Because of the ability of Prep1 to interact with both Pbx1 and p160, we have studied glucose homeostasis in Prep1i/i mice. We show that adult Prep1i/i animals exhibit enhanced sensitivity to insulin action and are protected from developing streptozotocin-induced diabetes. The increased sensitivity to insulin in these mice is due, at least in part, to a novel Pbx1-independent and p160-dependent mechanism. We demonstrate, for the first time, a role for Prep1 in glucose homeostasis mediated by the newly identified interactor p160.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials.Media, sera, antibiotics for cell culture, and the Lipofectamine reagent were from Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY). The anti-Prep1 polyclonal antibody and pBOS-Prep1 vector were described previously (3). pSG5-Pbx1, PSG5-Prep1HR1, and pRUFneo-p160 vectors were described previously (11). PGC-1α and GLUT4 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). The p160 antibody was from Zymed Laboratories (San Francisco, CA). Protein electrophoresis reagents were purchased from Bio-Rad (Richmond, VA), and Western blotting and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents were from Amersham Biosciences (Arlington Heights, IL). All other chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Generation and characterization of Prep1-hypomorphic mice. Prep1 targeted mice were generated by gene trapping by Lexikon Genetics, Inc. (The Woodlands, TX) and have been described (15, 38). In the experiments reported in this paper, heterozygous mice were backcrossed with wild-type C57BL/6 mice for four generations. All animal handling conformed to regulations of the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of H. S. Raffaele (IACUC permission number 207). Southern blot analysis of EcoRI-digested total DNA from tail biopsy specimens or yolk sacs was accomplished through a 132-bp double-stranded Prep1 cDNA probe prepared from full-length Prep-1 cDNA with the forward primer 5′-ATGATGGCGACACAGACGCTAAGTATA-3′ and the reverse primer 5′-GGGGTCTGAGACTCGATGGGAGGAGGACTC-3′. The PCR genotyping strategy employed the oligonucleotides Prep-R1 and LTR2 (sequences provided below), which amplify a 230-bp fragment in the disrupted allele, while the Prep-F1-Prep-R1 pair amplifies a 300-bp fragment of the wild-type allele. Sequences of oligonucleotides are as follows: Prep-F1, 5′-CCAAGGGCAGTAAGAGAAGCTCTGGAG-3′; Prep-R1 5′GGAGTGCCAACCATGTTAAGAAGAAGTCCC-3′; LTR2, 5′CAAAATGGCGTTACTTAAGCTAGCTTGCC-3′.

Pancreatic islet sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For morphometry, pancreases were obtained from 3-month-old control and hypomorphic littermate mice, and immunohistochemical detection of insulin and glucagon was performed in three sections (2 to 3 μm) separated by 200 μm, as described in reference 10.

Tissue samples (tibialis muscles and pancreases) were collected rapidly after mice were sacrificed by pentobarbitone overdose. Tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for subsequent Western blotting.

Mouse phenotyping.Blood glucose levels were measured with a glucometer (A. Menarini Diagnostics); insulin and glucagon were measured by radioimmunological assay (RIA) with a rat insulin standard (insulin rat RIA kit; Linco Research, St. Charles, MO) and glucagon standard (glucagon RIA kit; Linco Research).

For glucose and insulin tolerance tests, mice fasted overnight and then were injected with glucose (2 g·kg of body weight−1) intraperitoneally. Venous blood was drawn by tail clipping at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min without reclipping of the tails. For insulin tolerance, random-fed mice were injected intraperitoneally with insulin (0.75 mU·g of body weight−1) (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN). Venous blood was subsequently drawn by tail clipping at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after insulin injection to determine blood glucose levels. To assess ex vivo insulin secretion, islets were isolated from 6-month-old mice by collagenase digestion and subsequent centrifugation on a Histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich) gradient (23) A total of 20 islets were manually selected and preincubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. Islets were further incubated in Krebs-Ringer buffer (120 mmol/liter NaCl, 1.2 mmol/liter MgSO4, 5 mmol/liter KCl, 10 mmol/liter NaHCO3, 1.3 mmol/liter CaCl2, and 1.2 mmol/liter KH2PO4) for 30 min and then stimulated at 37°C with various concentrations of glucose for 1 h. Islets were subsequently collected by centrifugation, and supernatants were assayed for insulin content by RIA.

For low-dose streptozotocin treatment, mice fasted for 6 h prior to intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with streptozotocin (40 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in sterile citrate buffer or with the vehicle, citrate buffer (0.05 M sodium citrate, pH 4.5). Streptozotocin was administered for five consecutive days, and glycemia and body weight were measured during the next 4 weeks. Some mice were sacrificed during the streptozotocin treatment to evaluate the morphological alteration of the pancreas.

In vivo glucose utilization.An intravenous flash injection of 1 μCi of the nonmetabolizable glucose analog 2-[1-3H]deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and an i.p. injection of insulin (0,75 mU·g of body weight−1) were administered to random-fed mice. The specific blood 2-DG clearance was determined with 25-μl blood samples (tail vein) obtained 1, 10, 20, and 30 min after injection using the Somogyi procedure (42). Tibialis skeletal muscle tissue samples were removed 30 min after injection. The glucose utilization index was determined by measuring the accumulation of radiolabeled compounds (14). The amount of 2-DG-6 phosphate per milligram of protein was divided by the integral of the concentration ratio of 2-DG to unlabeled glucose measured. Glucose utilization is expressed as picomoles per milligram of protein per minute.

p160 gene delivery in skeletal muscle of Prep1-hypomorphic mice.We adopted an established technique (19, 40) to inject mouse tibialis muscles with 100 μg of pRUFneo-p160 naked DNA (encoding a Flag-tagged p160 cDNA), using 1-ml syringes and 27-gauge needles. After 48 h, mice were sacrificed and muscles were processed for RNA and/or protein extraction as described in the appropriate section.

Cell culture procedures and transfection.L6 skeletal muscle cells were cultured at 37°C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2% l-glutamine, 10,000 U/ml penicillin, and 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin. Transient transfection of Prep1, Prep1HR, p160, and Pbx1 plasmids or small interfering RNA oligonucleotides was performed by the Lipofectamine method according to the manufacturer's instructions. For these studies, 60 to 80% confluent cells were washed twice with Optimem (Invitrogen) and incubated for 8 h with 5 μg of plasmid construct or with 12 μg of oligonucleotides and 45 to 60 μl of Lipofectamine reagent. The medium was then replaced with DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum, and cells were further incubated for 15 h before being assayed.

2-DG uptake by the L6 cells was measured as previously reported (7). Briefly, confluent cells were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 0.25% albumin for 18 h at 37°C. The medium was aspirated, and cells were further incubated for 30 min in glucose-free HEPES buffer (5 mmol/liter KCl, 120 mmol/liter NaCl, 1.2 mmol/liter MgSO4, 10 mmol/liter NaHCO3, 1.2 mmol/liter KHPO4, and 20 mmol/liter HEPES [pH 7.8]; 2% albumin). The cells were incubated with 100 nmol/liter insulin for 30 min, supplemented during the final 10 min with 0.2 mmol/liter [14C]2-DG. Cells were then solubilized, and 2-DG uptake was quantitated by liquid scintillation counting.

Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation procedures.Tissue samples were homogenized in a Polytron (Brinkman Instruments) in 20 ml T-PER reagent per gram of tissue according to manufacture (Pierce). After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, supernatant was collected. Cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (50 mmol/liter HEPES [pH 7.5], 150 mmol/liter NaCl, 10 mmol/liter EDTA, 10 mmol/liter Na4P2O7, 2 mmol/liter Na3VO4, 100 mmol/liter NaF, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mg/ml aprotinin) for 1 h at 4°C, and lysates were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 20 min. Total or immunoprecipitated homogenates were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to 0.45-μm Immobilon-P membranes. Upon incubation with primary and secondary antibodies, immunoreactive bands were detected by ECL according to the manufacturer's instructions (30).

Real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis.Total cellular RNA was isolated from tibialis muscle and L6 cells by using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen Sciences), according to manufacturer's instructions. One microgram of tissue or cell RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). PCR products were analyzed using Sybr green mix (Invitrogen). Reactions were performed using Platinum Sybr green qPCR Super-UDG using an iCycler IQ multicolor real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). All reactions were performed in triplicate, and β-actin was used as an internal standard. Primer sequences used were as follows: GLUT4 R, 5′-AATGATGCCAATGAGAAAGG-3′; GLUT4 F, 5′-CAGAAGGTGATTGAACAGAG-3′; Prep1-R, 5′-GGAGTGCCAACCATGTTAAGAAGAAGTCCC-3′; Prep1-F, 5′-GACACCGTGTGCTTCTCGCTCAAG-3′; P160 R, 5′-AGACAAGCAATGTACCGACTACAG-3′; P160 F, 5′-GGCTCTGGTGGACATCCTCTC-3′; PGC-1α R, 5′-AGGGTCATCGTTTGTGGTCAG-3′; PGC-1α F, 5′CAGCGGTCTTAGCACTCAG-3′; Pbx1 R, 5′-TCATGATCCTGCGCTCCCGGTTCCTGGAT-3′; Pbx1 S, 5′-GATGCCCTGCGGACTGTACATCTGACTG-3′; β-actin F, 5′-GCGTGACATCAAAGAGAAG-3′; and β-actin R, 5′-ACTGTGTTGGCATAGAGG-3′.

Statistical procedures.Data were analyzed with Statview software (Abacus Concepts) by one-factor analysis of variance. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The total area under the curve for glucose response during the insulin tolerance test was calculated by the trapezoidal method (45).

RESULTS

Prep1-hypomorphic mice are protected from streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia.To address the role of Prep1 in glucose metabolism, we compared wild-type, Prep1i/+, and Prep1i/i littermate mice. We observed a gene dosage-dependent reduction in plasma insulin levels both under fasting conditions and upon glucose loading (Fig. 1A). As with insulin, circulating glucagon levels were also depressed in the Prep1-hypomorphic mice (Fig. 1B).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Insulin and glucagon levels in Prep1-hypomorphic mice. For determination of circulating insulin (A) and glucagon (B) levels, control and hypomorphic mice fasted overnight and were then injected with glucose (3 g/kg body wt) intraperitoneally. Plasma insulin concentrations were quantitated at the indicated times by radioimmunoassay. Glucagon levels were assessed in the fasting state. Data are means plus standard deviations for 12 mice/group. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

In spite of the absolute reduction in the insulin levels, i.p. glucose loading indicated preserved glucose tolerance in both the Prep1i/+and Prep1i/i mice, with no gender-related difference (Fig. 2). In addition, glucose tolerance remained normal in 12-month-old hypomorphic mice, suggesting protection of these animals from developing glucose tolerance abnormalities. To analyze this hypothesis further, we targeted β-cell function in the Prep1-hypomorphic mice with low-dosage (40 mg/kg) streptozotocin administration. As shown in Fig. 3A, this treatment reduced fasting plasma insulin levels by almost 40% in both Prep1i/+ and wild-type littermates. By day 12 of streptozotocin treatment, the wild-type mice developed overt hyperglycemia, accompanied by a 12% reduction in body weight (P < 0.05; Fig. 3B and C). In contrast, the Prep1i/+ mice showed twofold-smaller changes in plasma glucose levels with no significant weight loss. These data show that, despite their absolute hypoinsulinemia, Prep1i/+ mice are protected from streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Similar experiments could not be performed on homozygous Prep1i/i mice because of their frailness.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Glucose tolerance tests in Prep1-hypomorphic mice. Six groups (22/group) of male and female Prep1-hypomorphic and control mice were analyzed at 3 and 12 months of age. Following determinations of basal glycemias, mice were injected intraperitoneally with glucose (2 mg·kg−1), followed by further blood glucose level determinations at the indicated times as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means ± standard deviations for each group of animals. Areas under the curves showed no significant difference between groups.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Effect of streptozotocin in Prep1-hypomorphic mice. Heterozygous hypomorphic and control mice (12 mice/group) were subjected to daily i.p. administrations of either streptozotocin (40 mg/kg) or citrate buffer for five consecutive days as described in Materials and Methods. Fasting plasma insulin levels (A) and body weight (C) were assessed both before and 12 days after the end of the treatment. Blood glucose levels (B) were measured before and at the indicated times after streptozotocin administration. Data are means ± standard deviations of values obtained from each group of animals. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).

Prep1 gene hypomorphism causes enhanced insulin sensitivity in glucose disposal.TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling) assays revealed no difference in streptozotocin-induced β-cell apoptosis in hypomorphic and control mice (data not shown). We hypothesized therefore that the protection from development of hyperglycemia observed in the Prep1-hypomorphic mice could result from improved insulin sensitivity of glucose disposal. Indeed, upon i.p. insulin injection, the Prep1i/+ heterozygous and Prep1i/i homozygous mice developed more sustained and prolonged hypoglycemia than control mice (glucose area-under-the-curve difference between hypomorphic and control mice was significant at the P < 0.001 level), with a Prep1 gene dosage effect (Fig. 4A). Importantly, in vivo insulin-mediated 2-DG uptake by the skeletal muscle was almost 2.5- and 3.5-fold improved, respectively, in the Prep1i/+ and in the Prep1i/i mice (Fig. 4B). These results suggested a molecular mechanism operating in skeletal muscle and compensating for the absolute hypoinsulinemia caused by Prep1 deficiency.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Insulin action on glucose disposal in Prep1-hypomorphic mice. (A) Six-month-old Prep1-hypomorphic and control mice (23/group) were i.p. injected with insulin (0.75 mU/g body weight) followed by determinations of blood glucose levels at the indicated times. Data are means ± SD for each group of mice. (B) Prep1i/+ and control mice were subjected to intravenous flash injection of 1 μCi of 2-DG and to i.p. injection of insulin (0.75 mU/g of body weight). Tibialis muscles were removed after 30 min and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. 2-DG accumulated in muscle tissue was quantitated as described in Materials and Methods (B). Data are means plus standard deviations for 10 mice/group. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (*, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001).

Skeletal muscle from Prep1-hypomorphic mice shows altered expression of GLUT4, PGC-1α, and p160.To address the mechanisms responsible for increased insulin-mediated glucose disposal in Prep1-hypomorphic mice, we investigated the expression of several proteins playing an important role in insulin sensitivity and glucose disposal. Protein levels measured by immunoblotting of insulin receptor (IR), IR substrate 1 (IRS-1), IRS-2, Akt/PKB, PKC-ζ, ERK1/2, and Pbx1 were not significantly different in Prep1i/i, Prep1i/+, and control mice (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, however, GLUT4 expression was increased by 75 and 25%, respectively, in skeletal muscle of Prep1i/i and Prep1i/+ mice, at both the protein and the mRNA levels (Fig. 5A and B). Similar to GLUT4, the mRNA and protein expression of PGC-1α (29) was also upregulated in the muscle of Prep1-hypomorphic mice. The protein (though not the mRNA) levels of the PGC-1α repressor and Prep1-binding Pbx competitor p160 were reduced by 30 and 50%, respectively, in the Prep1i/+ and the Prep1i/i mice (Fig. 5A and B). At variance from muscle, liver expression of p160 as well as of PGC-1 exhibited no difference in Prep1-hypomorphic and in control mice, indicating tissue selectivity in Prep1 action (data not shown).

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Expression profile of skeletal muscle from Prep1-hypomorphic mice. (A) Tibialis muscles from Prep1-hypomorphic and control mice were dissected, solubilized, and subjected to Western blotting with IR, IRS1, IRS2, Akt, PKCζ, ERK-1/2, GLUT4, PGC-1α, p160, and Pbx1 antibodies. Blots were revealed by ECL and autoradiography, and bands were quantitated by laser densitometry and normalized for actin. Data are means plus standard deviations of duplicate determinations for 12 mice/group. (B) The abundance of RNAs for the indicated proteins was determined by real-time RT-PCR analysis of total RNA isolated from tibialis muscles of the hypomorphic and control mice, using beta-actin as an internal standard. Data are means plus standard deviations for four independent experiments in each of which reactions were performed in triplicate using the pooled total RNAs obtained from six mice/genotype. (C) Protein lysates (250 μg) from tibialis muscles of wild-type and Prep1-hypomorphic mice were precipitated with Prep1 antibody or with nonimmune mouse immunoglobulin G (mIgG) followed by blotting with p160 antibody, ECL, and autoradiography. The same lysates were directly blotted with antiactin antibodies for normalization. The autoradiograph shown is representative of four independent experiments.

P160 has been shown to directly interact with Prep1 in various cell lines (11). We also obtained evidence of Prep1-p160 interaction in tibialis muscle extracts of wild-type mice by immunoprecipitating with anti-Prep1 and blotting with p160 antibodies (Fig. 5C). Indeed, reduced coimmunoprecipitation was noted in the Prep1i/+ extracts, with no interaction in the Prep1i/i extracts. These findings raised the possibility that, in the skeletal muscle, Prep1 downregulation results in activation of the glucose transport machinery by decreasing p160 levels.

p160 mediates Prep1-dependent GLUT4 downregulation in L6 skeletal muscle cells.We analyzed this hypothesis further by transiently transfecting Prep1 cDNA in differentiating L6 skeletal muscle cells, leading to a ninefold overexpression of Prep1 in these cells (Fig. 6A). Consistent with the findings in muscles of hypomorphic mice, overexpression of the wild-type Prep1 cDNA determined a >70% inhibition of insulin-stimulated 2-DG uptake by these cells (Fig. 6B) and a similar decline in the expression of GLUT4 protein and mRNA (Fig. 6A and C). These effects were accompanied by a threefold decline in PGC-1α protein and mRNA levels (Fig. 6A and D) and opposite changes in the levels of p160 protein (though p160 mRNA remained unchanged) (Fig. 6A and E).

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

Effect of Prep1 overexpression in L6 skeletal muscle cells. (A) L6 myotubes were transiently transfected with the Prep1, Prep1HR1 mutant, p160, and Pbx1 cDNAs or with the empty vector (CTRL). Cells were solubilized, and lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blotting with GLUT4, PGC-1, p160, and Pbx1 antibodies. As a control, filters were reblotted with actin antibodies. Bands were revealed by ECL and autoradiography. The autoradiograph shown is representative of five independent experiments. (B) L6 myotubes transfected with the Prep1, Prep1HR1 mutant, p160, and Pbx1 cDNAs or with the empty vector (CTRL) were exposed to 100 nM insulin, and 2-DG uptake was assayed as described in Materials and Methods. Data are means plus standard deviations from four independent experiments, each in duplicate. (C, D, and E) Levels of mRNAs encoding GLUT4, PGC-1α, and p160 in cells transfected with the Prep1, Prep1HR1 mutant, p160, and Pbx1 cDNAs were quantitated by real-time RT-PCR analysis, using beta-actin as an internal standard. Data are means plus standard deviations from four independent experiments.

To test for the specificity of the Prep1 effect, we transfected the Prep1HR1 mutant, in which two leucines of the HR1 region of Prep1 are mutated to alanine, which prevents binding to both Pbx1 and p160 (11). Transfection with the Prep1HR1 mutant had no effect either on GLUT4, PGC-1α, p160, and Pbx1 protein levels (Fig. 6A) or on 2-DG uptake (Fig. 6B). However, transfection of p160 cDNA blocked GLUT4 and PGC-1α expression to an extent comparable to that caused by Prep1 (Fig. 6A) and decreased 2-DG uptake (Fig. 6B). Pbx1 levels were low in the L6 cells and did not change upon transfection with Prep1 cDNA but were further decreased by p160 (Fig. 6A). Overexpression of Pbx1, on the other hand, caused a twofold increase in PGC-1α and GLUT4 levels (Fig. 6A), a similar decrease of p160 (Fig. 6A), and an increase in 2-DG uptake (Fig. 6B).

Delivery of p160 in skeletal muscle reverts the Prep1i/i phenotype.Next, we injected 100 μg of p160 cDNA into the tibialis muscles of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous littermate mice. Consistent with the above findings, ectopic expression of p160 in tibialis muscles of Prep1i/i and Prep1i/+ mice by naked DNA delivery markedly reduced PGC-1α and GLUT4 levels, thereby rescuing the molecular phenotype (Fig. 7). The introduction of p160 cDNA into the muscles of wild-type mice also led to a reduction of PGC-1α and GLUT4. The data are therefore consistent with the view that Prep1 downregulates PGC-1α and GLUT4, and thereby the insulin-dependent glucose transport machinery, through p160 and not Pbx1.

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

p160, PGC-1α, and GLUT4 levels in Prep1-hypomorphic mice injected with pRUFneo-p160 vector. Mouse tibialis muscles were injected with 100 μg of pRUFneo-p160 vector. RNA was extracted 48 h later to measure p160 (A), PGC-1α (B), and GLUT4 (C) levels. The abundance of the indicated mRNA was determined by real-time RT-PCR analysis of total RNA isolated from tibialis muscles of the wild-type, Prep1i/+, and Prep1i/i and control mice, using beta-actin as an internal standard. Data are means plus standard deviations for three independent experiments in each of which reactions were performed in triplicate using pooled total RNAs from three mice/genotype. (D) Proteins were also extracted as described in Materials and Methods and analyzed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies.

Prep1 regulates proteasomal degradation of p160.Prep1 controls the half-life of Pbx at the protein stability level (15, 26). To test whether Prep1 can likewise regulate the stability of p160, we exposed L6 myotubes to the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide and found that this treatment reduced p160 cellular levels in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 8A). Interestingly, the degradation of p160 in the presence of cycloheximide was abolished in the Prep1-overexpressing cells, implying that, at least in part, upregulation of p160 by Prep1 (Fig. 6) involves posttranslational mechanisms. To better define these events, we also incubated L6 cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132. As shown in Fig. 8B, exposure to this agent for 6 h increased p160 intracellular levels by 10-fold. In the Prep1 overexpressing cells, the proteasome inhibitor induced a further 2.5-fold accumulation of the protein. Also, in these same cells, p160-Prep1 coprecipitation was 3-fold more effective than in cells expressing only their physiological complement of Prep1 (Fig. 8C). These data indicate that Prep1 interaction enhances p160 protein stability and explain the mechanism of p160 decrease in Prep1i/i muscle. Thus, we conclude that the Prep1 function on glucose disposal depends on its interaction with p160. This represents the first identified Pbx1-independent function of Prep1.

FIG. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 8.

Effect of cycloheximide and MG132 on p160 levels. L6 skeletal muscle cells overexpressing Prep1 or transfected with the empty vector (CTRL) were incubated with 40 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated times (A) or 10 μM MG132 for 3 h (B). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blotting with p160 and actin antibodies. Blots were revealed by ECL and autoradiography. The autoradiographs shown are representative of four (A) and five (B) independent experiments. (C) L6 cells were transiently transfected with either a cDNA encoding Prep1 or a control vector. Aliquots of the cell lysates were precipitated with Prep1 or with nonimmune mouse IgG (mIgG) antibodies followed by blotting with p160 antibodies. Blots were revealed by ECL and autoradiography. The same lysates were directly blotted with antiactin antibodies for normalization. The autoradiographs shown are representative of four independent experiments.

Effect of Prep1 deficiency on islet development and islet function.As the Prep1 partner Pbx1 is required for pancreas development and adult function (22), and in view of the lower insulin and glucagon plasma level of Prep1i/i mice, we also tested whether Prep1 deficiency has an effect on endocrine pancreas function. We first compared islet morphology in adult (3-month-old) Prep1i/+, Prep1i/i, and wild-type littermates. In these animals, pancreas weight correlated with the genotype, being lowest in the homozygous Prep1i/i mice (Table 1). However, the percentage of the area occupied by islets, including both α and β cells, was normal. Also, whole-islet and β-cell masses were decreased in the Prep1i/i mice. The heterozygous Prep1i/+ mice displayed an intermediate phenotype (Table 1). This phenotype could be assessed by histological and immunohistochemical examination of pancreatic sections (Fig. 9) showing smaller islets, with normal spatial distribution of α and β cells. The smaller size of the islets is consistent with the reduced plasma levels of insulin and glucagon (see Fig. 1).

FIG. 9.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 9.

Immunohistochemical analysis of islets from Prep1-hypomorphic mice. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pancreas sections from 3-month-old Prep1i/+, Prep1i/i, and wild-type (WT) mice were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H & E) or immunostained with insulin or glucagon antibodies. Microphotographs are representative of findings obtained from 12 heterozygous, 7 homozygous, and 8 wild-type mice. Magnification, ×100.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Morphometric analysis of Prep1 hypomorphic pancreasa

Since Prep1 stabilizes Pbx1 (15) and since Pbx1 is important in pancreas development and glucose tolerance (22), we measured Pbx-1 levels in pancreatic tissue by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 10A, Pbx1 levels were severely reduced in extracts of Prep1-hypomorphic pancreas. Again, the extent of this reduction correlated with the genotype. Other Pbx isoforms as well as p160 show a reduction similar to that of Pbx1 (data not shown). Importantly, however, islets isolated from the Prep1-hypomorphic and control littermates mice exhibited comparable insulin secretion responses when exposed to 16.7 mM glucose-containing culture medium (Fig. 10B), suggesting that Prep1 deficiency has no effect on the insulin secretion machinery.

FIG. 10.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 10.

Pbx1 expression and islet function in Prep1-hypomorphic mice. (A) Upon sacrifice, pancreases from hypomorphic and control mice were rapidly removed as described in Materials and Methods, solubilized, and subjected to Western blotting with Pbx1 antibodies. Specific bands were revealed by ECL and autoradiography, followed by densitometric quantitation. Data are means plus standard deviations for 15 mice/group. (B) Islets from 6-month-old control and Prep1-hypomorphic mice were dissected and cultured as described in Materials and Methods. Islets were exposed to the indicated concentrations of glucose, and insulin release was assessed in the culture media by radioimmunoassay. Data are means plus standard deviations from 10 independent experiments done in duplicate.

DISCUSSION

We have shown that Prep1-hypomorphic mice have a complex phenotype with at least two metabolically relevant features. One is increased insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle accompanied by protection from streptozotocin-induced diabetes. The second is pancreatic islet hypoplasia accompanied by absolute hypoinsulinemia.

So far, the Pbx proteins have been considered the unique partners of Prep1 (8, 4, 21, 33, 34, 35). However, it was recently shown that p160 can compete with Pbx1 for binding to Prep1 (11), although the functional in vivo relevance of this interaction is unknown. Pbx1 has a major role in pancreas development, as Pbx1−/− embryos feature pancreatic hypoplasia as well as defective endocrine and exocrine cell differentiation prior to death at embryonic day 15 to 16 (22, 41). An important role of Pbx1 in pancreatic adult function is also shown by the reduced glucose tolerance phenotype of heterozygous Pbx1+/− mice and by the overt diabetic phenotype of the compound Pbx1+/−Pdx1+/− mice (22). In the present paper, however, we show that the increased insulin sensitivity occurring in the skeletal muscle of Prep1i/+ and Prep1i/i mice does not depend on Pbx1. First, Pbx1 mRNA and protein levels were unchanged in skeletal muscle (unlike other organs) (Fig. 5A and B and Fig. 10). Second, studies with L6 cells show that overexpression of Prep1 and Pbx1 have opposite effects. Prep1 reduces the level of PGC-1α and GLUT4 in these cells (Fig. 6). Overexpression of Pbx1, on the other hand, boosts the levels of PGC-1α and GLUT4. Thus, Pbx1 and Prep1 have opposite effects on insulin-dependent glucose disposal by muscle.

At variance with Pbx1, p160 is key to Prep1 action on glucose disposal, consistent with the known function of p160 in regulating PGC-1α and energy metabolism in skeletal muscles (13). Indeed, we show that Prep1 increases the levels of p160 in muscle cells (Fig. 6). Overexpression of p160 in the L6 cells and direct delivery of a p160 cDNA in the muscle of Prep1i/+ and Prep1i/i mice mimic the effect of Prep1, decreasing PGC-1α and GLUT4 expression. No change of PGC-1α mRNA or protein was detected in the liver of the Prep1-hypomorphic mice (data not shown), suggesting that the interplays between these molecules are cell type selective. Together, these data are in agreement with several published papers reporting a positive correlation between PGC-1α and GLUT4 in rodent (29) and human (2) muscle cells and in humans in vivo (37) and may account for the enhanced insulin sensitivity in muscles of Prep1-hypomorphic mice (Fig. 6). Previous work by Miura et al. demonstrated GLUT4 downregulation in transgenic mice overexpressing PGC-1α (31). However, as suggested by those authors, a reduction in the lower-molecular-weight PGC-1α form might have caused the negative correlation between PGC-1α and GLUT4 levels in this model.

Cycloheximide experiments demonstrated that the regulation of the p160 expression by Prep1 was, at least in part, posttranslational. Furthermore, the stabilizing effect of MG132 shows that p160 degradation involves the proteasome. In the presence of excess Prep1, the proteasome inhibitor had a much smaller effect (Fig. 8), indicating that Prep1 interaction stabilizes p160 and induces p160 escape from proteasomal degradation.

The present results highlight a novel regulatory mechanism of insulin sensitivity occurring in the skeletal muscle upstream of the p160/PGC-1α complex and operated by the balance of p160 and Pbx1. When p160 exceeds Pbx1, it binds Prep1, is stabilized, and represses GLUT4 and insulin sensitivity. When Pbx1 is present in excess, the reverse occurs. These regulatory mechanisms must be more complex, however, since one would otherwise expect that a decrease in Pbx1 would directly lead to decreased insulin sensitivity, which is not the case. Indeed, Pbx1+/− mice display a slightly improved insulin sensitivity accompanied by early impairment of glucose tolerance (22). These mice differ from both the Prep1i/i and the Prep1i/+ mice, which show a significant enhancement in insulin sensitivity and exhibit no tendency to develop abnormal glucose tolerance. Furthermore, Prep1-hypomorphic mice are protected from streptozotocin-induced diabetes in spite of their decreased β-cell mass and circulating insulin levels. Based on TUNEL assays, this protection was independent of differences in streptozotocin-induced β-cell apoptosis between the hypomorphic and control mice (data not shown). The increase in the sensitivity to insulin action on glucose disposal and on glucose uptake by the skeletal muscle, together with the reduced glucagon levels, may contribute to the stability of glucose tolerance in the Prep1-hypomorphic mice.

Another important aspect of our work is that Prep1 and Pbx1 have distinct roles in pancreas function in the adult. Indeed, Prep1 binds and stabilizes Pbx proteins in a cell-specific manner (15, 26, 38, 46). Consistently, we show that the level of Pbx1 in Prep1i/i hypomorphic mice is decreased in the adult pancreas (Fig. 10A), though not in the skeletal muscle (Fig. 6). Therefore, the Prep1i/i animals were expected to display a pancreatic phenotype similar to that of Pbx1+/− mice, i.e., disrupted architecture of the pancreatic islets and hypoinsulinemia (22). Surprisingly, Prep1-hypomorphic mice were found to have normal islet architecture. However, they did show islet hypoplasia, accompanied by significantly reduced absolute insulin levels (both basal and postloading). Why the pancreatic phenotype of the Prep1i/i mice, which includes a strong reduction of Pbx1 pancreas expression (Fig. 10A), is different from that of the Pbx1+/− heterozygous mice (22) is not completely clear. The deficiency of Prep1 might have been complemented by the overexpression of other family members. This is unlikely, however, as no increase of Prep2 or Meis proteins is observed in Prep1i/i embryos (15). More simply, the reduction of Pbx1 in Prep1-hypomorphic mice may not be enough to generate the phenotype of the Pbx+/− mouse. It is also possible that other TALE family members (e.g., one of the Meis genes) cooperate with Pbx1 in pancreas development and in functions where Prep1 is not involved. Finally, it is possible that the islet phenotype of the Prep1-hypomorphic mice is established as an adaptive response to their enhanced insulin sensitivity. Indeed, islets isolated from Prep1i/+ mice exhibit a normal secretory response to glucose in culture (Fig. 10B). A decreased β-cell mass in conditions of chronically improved insulin sensitivity has been previously observed in mice. For instance, pancreatic β-cell area is decreased in protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b-deficient mice owing to increased peripheral insulin sensitivity and reduced insulin requirement (25).

The present results may have clinical relevance. In individuals with normal glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and secretion span a wide range and are determined by a number of different genes (16, 28). Variability in some of these genes is known to provide an important contribution to major human disorders, including type 2 diabetes (16, 17). For example, Pdx1 point mutations cause impaired insulin secretion and a rare form of non-insulin-dependent diabetes formerly termed MODY4 (43). On the basis of the results of this study, Prep1 might also be involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Whether genetic variability at the Prep1 locus affects insulin sensitivity in humans is an important issue presently under investigation in the laboratory.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported, in part, by the European Community's FP6 EUGENE2 (contract LSHM-CT-2004-512013) and FP7 PREPROBEDIA (grant 201681), by an EFSD/Lilly grant, by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), and by the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica (PRIN and FIRB RBNE0155LB). The financial support of Telethon—Italy is gratefully acknowledged. V. M. Diaz was a recipient of a Marie Curie Fellowship from the EU.

We are grateful to A. Zabatta for helping with the morphometric analysis. The technical help of Salvatore Sequino is also acknowledged.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 January 2008.
    • Returned for modification 8 March 2008.
    • Accepted 4 July 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Ahlgren, U., J. Jonsson, L. Jonsson, K. Simu, and H. Edlund. 1998. Beta-cell-specific inactivation of the mouse Ipf1/Pdx1 gene results in loss of the beta-cell phenotype and maturity onset diabetes. Genes Dev.12:1763-1768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Al-Khalili, L., M. Forsgren, K. Kannisto, J. R. Zierath, F. Lönnqvist, and A. Krook. 2005. Enhanced insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in response to insulin, metformin or rosiglitazone is associated with increased mRNA expression of GLUT4 and peroxisomal proliferator activator receptor gamma co-activator 1. Diabetologia48:1173-1179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Berthelsen, J., V. Zappavigna, F. Mavilio, and F. Blasi. 1998a. Prep1, a novel functional partner of Pbx proteins. EMBO J.17:1423-1433.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. 4.↵
    Berthelsen, J., V. Zappavigna, E. Ferretti, F. Mavilio, and F. Blasi. 1998b. The novel homeoprotein Prep1 modulates Pbx-Hox protein cooperativity. EMBO J.17:1434-1445.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. 5.↵
    Berthelsen, J., C. Kilstrup-Nielsen, F. Blasi, F. Mavilio, and V. Zappavigna. 1999. The subcellular localization of PBX1 and EXD proteins depends on nuclear import and export signals and is modulated by association with PREP1 and HTH. Genes Dev.13:946-953.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Calvo, K. R., P. Knoepfler, S. McGrath, and M. P. Kamps. 1999. An inhibitory switch derepressed by pbx, hox, and Meis/Prep1 partners regulates DNA-binding by pbx1 and E2a-pbx1 and is dispensable for myeloid immortalization by E2a-pbx1. Oncogene18:8033-8043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Caruso, M., C. Miele, F. Oriente, A. Maitan, G. Bifulco, F. Andreozzi, G. Condorelli, P. Formisano, and F. Beguinot. 1999. In L6 skeletal muscle cells, glucose induces cytosolic translocation of protein kinase C-alpha and trans-activates the insulin receptor kinase. J. Biol. Chem.274:28637-28644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Chen, H., C. Dossier, Y. Nakamura, A. Lynn, A. Chakravarti, and S. E. Antonarakis. 1997. Cloning of a novel homeobox-containing gene, PKNOX1, and mapping to human chromosome 21q22.3. Genomics41:193-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Deflorian, G., N. Tiso, E. Ferretti, D. Meyer, F. Blasi, M. Bortolussi, and F. Argenton. 2004. Prep1.1 has essential genetic functions in hindbrain development and cranial neural crest cell differentiation. Development131:613-627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Devedjian, J. C., M. George, A. Casellas, A. Pujol, J. Visa, M. Pelegrin, L. Gros, and F. Bosch. 2000. Transgenic mice overexpressing insulin-like growth factor-II in beta cells develop type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Investig.105:731-740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Diaz, V. M., S. Mori, E. Longobardi, G. Menendez, C. Ferrai, R. A. Keough, A. Bachi, and F. Blasi. 2007. p160 myb-binding-protein interacts with Prep1 and inhibits its transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell. Biol.27:7981-7990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Dutta, S., M. Gannon, B. Peers, C. Wright, S. Bonner-Weir, and M. Montminy. 2001. PDX:PBX complexes are required for normal proliferation of pancreatic cells during development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:1065-1070.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Fan, M., J. Rhee, J. St-Pierre, C. Handschin, P. Puigserver, J. Lin, S. Jäeger, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and B. M. Spiegelman. 2004. Suppression of mitochondrial respiration through recruitment of p160 myb binding protein to PGC-1α: modulation by p38 MAPK. Genes Dev.18:278-289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Ferre, P., A. Leturque, A. F. Burnol, L. Penicaud, and J. Girard. 1985. A method to quantify glucose utilization in vivo in skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue of the anaesthetized rat. Biochem. J.228:103-110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Ferretti, E., J. C. Villaescusa, P. Di Rosa, L. C. Fernandez-Diaz, E. Longobardi, R. Mazzieri, A. Miccio, N. Micali, L. Selleri, G. Ferrari, and F. Blasi. 2006. Hypomorphic mutation of the TALE gene Prep1 (pKnox1) causes a major reduction of Pbx and Meis proteins and a pleiotropic embryonic phenotype. Mol. Cell. Biol.26:5650-5662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Freeman, H., and R. D. Cox. 2006. Type-2 diabetes: a cocktail of genetic discovery. Hum. Mol. Genet.15:R202-209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Freimer, N. B., and C. Sabatti. 2007. Variants in common diseases. Nature445:828-830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Hani, E. H., J. Hager, A. Philippi, F. Demenais, P. Froguel, and N. Vionnet. 1997. Mapping NIDDM susceptibility loci in French families: studies with markers in the region of NIDDM1 on chromosome 2q. Diabetes46:1225-1226.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Horiki, M., E. Yamato, H. Ikegami, T. Ogihara, and J. Miyazaki. 2004. Needleless in vivo gene transfer into muscles by jet injection in combination with electroporation. J. Gene Med.6:1134-1138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Jaw, T. J., L. R. You, P. S. Knoepfler, L. C. Yao, C. Y. Pai, C. Y. Tang, L. P. Chang, J. Berthelsen, F. Blasi, M. P. Kamps, and Y. H. Sun. 2000. Direct interaction of two homeoproteins, homothorax and extradenticle, is essential for EXD nuclear localization and function. Mech. Dev.91:279-291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Kamps, M. P., C. Murre, X. H. Sun, and D. Baltimore. 1990. A new homeobox gene contributes the DNA binding domain of the t(1;19) translocation protein in pre-B ALL. Cell60:547-555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Kim, S. K., L. Selleri, J. S. Lee, A. Y. Zhang, X. Gu, Y. Jacobs, and M. L. Cleary. 2002. Pbx1 inactivation disrupts pancreas development and in Ipf1 deficient mice promotes diabetes mellitus. Nat. Genet.30:430-435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Kitamura, T., Y. Kido, S. Nef, J. Merenmies, L. F. Parada, and D. Accili. 2001. Preserved pancreatic beta-cell development and function in mice lacking the insulin receptor-related receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol.21:5624-5630.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Knoepfler, P. S., K. R. Calvo, H. Chen, S. E. Antonarakis, and M. P. Kamps. 1997. Meis1 and pKnox1 bind DNA cooperatively with Pbx1 utilizing an interaction surface disrupted in oncoprotein E2a-Pbx1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:14553-14558.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Kushner, J. A., F. G. Haj, L. D. Klaman, M. A. Dow, B. B. Kahn, B. G. Neel, and M. F. White. 2004. Islet-sparing effects of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1b deficiency delays onset of diabetes in IRS2 knockout mice. Diabetes53:61-66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Longobardi, E., and F. Blasi. 2003. Overexpression of PREP-1 in F9 teratocarcinoma cells leads to a functionally relevant increase of PBX-2 by preventing its degradation. J. Biol. Chem.278:39235-39241.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Macfarlane, W. M., T. M. Frayling, S. Ellard, J. C. Evans, L. I. Allen, M. P. Bulman, S. Ayres, M. Shepherd, P. Clark, A. Millward, A. Demaine, T. Wilkin, K. Docherty, and A. T. Hattersley. 1999. Missense mutations in the insulin promoter factor-1 gene predispose to type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Investig.104:R33-39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Marchetti, P., S. Del Prato, R. Lupi, and S. Del Guerra. 2006. The pancreatic beta-cell in human type 2 diabetes. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.16:S3-S6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Michael, L. F., Z. Wu, R. B. Cheatham, P. Puigserver, G. Adelmant, J. J. Lehman, D. P. Kelly, and B. M. Spiegelman. 2001. Restoration of insulin-sensitive glucose transporter (GLUT4) gene expression in muscle cells by the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:3820-3825.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Miele, C., M. Caruso, V. Calleja, R. Auricchio, F. Oriente, P. Formisano, G. Condorelli, A. Cafieri, D. Sawka-Verhelle, E. Van Obberghen, and F. Beguinot. 1999. Differential role of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in L6 skeletal muscle cells expressing the Arg1152→Gln insulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem.274:3094-3102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Miura, S., Y. Kai, M. Ono, and O. Ezaki. 2003. Overexpression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α down-regulates GLUT4 mRNA in skeletal muscles. J. Biol. Chem.278:31385-31390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    Moens, C. B., and L. Selleri. 2006. Hox cofactors in vertebrate development. Dev. Biol.291:193-206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Monica, K., N. Galili, J. Nourse, D. Saltman, and M. L. Cleary. 1991. PBX2 and PBX3, new homeobox genes with extensive homology to the human proto-oncogene PBX1. Mol. Cell. Biol.11:6149-6157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Moskow, J. J., F. Bullrich, K. Huebner, I. O. Daar, and A. M. Buchberg. 1995. Meis1, a PBX1-related homeobox gene involved in myeloid leukemia in BXH-2 mice. Mol. Cell. Biol.15:5434-5443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Nourse, J., J. D. Mellentin, N. Galili, J. Wilkinson, E. Stanbridge, S. D. Smith, and M. L. Cleary. 1990. Chromosomal translocation t(1;19) results in synthesis of a homeobox fusion mRNA that codes for a potential chimeric transcription factor. Cell60:535-545.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Pai, C. Y., T. S. Kuo, T. J. Jaw, E. Kurant, C. T. Chen, D. A. Bessarab, A. Salzberg, and Y. H. Sun. 1998. The Homothorax homeoprotein activates the nuclear localization of another homeoprotein, extradenticle, and suppresses eye development in Drosophila. Genes Dev.12:435-446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Patti, M. E., A. J. Butte, S. Crunkhorn, K. Cusi, R. Berria, S. Kashyap, Y. Miyazaki, I. Kohane, M. Costello, R. Saccone, E. J. Landaker, A. B. Goldfine, E. Mun, R. DeFronzo, J. Finlayson, C. R. Kahn, and L. J. Mandarino. 2003. Coordinated reduction of genes of oxidative metabolism in humans with insulin resistance and diabetes: potential role of PGC-1 and NRF1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100:8466-8471.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Penkov, D., P. Di Rosa, L. Fernandez Diaz, V. Basso, E. Ferretti, F. Grassi, A. Mondino, and F. Blasi. 2005. Involvement of Prep1 in the αβ T-cell receptor T-lymphocytic potential of hematopoietic precursors. Mol. Cell. Biol.25:10768-10781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Rieckhof, G. E., F. Casares, H. D. Ryoo, M. Abu-Shaar, and R. S. Mann. 1997. Nuclear translocation of extradenticle requires homothorax, which encodes an extradenticle-related homeodomain protein. Cell91:171-183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Rizzuto, G., M. Cappelletti, D. Maione, R. Savino, D. Lazzaro, P. Costa, I. Mathiesen, R. Cortese, G. Ciliberto, R. Laufer, N. La Monica, and E. Fattori. 1999. Efficient and regulated erythropoietin production by naked DNA injection and muscle electroporation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96:6417-6422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Selleri, L., M. J. Depew, Y. Jacobs, S. K. Chanda, K. Y. Tsang, K. S. Cheah, J. L. Rubenstein, S. O'Gorman, and M. L. Cleary. 2001. Requirement for Pbx1 in skeletal patterning and programming chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development128:3543-3557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Somogyi, M. 1945. Determination of blood sugar. J. Biol. Chem.160:69-73.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Stoffers, D. A., J. Ferrer, W. L. Clarkem, and J. F. Habener. 1997. Early-onset type-II diabetes mellitus (MODY4) linked to IPF1. Nat. Genet.17:138-139.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Tavner, F. J., R. Simpson, S. Tashiro, D. Favier, N. A. Jenkins, D. J. Gilbert, N. J. Copeland, E. M. Macmillan, J. Lutwyche, R. A. Keough, S. Ishii, and T. J. Gonda. 1998. Molecular cloning reveals that the p160 Myb-binding protein is a novel, predominantly nucleolar protein which may play a role in transactivation by Myb. Mol. Cell. Biol.18:989-1002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Vigliotta, G., C. Miele, S. Santopietro, G. Portella, A. Perfetti, M. A. Maitan, A. Cassese, F. Oriente, A. Trencia, F. Fiory, C. Romano, C. Tiveron, L. Tatangelo, G. Troncone, P. Formisano, and F. Beguinot. 2004. Overexpression of the ped/pea-15 gene causes diabetes by impairing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in addition to insulin action. Mol. Cell. Biol.24:5005-5015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Waskiewicz, A. J., H. A. Rikhof, and C. B. Moens. 2002. Eliminating zebrafish pbx proteins reveals a hindbrain ground state. Dev. Cell3:723-733.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Prep1 Deficiency Induces Protection from Diabetes and Increased Insulin Sensitivity through a p160-Mediated Mechanism
Francesco Oriente, Luis Cesar Fernandez Diaz, Claudia Miele, Salvatore Iovino, Silvia Mori, Victor Manuel Diaz, Giancarlo Troncone, Angela Cassese, Pietro Formisano, Francesco Blasi, Francesco Beguinot
Molecular and Cellular Biology Sep 2008, 28 (18) 5634-5645; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00117-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prep1 Deficiency Induces Protection from Diabetes and Increased Insulin Sensitivity through a p160-Mediated Mechanism
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Prep1 Deficiency Induces Protection from Diabetes and Increased Insulin Sensitivity through a p160-Mediated Mechanism
Francesco Oriente, Luis Cesar Fernandez Diaz, Claudia Miele, Salvatore Iovino, Silvia Mori, Victor Manuel Diaz, Giancarlo Troncone, Angela Cassese, Pietro Formisano, Francesco Blasi, Francesco Beguinot
Molecular and Cellular Biology Sep 2008, 28 (18) 5634-5645; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00117-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Blood Glucose
Carrier Proteins
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental
Homeodomain Proteins
insulin
Nuclear Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549