Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Molecular and Cellular Biology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MCB
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Articles

SIK2 Restricts Autophagic Flux To Support Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival

Kimberly E. Maxfield, Jennifer Macion, Hariprasad Vankayalapati, Angelique W. Whitehurst
Kimberly E. Maxfield
aDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
bSimmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Macion
bSimmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hariprasad Vankayalapati
cEarly Discovery & Medicinal Chemistry, Arrien Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angelique W. Whitehurst
bSimmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00380-16
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIG 1
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1

    Pangenomic loss-of-function screen identified SIK2 as essential for TNBC. (A) Schematic for pangenomic siRNA screen. (B) SUM159 cells were transfected with control or ubiquitin B (UBB) siRNA for 96 h. Bars represent relative viability measured by CTG and range (n = 2). (C) Indicated cell lines were exposed to escalating doses of paclitaxel for 48 h. Points indicate viability as measured by CTG (n = 2; bars indicate the ranges). (D) Z-scores for each siRNA, ranked lowest to highest. siRNAs with Z-scores less than −5 are highlighted. (E) Heat map of viability scores (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) of 30 siRNAs identified in panel D in SUM159, SUM149, HCC1806, and WHIM12 with or without paclitaxel ranked by cell line penetrance. Gray coloring indicates unavailable values. (F, left) SUM159 cells were transfected with two independent SIK2 siRNAs. At 120 h posttransfection, cell viability was assessed by CTG. Bars represent average viability (n ≥ 5; ±standard deviations [SD]). (Middle) As described for the left, except mRNA was collected at 72 h and SIK2 transcript measured by qPCR. Bars represent average values and ranges (n = 2). (Right) Whole-cell lysates (WCLs) from SUM159 transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 72 h were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies.

  • FIG 2
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2

    SIK2 is essential for viability in a subset of TNBC. (A) Indicated cell lines were transfected with siCTRL or siSIK2 for 120 h. Bars represent relative viability (n = 3; error bars indicate SD) measured by CTG. Solid bars are siRNA pool 1 and bars with hatch marks are pool 2. (B) Indicated cell lines were transfected with siCTRL or siSIK2 for 96 h and then replated at limiting dilution. (C) SUM159 cells were transfected for 24 h and then plated into soft agar. (Left) Images of stained colonies at 2 weeks after plating. (Right) Bars represent average colony numbers and ranges quantitated manually (n = 2). (D) SUM159 cells were exposed to 1 μM vehicle or ARN-3236 for 6 h. (Top) Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted for the indicated antibodies. (Bottom) Quantitation of band intensity for each antibody relative to ERK1/2 over 2 independent experiments. (E) Indicated cells were plated in 96-well format and treated with the indicated compounds. Bars represent relative viability as determined by CTG assay (n = 8; ±SD). As defined for panel A, red bars indicate siSIK2 sensitive and green bars indicate siSIK2 resistant. (F) SUM159 cells were plated into soft agar and treated each day for 9 days with 1 μM ARN-3236. (Left) Representative images of stained colonies. (Right) Average number of colonies per condition quantitated manually (n = 4; ±SD).

  • FIG 3
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3

    SIK2 restrict autophagy. (A to C) Immunoblots of WCLs from cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 72 h. (D) Representative confocal sections of SUM159-GFP-LC3 cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 72 h and exposed to 50 μM Cq for 4 h. Cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 20 μm. (E) Cells treated as described for panel D were manually quantitated for GFP-positive puncta on an upright epifluorescence microscope. One hundred cells were quantitated per condition over two independent experiments. P values were calculated by Mann-Whitney test. (F) Representative confocal sections of SUM159 cells treated as described for panel D and stained with anti-p62 antibody and DAPI. Scale bars, 20 μm. (G) SUM159 cells treated as described for panel F were manually quantitated for p62-positive puncta on an upright epifluorescence microscope. One hundred cells were quantitated per condition over two independent experiments. P values were calculated by Mann-Whitney test. (H) SUM159-GFP-LC3 cells were exposed to 50 μM Cq for 9 h plus 1 μM ARN-3236 for 24 h. Representative confocal sections are presented. Scale bars, 20 μm. (I) GFP-LC3 puncta was quantitated in cells treated as described for panel H and treated with ARN-3236 for the indicated times. P values were calculated by Mann-Whitney test. (J) U2OS-GFP-LC3 stably expressing control (CTRL) or SIK2(K49M) cDNA were exposed to 50 μM Cq for 4 h. GFP-LC3 puncta in 25 transfected cells were manually quantitated using images acquired by confocal microscopy. P values were calculated using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

  • FIG 4
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 4

    SIK2 restricts autophagy to support TNBC viability. (A) SUM159-GFP-LC3 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 72 h and exposed to 50 μM Cq for 16 h. Cells were fixed, stained with DAPI, and visualized for GFP. Representative images were captured by epifluorescence. Scale bars, 20 μm. (B) Cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 72 h. WCLs were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (C) Cell lines were transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 96 h (SUM159). Bars represent average relative viability and ranges (n = 2) measured by CTG. (D) Bright-field images of SUM159 cells transfected as described for panel C. (E) SUM159 cells were infected with lentivirus encoding shCTRL or shSIK2 hairpins for 2 days. (Left) Relative SIK2 mRNA expression was measured by qPCR in SUM159 cells stably expressing the indicated shRNAs. Bars represent average levels of SIK2 mRNA and range (n = 2). (Right) WCLs from cells shown on the left were immunoblotted for the indicated antibodies. (F) Cells shown in panel E were plated into soft agar. Bars represent the average number of colonies quantitated manually (n = 3 ±standard errors of the means [SEM]). The P value was calculated using a two-tailed Student t test. (G) Growth curves of SUM159 cells shown in panel E were injected subcutaneously in NSG mice, and tumor volume was measured at the indicated time points. Points represent average volumes of shCTRL (n = 10) or shSIK2 (n = 10) ± SEM. The P value was calculated with an unpaired, two-tailed Student t test. (H) At the study endpoint, tumors were excised and weighed. (Top) Bars represent mean tumor weights ± SEM. The P value was calculated with an unpaired, two-tailed Student t test and are indicated on the graph. (Bottom) Images of tumors expressing the indicated shRNAs.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplemental material

    • Supplemental file 1 -

      Fig. S1 (Cell viability results) and S2 (SIK2 inhibition and mitotic defects)

      PDF, 88K

    • Supplemental file 2 -

      Table S1 (Z-scores for SUM159 cells for siRNA screen)

      XLSX, 909K

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
SIK2 Restricts Autophagic Flux To Support Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival
Kimberly E. Maxfield, Jennifer Macion, Hariprasad Vankayalapati, Angelique W. Whitehurst
Molecular and Cellular Biology Nov 2016, 36 (24) 3048-3057; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00380-16

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Molecular and Cellular Biology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SIK2 Restricts Autophagic Flux To Support Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Molecular and Cellular Biology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Molecular and Cellular Biology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
SIK2 Restricts Autophagic Flux To Support Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Survival
Kimberly E. Maxfield, Jennifer Macion, Hariprasad Vankayalapati, Angelique W. Whitehurst
Molecular and Cellular Biology Nov 2016, 36 (24) 3048-3057; DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00380-16
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MCB
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MCBJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0270-7306; Online ISSN: 1098-5549