Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

CREB Binding Protein (CBP) Activation Is Required for Luteinizing Hormone Beta Expression and Normal Fertility in Mice

Ryan S. Miller, Andrew Wolfe, Ling He, Sally Radovick, Fredric E. Wondisford
Ryan S. Miller
aDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Wolfe
aDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
cDepartment of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ling He
bDivision of Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Radovick
aDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredric E. Wondisford
bDivision of Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
cDepartment of Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00394-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1

    CBP mediates GNRH induction of Lhb expression in LβT2 cells. (A) Luciferase activity was measured following GNRH treatment in cells transfected with an Lhb promoter-luciferase reporter and either pcDNA3.1 only or pcDNA containing full-length CBP. RLU, relative light units. (B) Relative levels of Lhb mRNA expression were determined in LβT2 cells that were transfected with either scrambled Ad-shRNA or CBP Ad-shRNA and then treated with GNRH 48 h later. (C) Immunoblot of total CBP from LβT2 cells transduced with either scrambled (Scr) or CBP Ad-shRNA. (D to F) Changes in transcript levels of Lhb, Egr-1, and Crebbp were determined in LβT2 cells following 4 h of GNRH treatment. ns, not significant. (G) Total CBP and phospho-CBP (p-CBP) (S436) protein levels were detected by immunoblotting following GNRH treatment for the indicated periods of time. (H) Immunoblot of phospho-CBP with and without alkaline phosphatase. Means at points without a common letter differ (P < 0.05). *, P < 0.01. Bars represent means ± standard errors of the means (SEM).

  • Fig 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2

    GNRH induction of Lhb expression requires CBP phosphorylation at Ser436. (A) Total CBP protein levels from whole-cell lysates after LβT2 cells were transduced with either scrambled shRNA or CBP 5′ UTR Ad-shRNA, followed by transfection with pcDNA3.1 only, pcDNA expressing WT CBP (CBP-wt), or pcDNA expressing S436A mutant CBP (CBP-mut). (B) Relative Lhb transcript levels in LβT2 cells following transduction with adenovirus expressing CBP 5′UTR shRNA and transfection with pcDNA3.1, WT CBP, or S436A mutant CBP. Cells were treated with GNRH 4 h prior to the harvest of RNA. *, P < 0.01 versus values for WT untreated, pcDNA-transfected, and mutant untreated cells; #, P < 0.05. Bars represent means ± SEM.

  • Fig 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3

    CBP–Egr-1 interactions on the proximal Lhb promoter in response to GNRH. (A, B) CBP and Egr-1 occupancy of the Lhb promoter in LβT2 cells was detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation following GNRH treatment for the indicated periods of time. PCR (A) and Q-PCR (B) were performed using primers against both the proximal (−126 to −26) and the distal (−1189 to −893) Lhb promoter. *, P < 0.01 versus untreated cells. (C) LβT2 cells were transduced with Ad-shRNA against the 5′UTR of CBP, followed by transfection with the pFR-Luc reporter. Cells were also transfected as indicated with pcDNA only, WT CBP, or S436A CBP. Luciferase (Luc) activity was then measured after treatment with GNRH. *, P < 0.01 versus values for WT untreated cells and other conditions; #, P < 0.05. (D) Model of postulated CBP–Egr-1 interactions in the modified two-hybrid system. (E) CBP and Egr-1 occupancy of the Lhb promoter in response to GNRH was detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation in LβT2 cells 48 h after Egr-1 knockdown with Ad-shRNA. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using primers against the proximal (−126 to −26) Lhb promoter. *, P < 0.01. (F) Immunoblot showing Egr-1 protein following transduction of LβT2 cells with scrambled or Egr-1 Ad-shRNA. Bars represent means ± SEM.

  • Fig 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4

    Assessment of fertility in S436A mice. Breeding pairs were established and observed for numbers of litters produced over time. (A) The number of pups per litter was observed over 60 days. Means without a common letter differ (P < 0.01). (B) Lengths of time to the first litter and between the first and second litters were measured for each breeding pair. Means without a common letter differ (P < 0.05). Bars represent means ± SEM. (C) Total number of litters and pups produced over 60 days for each breeding pair category. Each line represents values for one breeding pair, and each “×” represents a litter. M, male; F, female. There were 10 breeding pairs per group.

  • Fig 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5

    Assessment of the reproductive phenotype of S436A mice. (A) Vaginal cytology was performed at 24-h intervals by microscopic evaluation of stained vaginal smears, and the predominant cell type was recorded for each day. Data are shown for two representative animals from each group. (B) Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained histological sections of ovaries are shown from wild-type and S436A knock-in mice. Scale bars, 200 mm. (C) The proportion of time in diestrus versus estrus was recorded for each group. There were 7 to 8 mice per group. (D, E) Evening serum LH (D) and FSH (E) levels were measured in diestrus or proestrus for WT or S436A mice. There were 4 to 6 mice per group. *, P < 0.01; #, P < 0.05. Bars represent means ± SEM.

  • Fig 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6

    Assessment of phenotype in male mice. (A) Basal morning serum LH, serum FSH, and testosterone levels were measured in WT and S436A mice. There were 13 to 16 mice per group. No significant differences were detected. (B) Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained histological sections of testes are shown from wild-type and S436A knock-in mice. Scale bars, 200 mm. (C) Basal morning serum LH and FSH levels were measured in WT and S436A male mice 10 days following gonadectomy. There were 9 to 10 mice per group. (D) The fold change in serum LH was measured following subcutaneous administration of GNRH to WT and S436A male mice. GNRH stim, GNRH stimulation. There were 7 mice per group. *, P < 0.05 versus WT. Bars represent means ± SEM.

  • Fig 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7

    Model of proposed CBP interactions on the cAMP response element (CRE) and proximal Lhb promoter.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
CREB Binding Protein (CBP) Activation Is Required for Luteinizing Hormone Beta Expression and Normal Fertility in Mice
Ryan S. Miller, Andrew Wolfe, Ling He, Sally Radovick, Fredric E. Wondisford
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jun 2012, 32 (13) 2349-2358; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00394-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CREB Binding Protein (CBP) Activation Is Required for Luteinizing Hormone Beta Expression and Normal Fertility in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
CREB Binding Protein (CBP) Activation Is Required for Luteinizing Hormone Beta Expression and Normal Fertility in Mice
Ryan S. Miller, Andrew Wolfe, Ling He, Sally Radovick, Fredric E. Wondisford
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jun 2012, 32 (13) 2349-2358; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00394-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549