Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Dual Role of Cdc42 in Spindle Orientation Control of Adherent Cells

Masaru Mitsushima, Fumiko Toyoshima, Eisuke Nishida
Masaru Mitsushima
1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fumiko Toyoshima
1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
2PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
3Laboratory of Subcellular Biogenesis, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Shogoin-Kawahara cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ftoyoshi@virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Eisuke Nishida
1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01713-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Cdc42 and Rac1 are required for the spindle orientation parallel to the substratum in HeLa cells. (A) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA, RhoA siRNA, Rac1 siRNA, or Cdc42 siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-RhoA, anti-Rac1, anti-Cdc42, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (B) The X-Z projections of metaphase cells as prepared in panel A and stained with anti-γ-tubulin (green) and Hoechst (blue). (C) The spindle angle (left; α°) was measured in metaphase cells. Distribution (right; histogram; n = 50) and the average (right; inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown (right). **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of control GFP siRNA, analyzed by F-test.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Cdc42 is required for the activation of PI(3)K during mitosis. (A) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA, RhoA siRNA, Rac1 siRNA, or Cdc42 siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-RhoA, anti-Rac1, anti-Cdc42, anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473), anti-Akt, anti-cyclin B1, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (B) Total lysates of synchronized cells transfected with GFP siRNA, Cdc42 siRNA, or β1 integrin siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473), anti-Akt, anti-Cdc42, anti-β1 integrin, anti-cyclin B1, anti-cyclin A2, anti-cyclin E, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (C) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized cells transfected with GFP siRNA or Cdc42 siRNA, pretreated with LY294002 for 2 h, washed with condition medium, and exposed to carrier histone or PIP3-histone for 5 min or 10 min were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) and anti-Akt antibodies.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Cdc42 and PAK2 regulate actin reorganization during mitosis. (A) Z-stack images (2.5 μm apart) with phalloidin (green) and Hoechst (blue) in metaphase HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA, RhoA siRNA, Rac1 siRNA, or Cdc42 siRNA. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-PAK2, anti-PAK1, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (C) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) and anti-Akt antibodies. (D) Z-stack images (2.5 μm apart) with phalloidin (green) and Hoechst (blue) in metaphase cells transfected with PAK2 siRNA. The scale bar represents 10 μm.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    PAK2 is required for the proper spindle orientation. (A) The X-Z projections of metaphase cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA and stained with anti-γ-tubulin (green) and Hoechst (blue). (B) Spindle orientation analyses of the cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown. **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of control GFP siRNA, analyzed by F-test. (C) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP or pEGFP-PAK2-res were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-PAK2, anti-GFP, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (D) Spindle orientation analysis in the cells transfected with PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP or pEGFP-PAK2-res. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown. **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of the control pEGFP-transfected cells, analyzed by F-test.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    PAK2 regulates spindle orientation in a Cdc42/Rac1 binding-dependent and kinase activity-independent manner. (A) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP, pEGFP-PAK2-res, or pEGFP-PAK2-res-H82, 85L were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-PAK2, anti-GFP, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (B) Spindle orientation analysis in the cells transfected with PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP, pEGFP-PAK2-res, or pEGFP-PAK2-res-H82, 85L. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown. **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of the control pEGFP-transfected cells, analyzed by F-test. (C) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP, pEGFP-PAK2-res, or pEGFP-PAK2-res-K278R were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-PAK2, anti-GFP, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (D) Spindle orientation analysis in the cells transfected with PAK2 siRNA together with pEGFP, pEGFP-PAK2-res, or pEGFP-PAK2-res-K278R. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown. *, P value of <0.01 and **, P value of <0.001 compared with those of control pEGFP-transfected cells, analyzed by F-test.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    PAK2 regulates spindle orientation through binding to βPix. (A) Total lysates (80 μl) of synchronized HeLa cells were incubated with anti-PAK2 antibody or rabbit IgG. Total lysates (7.5 μl) and the precipitates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-βPix, anti-Git1, and anti-PAK2 antibodies. (B) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with or without (mock) GFP siRNA, βPix siRNA, or Git1 siRNA. GFP siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-βPix, anti-Git1, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (C) Spindle orientation analyses in the cells transfected with GFP siRNA, βPix siRNA, or Git1 siRNA. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition are shown. **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of GFP siRNA-transfected cells, analyzed by F-test. (D) Total cell lysates of the cells transfected with pcDL-SRα-myc-PAK2-res, PAK2-res-P185A/R186A, or PAK2-res-H82, 85L were incubated with anti-Myc antibody. The precipitates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-βPix and anti-Myc antibodies. (E) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA or PAK2 siRNA together with or without (mock) pcDL-SRα-myc-PAK2-res or PAK2-res-P185A/R186A were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-PAK2, anti-Myc, and anti-α-tubulin antibodies. (F) Spindle orientation analyses of the cells as prepared in panel E. Distribution (histogram; n = 50) and the average (inset; mean ± standard deviation; n = 50) of spindle angles in each condition is shown. **, P value of <0.001 compared with that of control GFP siRNA-transfected (GFPsi)/mock cells, analyzed by F-test. (G) Total lysates of M phase-synchronized HeLa cells transfected with GFP siRNA or βPix siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) and anti-Akt antibodies. (H) Z-stack images (2.5 μm apart) with phalloidin (green) and Hoechst (blue) in metaphase cells transfected with βPix siRNA. The scale bar represents 10 μm.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    Cdc42, PAK2, and βPix regulate the distribution of cortical dynactin. (A) Z-stack images (2.5 μm apart) with p150Glued (green) and Hoechst (blue) in metaphase cells transfected with GFP siRNA, Cdc42 siRNA, PAK2 siRNA, or βPix siRNA. The scale bar represents 15 μm. (B) Quantification of the widths of distribution for cortical dynactin along the z axis in metaphase cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. Values are means ± standard deviations. (n = 20). (C) A model for the two distinct pathways downstream from Cdc42 that control the spindle orientation in nonpolarized adherent cells.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Movies S1 to S4 (siRNA-transfected cells)
      Zipped MPG files, 2.9MB.
    • Supplemental file 2 - Fig. S1 PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-induced PI(3)K activation, S2 (GFP signals in siRNA-transfected cells), S3 (Cdc42 knockdown and misaligned chromosomes), S4 (Misoriented spindle assembly in siRNA-transfected cells), S5 (Dominant-negative Cdc42 and spindle misorientation), S6 (Cdc42 and Rac1 knockdown and cell area of metaphase HeLa cells), S7(Cdc42 or PAK2 knockdown and retraction fiber number), and S8 (Spindle formation in PAK2-depleted cells)
      Zipped PDF file, 1.8MB.
    • Supplemental file 3 - Fig. S9 and S10 (PAK2 and spindle orientation in MCF10A [S9] and HeLa [S10] cells), S11 (Cdc42-dependent PAK2 localization), S12 [PI(3)K and PAK2-βPix interaction], S13 [PAK2 and PI(3)K in spindle orientation[, S14 (Spindle orientation in Cdc42- or β1 integrin-depleted cells), S15 (PAK1 and βPix in spindle orientation control), and S16 (PAK2 depletion and Aurora A activation)
      Zipped PDF file, 2.1MB.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Dual Role of Cdc42 in Spindle Orientation Control of Adherent Cells
Masaru Mitsushima, Fumiko Toyoshima, Eisuke Nishida
Molecular and Cellular Biology May 2009, 29 (10) 2816-2827; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01713-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Role of Cdc42 in Spindle Orientation Control of Adherent Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Dual Role of Cdc42 in Spindle Orientation Control of Adherent Cells
Masaru Mitsushima, Fumiko Toyoshima, Eisuke Nishida
Molecular and Cellular Biology May 2009, 29 (10) 2816-2827; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01713-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cell adhesion
cell polarity
Spindle Apparatus
cdc42 GTP-Binding Protein

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549