Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

Reciprocal Phosphorylation of Yeast Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases in Adaptation to Distinct Types of Stress

Yong Jae Lee, Grace R. Jeschke, Françoise M. Roelants, Jeremy Thorner, Benjamin E. Turk
Yong Jae Lee
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace R. Jeschke
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise M. Roelants
bDivision of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Structural Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Thorner
bDivision of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Structural Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin E. Turk
aDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00897-12
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1

    Gpd1 and Gpd2 are reciprocally phosphorylated at a conserved site in response to glucose. (A) The NADH-consuming biosynthetic pathway leading to glycerol production in yeast involving Gpd1 and Gpd2. (B) Schematic depiction of primary sequence features of Gpd1 and Gpd2, i.e., the N-terminal localization sequence (blue), a conserved phosphorylation site (red), and the catalytic domain (gray). Inset, sequence context of the conserved phosphorylation site (underlined). (C) Reciprocal phosphorylation of Gpd1 and Gpd2 in response to glucose. Cells expressing WT Gpd1-His6-GFP (left) or Gpd2-His6-GFP (right) or the indicated phosphorylation site mutant proteins from their own promoters on low-copy-number plasmids were propagated to mid-exponential phase in medium containing a high glucose concentration (2%) (H), and then a portion of each culture was shifted to the same medium a containing limiting glucose concentration (0.05%) (L). After 90 min, samples of each culture were harvested and lysed and the His6-tagged proteins in the extract were enriched by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and then resolved by Phos-tag PAGE before (−) or after (+) treatment with λ protein phosphatase (λPP) and analysis by immunoblotting with anti-GFP antibodies. (D) Analysis of Gpd1 using a phospho-specific antibody. The experiment was performed as in the left side of panel C, except that samples were analyzed by standard SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-RXRXXS to detect Gpd1 phosphorylation and anti-GFP antibody to detect total Gpd1.

  • Fig 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2

    Phosphorylation of Gpd2 by Snf1. (A) Snf1 phosphorylates Gpd2 in a radiolabel kinase assay. TAP-tagged Gpd2 (WT or S72A mutant) purified from yeast was incubated with the bacterially expressed Snf1 catalytic domain and radiolabeled ATP, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by autoradiography. (B) Mobility shift analysis indicates that Snf1 phosphorylates Gpd2 to high stoichiometry. TAP-tagged Gpd2 (WT or S72A mutant) was incubated alone, with λ protein phosphatase (λPP), or with the Snf1 catalytic domain in the presence of unlabeled ATP, resolved by Phos-tag PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting. (C) Gpd2 phosphorylation depends on Snf1 in vivo. Cultures of WT and snf1Δ and elm1Δ tos3Δ sak1Δ mutant yeast cells expressing Gpd2-His6-GFP from its own promoter on a low-copy-number vector were grown to mid-exponential phase in SC-Leu medium containing 2% glucose (H). The cultures were then split and either left untreated or transferred into SC-Leu containing 0.05% glucose (L). After 90 min, cells were harvested and lysed and Gpd2 was partially purified and analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1C. (D) Reexpression of Snf1 rescues the Gpd2 phosphorylation defect of a snf1Δ mutant strain. The WT and snf1Δ mutant strains, as indicated, were transformed with an empty vector (−) or the same plasmid expressing SNF1 and then cotransformed with a plasmid expressing either Gpd2-His6-GFP (top) or HA-tagged Mig1 (bottom). Cells were grown, treated, and lysed as described for panel C. Partially purified Gpd2 was subjected to Phos-tag PAGE (top), and total cell lysates containing Mig1 were subjected to standard SDS-PAGE (bottom) before immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (E) Phosphorylation of Gpd2 at Ser72 by Snf1 primes for phosphorylation at Ser75 by Yck1. Purified, HA-tagged Gpd2 was incubated with ATP and the indicated kinases, resolved by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting. For the far right lane, after phosphorylation, the sample was treated with λPP. The arrow indicates the slowest-migrating dually phosphorylated species. (F) Priming-dependent phosphorylation of Ser75 in vivo. Cultures of either a gpd2Δ single mutant (top) or a snf1Δ mutant (bottom) expressing WT Gpd2-(His)6-GFP or its S72A or S75A mutant form were treated and analyzed as described for panel C.

  • Fig 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3

    Phosphorylation of Gpd1 by Ypk1 and Ypk2 is sensitive to osmotic conditions. (A) TAP-tagged Gpd1 purified from yeast was incubated with ATP alone; in the presence Ypk1, Ypk2, or Sch9; or in the presence of λPP, as indicated. After incubation, samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-RXRXXS antibody to detect Gpd1 phosphorylation and with anti-HA antibody to detect total Gpd1. (B) Purified WT Gpd1 or Gpd1-S24A was incubated with [γ-33P]ATP in the absence (−) or presence (+) of purified Ypk1. After incubation, samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography (top), by staining with Coomassie blue to confirm the presence of the substrate (middle), and with anti-phospho-RXRXXS antibody as an independent confirmation of phosphorylation (bottom). (C) Purified WT Gpd1 and Gpd1-S24A were incubated with either Ypk1 or λPP in the presence of ATP and resolved by Phos-tag PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HA antibody. (D) Cultures of otherwise isogenic WT and ypk1ts ypk2Δ mutant strains expressing Gpd1-His6-GFP from its own promoter on a low-copy-number vector were grown to mid-exponential phase at 30°C and then shifted to 37°C. At the indicated times, samples were withdrawn and the harvested cells were lysed and analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1C. (E) Cultures of ypk1Δ ypk2Δ mutant cells expressing Gpd1-His6-GFP and either WT Ypk1 (ypk2Δ, left) or Ypk1-as (ypk2Δ ypk1-as, right) were grown to mid-exponential phase and then treated with 1NM-PP1 or a vehicle control. After 30 min, cultures were analyzed for Gpd1 phosphorylation as described in the legend to Fig. 1D. (F) A culture of gpd1Δ mutant cells expressing Gpd1-His6-GFP was grown to mid-exponential phase, and then samples were treated for 30 min with 1 M NaCl with or without 1.25 μM myriocin, as indicated. The cells were then analyzed as described for panel D. (G) Cells transformed with either an empty vector or the same vector expressing TAP-tagged Ypk1 from the GAL1 promoter were grown to mid-exponential phase and either not induced or induced with galactose. Cultures were then left untreated or treated with 1 M NaCl for 15 min prior to harvesting, cell lysis, and immunoprecipitation of Ypk1. Immobilized Ypk1 was incubated with ATP and purified, bacterially expressed GST-Gpd1. After incubation, samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-phospho-RXRXXS to detect GST-Gpd1 phosphorylation, with anti-HA antibodies to determine the level of Ypk1, and with anti-GST antibodies to confirm that equivalent amounts of GST-Gpd1 were present. (H) Hyperosmotic shock blocks TORC2-dependent phosphorylation of Ypk1. Cultures of WT cells (strain BY4741) and an otherwise isogenic hog1Δ mutant, each expressing Ypk111A-myc as a reporter for TORC2-dependent phosphorylation at Thr622, as described in detail elsewhere (57), were grown to mid-exponential phase and split, and then one-half of each culture was exposed to 1 M sorbitol for 10 min. Cells were harvested and lysed, and the resulting extracts were resolved by Phos-tag PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-c-myc MAb 9E10 to detect all Ypk1 species and with anti-phospho-p38 antibodies to detect activated, dually phosphorylated Hog1, as described in detail elsewhere (73). (I) Cultures of WT and hog1Δ mutant cells expressing tagged Gpd1-His6-GFP (WT or S24A mutant) were grown to mid-exponential phase and then either left untreated or treated with 1 M NaCl for 30 min. Samples were then processed as described in the legend to Fig. 1C.

  • Fig 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4

    Phosphorylation decreases the catalytic activity of Gpd1 and Gpd2 and curtails glycerol production in vivo. (A) Gpd1 activity following phosphorylation by Ypk1. Gpd1-TAP (WT or S24A or S24E,S27E [SSEE] mutant form) purified from yeast was preincubated with ATP in the presence or absence of Ypk1 and then catalytic activity with DHAP as the substrate was measured by monitoring NADH consumption spectrophotometrically (top). In parallel, mobility on Phos-tag PAGE was used to assess the extent of phosphorylation (bottom). (B) Gpd2 activity following phosphorylation by Snf1. The catalytic activities and electrophoretic mobilities of Gpd2, Gpd2-S72A, and Gpd2-S72E,S75E were assessed as described for panel A following phosphorylation by Snf1. (C) Multisite phosphorylation has an additive inhibitory effect on Gpd2 activity. Purified Gpd2 was incubated with ATP in the absence (−) or presence of Snf1 alone, Yck1 alone, or both enzymes, and then enzymatic activity was assessed as described for panel B. In all of the panels, bars show average initial reaction rates (n = 3) and error bars show standard deviations.

  • Fig 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5

    Effect of Gpd2 mutation on glycerol production in vivo. Cultures of WT and gpd1Δ, gpd2Δ, or gpd1Δ gpd2Δ mutant yeast cells were transformed with either an empty low-copy-number vector (−) or the same plasmid expressing Gpd2, Gpd2-S72A, or Gpd2-S72E,S75E, Gpd1, Gpd1-S24A, or Gpd1-S24E,S27E (SSEE) as indicated. Cells were grown to exponential phase (A and B) or early stationary phase (C, D, G, and H), and the total glycerol concentration was determined as described in Materials and Methods. (E and F) Exponential-phase cultures (in medium containing 2% glucose) were transferred to fresh medium containing 0.05% glucose, and glycerol production was assayed 1 h later. Bars show the average glycerol concentrations across three separate cultures grown in parallel; error bars show standard deviations. *, P < 0.03 (compared to the identical strain expressing the WT Gpd isozyme, by unpaired one-tailed t test).

  • Fig 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6

    Both Gpd1 dephosphorylation and transcriptional induction are essential mechanisms for survival and long-term growth at high osmolarity. Ten-fold serial dilutions of WT or gpd1Δ or gpd1Δ gpd2Δ mutant cells, as indicated, expressing WT Gpd1, Gpd1-S24A (GPD1 SA), or Gpd1-S24E,S27E (GPD1 EE) from either the native GPD1 promoter (top and middle panels) or the GPD2 promoter (bottom panel) were spotted onto agar plates containing SC-Leu with or without 1 M NaCl or 1 M sorbitol and incubated at 30°C for 3 days.

  • Fig 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7

    Gpd1 dephosphorylation is essential for rapid adaptation to hyperosmotic stress. (A) Gpd1 is rapidly dephosphorylated in response to hyperosmolarity. Cultures of gpd1Δ mutant cells expressing Gpd1-His6-GFP from a low-copy-number plasmid were grown to mid-exponential phase and then transferred into medium containing 1 M NaCl (left panel). At the indicated times, samples were withdrawn and lysates were prepared. Gpd1-His6-GFP was recovered on immobilized metal affinity resin and either resolved by standard SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-phospho-RXRXXS (top) or resolved by Phos-tag PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GFP (bottom). In a separate experiment, identical cultures were processed in the same manner except that they were treated with 1 M sorbitol rather than NaCl (right panel). (B) Gpd1 dephosphorylation promotes glycerol production following hyperosmotic shock. Cultures of WT and gpd1Δ mutant cells transformed with either an empty plasmid (−) or the same vector expressing WT Gpd1, Gpd1-S24A, or Gpd1-S24E,S27E (SSEE) were harvested 15 min after treatment with 1 M NaCl or 1 M sorbitol. The total glycerol concentration was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 4C. Bars show average glycerol concentrations (n = 3 for separate cultures incubated in parallel); error bars show standard deviations. *, P < 0.005 (compared to gpd1Δ mutant cells expressing WT Gpd1 by unpaired one-tailed t test). (C) Acute inhibition of Ypk1 leads to enhanced glycerol production. A ypk1Δ ypk2Δ mutant strain harboring a plasmid expressing either WT Ypk1 (ypk2Δ) or Ypk1-as (ypk2Δ ypk1-as) was grown to exponential phase and transferred to fresh medium in the presence or absence of 1NM-PP1. After 30 min, the glycerol concentration was determined. (D and E) Gpd1 dephosphorylation accelerates adaptation to hyperosmolarity. The transformed strains used in panel B or similarly transformed gpd1Δ gpd2Δ mutant strains were grown to mid-exponential phase and transferred to into medium containing 1 M NaCl (D) or 1 M sorbitol (E) to an OD600 of 1.0. Cell density (OD600) was determined at 15-min intervals.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Primers used in this study

    PrimerDescriptionaSequence
    G1P-FGPD1 promoter FCTGACTCGAGAGCCCGAAAGAGTTATCGTTACTC
    G1-FGPD1 ORF FTCGAGGATCCATGTCTGCTGCTGCTGATAG
    G1-RGPD1 ORF RCTGAGCGGCCGCCATGGTGATGGTGATGGTGATCTTCATGTAGATCTAATTCTTC
    G1SA-FGPD1 S24A FGGTAGAAAGAGAAGTTCCGCTTCTGTTTCTTTGAAGGCTG
    G1SA-RGPD1 S24A RCAGCCTTCAAAGAAACAGAAGCGGAACTTCTCTTTCTACC
    G1SSEE-FGPD1 S24E/S27E FGGTAGAAAGAGAAGTTCCGAATCTGTTGAATTGAAGGCTGCCGAAAAG
    G1SSEE-RGPD1 S24E/S27E RCTTTTCGGCAGCCTTCAATTCAACAGATTCGGAACTTCTCTTTCTACC
    G2P-FGPD2 promoter FCTGACTCGAGCAAAAACGACATATCTATTATAGTG
    G2-RGPD2 ORF RCTGAGCGGCCGCCATGGTGATGGTGATGGTGTTCGTCATCGATGTCTAGCTCTTC
    G2SA-FGPD2 S72A FCCTATCAGAAGATCGGACGCAGCCGTGTCAATTGTACAT
    G2SA-RGPD2 S72A RCTGAGCGGCCGCCATGGTGATGGTGATGGTGTTCGTCATCGATGTCTAGCTCTTC
    G2+3SA-FGPD2 S75A FTCGGACTCTGCCGTGGCAATTGTACATTTGAAAC
    G2+3SA-RGPD2 S75A RGTTTCAAATGTACAATTGCCACGGCAGAGTCCGA
    G2PG1-RGPD2 promoter-GPD1 RCCTTCGCTCCCCTTCCTTATCAATGTCTGCTGCTGCTGATAG
    G2PG1-FGPD2 promoter-GPD1 FCTATCAGCAGCAGCAGACATTGATAAGGAAGGGGAGCGAAGG
    G2KO-Fgpd2Δ::HIS3 FTTCTCTTTCCCTTTCCTTTTCCTTCGCTCCCCTTCCTTATCAATGTCTACCGGCAGATCCGCTAG
    G2KO-Rgpd2Δ::HIS3 RAGGCAACAGGAAAGATCAGAGGGGGAGGGGGGGGGAGAGTGTCTA GAATTCGAGCTCGTTTAAAC
    G2KO-AGPD2 5′ UTR (−370)CTCTGCCATTGTTATATTACGCTTT
    G2KO-DGPD2 3′ UTR (+334)GAGAATTACTGCAGTGAAAAAGCTC
    HIS3-BHIS3 RTTGCGCTCCTGAACAGTTTG
    HIS3-CHIS3 FATTGGATGAGGCGCTATCACG
    SNF1-FSNF1 cat domain FCAGTGGATCCAATCCCAAGTCGTCCTTAGC
    SNF1-RSNF1 cat domain RGTGAGCGGCCGCTCAAAGTAGATATTCTGGCAGGTC
    • ↵a F, forward; R, reverse; UTR, untranslated region.

  • Table 2

    Yeast plasmids used in this study

    PlasmidDescriptionReference or source
    pBG1805-Gpd12μm URA3 PGAL1-GPD1-6×His-HA-ZZ32
    pBG1805-Gpd1-S24ApBG1805-Gpd1 S24A mutantThis study
    pBG1805-Gpd1-SSEEpBG1805-Gpd1 S24E,S27E mutantThis study
    pBG1805-Gpd22μm URA PGAL1-Gpd2-6×His-HA-ZZ32
    pBG1805-Gpd2-S72ApBG1805-Gpd2 S72A mutantThis study
    pBG1805-Gpd2-SSEEpBG1805-Gpd2 S72E,S75E mutantThis study
    p415-GFPCEN LEU2 GFP TCYC1M. Hochstrasser
    p415-Gpd1CEN LEU2 GPD1-6×His-GFP TCYC1This study
    p415-Gpd1-S24Ap415-Gpd1 S24A mutantThis study
    p415-Gpd1-SSEEp415-Gpd1 S24E,S27E mutantThis study
    p415-Gpd2CEN LEU2 GPD2-6×His-GFP TCYC1This study
    p415-Gpd2-S72Ap415-Gpd2 S72A mutantThis study
    p415-Gpd2-SSEEp415-Gpd2 S72E, S75E mutantThis study
    p415-G2P-Gpd1CEN LEU2 PGPD2-GPD1-6×His-GFP TCYC1This study
    p415-G2P-Gpd1-SAp415-G2P-Gpd1 S72A mutantThis study
    p415-G2P-Gpd1-SSEEp415-G2P-Gpd1 S72E, S75E mutantThis study
    pRS315-Ypk111A-mycCEN LEU2 YPK1-11A-myc57
    pRS316-Snf1CEN URA3 SNF1-3×HAaM. Schmidt
    pRS315-Mig1CEN LEU2 MIG1-3×HAM. Schmidt
    • ↵a HA, hemagglutinin.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Reciprocal Phosphorylation of Yeast Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases in Adaptation to Distinct Types of Stress
Yong Jae Lee, Grace R. Jeschke, Françoise M. Roelants, Jeremy Thorner, Benjamin E. Turk
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 2012, 32 (22) 4705-4717; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00897-12

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reciprocal Phosphorylation of Yeast Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases in Adaptation to Distinct Types of Stress
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reciprocal Phosphorylation of Yeast Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases in Adaptation to Distinct Types of Stress
Yong Jae Lee, Grace R. Jeschke, Françoise M. Roelants, Jeremy Thorner, Benjamin E. Turk
Molecular and Cellular Biology Oct 2012, 32 (22) 4705-4717; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00897-12
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549