Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Role of ATM and the Damage Response Mediator Proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the Maintenance of G2/M Checkpoint Arrest

Atsushi Shibata, Olivia Barton, Angela T. Noon, Kirsten Dahm, Dorothee Deckbar, Aaron A. Goodarzi, Markus Löbrich, Penny A. Jeggo
Atsushi Shibata
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivia Barton
2Darmstadt University of Technology, Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela T. Noon
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Dahm
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorothee Deckbar
2Darmstadt University of Technology, Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron A. Goodarzi
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Löbrich
2Darmstadt University of Technology, Radiation Biology and DNA Repair, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk lobrich@bio.tu-darmstadt.de
Penny A. Jeggo
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, East Sussex BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk lobrich@bio.tu-darmstadt.de
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01644-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Chk1/Chk2 regulates the initiation and maintenance of checkpoint arrest. (A) Checkpoint initiation requires ATM and Chk1/Chk2. Mitotic entry was examined in 1BR3 hTERT cells following 3 Gy IR in untreated cells or cells treated with the ATM inhibitor or Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor 30 min prior to IR. Cells, >400, were scored for mitotic index. Results represent the mitotic index relative to untreated cells. Maximal levels of p-Chk1 and p-Chk2 are reached within 30 min after 3 Gy. 1BR hTERT and A549 cells were exposed to 3 Gy IR, and p-Chk2 (B) and p-Chk1 (C) levels assessed by IF at various times post-IR. (D) Checkpoint maintenance requires Chk1/Chk2. The time of mitotic entry following exposure to 3 Gy IR in cells either untreated or treated with the Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor 30 min post-IR was examined. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) from 3 experiments.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    ATR-Chk1 signaling contributes to checkpoint maintenance. (A) Mitotic entry in 1BR3 hTERT cells following treatment with control and Chk1 siRNA and 3 Gy IR was examined. Chk1 knockdown did not significantly compromise G2 proportion based on fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (data not shown). (B) Mitotic entry in 1BR3 hTERT and ATR-SS hTERT cells following treatment with control or ATR siRNA and 3 Gy IR. The right panel shows ATR expression levels. (C) ATR-SS hTERT cells show impaired Chk1 phosphorylation but normal Chk2 phosphorylation. The levels of p-Chk1 Ser317 and p-Chk2 Thr68 were quantified by IF in ATR-SS hTERT G2 cells at 30 min after IR exposure. (D) Mitotic entry in control and ATR-SS LBL cell lines following mock and ATR cDNA transfection. To verify the impact of Chk1 siRNA on Chk1 activity, we examined hydroxyurea (HU)-induced 53BP1 focus formation, which is a characterized Chk1-dependent response (26). 53BP1 foci failed to form after HU treatment in ATR-SS hTERT cells and following Chk1 siRNA, consistent with previous findings (data not shown) (30). Error bars represent the SEM from 3 experiments.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Sustained ATM signaling also contributes to checkpoint maintenance. (A) ATM inhibitor addition impairs checkpoint arrest and signaling within 5 min. 1BR3 hTERT cells were untreated or treated with ATM inhibitor 5, 15, or 30 min prior to IR. Cells were examined by immunoblotting using anti-Thr68-p-Chk2 at 30 min (top) and for mitotic entry at 1 h post-IR (bottom). Chk2 and β-tubulin antibodies were loading controls. (B) ATM inhibitor addition 30 min post-IR diminishes the duration of checkpoint arrest after 3 Gy IR in 1BR3 hTERT and in ATR-SS hTERT cells. (C) siRNA-Chk2 diminishes the duration of checkpoint arrest after 3 Gy IR. Error bars represent the SEM of 3 experiments.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Sustained ATM signaling contributes to prolonged checkpoint arrest in NHEJ-defective cells. (A) Cells were exposed to 1 Gy IR, and APH was added. A total of 50 ng/ml calyculin A was added 30 min before fixation, and PCCs were scored. (B) ATM and Chk1/Chk2 are required for checkpoint initiation in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells. Mitotic entry was examined following 3 Gy IR in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells either untreated or treated with the ATM or Chk1/Chk2 inhibitor 30 min prior to IR. (C) Prolonged checkpoint arrest in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells requires sustained ATM signaling. Mitotic entry after 3 Gy IR was examined in 1BR3 and 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells either with or without ATM inhibitor 30 min post-IR. (D) 1BR3 and 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells were exposed to 3 Gy IR with or without ATM inhibitor addition 30 min post-IR. p-Chk2 levels were quantified in CENP-F+ (G2) cells by IF using anti-Thr68-p-Chk2 antibodies. The background signal in unirradiated cells was subtracted. At <1 h post-IR, 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells harbor elevated DSBs compared to 1BR3 hTERT cells (as shown in panel A), consistent with their elevated p-Chk2 signal. By 8 h the p-Chk2 level decreased by >50% in 1BR3 hTERT cells compared with 20% in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells. (E) 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells were exposed to 3 Gy IR with or without ATM inhibitor addition 4 or 6 h post-IR. p-Chk2 levels were quantified in CENP-F+ (G2) cells by IF using anti-Thr68-p-Chk2 antibodies. (F) The maintenance of checkpoint arrest in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells requires Chk1 and Chk2. Mitotic entry was examined in 2BN (XLF−/−) hTERT cells treated with control, Chk1, or Chk2 siRNA. Error bars represent the SEM of 3 experiments.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    MDC1 −/ − and 53BP1−/− MEFs show impaired G2/M checkpoint maintenance and reduced Chk1 phosphorylation. (A and B) Mitotic entry in WT, MDC1−/−, and 53BP1−/− MEFs after 3 Gy and 6 Gy IR was evaluated. APH was added after IR. (C) Cell cycle profile in control and 53BP1 siRNA cells after double thymidine block. (D) p-Chk1 is reduced in synchronized G2 53BP1 siRNA cells post-IR. Cells were synchronized in G1/S by double thymidine block and irradiated 8 h postrelease. Cells were examined by immunoblotting using anti-pChk1 Ser345 antibody. The asterisk represents a nonspecific band. Quantification of p-Chk1 from 2 experiments is shown. (E) 53BP1 siRNA cells show impaired Chk1 activation. The p-Ser317 Chk1 signal was quantified by IF in CENP-F+ (G2) A549 cells treated 3 Gy IR and 53BP1 or control siRNA. The signal in undamaged nuclei is subtracted. Error bars represent the SEM of 3 experiments.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    53BP1-defective cells show impaired sustained ATM-Chk2 signaling. (A) A549 cells treated with 53BP1 siRNA, XLF siRNA, or both were exposed to 3 Gy IR, and the mitotic entry was evaluated. 53BP1 and XLF siRNA causes prolonged arrest compared to 53BP1 siRNA alone. The knockdown efficiency is shown in right panel. (B) WT or 53BP1−/− MEFs were treated with or without DNA-PK inhibitor addition 30 min after 3 Gy IR, and mitotic entry was examined. (C) Typical picture of p-Chk2 Thr68 in 53BP1 siRNA A549 cells after 3 Gy IR. α, anti. (D) Quantification of p-Chk2 levels in 53BP1 siRNA-treated A549 cells after 3 Gy IR. p-Chk2 levels were assessed by IF quantification in CENP-F+ (G2) cells. (E) Quantification of the p-Chk2 in G2 cells following XLF or 53BP1/XLF siRNA after 3 Gy IR.

  • FIG. 7.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 7.

    The combined DSB repair and signaling defects in MDC1−/− and 53BP1−/− MEFs contribute to chromosome breakage. (A) Cells were exposed to 3 Gy IR. A total of 50 ng/ml calyculin A was added 20 min before fixation. PCCs are scored per 100 chromosomes. (B) Diagram showing the procedure used. Colcemid was added from 2 to 12 h after 3 Gy IR. Mitotic cells were not collected during the first 2 h post-IR to prevent analysis of cells that “escape” checkpoint arrest. Chromatid breaks were scored. (C) Mitotic chromosomal break analysis of 2 WT, MDC1−/−, 53BP1−/−, Artemis−/−, and ATM−/− MEFs. Chromatid break numbers were normalized to 100 chromosomes to account for differences in chromosome numbers for different lines. (D) Model showing the mechanisms contributing to checkpoint maintenance and the contribution of 53BP1 and MDC1.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental material

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental file 1 - Fig. S1 (APH and S-phase progression into G2/M)
      Zipped JPEG Image file, 362K.
    • Supplemental file 2 - Fig. S2 (Anti-p-Chk2 Thr68 and anti-p-Chk1 Ser317 specificities)
      Zipped JPEG Image file, 1.3 MB.
    • Supplemental file 3 - Legends to Fig. S1 and S2
      MS Word document, 47K.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Role of ATM and the Damage Response Mediator Proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the Maintenance of G2/M Checkpoint Arrest
Atsushi Shibata, Olivia Barton, Angela T. Noon, Kirsten Dahm, Dorothee Deckbar, Aaron A. Goodarzi, Markus Löbrich, Penny A. Jeggo
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jun 2010, 30 (13) 3371-3383; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01644-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of ATM and the Damage Response Mediator Proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the Maintenance of G2/M Checkpoint Arrest
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Role of ATM and the Damage Response Mediator Proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the Maintenance of G2/M Checkpoint Arrest
Atsushi Shibata, Olivia Barton, Angela T. Noon, Kirsten Dahm, Dorothee Deckbar, Aaron A. Goodarzi, Markus Löbrich, Penny A. Jeggo
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jun 2010, 30 (13) 3371-3383; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01644-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Cell Cycle Proteins
cell division
DNA damage
DNA repair
DNA-Binding Proteins
G2 Phase
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
Protein-Serine-Threonine Kinases
Tumor Suppressor Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549