Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

KAP-1 Promotes Resection of Broken DNA Ends Not Protected by γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in G1-Phase Lymphocytes

Anthony T. Tubbs, Yair Dorsett, Elizabeth Chan, Beth Helmink, Baeck-Seung Lee, Putzer Hung, Rosmy George, Andrea L. Bredemeyer, Anuradha Mittal, Rohit V. Pappu, Dipanjan Chowdhury, Nima Mosammaparast, Michael S. Krangel, Barry P. Sleckman
Anthony T. Tubbs
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yair Dorsett
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Chan
bDepartment of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Helmink
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baeck-Seung Lee
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Putzer Hung
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosmy George
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrea L. Bredemeyer
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anuradha Mittal
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Biological Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rohit V. Pappu
cDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Biological Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dipanjan Chowdhury
dDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nima Mosammaparast
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Krangel
bDepartment of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry P. Sleckman
aDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00441-14
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    53BP1 inhibits resection of RAG DSBs. (A) Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ in abl pre-B cells treated with imatinib for 0, 2, or 4 days. Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRV and hybridized with the C4b probe. The bands generated by unrearranged pMX-DELCJ (UR) and full-length (2.2-kb) pMX-DELCJ coding ends (CE) are indicated. Resected coding ends have a lower molecular weight and are also indicated. Molecular size markers, in kilobases, are indicated. The Eb probe was used a DNA loading control. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:DELCJ-7, LigIV−/−:H2AX−/−:DELCJ-5, and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-58 abl pre-B cells. Similar results were obtained for LigIV−/−:DELCJ-1, LigIV−/−:H2AX−/−:DELCJ-148, and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-5 abl pre-B cells. (B) Confocal immuno-FISH of Rag1−/− and LigIV−/− abl pre-B cells treated with imatinib for 2 days. Nuclei were probed by using a BAC for Igk (red) and were stained by using an anti-53BP1 antibody (green) and DAPI (blue). Composite three-dimensional images are displayed as z-projections. Data shown were generated from Rag1−/− (R1K) and LigIV−/− (ALig4) abl pre-B cells, and similar results were obtained for Rag2−/− (R2K2) and LigIV−/− (BLig4) abl pre-B cells. (C) Immunofluorescence assay for 53BP1 and γ-H2AX in abl pre-B cells treated with imatinib for 2 days. Bar, 1 μm. Data shown were generated from Rag1−/− (R1K), LigIV−/− (ALig4), LigIV−/−:H2AX−/− (LH5), and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/− (AL5) abl pre-B cells. Similar results were obtained for LigIV−/− (BLig4), LigIV−/−:H2AX−/− (LH8), and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/− (BL5) abl pre-B cells.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    KAP-1 knockdown limits resection in G1-phase lymphocytes. (A) Immunoblot (IB) analysis of KAP-1 expression in LigIV−/−:53BP1−/− abl pre-B cells expressing either a KAP-1 or control (ctr) shRNA. GAPDH expression is shown as a protein loading control. Molecular mass markers, in kDa, are indicated. (B) Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ as described in the legend of Fig. 1A. LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing either ctr, KAP-1, or CtIP shRNA treated with imatinib for the indicated numbers of days were analyzed. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells, and similar results were obtained for LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-58 abl pre-B cells. (C) Density plots comparing lane signals from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing either ctr or KAP-1 shRNA and treated with imatinib for 4 days, as shown in panel B. The signal was normalized for the Eb DNA loading control. Molecular size markers, in kilobases, are shown on the x axis. Peaks representing the unrearranged pMX-DELCJ (UR), full-length (2.2-kb) pMX-DELCJ coding ends (CE), and resected coding ends are indicated. A.U., arbitrary units. (D) Analysis of chromatin-bound RPA32 in LigIV−/− and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/− abl pre-B cells expressing either ctr, KAP-1, or CtIP shRNA. Cells were treated with imatinib for 2 days and then treated with 5 μg/ml bleocin for 24 h. RPA32 retention in the nucleus was assessed and quantified as the fraction of RPA-positive cells either treated or not treated with bleocin. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:DELCJ-7 and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-5 abl pre-B cells. Similar results were obtained for LigIV−/−:DELCJ-10 and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells.

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    Expression of human KAP-1 blocks resection of RAG DSBs. (A) Immunoblot analysis of ectopic KAP-1 expression in LigIV−/−:53BP1−/− abl pre-B cells expressing either an empty retrovirus (Empty) or a retrovirus encoding Flag–HA–mouse KAP-1 (mKAP-1) or Flag–HA–human KAP-1 (hKAP-1) proteins. Blots were probed with anti-Flag, anti-KAP-1, and anti-GAPDH as a loading control. (B) Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ as described in the legend of Fig. 1A. LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing a retrovirus encoding Flag-HA-tagged mKAP-1 or hKAP-1 were treated with imatinib for the indicated numbers of days. (C) Density plots comparing lane signals from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells in panel B at 4 days of imatinib treatment, as described in the legend of Fig. 2C. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells, and similar results were obtained for LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-5 abl pre-B cells.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    Effect of KAP-1 mouse-human hybrids on resection of RAG DSBs. (A to D, left) Linear diagrams of mKAP-1, hKAP-1, and human-mouse hybrids, as described in the text. mKAP-1 domains are shown in gray, while hKAP-1 domains are shown in red. All KAP-1 hybrid proteins are Flag tagged at the N terminus. (Right) Density plots comparing lane signals from Southern blot analyses of pMX-DELCJ, as described in the legend of Fig. 2C, in LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing a retrovirus encoding the indicated KAP-1 hybrid proteins treated with imatinib for 4 days. Primary data are posted at http://pathology.wustl.edu/labs/sleckman/Tubbs_et_a_MCB_2014_Supplement.pdf. Dotted lines represent KAP-1 hybrids that function similarly to mKAP-1 to promote resection. Solid lines represent KAP-1 hybrids that function to inhibit resection. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells. (E) Probability of disorder, as determined by PrDOS, along the linear amino acid sequences of hKAP-1 and mKAP-1. The gray box indicates the region between amino acids 531 and 548, which is predicted to be disordered.

  • FIG 5
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 5

    A single-amino-acid change at position 548 determines KAP-1 functionality during resection of RAG DSBs. (A) Comparison of amino acid discrepancies between mKAP-1 and mKAP-1h531–548. Human-specific residues are highlighted in red. (B) Immunoblot analysis of LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing either an empty retrovirus (Empty) or a retrovirus encoding the indicated mKAP-1 point mutants. All mutants are Flag tagged at the N terminus. (C) Density plots comparing lane signals from Southern blot analyses of pMX-DELCJ, as described in the legend of Fig. 2C, in LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells expressing a retrovirus encoding the indicated mKAP-1 point mutants treated with imatinib for 4 days. Primary data are posted at http://pathology.wustl.edu/labs/sleckman/Tubbs_et_a_MCB_2014_Supplement.pdf. (D) Amino acid sequence surrounding position 548 in mKAP-1, mKAP-1P548A, hKAP-1, and hKAP-1A548P. Human-specific residues are highlighted in red. (E) Immunoblot analysis of LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing either a ctr shRNA or KAP-1 shRNA in addition to an empty retrovirus or a retrovirus encoding Flag-HA-tagged mKAP-1, mKAP-1P548A, hKAP-1, or hKAP-1A548P. (F) Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ, as described in the legend of Fig. 1A. LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing KAP-1 shRNA in addition to a retrovirus encoding mKAP-1, mKAP-1P548A, hKAP-1, or hKAP-1A548P were treated with imatinib for the indicated numbers of days. Data shown were generated from LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-5 abl pre-B cells, and similar results were obtained for LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:DELCJ-6 abl pre-B cells.

  • FIG 6
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 6

    KAP-1 is required for opening of hairpin-sealed coding ends in the absence of Artemis. (A) Denaturing Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ. EcoRV-digested genomic DNA from Art−/−:DELCJ and LigIV−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells treated with imatinib for 2 days were either denatured (D) or left nondenatured (N). Nondenatured (N) and denatured (D) bands distinguishing unrearranged pMX-DELCJ (UR), hairpin-sealed coding ends (hCE), and open coding ends (oCE) are labeled. (B) Denaturing Southern blot analysis of pMX-DELCJ as described above for panel A. Art−/−:DELCJ, LigIV−/−:DELCJ, and Art−/−:H2AX−/−:DELCJ abl pre-B cells expressing either an empty retrovirus or a retrovirus encoding Flag-HA-tagged mKAP-1, mKAP-1P548A, hKAP-1, or hKAP-1A548P were analyzed after imatinib treatment for the indicated numbers of days. (C) Bar graph showing the percentages of pMX-DELCJ coding ends that are either hairpin sealed or open, as quantitated from denaturing Southern blot lanes at 2 days of imatinib treatment in panel B. Data shown were generated from Art−/−:H2AX−/−:DELCJ-95 abl pre-B cells, and similar results were obtained with Art−/−:H2AX−/−:DELCJ-124 abl pre-B cells.

  • FIG 7
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 7

    KAP-1 promotes resection of non-RAG DSBs in G1-phase lymphocytes. (A) Southern blot analysis of the endogenous Tcrb locus. LigIV−/−:Eb:ZFN and LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:Eb:ZFN abl pre-B cells were treated with imatinib for 1 day and then treated with doxycycline for 1 day in presence or absence of the ATM inhibitor (ATMi) KU55933. Genomic DNA was digested with HindIII, and blots were hybridized with an Eb probe. An Erag probe was used as a DNA loading control. Uncut Tcrb (UN) and unrepaired ZFN DSBs are indicated, as are as resected ZFN DSBs. (B) Southern blot analysis of the endogenous Tcrb locus, as described above for panel A. LigIV−/−:53BP1−/−:Eb:ZFN abl pre-B cells were infected with either an empty retrovirus or a retrovirus expressing Flag–HA–mKAP-1 or Flag–HA–mKAP-1P548A. Cells were pretreated with imatinib for 1 day, and doxycycline was then added for the indicated numbers of days.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
KAP-1 Promotes Resection of Broken DNA Ends Not Protected by γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in G1-Phase Lymphocytes
Anthony T. Tubbs, Yair Dorsett, Elizabeth Chan, Beth Helmink, Baeck-Seung Lee, Putzer Hung, Rosmy George, Andrea L. Bredemeyer, Anuradha Mittal, Rohit V. Pappu, Dipanjan Chowdhury, Nima Mosammaparast, Michael S. Krangel, Barry P. Sleckman
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jul 2014, 34 (15) 2811-2821; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00441-14

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
KAP-1 Promotes Resection of Broken DNA Ends Not Protected by γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in G1-Phase Lymphocytes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
KAP-1 Promotes Resection of Broken DNA Ends Not Protected by γ-H2AX and 53BP1 in G1-Phase Lymphocytes
Anthony T. Tubbs, Yair Dorsett, Elizabeth Chan, Beth Helmink, Baeck-Seung Lee, Putzer Hung, Rosmy George, Andrea L. Bredemeyer, Anuradha Mittal, Rohit V. Pappu, Dipanjan Chowdhury, Nima Mosammaparast, Michael S. Krangel, Barry P. Sleckman
Molecular and Cellular Biology Jul 2014, 34 (15) 2811-2821; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00441-14
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549